Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å

Nature

Volumn 524, Issue 7564, 2015, Pages 186-191

  Li, Ningning ^a   Zhai, Yuanliang ^b   Zhang, Yixiao ^a   Li, Wanqiu ^a   Yang, Maojun ^a   Lei, Jianlin ^a   Tye, Bik Kwoon ^b,c   Gao, Ning ^a  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^c Plant Breeding and Genetics Section in the School of Integrative Plant Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN 7; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CHROMATIN; DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA SYNTHESOME; MCM2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MCM5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN; MULTIENZYME COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

CHROMOSOME; DNA; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTE; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; DNA DENATURATION; DNA REPLICATION ORIGIN; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

EUKARYOTA;

BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; G1 PHASE; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; NUCLEIC ACID DENATURATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; REPLICATION ORIGIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84939545029     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14685     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ODonnell, M., Langston, L. & Stillman, B. Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a010108 (2013
2. Costa, A., Hood, I. V. & Berger, J. M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 25-54 (2013
3. Duderstadt, K. E. & Berger, J. M. A structural framework for replication origin opening by AAA1 initiation factors. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 144-153 (2013
4. Tye, B. K. MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 649-686 (1999
5. Remus, D., et al. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 139, 719-730 (2009
6. Evrin, C., et al. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20240-20245 (2009
7. Siddiqui, K., On, K. F. & Diffley, J. F. Regulating DNA replication in eukarya. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012930 (2013
8. Heller, R. C., et al. Eukaryotic origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro reveals sequential action of DDK and S-CDK kinases. Cell 146, 80-91 (2011
9. Yeeles, J. T., Deegan, T. D., Janska, A., Early, A. & Diffley, J. F. Regulated eukaryotic DNA replication origin firing with purified proteins. Nature 519, 431-435 (2015
10. Tanaka, S. & Araki, H. Helicase activation and establishment of replication forks at chromosomal origins of replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a01037 (2013
11. Tognetti, S., Riera, A. & Speck, C. Switch on the engine: how the eukaryotic replicative helicaseMCM2-7 becomes activated. Chromosoma 124, 13-26 (2015
12. Ilves, I., Petojevic, T., Pesavento, J. J. & Botchan, M. R. Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by associationwithCdc45 andGINS proteins.Mol. Cell 37, 247-258 (2010
13. Fu, Y. V., et al. Selective bypass of a lagging strand roadblock by the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Cell 146, 931-941 (2011
14. Rothenberg, E., Trakselis, M. A., Bell, S. D.& Ha, T.MCMforked substrate specificity involves dynamic interaction with the 59-tail. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34229-34234 (2007
15. McGeoch, A. T., Trakselis, M. A., Laskey, R. A. & Bell, S. D. Organization of the archaeal MCM complex on DNA and implications for the helicase mechanism. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 756-762 (2005
16. Costa, A., et al. DNA binding polarity, dimerization, and ATPase ring remodeling in the CMG helicase of the eukaryotic replisome. eLife 3, e03273 (2014
17. Graham, B. W., Schauer, G. D., Leuba, S. H. & Trakselis, M. A. Steric exclusion and wrapping of the excluded DNA strand occurs along discrete external binding paths during MCM helicase unwinding. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6585-6595 (2011
18. Sun, J., et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into Mcm2-7 double-hexamer assembly and function. Genes Dev. 28, 2291-2303 (2014
19. Samel, S. A., et al. A unique DNA entry gate serves for regulated loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto DNA. Genes Dev. 28, 1653-1666 (2014
20. Sun, J., et al. Cryo-EMstructure of a helicase loading intermediate containing ORCCdc6- Cdt1-MCM2-7 bound to DNA. Nature Struct.Mol. Biol. 20, 944-951 (2013
21. Costa, A., et al. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 471-477 (2011
22. Hesketh, E. L., et al. DNAinduces conformational changes in a recombinant human minichromosome maintenance complex. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 7973-7979 (2015
23. Brewster, A. S., et al. Crystal structure of a near-full-length archaeal MCM: functional insights for an AAA1hexameric helicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20191-20196 (2008
24. Bae, B., et al. Insights into the architecture of the replicative helicase from the structure of an archaeal MCM homolog. Structure 17, 211-222 (2009
25. Slaymaker, I.M., et al. Mini-chromosome maintenance complexes form a filament to remodelDNA structure and topology. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 3446-3456 (2013
26. Fletcher, R. J., et al. The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. thermoautotrophicum. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 160-167 (2003
27. Froelich, C. A., Kang, S., Epling, L. B., Bell, S. P. & Enemark, E. J. A conserved MCM single-stranded DNA binding element is essential for replication initiation. eLife 3, e01993 (2014
28. Fu, Y., Slaymaker, I.M., Wang, J.,Wang, G. & Chen, X. S. The 1.8-A? crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of an archaeal MCM as a right-handed filament. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 1512-1523 (2014
29. Liu,W., Pucci, B., Rossi, M., Pisani, F. M. & Ladenstein, R. Structural analysis of the Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM protein N-terminal domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3235-3243 (2008
30. Miller, J. M., Arachea, B. T., Epling, L. B. & Enemark, E. J. Analysis of the crystal structure of an active MCM hexamer. eLife 3, e03433 (2014
