Antibody-carbohydrate recognition from docked ensembles using the automap procedure

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1331, Issue , 2015, Pages 41-55

  Dingjan, Tamir ^a   Agostino, Mark ^a   Ramsland, Paul A ^a   Yuriev, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Carbohydrate recognition; Ligand docking; Protein ligand interactions; Site mapping

Indexed keywords

LEWIS Y TETRASACCHARIDE; LIGAND; PROTEIN; TETRASACCHARIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIBODY; BLOOD GROUP LEWIS SYSTEM; CARBOHYDRATE; LEWIS Y ANTIGEN; OLIGOSACCHARIDE;

ANTIBODY CARBOHYDRATE RECOGNITION; AUTOMAP PROCEDURE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BOND; LABORATORY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; BLOOD GROUP LEWIS SYSTEM; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY;

ANTIBODIES; CARBOHYDRATES; HUMANS; LEWIS BLOOD-GROUP SYSTEM; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; PROTEINS;

EID: 84959235038     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2874-3_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Gabius H (ed) (2009) The sugar code. Fundamentals of glycosciences. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
2. Air GM (2011) The role of carbohydrates in viral infections. In: Binghe W, Boons G-J (eds) Carbohydrate recognition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, pp 65–91
3. Weis W, Brown JH, Cusack S et al (1988) Structure of the influenza virus haemagglutinin complexed with its receptor, sialic acid. Nature 333(6172):426–431
4. Hutson AM, Atmar RL, Estes MK (2004) Norovirus disease: changing epidemiology and host susceptibility factors. Trends Microbiol 12(6):279–287
5. Yuriev E, Farrugia W, Scott AM et al (2005) Three-dimensional structures of carbohydrate determinants of Lewis system antigens: implications for effective antibody targeting of cancer. Immunol Cell Biol 83(6):709–717
6. Agostino M, Sandrin MS, Thompson PE et al (2011) Carbohydrate-mimetic peptides: structural aspects of mimicry and therapeutic implications. Expert Opin Biol Ther 11(2):211–224
7. Yuriev E, Ramsland PA, Edmundson AB (2001) Docking of combinatorial peptide libraries into a broadly cross-reactive human IgM. J Mol Recognit 14(3):172–184
8. Yuriev E, Ramsland PA, Edmundson AB (2002) Recognition of IgG-derived peptides by a human IgM with an unusual combining site. Scand J Immunol 55(3):242–253
9. Milland J, Yuriev E, Xing PX et al (2007) Carbohydrate residues downstream of the terminal Gala(1,3)Gal epitope modulate the specificity of xenoreactive antibodies. Immunol Cell Biol 85:623–632
10. Yuriev E, Sandrin MS, Ramsland P (2008) Antibody-ligand docking: insights into peptide- carbohydrate mimicry. Mol Simulat 34:461–468
11. Agostino M, Sandrin MS, Thompson PE et al (2009) In silico analysis of antibody- carbohydrate interactions and its application to xenoreactive antibodies. Mol Immunol 47:233–246
12. Agostino M, Yuriev E, Ramsland P (2011) A computational approach for exploring carbohydrate recognition by lectins in innate immunity. Front Immunol 2:23
13. Agostino M, Yuriev E, Ramsland PA (2012) Antibody recognition of cancer-related gangliosides and their mimics investigated using in silico site mapping. PLoS One 7(4), e35457
14. Agostino M, Sandrin MS, Thompson PE et al (2010) Identification of preferred carbohydrate binding modes in xenoreactive antibodies by combining conformational filters and binding site maps. Glycobiology 20:724–735
15. Agostino M, Gandhi NS, Mancera RL (2014) Development and application of site mapping methods for the design of glycosaminoglycans. Glycobiology 24:840–851
16. Agostino M, Mancera RL, Ramsland PA et al (2013) AutoMap: A tool for analyzing protein- ligand recognition using multiple ligand binding modes. J Mol Graph Model 40:80–90
17. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):235–242
18. Ramsland PA, Farrugia W, Bradford TM et al (2004) Structural convergence of antibody binding of carbohydrate determinants in Lewis Y tumor antigens. J Mol Biol 340(4):809–818
19. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51(10): 2778–2786
20. Chalmers DK, Roberts BP (2011) Silico—a Perl molecular modelling toolkit.
21. Maestro, version 9.7 (2014). Schrödinger, LLC, New York
22. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4. Schrodinger, LLC, New York.
23. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB et al (2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring.1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 47(7):1739–1749
24. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ et al (2003) Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 52:609–623
25. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS et al (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19(14): 1639–1662
26. Huey R, Morris GM, Olson AJ et al (2007) A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J Comput Chem 28(6):1145–1152
27. Lang PT, Brozell SR, Mukherjee S et al (2009) DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. RNA 15(6): 1219–1230
28. McGann M (2011) FRED pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. J Chem Inf Model 51(3):578–596
29. Agostino M, Sandrin MS, Thompson PE et al (2011) Peptide inhibitors of xenoreactive antibodies mimic the interaction profile of the native carbohydrate antigens. Biopolymers 96: 193–206