Active learning with rationales for text classification

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 441-451

  Sharma, Manali ^a   Zhuang, Di ^a   Bilgic, Mustafa ^a  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ACTIVE LEARNING; ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; MULTINOMIALS; SIMPLE APPROACH; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 84959878402     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1047     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Josh Attenberg, Prem Melville, and Foster Provost. 2010. A unified approach to active dual supervision for labeling features and examples. In European conference on Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases, pages 40-55.
2. Olivier Chapelle, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Zien, editors. 2006. Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Jeff Donahue and Kristen Grauman. 2011. Annotator rationales for visual recognition. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1395-1402.
4. G. Druck, B. Settles, and A. McCallum. 2009. Active learning by labeling features. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1, pages 81-90.
5. GlennMFung, Olvi L Mangasarian, and JudeWShavlik. 2002. Knowledge-based support vector machine classifiers. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 521-528.
6. Federico Girosi and Nicholas Tung Chan. 1995. Prior knowledge and the creation of virtual examples for rbf networks. In Neural Networks for Signal Processing [1995] V. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Workshop, pages 201-210.
7. Isabell Guyon. 2011. Results of active learning challenge.
8. D.D. Lewis and J. Catlett. 1994. Heterogeneous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on machine learning, pages 148-156.
9. David D. Lewis andWilliam A. Gale. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 3-12.
10. Andrew L Maas, Raymond E Daly, Peter T Pham, Dan Huang, Andrew Y Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2011. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pages 142-150.
11. Prem Melville and Vikas Sindhwani. 2009. Active dual supervision: Reducing the cost of annotating examples and features. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing, pages 49-57.
12. Amar Parkash and Devi Parikh. 2012. Attributes for classifier feedback. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2012, pages 354-368. Springer.
13. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825-2830.
14. Hema Raghavan and James Allan. 2007. An interactive algorithm for asking and incorporating feature feedback into support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 79-86.
15. Hema Raghavan, Omid Madani, and Rosie Jones. 2006. Active learning with feedback on features and instances. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1655-1686.
16. Nicholas Roy and Andrew McCallum. 2001. Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 441-448.
17. Richard Segal, Ted Markowitz, and William Arnold. 2006. Fast uncertainty sampling for labeling large email corpora. In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam.
18. Burr Settles. 2012. Active Learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
19. H. S. Seung, M. Opper, and H. Sompolinsky. 1992. Query by committee. In ACM Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 287-294.
20. Manali Sharma and Mustafa Bilgic. 2013. Most-surely vs. least-surely uncertain. In IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 667-676.
21. Vikas Sindhwani, Prem Melville, and Richard D Lawrence. 2009. Uncertainty sampling and transductive experimental design for active dual supervision. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 953-960.
22. Kevin Small, Byron Wallace, Thomas Trikalinos, and Carla E Brodley. 2011. The constrained weight space svm: learning with ranked features. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), pages 865-872.
23. Simone Stumpf, Vidya Rajaram, Lida Li, Margaret Burnett, Thomas Dietterich, Erin Sullivan, Russell Drummond, and Jonathan Herlocker. 2007. Toward harnessing user feedback for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 82-91.
24. S. Stumpf, E. Sullivan, E. Fitzhenry, I. Oberst, W.K. Wong, and M. Burnett. 2008. Integrating rich user feedback into intelligent user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 50-59.
25. Simon Tong and Daphne Koller. 2001. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:45-66.
26. Geoffrey G Towell and Jude W Shavlik. 1994. Knowledge-based artificial neural networks. Artificial intelligence, 70(1):119-165.
27. Geofrey G Towell, Jude W Shavlik, and Michiel Noordewier. 1990. Refinement of approximate domain theories by knowledge-based neural networks. In Proceedings of the eighth National conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 861-866.
28. Omar Zaidan, Jason Eisner, and Christine D Piatko. 2007. Using" annotator rationales" to improve machine learning for text categorization. In HLT-NAACL, pages 260-267.
29. Omar F Zaidan, Jason Eisner, and Christine Piatko. 2008. Machine learning with annotator rationales to reduce annotation cost. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2008 Workshop on Cost Sensitive Learning.
30. J. Zhu and E. Hovy. 2007. Active learning for word sense disambiguation with methods for addressing the class imbalance problem. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 783-790.