31. Cuesta, I., et al. Conformational rearrangements of SV40 large T antigen during early replication events. J. Mol. Biol. 397, 1276-1286 (2010
32. Vijayraghavan, S. & Schwacha, A. The eukaryotic Mcm2-7 replicative helicase. Subcell. Biochem. 62, 113-134 (2012
33. Bochman,M. L.,Bell, S. P.&Schwacha, A.Subunit organizationofMcm2-7andthe unequal role of active sites in ATP hydrolysis and viability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5865-5873 (2008
34. Evrin, C., et al. The ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex facilitates MCM2-7 dimerization during prereplicative complex formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2257-2269 (2014
35. Slaymaker, I.M.&Chen, X.S.MCMstructureandmechanics:whatwehave learned from archaeal MCM. Subcell. Biochem. 62, 89-111 (2012
36. Bochman,M. L.&Schwacha, A. TheMcmcomplex: unwinding themechanismof a replicative helicase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 652-683 (2009
37. Shima, N., et al. A viable allele of Mcm4 causes chromosome instability and mammary adenocarcinomas in mice. Nature Genet. 39, 93-98 (2007
38. Hardy, C. F., Dryga, O., Seematter, S., Pahl, P. M. & Sclafani, R. A. mcm5/cdc46- bob1 bypasses the requirement for the S phase activator Cdc7p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3151-3155 (1997
39. Bleichert, F., Botchan, M. R. & Berger, J. M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic origin recognition complex. Nature 519, 321-326 (2015
40. Enemark, E. J. & Joshua-Tor, L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442, 270-275 (2006
41. Kang, S., Warner, M. D. & Bell, S. P. Multiple functions for Mcm2-7 ATPase motifs during replication initiation. Mol. Cell 55, 655-665 (2014
42. Coster, G., Frigola, J., Beuron, F., Morris, E. P.& Diffley, J. F. Origin licensing requires ATP binding and hydrolysis by the MCM replicative helicase. Mol. Cell 55, 666-677 (2014
43. Bell, S. D. & Botchan, M. R. The minichromosome maintenance replicative helicase. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012807 (2013
44. Jenkinson, E. R. & Chong, J. P. Minichromosome maintenance helicase activity is controlled by N- and C-terminal motifs and requires the ATPase domain helix-2 insert. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7613-7618 (2006
45. Gai,D., Zhao,R., Li,D. Finkielstein C. V.&Chen X. S.Mechanisms of conformational change for a replicative hexameric helicase of SV40 large tumor antigen. Cell 119, 47-60, (2004).
46. On, K. F., et al. Prereplicative complexes assembled in vitro support origindependent and independent DNA replication. EMBO J. 33, 605-620 (2014
47. Bruck, I. & Kaplan, D. L. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotesMcm2-7 ring opening to allowfor single-strandedDNAextrusion and helicase assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 1210-1221 (2015
48. Bruck, I. & Kaplan, D. L. Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 7550-7563 (2013
49. Fien, K., et al. Primer utilization by DNA polymerase a-primase is influenced by its interaction with Mcm10p. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16144-16153 (2004
50. Eisenberg, S., Korza, G., Carson, J., Liachko, I. & Tye, B. K. Novel DNA binding properties of the Mcm10 protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 25412-25420 (2009
51. Janke, C., et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins,moremarkers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947-962 (2004
52. Zhai, Y., Yung, P. Y., Huo, L. & Liang, C. Cdc14p resets the competency of replication licensing by dephosphorylating multiple initiation proteins during mitotic exit in budding yeast. J. Cell Sci. 123, 3933-3943 (2010
53. Scheres, S. H. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406-418 (2012
54. Li, X., et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable nearatomic- resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods 10, 584-590 (2013
55. Shaikh, T. R., et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nature Protocols 3, 1941-1974 (2008
56. Mindell, J.A.&Grigorieff, N. Accurate determinationof local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003
57. Chen, S., et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24-35 (2013
58. Heymann, J. B. & Belnap, D. M. Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 3-18 (2007
59. Pettersen, E. F., et al. UCSFChimera-a visualization systemfor exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004
60. Mount, D. W. Using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). CSH Protoc. 2007, pdb.top17 (2007
61. Buchan, D. W., Minneci, F., Nugent, T. C., Bryson, K. & Jones, D. T. Scalable web services for the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W349-W357 (2013
62. Stein, N. CHAINSAW: a program for mutating pdb files used as templates in molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 641-643 (2008
63. Winn, M. D., et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235-242 (2011
64. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486-501 (2010
65. Afonine, P. V., et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 352-367 (2012
66. Adams, P. D., et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010
67. Wang, Z., et al. An atomic model of brome mosaic virus using direct electron detection and real-space optimization. Nature Commun. 5, 4808 (2014
68. Zhao, M., et al. Mechanistic insights into the recycling machine of the SNARE complex. Nature 518, 61-67 (2015
69. Amunts, A., et al. Structure of the yeast mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit. Science 343, 1485-1489 (2014
70. Chen, V. B., et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12-21 (2010
71. Schrodinger, L. L. C. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System v.1.3r1 (2010
72. Krissinel, E.&Henrick, K. Inference ofmacromolecular assemblies fromcrystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774-797 (2007
73. Hall, T. A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95-98 (1999
74. Wei, Z., et al. Characterization and structure determination of the Cdt1 binding domain of human minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) 6. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12469-12473 (2010