Comparing direct stenting with conventional stenting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials

Angiology

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 317-325

  Li, Chuang ^a   Zhang, Bei ^a   Li, Mei ^a   Liu, Jielin ^a   Wang, Lijuan ^a   Liu, Ya ^a   Wang, Zuoguang ^a   Wen, Shaojun ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

acute coronary syndrome; conventional stenting; direct stenting; meta analysis; predilation; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVENTIONAL STENT; DIRECT STENT; EMBASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; NO REFLOW PHENOMENON; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STENT; WEB OF SCIENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROCEDURES; TIME FACTOR; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84959298079     PISSN: 00033197     EISSN: 19401574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0003319715585662     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Simard T, Hibbert B, Ramirez FD, et al. The evolution of coronary stents: a brief review. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30 (1): 35-45.
2. Windecker S, Bax JJ, Myat A, Stone GW, Marber MS,. Future treatment strategies in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2013; 382 (9892): 644-657.
3. Connolly M, Menown IB,. Key advances in clinical cardiology. Adv Ther. 2013; 30 (4): 369-386.
4. Barbato E, Marco J, Wijns W,. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24 (5): 394-403.
5. Silva-Orrego P, Bigi R, Colombo P, et al. Direct stenting after thrombus removal before primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. 2008; 21 (4): 300-306.
6. Dudek D, Mielecki W, Burzotta F, et al. Thrombus aspiration followed by direct stenting: a novel strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results of the Polish-Italian-Hungarian RAndomized ThrombEctomy Trial (PIHRATE Trial). Am Heart J. 2010; 160 (5): 966-972.
7. Caputo RP, Flately M, Ho KK, Baim DS,. Safety and effectiveness of stent implantation without predilation for small coronary arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 59 (4): 455-458.
8. Brito FJ, Caixeta AM, Perin MA, et al. Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89 (2): 115-120.
9. Elbaz M, El ME, Khalife K, et al. Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study. Am Heart J. 2002; 144 (4): E7.
10. Burzotta F, Trani C, Prati F, et al. Comparison of outcomes (early and six-month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials). Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91 (7): 790-796.
11. Piscione F, Piccolo R, Cassese S, et al. Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? Results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2010; 96 (8): 588-594.
12. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Web site. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp. 2013; 7 (5): e2195. Published 2011. Accessed December 15, 2014.
13. Higgins J, Thompson S,. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21 (11): 1539-1558.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG,. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560.
15. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C,. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315 (7109): 629-634.
16. Egger M, Smith GD,. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998; 316 (7124): 61-66.
17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339: b2700.
18. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Direct infarct artery stenting without predilation and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2001; 142 (4): 684-690.
19. Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Lefevre T, Piéchaud JF, Louvard Y, Dumas P,. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39 (1): 15-21.
20. Sabatier R, Hamon M, Zhao QM, et al. Could direct stenting reduce no-reflow in acute coronary syndromes? A randomized pilot study. Am Heart J. 2002; 143 (6): 1027-1032.
21. Suselbeck T, Turkoglu A, Lang S, et al. Direct versus conventional stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome just before the era of drug-eluting stents. Int J Cardiol. 2005; 105 (1): 85-89.
22. Cuellas C, Fernandez-Vazquez F, Martinez G, et al. Direct Stent Implantation in Acute Myocardial Infarction. The DISCO 3 Study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2006; 59 (3): 217-224.
23. Ozdemir R, Sezgin AT, Barutcu I, Topal E, Gullu H, Acikgoz N,. Comparison of direct stenting versus conventional stent implantation on blood flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiology. 2006; 57 (4): 453-458.
24. Gasior M, Gierlotka M, Lekston A, et al. Comparison of outcomes of direct stenting versus stenting after balloon predilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIRAMI). Am J Cardiol. 2007; 100 (5): 798-805.
25. Tacoy G, Yazici GE, Erden M, et al. The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009; 3 (3): 181-186.
26. Möckel M, Vollert J, Lansky AJ, et al. Comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108 (12): 1697-1703.
27. Isik T, Ayhan E, Uyarel H, et al. A comparison of direct versus conventional stenting in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2012; 23 (5): 348-353.
28. Dziewierz A, Siudak Z, Rakowski T, et al. Impact of direct stenting on outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER registry). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84 (6): 925-931.
29. Mccormick LM, Brown AJ, Ring LS, et al. Direct stenting is an independent predictor of improved survival in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014; 3 (4): 340-346.
30. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33 (20): 2551-2567.
31. Windecker S, Bax JJ, Myat A, Stone GW, Marber MS,. Future treatment strategies in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2013; 382 (9892): 644-657.
32. Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992; 85 (5): 1699-1705.
33. Kaul S,. The "no reflow" phenomenon following acute myocardial infarction: mechanisms and treatment options. J Cardiol. 2014; 64 (2): 77-85.
34. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, et al. Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation. 2001; 104 (6): 636-641.
35. Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Cox D, et al. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42 (10): 1739-1746.
36. Harrison RW, Aggarwal A, Ou FS, et al. Incidence and outcomes of no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111 (2): 178-184.
37. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Malagutti P, et al. Persistent coronary no flow after wire insertion is an early and readily available mortality risk factor despite successful mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis from the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4 (1): 51-62.
38. Earl TJ, Abbott JD,. Direct stenting: soft endpoints are enough. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 81 (6): 957-958.
39. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346 (23): 1773-1780.
40. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation. 2003; 107 (1): 38-42.
41. Ormiston JA, Mahmud E, Turco MA, et al. Direct stenting with the TAXUS Liberte drug-eluting stent: results from the Taxus Atlas Direct Stent Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 1 (2): 150-160.
42. Abbott JD, Earl T, Vlachos HE, et al. Direct stenting compared to balloon predilation in drug-eluting stents: one-year outcomes from the DEScover Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 79 (1): 84-89.
43. Gilchrist IC,. Direct stenting is also reasonable in DES. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 79 (1): 90.
44. Hoffmann R, Takimoglu-Boerekci M, Langenberg R, et al. Randomized comparison of direct stenting with predilatation followed by stenting on vessel trauma and restenosis. Am Heart J. 2004; 147 (4): E13.
45. Katsiki N, Athyros VG, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP,. Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: An "All or None" Phenomenon? Angiology. 2014; 66 (6): 508-513.