On-line algorithm for ground-level ozone prediction with a mobile station

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 131, Issue , 2016, Pages 326-333

  Kocijan, Juš ^a,b   Gradišar, Dejan ^a   Božnar, Marija Zlata ^c   Grašič, Boštjan ^c   Mlakar, Primož ^c  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

^c MEIS doo   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Evolving model; Gaussian process model; Mobile air quality measurement station; Ozone; Prediction of ozone concentration; Statistical modelling

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; AIR QUALITY STANDARDS; CLIMATE CHANGE; FORECASTING; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; LANDFORMS; LOCATION; OZONE; OZONE LAYER; QUALITY CONTROL;

EVOLVING MODELS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; MOBILE AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS; OZONE CONCENTRATION; STATISTICAL MODELLING;

CLIMATE MODELS;

OZONE;

AIR QUALITY; ALGORITHM; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA PROCESSING; OZONE; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; TROPOSPHERE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY STANDARD; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FORECASTING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

SLOVENIA;

EID: 84958568083     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Al-Alawi S.M., Abdul-Wahab S.A., Bakheit C.S. Combining principal component regression and artificial neural-networks for more accurate predictions of ground-level ozone. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23:396-403.
2. Angelov P., Filev D.P., Kasabov N. Evolving Intelligent Systems: Methodology and Applications. IEEE Press Series on Computational Intelligence April 2010, Wiley-IEEE Press.
3. Baawain M.S., Al-Serihi A.S. Systematic approach for the prediction of ground-level air pollution (around an industrial port) using an artificial neural network. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. February 2014, 14(1):124-134.
4. Božnar M., Lesjak M., Mlakar P. A neural network-based method for short-term predictions of ambient so 2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain. Atmos. Environ. Part B. Urban Atmos. 1993, 27(2):221-230.
5. Chelani A.B. Prediction of daily maximum ground ozone concentration using support vector machine. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 162:169-176.
6. Cheng C.-H., Huang S.-F., Teoh H.-J. Predicting daily ozone concentration maxima using fuzzy time series based on a two-stage linguistic partition method. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 2016-2028.
7. Csató L., Opper M. Sparse online Gaussian processes. Neural Comput. 2002, 14(3):641-668.
8. Duenas C., Fernandez M., Canete S., Carretero J., Liger E. Stochastic model to forecast ground-level ozone concentration at urban and rural areas. Chemosphere 2005, 61:1379-1389.
9. EU-Commission Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 2008, 152:1-44. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:152:0001:0044:EN:PDF.
10. Feng Y., Zhang W., Sun D., Zhang L. Ozone concentration forecast method based on genetic algorithm optimized back propagation neural networks and SVM data classification. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:1979-1985.
11. Fontes T., Silva L., Silva M., Barros N., Carvalho A. Can artificial neural networks be used to predict the origin of ozone episodes?. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 488-489:197-207.
12. Garner G.G., Thompson A.M. Ensemble statistical post-processing of the national air quality forecast capability: enhancing ozone forecasts in Baltimore, Maryland. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 81:517-522.
13. Glavan M., Gradišar D., Atanasijević-Kunc M., Strmčnik S., Mušič G. Input variable selection for model-based production control and optimisation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 68(9-12):2743-2759.
14. Gradišar D., Glavan M., Strmčnik S., Mušič G. Proopter. Comput. Ind. Jun. 2015, 70(C):102-115.
15. Grašič B., Mlakar P., Božnar M. Ozone prediction based on neural networks and Gaussian processes. Nuovo cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. C Geophys. Space Phys. 2006, 29(6):651-661.
16. Gregorčič G., Lightbody G. Local model identification with Gaussian processes. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2007, 18(5):1404-1423.
17. Gregorčič G., Lightbody G. Nonlinear system identification: from multiple-model networks to Gaussian processes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2008, 21(7):1035-1055.
18. Gregorčič G., Lightbody G. Gaussian process approach for modelling of nonlinear systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2009, 22(4-5):522-533.
19. Gregorčič G., Lightbody G. Gaussian process internal model control. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2012, 43(11):2079-2094.
