Prediction of 8h-average ozone concentration using a supervised hidden Markov model combined with generalized linear models

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 81, Issue , 2013, Pages 199-208

  Sun, Wei ^a   Zhang, Hao ^a   Palazoglu, Ahmet ^b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Data driven models; Hidden Markov models; Ozone prediction

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION RANGES; DATA-DRIVEN MODEL; GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS; GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL; MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR; OZONE CONCENTRATION; OZONE PREDICTION; RELATIVE PROBABILITY;

FORECASTING; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

OZONE;

OZONE;

ALGORITHM; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ERROR ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OZONE; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTANT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEASON; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CALIFORNIA; LIVERMORE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884952307     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abdul-Wahab S.A., Bakheit C.S., Al-Alawi S.M. Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20:1263-1271.
2. Ainsworth E.A., Yendrek C.R., Sitch S., Collins W.J., Emberson L.D. The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:637-661.
3. Bandyopadhyay G., Chattopadhyay S. Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 4:141-150.
4. Beaver S., Palazoǧlu A. Acluster aggregation scheme for ozone episode selection in the San Francisco, CA Bay Area. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:713-725.
5. x-limitation of ozone formation in central California. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35:3861-3873.
6. 2.5 air quality forecast model based on nonlinear regression and back-trajectory concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44:3015-3023.
7. Cobourn W.G., Dolcine L., French M., Hubbard M.C. Acomparison of nonlinear regression and neural network models for ground-level ozone forecasting. J.Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50:1999-2009.
8. Cox W.M., Chu S.-H. Meteorologically adjusted ozone trends in urban areas: a probabilistic approach. Atmos. Environ. Part B Urban Atmos. 1993, 27:425-434.
9. Crutzen P.J. Photochemical reactions initiated by and influencing ozone in unpolluted tropospheric air. Tellus 1974, 26:47-57.
10. Deng Y., Byrne W. HMM word and phrase alignment for statistical machine translation. Audio, Speech Lang. Process. IEEE Trans. on 2008, 16:494-507.
11. Fletcher S.J., Zupanski M. Ahybrid multivariate normal and lognormal distribution for data assimilation. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 2006, 7:43-46.
12. Forney G.D. The viterbi algorithm. Proc. IEEE 1973, 61:268-278.
13. Hassan M.R., Nath B., Kirley M. Afusion model of HMM, ANN and GA for stock market forecasting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 33:171-180.
14. Jenkin M.E., Clemitshaw K.C. Ozone and other secondary photochemical pollutants: chemical processes governing their formation in the planetary boundary layer. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34:2499-2527.
15. Krupa S.V., Manning W.J. Atmospheric ozone: formation and effects on vegetation. Environ. Poll. 1988, 50:101-137.
16. Kundu A., He Y., Bahl P. Recognition of handwritten word: first and second order hidden Markov model based approach. Pattern Recognit. 1989, 22:283-297.
17. Legge A., Nosal M., McVehil G., Krupa S. Ozone and the clean troposphere: ecological implications. Environ. Poll. 1991, 70:157-175.
18. Nelder J.A., Wedderburn R.W. Generalized linear models. J.R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Gen.) 1972, 370-384.
19. Pires J., Alvim-Ferraz M., Pereira M., Martins F. Prediction of tropospheric ozone concentrations: application of a methodology based on the Darwin's Theory of Evolution. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:1903-1908.
20. Rabiner L., Juang B. An introduction to hidden Markov models. ASSP Mag. IEEE 1986, 3:4-16.
21. Ryan W.F. Forecasting severe ozone episodes in the Baltimore metropolitan area. Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29:2387-2398.
22. Söding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:951-960.
23. Schlink U., Herbarth O., Richter M., Dorling S., Nunnari G., Cawley G., Pelikan E. Statistical models to assess the health effects and to forecast ground-level ozone. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2006, 21:547-558.
24. Schneider T. Analysis of incomplete climate data: estimation of mean values and covariance matrices and imputation of missing values. J.Clim. 2001, 14:853-871.
25. x and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33:1821-1845.
26. Uricaru R., Bréhélin L., Rivals E. Anew type of Hidden Markov Models to predict complex domain architecture in protein sequences. JOBIM'07: Journ. Ouvert. Biol. Inform. Math. 2007, 97-102.
27. Van Dingenen R., Dentener F.J., Raes F., Krol M.C., Emberson L., Cofala J. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43:604-618.
28. Vogel S., Ney H., Tillmann C. HMM-based Word Alignment in Statistical Translation. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics 1996, vol. 2:836-841. Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. Zhang H., Zhang W., Palazoglu A., Sun W. Prediction of ozone levels using a hidden Markov model (HMM) with gamma distribution. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 62:64-73.