Integrating rich user feedback into intelligent user interfaces

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 50-59

  Stumpf, Simone ^a   Sullivan, Erin ^a   Fitzhenry, Erin ^a   Oberst, Ian ^a   Wong, Weng Keen ^a   Burnett, Margaret ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Machine learning; User feedback

Indexed keywords

EXCHANGE OF INFORMATIONS; INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES; MACHINE LEARNING; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS; SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS; TRAINING PHASES; USER FEEDBACK; USER FEEDBACKS; USER'S KNOWLEDGES;

EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PHASE INTERFACES; ROBOT LEARNING; USER INTERFACES;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 57349158693     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1378773.1378781     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Altendorf, E., Restificar, E., Dietterich, T. Learning from sparse data by exploiting monotonicity constraints. Proc. UAI (2005).
2. Beckwith, L. Kissinger, C., Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Lawrance, J., Blackwell, A., Cook, C. Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging, Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 231-240.
3. Billsus, D., Hilbert, D., Maynes-Aminzade, D., Improving proactive information systems. Proc. IUI (2005), 159-166.
4. Blythe, J. Task learning by instruction in Tailor. Proc. IUI (2005), 191-198.
5. Blum, A., Mitchell, T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. Proc. COLT (1998).
6. Brutlag, J., Meek, C. Challenges of the email domain for text classification. Proc. ICML (2000), 103-110.
7. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C, Schafer W. D. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999), 367-383.
8. Chapelle, O., Scholkopf, B., Zien, A. Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
9. Cohen, W. Learning rules that classify e-mail. Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Information Access (1996).
10. Crawford, E., Kay, J., McCreath, E. IEMS - The Intelligent Email Sorter. Proc. ICML (2002), 83-90.
11. Culotta, A. Kristjansson, T. McCallum, A., Viola, P. Corrective Feedback and Persistent Learning for Information Extraction. Artificial Intelligence 170, (2006), 1101-1122.
12. Cypher, A. (ed.) Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
13. Facione, P. A. The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: College Level Technical Report #2. California Academic Press, Millbrae CA. 1990 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 550).
14. Fails, J. A., Olsen, D. R. Interactive machine learning. Proc. IUI (2003), 39-45.
15. Fung, G., Mangasarian, O., Shavlik, J. Knowledge-based support vector machine classifiers. Proc. NIPS (2002).
16. Hart, S., Staveland, L. Development of a NASA-TLX (Task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, Human Mental Workload (1988), Hancock, P. and Meshkati, N. (eds.), 139-183.
17. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. Proc. CSCW (2000), 241-250.
18. Holtzblatt, K., Beyer, H. Making customer-centered design work for teams. Comms ACM 36, 10 (1993), 92-103.
19. Huang, Y., Mitchell, T. M. Text clustering with extended user feedback. Proc. SIGIR (2006), 413-420.
20. Lieberman, H., (ed.) Your Wish is My Command: Programming By Example. 2001.
21. Liu, B. Li, X. Lee, W., Yu, P. Text Classification by Labeling Words. Proc. AAAI (2004).
22. McCarthy, K., Reilly, J., McGinty, L., Smyth, B. Experiments in dynamic critiquing. Proc. IUI (2005), 175-182.
23. McDaniel, R.G. and Myers, B.A. Getting more out of programming-by- demonstration. Proc. CHI (1999), 442-449.
24. Oblinger, D., Castelli, V., Bergman, L. Augmentation-based learning. Proc. IUI (2006), 202-209.
25. Phalgune, A., Kissinger, C., Burnett, M., Cook, C., Beckwith, L. Ruthruff, J. Garbage in, garbage out? An empirical look at oracle mistakes by end-user programmers. Proc. VL/HCC (2005), 45-52.
26. Shen, J., Li, L., Dietterich, T. Herlocker, J. A hybrid learning system for recognizing user tasks from desk activities and email messages. Proc. IUI (2006), 86-92.
27. Stumpf S, Rajaram V, Li L, Burnett M, Dietterich T, Sullivan E, Drummond R, Herlocker J. Toward Harnessing User Feedback For Machine Learning. Proc. IUI (2007).
28. Stumpf S, Rajaram V, Li L, Wong W-K, Burnett M, Dietterich T, Sullivan E, Herlocker J. Interacting Meaningfully with Machine Learning Systems: Three Experiments. EECS OSU Technical Report 2007-46, http://eecs.oregonstate.edu/ library.
29. Ware, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Hall, M., Witten, I. H. Interactive machine learning: letting users build classifiers. IJHCS 55 (2001), 281-292.