20. Im U., Bianconi R., Solazzo E., Kioutsioukis I., Badia A., Balzarini A., Bar R., Bellasio R., Brunner D., Chemel C., Curci G., Flemming J., Forkel R., Giordano L., Jimnez-Guerrero P., Hirtl M., Hodzic A., Honzak L., Jorba O., Knote C., Kuenen J.J., Makar P.A., Manders-Groot A., Neal L., Prez J.L., Pirovano G., Pouliot G., Jose R.S., Savage N., Schroder W., Sokhi R.S., Syrakov D., Torian A., Tuccella P., Werhahn J., Wolke R., Yahya K., Zabkar R., Zhang Y., Zhang J., Hogrefe C., Galmarini S. Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: ozone. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 115:404-420.
21. Kocijan J. Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems Using Gaussian Process Models 2016, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
22. Kocijan J., Girard A., Banko B., Murray-Smith R. Dynamic systems identification with Gaussian processes. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 2005, 11(4):411-424.
23. Kocijan J., Hančič M., Petelin D., Božnar M.Z., Mlakar P. Regressor selection for ozone prediction. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2015, 54:101-115.
24. Krige D.G. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J. Chem. Metall. Min. Soc. S. Afr. 1951, 52(6):119-139.
25. Lin Y., Cobourn W.G. Fuzzy system models combined with nonlinear regression for daily ground-level ozone predictions. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41:3502-3513.
26. Lu W.-Z., Wang D. Learning machines: rationale and application in ground-level ozone prediction. Appl. Soft Comput. 2014, 24:135-141.
27. MacKay D.J.C. Introduction to Gaussian processes. NATO ASI Ser. 1998, 168:133-166.
28. Mlakar P., Božnar M.Z. Advanced air pollution. InTech, Rijeka, Ch. Artificial Neural networks: A Useful Tool in Air Pollution and Meteorological Modelling 2011, 495-508.
29. Moustris K.P., Nastos P.T., Larissi I.K., Paliatsos A.G. Application of multiple linear regression models and artificial neural networks on the surface ozone forecast in the greater Athens area, Greece. Adv. Meteorol. 2012, 2012:1-8.
30. Neal R.M. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. Vol. 118 of Lecture Notes in Statistics 1996, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
31. Nebot A., Mugica V., Escobet A. Ozone prediction based on meteorological variables: a fuzzy inductive reasoning approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2008, 8:12343-12370.
32. O'Hagan A. On curve fitting and optimal design for regression (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1978, 40(1):1-42.
33. Petelin D., Grancharova A., Kocijan J. Evolving Gaussian process models for the prediction of ozone concentration in the air. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2013, 33(1):68-80.
34. Petelin D., Kocijan J. Control system with evolving Gaussian process model. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2011 2011, IEEE, Paris.
35. Petelin D., Kocijan J. Evolving Gaussian process models for predicting chaotic time-series. 2014 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS) June 2014, 1-8.
36. Petelin D., Mlakar P., Božnar M.Z., Grašič B., Kocijan J. Ozone forecasting using an on-line updating Gaussian-process model. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 57(3/4):111-122.
37. Quinonero-Candela J., Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I. Large-scale Kernel Machines. Neural Information Processing September 2007, 203-223. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, Ch. Approximation methods for Gaussian process regression.
38. Ranganathan A., Yang M.-H., Ho J. Online sparse Gaussian process regression and its applications. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011, 20(2):391-404.
39. Rasmussen C.E. Evaluation of Gaussian Processes and Other Methods for Nonlinear Regression 1996, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
40. Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Seeger M. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2004, 14:2004.
42. Seeger M. Low Rank Updates for the Cholesky Decomposition 2008, Tech. rep., University of California at Berkeley.
43. Seeger M., Williams C.K.I., Lawrence N.D. Fast forward selection to speed up sparse Gaussian process regression. Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2003, Society for Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
44. Shi J.Q., Choi T. Gaussian Process Regression Analysis for Functional Data 2011, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
45. Shi J.Q., Murray-Smith R., Titterington D.M. Hierarchical Gaussian process mixtures for regression. Stat. Comput. 2005, 15(1):31-41.
46. Solaiman T.A., Coulibaly P., Kanaroglou P. Ground-level ozone forecasting using data-driven methods. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2008, 1:179-193.
47. Sun W., Zhang H., Palazoglu A. Prediction of 8 h-average ozone concentration using a supervised hidden Markov model combined with generalized linear models. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 81:199-208.
48. Sundaramoorthi D. A data-integrated simulation model to forecast ground-level ozone concentration. Ann. Oper. Res. 2014, 216:53-69.