Cryo-EM structures of the eukaryotic replicative helicase bound to a translocation substrate

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Abid Ali, Ferdos ^a   Renault, Ludovic ^a,b   Gannon, Julian ^a   Gahlon, Hailey L ^c   Kotecha, Abhay ^d   Zhou, Jin Chuan ^a   Rueda, David ^c   Costa, Alessandro ^a  

^a THE FRANCIS CRICK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STANDARDS AND CONTROL   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CARRIER PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HELICASE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; DNA; DNA HELICASE;

DNA; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTE; GENOME; HYDROLYSIS; RESOLUTION; TRANSLOCATION;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA BINDING; DNA DENATURATION; DNA REPLICATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENOME; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULE; NONHUMAN; ENZYMOLOGY; EUKARYOTE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

EUKARYOTA;

CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84958559117     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10708     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Remus, D. & Diffley, J. F. Eukaryotic DNA replication control: lock and load, then fire. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 771-777 (2009).
2. Remus, D. et al. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 139, 719-730 (2009).
3. Evrin, C. et al. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20240-20245 (2009).
4. Li, N. et al. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8A. Nature 524, 186- 191 (2009 (2015).
5. Yeeles, J. T., Deegan, T. D., Janska, A., Early, A. & Diffley, J. F. Regulated eukaryotic DNA replication origin firing with purified proteins. Nature 519, 431-435 (2015).
6. Ilves, I., Petojevic, T., Pesavento, J. J. & Botchan, M. R. Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by association with Cdc45 and GINS proteins. Mol. Cell 37, 247-258 (2010).
7. Moyer, S. E., Lewis, P. W. & Botchan, M. R. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10236-10241 (2006).
8. Yardimci, H., Loveland, A. B., Habuchi, S., van Oijen, A. M. & Walter, J. C. Uncoupling of sister replisomes during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 40, 834-840 (2010).
9. Costa, A. & Onesti, S. Structural biology of MCM helicases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 44, 326-342 (2009).
10. Fu, Y. V. et al. Selective bypass of a lagging strand roadblock by the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Cell 146, 931-941 (2011).
11. McGeoch, A. T., Trakselis, M. A., Laskey, R. A. & Bell, S. D. Organization of the archaeal MCM complex on DNA and implications for the helicase mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 756-762 (2005).
12. Petojevic, T. et al. Cdc45 (cell division cycle protein 45) guards the gate of the eukaryote replisome helicase stabilizing leading strand engagement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E249-E258 (2015).
13. Takahashi, T. S., Wigley, D. B. & Walter, J. C. Pumps, paradoxes and ploughshares: mechanism of the MCM2-7 DNA helicase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 437-444 (2005).
14. Heller, R. C. et al. Eukaryotic origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro reveals sequential action of DDK and S-CDK kinases. Cell 146, 80-91 (2011).
15. Lyubimov, A. Y., Strycharska, M. & Berger, J. M. The nuts and bolts of ring-translocase structure and mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 240-248 (2011).
16. Costa, A. et al. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 471-477 (2011).
17. Sun, J. et al. The architecture of a eukaryotic replisome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 976-982 (2015).
18. Chang, Y. P., Wang, G., Bermudez, V., Hurwitz, J. & Chen, X. S. Crystal structure of the GINS complex and functional insights into its role in DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12685-12690 (2007).
19. Costa, A. et al. DNA binding polarity, dimerization, and ATPase ring remodeling in the CMG helicase of the eukaryotic replisome. Elife 3, e03273 (2014).
20. Yamagata, A., Kakuta, Y., Masui, R. & Fukuyama, K. The crystal structure of exonuclease RecJ bound to Mn2 + ion suggests how its characteristic motifs are involved in exonuclease activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5908-5912 (2002).
21. Krastanova, I. et al. Structural and functional insights into the DNA replication factor Cdc45 reveal an evolutionary relationship to the DHH family of phosphoesterases. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 4121-4128 (2012).
22. Sanchez-Pulido, L., Diffley, J. F. & Ponting, C. P. Homology explains the functional similarities of Treslin/Ticrr and Sld3. Curr. Biol. 20, R509-R510 (2010).
23. Gai, D., Zhao, R., Li, D., Finkielstein, C. V. & Chen, X. S. Mechanisms of conformational change for a replicative hexameric helicase of SV40 large tumor antigen. Cell 119, 47-60 (2004).
24. Thomsen, N. D. & Berger, J. M. Running in reverse: the structural basis for translocation polarity in hexameric helicases. Cell 139, 523-534 (2009).
25. Enemark, E. J., Chen, G., Vaughn, D. E., Stenlund, A. & Joshua-Tor, L. Crystal structure of the DNA binding domain of the replication initiation protein E1 from papillomavirus. Mol. Cell 6, 149-158 (2000).
