Joint modeling of cell and nuclear shape variation

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 26, Issue 22, 2015, Pages 4046-4056

  Johnson, Gregory R ^a   Buck, Taraz E ^a   Sullivan, Devin P ^a   Rohde, Gustavo K ^a,b   Murphy, Robert F ^a,b,c,d  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 (4 FLUOROPHENYL) 2 (4 NITROPHENYL) 5 (4 PYRIDYL)IMIDAZOLE; AURORA KINASE INHIBITOR; AZ 138; AZ A; AZ J; C1QBP PROTEIN; CBWD5 PROTEIN; CD164 ANTIGEN; CHEMICALS AND DRUGS; COX7C PROTEIN; CYCLOHEXIMIDE; CYTOCHALASIN B; DEMECOLCINE; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; ETOPOSIDE; FLOXURIDINE; N ACETYLLEUCYLLEUCYLNORLEUCINAL; PACLITAXEL; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; RAVER1 PROTEIN; RPL39 PROTEIN; RPS24 PROTEIN; SIMVASTATIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; H1299 CELL LINE; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LARGE DEFORMATION DIFFEOMORPHIC METRIC MAPPING; LUNG CANCER CELL LINE; MCF 7 CELL LINE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEAR SHAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LUNG TUMOR; MCF-7 CELL LINE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ALGORITHMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS SHAPE; CELL SHAPE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MCF-7 CELLS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84946738735     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0370     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Avants B, Gee JC (2004). Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation. NeuroImage 23(Suppl 1), S139-S150.
2. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouve A, Younes L (2005). Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic fows of diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vis 61, 139-157.
3. Buck TE, Li J, Rohde GK, Murphy RF (2012). Toward the virtual cell: automated approaches to building models of subcellular organization "learned" from microscopy images. BioEssays 34, 791-799.
4. Caie PD, Walls RE, Ingleston-Orme A, Daya S, Houslay T, Eagle R, Roberts ME, Carragher NO (2010). High-content phenotypic profling of drug response signatures across distinct cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 9, 1913-1926.
5. Dahl KN, Scaffdi P, Islam MF, Yodh AG, Wilson KL, Misteli T (2006). Distinct structural and mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 10271-10276.
6. de Silva V, Tenenbaum JB (2004). Sparse multidimensional scaling using landmark points. Technical Report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Available at http://pages.pomona.edu/∼vds04747/public/papers/landmarks.pdf (accessed 15 June 2015).
7. Elliott H, Fischer RS, Myers KA, Desai RA, Gao L, Chen CS, Adelstein RS, Waterman CM, Danuser G (2015). Myosin II controls cellular branching morphogenesis and migration in three dimensions by minimizing cell-surface curvature. Nat Cell Biol 17, 137-147.
8. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA (1998). Multiscale vessel enhancement fltering. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interventation-MICCAI'98, Berlin: Springer, 130-137.
9. Hagwood C, Bernal J, Halter M, Elliott J, Brennan T (2013). Testing equality of cell populations based on shape and geodesic distance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32, 2230-2237.
10. Joshi S, Davis B, Jomier M, Gerig G (2004). Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy. NeuroImage 23(Suppl 1), S151-S160.
11. Khatau SB, Hale CM, Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, Patel MS, Stewart CL, Searson PC, Hodzic D, Wirtz D (2009). A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 19017-19022.
12. Kihara T, Haghparast SM, Shimizu Y, Yuba S, Miyake J (2011). Physical properties of mesenchymal stem cells are coordinated by the perinuclear actin cap. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 409, 1-6.
13. McGee AM, Douglas DL, Liang Y, Hyder SM, Baines CP (2011). The mi-tochondrial protein C1qbp promotes cell proliferation, migration and resistance to cell death. Cell Cycle 10, 4119-4127.
14. Murphy RF (2012). CellOrganizer: image-derived models of subcel-lular organization and protein distribution. Methods Cell Biol 110, 179-193.
15. Otsu N (1979). A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 9, 62-66.
16. Peng T, Murphy RF (2011). Image-derived, three-dimensional generative models of cellular organization. Cytometry A 79A, 383-391.
17. Peng T, Wang W, Rohde GK, Murphy RF (2009). Instance-based generative biological shape modeling. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 5193141, 690-693.
18. Pincus Z, Theriot JA (2007). Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis. J Microsc 227, 140-156.
19. Ridler TW, Calvard S (1978). Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet SMC-8, 630-632.
20. Rohde GK, Ribeiro AJ, Dahl KN, Murphy RF (2008a). Deformation-based nuclear morphometry: capturing nuclear shape variation in HeLa cells. Cytometry A 73, 341-350.
21. Rohde GK, Wang W, Peng T, Murphy RF (2008b). Deformation-based nonlinear dimension reduction: applications to nuclear morphometry. Proc 2008 Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2008, 500-503.
22. Sailem H, Bousgouni V, Cooper S, Bakal C (2014). Cross-talk between Rho and Rac GTPases drives deterministic exploration of cellular shape space and morphological heterogeneity. Open Biol 4, 130132.
23. Sigal A, Danon T, Cohen A, Milo R, Geva-Zatorsky N, Lustig G, Liron Y, Alon U, Perzov N (2007). Generation of a fuorescently labeled endogenous protein library in living human cells. Nat Protoc 2, 1515-1527.
24. Sigal A, Milo R, Cohen A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Klein Y, Alaluf I, Swerdlin N, Perzov N, Danon T, Liron Y, et al. (2006). Dynamic proteomics in individual human cells uncovers widespread cell-cycle dependence of nuclear proteins. Nat Methods 3, 525-531.
25. Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V, Langford JC (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319-2323.
26. Tsygankov D, Bilancia CG, Vitriol EA, Hahn KM, Peifer M, Elston TC (2014). CellGeo: a computational platform for the analysis of shape changes in cells with complex geometries. J Cell Biol 204, 443-460.
27. Tukey JW (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5, 99-114.
28. Vader G, Lens SM (2008). The Aurora kinase family in cell division and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786, 60-72.
29. Velliste M, Murphy RF (2002). Automated determination of protein subcel-lular locations from 3D fuorescence microscope images. Proc 2002 IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2002, 867-870.
30. Yin Z, Sadok A, Sailem H, McCarthy A, Xia X, Li F, Garcia MA, Evans L, Barr AR, Perrimon N, et al. (2013). A screen for morphological complexity identifes regulators of switch-like transitions between discrete cell shapes. Nat Cell Biol 15, 860-871.
31. Yin Z, Zhou X, Bakal C, Li F, Sun Y, Perrimon N, Wong ST (2008). Using iterative cluster merging with improved gap statistics to perform online phenotype discovery in the context of high-throughput RNAi screens. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 264.
32. Yu D, Pham TD, Zhou X, Wong SC (2009). Recognition and analysis of cell nuclear phases for high-content screening based on morphological features. Pattern Recogn 42, 498-508.
33. Zhao T, Murphy RF (2007). Automated learning of generative models for subcellular location: building blocks for systems biology. Cytometry A 71A, 978-990.