Accurate prediction of cellular co-translational folding indicates proteins can switch from post- to co-translational folding

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Nissley, Daniel A ^a   Sharma, Ajeet K ^a   Ahmed, Nabeel ^b   Friedrich, Ulrike A ^c,d   Kramer, Günter ^c,d   Bukau, Bernd ^c,d   O'Brien, Edward P ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CHEMICAL REACTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MODELING; PREDICTION; PROTEIN; YEAST;

CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CODON; DISEASE MODEL; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; KINETICS; MISSENSE MUTATION; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RNA TRANSLATION; YEAST; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RIBOSOME;

CODON; PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CODON; KINETICS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; RIBOSOMES;

EID: 84958554893     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10341     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Komar, A. A. A pause for thought along the co-translational folding pathway. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 16-24 (2008).
2. Kramer, G., Boehringer, D., Ban, N. & Bukau, B. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 589-597 (2009).
3. O'Brien, E. P., Ciryam, P., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Understanding the influence of codon elongation rates on cotranslational protein folding. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1536-1544 (2014).
4. Kowarik, M., Küng, S., Martoglio, B. & Helenius, A. Protein folding during cotranslational translocation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 10, 769-778 (2002).
5. Eichmann, C., Preissler, S., Riek, R. & Deuerling, E. Cotranslational structure acquisition of nascent polypeptides monitored by NMR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9111-9116 (2010).
6. Kim, S. J. et al. Translational tuning optimizes nascent protein folding in cells. Science 348, 1-6 (2015).
7. Nicola, A. V., Chen, W. & Helenius, A. Co-translational folding of an alphavirus capsid protein in the cytosol of living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 341-345 (1999).
8. Braakman, I., Hoover-Litty, H., Wagner, K. R. & Helenius, A. Folding of influenza hemagglutinin in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 114, 401-411 (1991).
9. Sánchez, I. E., Morillas, M., Zobeley, E., Kiefhaber, T. & Glockshuber, R. Fast folding of the two-domain semliki forest virus capsid protein explains co-translational proteolytic activity. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 159-167 (2004).
10. O'Brien, E. P., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Prediction of variable translation rate effects on cotranslational protein folding. Nat. Commun. 3, 868 (2012).
11. Reuveni, S., Meilijson, I., Kupiec, M., Ruppin, E. & Tuller, T. Genome-scale analysis of translation elongation with a ribosome flow model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002127 (2011).
12. Margaliot, M. & Tuller, T. On the steady-state distribution in the homogeneous ribosome flow model. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 9, 1724-1736 (2012).
13. Tinoco, I. & Wen, J.-D. Simulation and analysis of single-ribosome translation. Phys. Biol. 6, 025006 (2009).
14. Ingolia, N. T., Lareau, L. F. & Weissman, J. S. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 147, 789-802 (2011).
15. Kosolapov, A. & Deutsch, C. Tertiary interactions within the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 405-411 (2009).
16. Hoffmann, A. et al. Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone trigger factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. Mol. Cell 48, 63-74 (2012).
17. Kaiser, C. M., Goldman, D. H., Chodera, J. D., Tinoco, I. & Bustamante, C. The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 334, 1723-1727 (2011).
18. O'Brien, E. P., Christodoulou, J., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. New scenarios of protein folding can occur on the ribosome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 513-526 (2011).
19. O'Brien, E. P., Hsu, S.-T. D., Christodoulou, J., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Transient tertiary structure formation within the ribosome exit port. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 16928-16937 (2010).
20. Ingolia, N. & Ghaemmaghami, S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218-223 (2009).
21. Gardin, J. et al. Measurement of average decoding rates of the 61 sense codons in vivo. Elife 3, e03735 (2014).
22. Stadler, M. & Fire, A. Wobble base-pairing slows in vivo translation elongation in metazoans. RNA 17, 2063-2073 (2011).
23. Dana, A. & Tuller, T. The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9171-9181 (2014).
24. Fluitt, A., Pienaar, E. & Viljoen, H. Ribosome kinetics and aa-tRNA competition determine rate and fidelity of peptide synthesis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 31, 335-346 (2007).
25. Han, Y. et al. Monitoring cotranslational protein folding in mammalian cells at codon resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12467-12472 (2012).
26. O'Brien, E. P., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Kinetic modelling indicates that fast-translating codons can coordinate co-translational protein folding by avoiding misfolded intermediates. Nat. Commun. 5, 2988 (2014).
27. Ciryam, P., Morimoto, R. I., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M. & O'Brien, E. P. In vivo translation rates can substantially delay the cotranslational folding of the Escherichia coli cytosolic proteome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E132-E140 (2013).