26. Miller, J. M., Arachea, B. T., Epling, L. B. & Enemark, E. J. Analysis of the crystal structure of an active MCM hexamer. Elife 3, e03433 (2014).
27. Lam, S. K. et al. The PS1 hairpin of Mcm3 is essential for viability and for DNA unwinding in vitro. PLoS ONE 8, e82177 (2013).
28. Fletcher, R. J. et al. The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. thermoautotrophicum. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 160-167 (2003).
29. Barry, E. R., Lovett, J. E., Costa, A., Lea, S. M. & Bell, S. D. Intersubunit allosteric communication mediated by a conserved loop in the MCM helicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1051-1056 (2009).
30. Froelich, C. A., Kang, S., Epling, L. B., Bell, S. P. & Enemark, E. J. A conserved MCM single-stranded DNA binding element is essential for replication initiation. Elife 3, e01993 (2014).
31. Enemark, E. J. & Joshua-Tor, L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442, 270-275 (2006).
32. Itsathitphaisarn, O., Wing, R. A., Eliason, W. K., Wang, J. & Steitz, T. A. The hexameric helicase DnaB adopts a nonplanar conformation during translocation. Cell 151, 267-277 (2012).
33. Taylor, M. R. et al. Rad51 paralogs remodel pre-synaptic Rad51 filaments to stimulate homologous recombination. Cell 162, 271-286 (2015).
34. Labib, K. How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells? Genes Dev. 24, 1208-1219 (2010).
35. Hardy, C. F., Dryga, O., Seematter, S., Pahl, P. M. & Sclafani, R. A. mcm5/cdc46-bob1 bypasses the requirement for the S phase activator Cdc7p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3151-3155 (1997).
36. Lyubimov, A. Y., Costa, A., Bleichert, F., Botchan, M. R. & Berger, J. M. ATP-dependent conformational dynamics underlie the functional asymmetry of the replicative helicase from a minimalist eukaryote. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11999-12004 (2012).
37. Samel, S. A. et al. A unique DNA entry gate serves for regulated loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto DNA. Genes Dev. 28, 1653-1666 (2014).
38. Yardimci, H. et al. Bypass of a protein barrier by a replicative DNA helicase. Nature 492, 205-209 (2012).
39. Duxin, J. P., Dewar, J. M., Yardimci, H. & Walter, J. C. Repair of a DNA-protein crosslink by replication-coupled proteolysis. Cell 159, 346-357 (2014).
40. Takahashi, K., Yamada, H. & Yanagida, M. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 1145-1158 (1994).
41. Martin, A., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Rebuilt AAA + motors reveal operating principles for ATP-fuelled machines. Nature 437, 1115-1120 (2005).
42. Yakamavich, J. A., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Asymmetric nucleotide transactions of the HslUV protease. J. Mol. Biol. 380, 946-957 (2008).
43. Singleton, M. R., Sawaya, M. R., Ellenberger, T. & Wigley, D. B. Crystal structure of T7 gene 4 ring helicase indicates a mechanism for sequential hydrolysis of nucleotides. Cell 101, 589-600 (2000).
44. Moreau, M. J., McGeoch, A. T., Lowe, A. R., Itzhaki, L. S. & Bell, S. D. ATPase site architecture and helicase mechanism of an archaeal MCM. Mol. Cell 28, 304-314 (2007).
45. Beckwith, R., Estrin, E., Worden, E. J. & Martin, A. Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA + unfoldase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1164-1172 (2013).
46. Roberts, A. J., Kon, T., Knight, P. J., Sutoh, K. & Burgess, S. A. Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 713-726 (2013).
47. Schmidt, H., Gleave, E. S. & Carter, A. P. Insights into dynein motor domain function from a 3.3-A crystal structure. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 492- 497, S1 (2012).
48. Matyskiela, M. E., Lander, G. C. & Martin, A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 781-788 (2013).
49. Erzberger, J. P. & Berger, J. M. Evolutionary relationships and structural mechanisms of AAA + proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 93-114 (2006).
50. Gleave, E. S., Schmidt, H. & Carter, A. P. A structural analysis of the AAA + domains in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytoplasmic dynein. J. Struct. Biol. 186, 367-375 (2014).
51. Bai, X. C., Fernandez, I. S., McMullan, G. & Scheres, S. H. Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. Elife 2, e00461 (2013).
52. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584-590 (2013).
53. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007).
54. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216-221 (2015).
55. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
56. Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003).
57. Sorzano, C. O. et al. XMIPP: a new generation of an open-source image processing package for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 148, 194-204 (2004).
58. Amunts, A., Brown, A., Toots, J., Scheres, S. H. & Ramakrishnan, V. Ribosome. The structure of the human mitochondrial ribosome. Science 348, 95-98 (2015).
59. Scheres, S. H. Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. Elife 3, e03665 (2014).
60. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
61. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
62. Lamichhane, R., Solem, A., Black, W. & Rueda, D. Single-molecule FRET of protein-nucleic acid and protein-protein complexes: surface passivation and immobilization. Methods 52, 192-200 (2010).