A critical race policy analysis of the school-to-prison pipeline for Chicanos

Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 260-269

  Valles, Brenda Guadalupe ^a   Villalpando, Octavio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958182032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203155721     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Alemán, E. (2006). Is Robin Hood the “prince of thieves” or a pathway to equity? Applying a critical race theory to school finance political discourse. Educational Policy, 20, 113-142.
2. Casella, R. (2003). Zero-tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 872-892.
3. Children’s Defense Fund. (1975). School suspensions: Are they helping children? Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund.
4. Covarrubias, A. (2011). Quantitative intersectionality: A critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 86-105.
5. DeCuir, J.T., & Dixson, A.D. (2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there”: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31.
6. Delgado Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 105-124.
7. Donato, R., Menchaca, M., & Valencia, R.R. (1991). Segregation, desegregation, and integration of Chicano students: Problem and prospects. In R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Research and policy agendas for the 1990s (pp. 27-63). New York: Falmer Press.
8. Fernandez, L. (2002). Telling stories about school: Using critical race and Latino critical theories to document Latina/Latino education and resistance. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 45-65.
9. Gotanda, N. (1991). A critique of “Our constitution is color-blind.” Stanford Law Review, 44, 1-68.
10. Hernandez-Truyol, B. (1997). Borders (en)gendered: Normativities, Latinas and a LatCrit paradigm. New York University Law Review, 72, 882-927.
11. Iglesias, E.M. (1997). International law, human rights, and LatCrit theory. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 28, 177-213.
12. Iglesias, E.M., & Valdes, F. (1998). Afterword: Religion, gender, sexuality, race and class in coalitional theory: A critical and self-critical analysis of LatCrit social justice agendas. UCLA Chicano-Latino Law Review, 19, 503-588.
13. Johnson, K.R. (1995). Celebrating LatCrit theory: What do we do when the music stops? UC Davis Law Review, 33, 753.
14. Johnson, K.R., & Martinez, G. (2000). Discrimination by proxy: The case of Proposition 227 and the ban on bilingual education. UC Davis Law Review, 33, 1227.
15. Kim, C., Losen, D., & Hewitt, D. (2010). The school to prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: NYU Press.
16. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.
17. Lopez, G. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 69-94.
18. Lynn, M., & Parker, L. (2006). Critical race studies in education: Examining a decade of research on U.S. schools. Urban Review, 38(4), 257-290.
19. Malagon, M. (2010). Trenches under the pipeline: The educational trajectories of Chicano male continuation high school students. Thinking Gender Papers. UCLA Center for the Study of Women.
20. Morrison, G.M., & D’Incau, B. (1997). The web of zero-tolerance: Characteristics of students who are recommended for expulsion from school. Education and the Treatment of Children, 20, 316-335.
21. MWSOE (Mountain West State Office of Education). (2006). Annual report.
22. NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). (2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
23. NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). (2011). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24. Noguera, P. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 341-350.
25. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. OCR (Office of Civil Rights). (2006). State and national projects for enrollment and selected items by race/ethnicity and sex. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27. Osher, D.M., Quinn, M.M., Poirier, J.M., & Rutherford, R.B. (2003). Deconstructing the pipeline: Using efficacy and effectiveness data and cost-benefit analyses to reduce minority youth incarceration. In J. Wald & D.J. Losen (Eds.), New direction for youth development: Deconstructing the school-to-prison pipeline (pp. 91-120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Parker, L. (2003). Critical race theory and its implications for methodology and policy analysis in higher education desegregation. In G.R. López & L. Parker (Eds.), Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology (pp. 145-173). New York: Peter Lang.
29. Parker, L., & Lynn, M. (2002). What’s race got to do with it? Critical race theory’s conflicts with and connections to qualitative research methodology and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 7-22.
30. Parker, L., & Villalpando, O. (2007). A Race(cialized) perspective on educational leadership: Critical race theory in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 519-524.
31. Perez, T. (2010). The civil rights and school discipline. Addressing Disparities to Ensure Equal Educational Opportunities Conference. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, Washington, DC.
32. Pew Hispanic Center. (2010). Population counts 2010, Census 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
33. Raffaele Mendez, L.M. (2003). Predictors of suspension and negative outcomes: A longitudinal investigation. New Directions for Youth Development, 99, 17-33.
34. Reyes, A. (2006). Discipline, achievement and race: Is zero tolerance the answer? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35. Skiba, R.J., Michael, R.S., Nardo, A.C., & Peterson, R. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317-342.
36. Skiba, R., Rausch, K., & Ritter, S. (2004). Children left behind: Series summary and recommendations. Education Policy Briefs from Indiana Youth Services, 2(4).
37. Solórzano, D.G., & Ornelas, A. (2002). A critical race analysis of advanced placement classes: A case of educational inequalities. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(4), 215-229.
38. Solórzano, D., Villalpando, O., & Oseguera, L. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(30), 272-294.
39. Townsend, B.L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 382-384.
40. Valdes, F. (1997). LatCrit theory: Naming and launching a new direction of critical legal scholarship. Harvard Latino Law Review, 2, 1-501.
41. Valdes, F. (2002). Under construction: LatCrit consciousness, community, and theory. La Raza Law Journal, 10, 3-56.
42. Valencia, R. (1997). Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. In R.R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London: Falmer Press.
43. Verdugo, R.R. (2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero-tolerance policies: The cultural and structural wars. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 50-71.
44. Villalpando, O. (2005). Conditions that affect the participation and success of Latino males in college. Policy study commissioned by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and the Kellogg Foundation, for the Dellums Commission, Washington, DC.
45. Villalpando, O. (2010). Latinos/as in higher education: Eligibility, enrollment, and educational attainment. Handbook of Latinos and education. New York: Routledge Press.