28. Sherman, M. Y. & Qian, S.-B. Less is more: improving proteostasis by translation slow down. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 585-591 (2013).
29. Komar, A. A., Lesnik, T. & Reiss, C. Synonymous codon substitutions affect ribosome traffic and protein folding during in vitro translation. FEBS Lett. 462, 387-391 (1999).
30. Saunders, R. & Deane, C. M. Synonymous codon usage influences the local protein structure observed. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6719-6728 (2010).
31. Zhang, G., Hubalewska, M. & Ignatova, Z. Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 274-280 (2009).
32. De Sancho, D. & Muñoz, V. Integrated prediction of protein folding and unfolding rates from only size and structural class. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17030-17043 (2011).
33. Gillespie, D. T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340-2361 (1977).
34. Liang, S., Xu, Y., Dennis, P. & Bremer, H. mRNA Composition and Control of Bacterial Gene Expression mRNA Composition and Control of Bacterial Gene Expression. J. Bacteriol. 182, 3037-3044 (2000).
35. Horwitz, M. S., Scharff, M. D. & Maizel, J. V. Synthesis and assembly of adenovirus 2. Virology 39, 682-694 (1967).
36. Netzer, W. J. & Hartl, F. U. Recombination of protein domains facilitated by co-translational folding in eukaryotes. Nature 388, 343-349 (1997).
37. Nolting, B. Protein Folding Kinetics: Biophysical Methods 47 (Springer, 2006).
38. Agashe, V. R. et al. Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Trends Biochem. Sci. 117, 199-209 (2004).
39. Rutkowska, A. et al. Dynamics of trigger factor interaction with translating ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4124-4132 (2008).
40. Gloge, F., Becker, A. H., Kramer, G. & Bukau, B. Co-translational mechanisms of protein maturation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 24, 24-33 (2014).
41. O'Brien, E. P., Christodoulou, J., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. Trigger factor slows co-translational folding through kinetic trapping while sterically protecting the nascent chain from aberrant cytosolic interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10920-10932 (2012).
42. Spencer, P. S., Siller, E., Anderson, J. F. & Barral, J. M. Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. J. Mol. Biol. 422, 328-335 (2012).
43. Zhou, M. et al. Non-optimal codon usage affects expression, structure and function of clock protein FRQ. Nature 495, 111-115 (2013).
44. Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. et al. A 'silent' polymorphism substrate changes in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315, 525-528 (2007).
45. Cortazzo, P. et al. Silent mutations affect in vivo protein folding in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293, 537-541 (2002).
46. Hunt, R. C., Simhadri, V. L., Iandoli, M., Sauna, Z. E. & Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Exposing synonymous mutations. Trends Genet. 30, 308-321 (2014).
47. Pechmann, S. & Frydman, J. Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of cotranslational folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 237-243 (2013).
48. Angov, E., Hillier, C. J., Kincaid, R. L. & Lyon, J. A. Heterologous protein expression is enhanced by harmonizing the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host. PLoS ONE 3, e2189 (2008).
49. Tomita, S., Kirino, Y. & Suzuki, T. Cleavage of Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein (APP) by Secretases occurs after O-glycosylation of APP in the protein secretory pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6277-6284 (1998).
50. Twisk, J. et al. The role of the LDL receptor in apolipoprotein B secretion. J. Clin. Invest. 105, 521-532 (2000).
51. Govind, A. P., Walsh, H. & Green, W. N. Nicotine-induced upregulation of native neuronal nicotinic receptors is caused by multiple mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 32, 2227-2238 (2012).
52. Cumming, G., Fidler, F. & Vaux, D. L. Error bars in experimental biology. J. Cell Biol. 177, 7-11 (2007).
53. Sillitoe, I. et al. New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D490-D498 (2013).
54. Altschup, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
55. Frank, J. & Gonzalez, R. L. Structure and dynamics of a processive Brownian motor: the translating ribosome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 381-412 (2010).
56. Wen, J.-D. et al. Following translation by single ribosomes one codon at a time. Nature 452, 598-603 (2008).
57. Ingolia, N. T., Brar, G. A., Rouskin, S., McGeachy, A. M. & Weissman, J. S. The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1534-1550 (2012).
58. Oh, E. et al. Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147, 1295-1308 (2011).
59. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet 17, 10-12 (2011).
60. Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863-864 (2011).
61. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
62. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
63. Choi, H. K., Lu, G., Lee, S., Wengler, G. & Rossmann, M. G. PDB ID:1VCQ structure of Semliki Forest virus core protein. Proteins 27, 345-359 (1997).
64. Liang, J., Choi, J. & Clardy, J. Refined structure of the FKBP12-rapamycin-FRB ternary complex at 2.2 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 736-744 (1999).
65. Gamblin, S. J. et al. The structure and receptor binding properties of the 1918 influenza hemagglutinin. Science 303, 1838-1842 (2004).
66. Xu, Y., Xu, D. & Gabow, H. N. Protein domain decomposition using a graph-theoretic approach. Bioinformatics 16, 1091-1104 (2000).