The constrained weight space SVM: Learning with ranked features

Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 865-872

  Small, Kevin ^a   Wallace, Byron C ^a,b   Brodley, Carla E ^b   Trikalinos, Thomas A ^a  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; SUPERVISED LEARNING METHODS; TRAINING DATA;

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 80053460449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., and Zien, A. (eds.). SemiSupervised Learning. MIT Press, 2010.
2. Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3):273-297, 1995.
3. Dahl, J. and vandenberghe, L. CXVOPT - python software for convex optimization, 2004. URL http://abel.ee.ucla.edu/cvxopt.
4. Druck, G., Mann, G., and McCallum, A. Learning from labeled features using generalization expectation criteria In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp. 595-602, 2008.
5. Fawcett, T. E. and Utgoff, P. E. Automatic feature generation for problem solving systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 144-153, 1992.
6. Fung, G., Mangasarian, O. L., and Shavlik, J. W. Knowledge-based support vector machine classifiers. In The Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 521-528, 2002.
7. Joachims, T. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML), pp. 137-142, 1998.
8. Liu, B., Li, X., Lee, W. S., and Yu, P. S. Text classification by labeling words. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 425-430, 2004.
9. McCallum, A. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit, 2002. URL http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
10. Melville, P., Gryc, W., and Lawrence, R. D. Sentiment analysis of blogs by combining lexical knowledge with text classification. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 1275-1284, 2009.
11. Pang, B. and Lee, L. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 271-278, 2004.
12. Settles, B. Active learning literature survey. Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin, 2009.
13. Sun, Q. and DeJong, G. Explanation-augmented SVM: an approach to incorporating domain knowledge into SVM learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 864-871, 2005.
14. van Hulse, J., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., and Napolitano, A. Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 935-942, 2007.
15. Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., and Trikalinos, T. A. Active learning for biomedical citation screening. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 173-182. ACM, 2010.
16. Zaidan, O., Eisner, J., and Piatko, C. Using "annotator rationales" to improve machine learning for text categorization. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pp. 260-267, 2007.
17. Zaidan, O. F. and Eisner, J. Modeling annotators: A generative approach to learning from annotator rationales. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 31-40, 2008.