Identifying effective moves in tutoring: On the refinement of dialogue act annotation schemes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8474 LNCS, Issue , 2014, Pages 199-209

  Vail, Alexandria Katarina ^a   Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; STUDENTS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; DIALOGUE ACTS; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; INTRODUCTORY COMPUTER SCIENCE; NATURAL LANGUAGE DIALOGUE; STUDENT LEARNING;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 84958522752     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. VanLehn, K., et al.: When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? Cog. Sci. 31(1), 3-62 (2007)
2. Bloom, B.S.: The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educ. Res. 13(6), 4-16 (1984)
3. Chi, M.T., et al.: Learning from human tutoring. Cog. Sci. 25(4), 471-533 (2001)
4. Lepper, M.R., et al.: Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. Computers as Cognitive Tools 1993, 75-105 (1999)
5. Graesser, A.C., et al.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cog. Psy. 9(6), 495-522 (1995)
6. Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D.: Do Micro-Level Tutorial Decisions Matter: Applying Reinforcement Learning to Induce Pedagogical Tutorial Tactics. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 224-234. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
7. Dzikovska, M.O., Steinhauser, N.B., Moore, J.D., Campbell, G.E., Harrison, K.M., Taylor, L.S.: Content, social, and metacognitive statements: An empirical study comparing human-human and human-computer tutorial dialogue. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 93-108. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
8. Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J.L., Rosé, C.P.: Socially Capable Conversational Tutors Can Be Effective in Collaborative Learning Situations. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 156-164. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
9. DMello, S.K., et al.: A Motivationally Supportive Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor. New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Tech. 3, 113-126 (2011)
10. Chen, L., et al.: Exploring Effective Dialogue Act Sequences in One-on-one Computer Science Tutoring Dialogues. In: Tetreault, J., et al. (eds.) Proc. 6th BEA Work., Portland, USA, pp. 65-75. Assoc. for Comp. Ling (2011)
11. Stellan, Ohlsson, o.: Beyond the Code-and-count Analysis of Tutoring Dialogues. In: R, Luckin, o. (eds.) Proc. 13th Int. Conf. AIED, Los Angeles, USA, vol. 158, pp. 349-356. IOS (2007)
12. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.J.: Adapting to Student Uncertainty Improves Tutoring Dialogues. In: Vania, Dimitrova, o. (eds.) Proc. 14th Int. Conf. AIED, Brighton, United Kingdom, pp. 33-40. IOS (2009)
13. Cohen, P.A., et al.: Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19(2), 237-248 (1982)
14. DMello, S.K., et al.: Mining Collaborative Patterns in Tutorial Dialogues. J. EDM 2(1), 1-37 (2010)
15. Chu-Carroll, J.: A Statistical Model for Discourse Act Recognition in Dialogue Interactions. In: Chu-Carroll, J., Green, N. (eds.) AAAI Spring Symp.: Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing, Pan Alto, USA, vol. 1996, pp. 12-17. AAAI Press (1998)
16. Litman, D.J., Forbes-Riley, K.: Correlations between dialogue acts and learning in spoken tutoring dialogues. Nat. Lang. Eng. 12(2), 161-176 (2006)
17. Mitchell, C.M., et al.: Recognizing Effective and Student-Adaptive Tutor Moves in Task-Oriented Tutorial Dialogue. In: Youngblood, M.G., McCarthy, P.M. (eds.) Proc. 25th Int. FLAIRS Conf., Marco Island, Florida, pp. 450-455. AAAI Press (2009)
18. Person, N.K., et al.: The Dialog Advancer Network: A Conversation Manager for AutoTutor. In: Gauthier, G., et al. (eds.) Proc. ITSWork. Modeling Human Teaching Tactics and Strategies, Montreal, Canada, pp. 86-92. Springer (2000)
19. Core, M.G., Allen, J.F.: Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL Annotation Scheme. In: Proc. 1997 AAAI Fall Symp.: Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, Providence, USA, pp. 28-35. AAAI (1997)
20. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data Data for Categorical of Observer Agreement The Measurement. Biometrics 33(1), 159-174 (1977)