The government's lies and the constitution

Indiana Law Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 73-120

  Norton, Helen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958088719     PISSN: 00196665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Peter W. Morgan, The Undefined Crime of Lying to Congress: Ethics Reform and the Rule of Law, 86 NW. U. L. REV. 177, 223 (1992).
2. ERIC ALTERMAN, WHEN PRESIDENTS LIE 162 (2004)
3. GEOFFREY R. STONE, PERILOUS TIMES 517 (2004).
4. JOHN J. MEARSHEIMER, WHY LEADERS LIE 5 (2011).
5. MELVIN I. UROFSKY, LOUIS D. BRANDEIS: A LIFE 262-76 (2009).
6. William H. Simon, Virtuous Lying: A Critique of Quasi-Categorical Moralism, 12 GEO. J. LEGAL ETHICS 433, 458 (1999).
7. JIM NEWTON, EISENHOWER: THE WHITE HOUSE YEARS 313-15 (2011).
8. Mary-Rose Papandrea, Leaker Traitor Whistleblower Spy: National Security Leaks and the First Amendment, 94 B.U. L. REV. 449, 467 (2014).
9. Steven G. Gey, The First Amendment and the Dissemination of Socially Worthless Untruths, 36 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1, 9 (2008).
10. David A. Strauss, Persuasion, Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression, 91 COLUM. L. REV. 334, 355-59 (1991)
11. Jonathan D. Varat, Deception and the First Amendment: A Central, Complex, and Somewhat Curious Relationship, 53 UCLA L. REV. 1107, 1108-10 (2006).
12. Beth Orsoff, Note, Government Speech as Government Censorship, 67 S. CAL. L. REV. 229, 248 (1993).
13. Helen Norton, Lies to Manipulate, Misappropriate, and Acquire Governmental Power in LAW AND LIES 143, 176-90 (Austin Sarat ed., 2015).
14. DAVID NYBERG, THE VARNISHED TRUTH 50 (1993).
15. Mark Tushnet, "Telling Me Lies": The Constitutionality of Regulating False Statements of Fact 2 (Harvard Law Sch. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series, Paper No. 11-02, 2011), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737930 [http://perma.cc/Q2S8-EEHU].
16. Heidi Kitrosser, Classified Information Leaks and Free Speech, 2008 U. ILL. L. REV. 881, 885 (2008).
17. Stuart P. Green, Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements, 53 HASTINGS L.J. 157, 177 (2001).
18. Mark Spottswood, Falsity, Insincerity, and the Freedom of Expression, 16 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1203, 1235 (2008).
19. SEANA VALENTINE SHIFFRIN, SPEECH MATTERS: ON LYING, MORALITY AND THE LAW 116 (2014).
20. Steven R. Morrison, When is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis of the Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 111, 116-17 (2009).
21. CHARLES FRIED, RIGHT AND WRONG 60 (1978).
22. Deborah Young, Unnecessary Evil: Police Lying in Interrogations, 28 CONN. L. REV. 425, 468 (1996).
23. Helen Norton, Lies and the Constitution, 2012 SUP. CT. REV. 161, 185-200.
24. Harry Frankfurt, On Truth, Lies, and Bullshit, in THE PHILOSOPHY OF DECEPTION 37, 37 (Clancy Martin ed., 2009)
25. David L. Shapiro, In Defense of Judicial Candor, 100 HARV. L. REV. 731, 736-37 (1987).
26. Leslie Gielow Jacobs, Bush, Obama and Beyond: Observations on the Prospect of Fact Checking Executive Department Threat Claims before the Use of Force, 26 CONST. COMMENT. 433, 442 (2010).
27. STUART P. GREEN, LYING, CHEATING, AND STEALING 34-39 (2006).
28. PETER IRONS, UNFINISHED BUSINESS: THE CASE FOR SUPREME COURT REPUDIATION OF THE JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT CASES 4 (2013)
29. Eric K. Yamamoto, White (House) Lies: Why the Public Must Compel the Courts to Hold the President Accountable for National Security Abuses, 68 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 285, 292-93 (2005).
30. Nathan Cortez, Adverse Publicity by Administrative Agencies in the Internet Era, 2011 BYU L. REV. 1371, 1374 (2011).
31. James O'Reilly, Libels on Government Websites: Exploring Remedies for Federal Internet Defamation, 55 ADMIN. L. REV. 507 (2003).
32. Gregory P. Magarian, The First Amendment, The Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate, 73 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 101, 103 (2004).
33. David L. Ponet & Ethan J. Leib, Fiduciary Law's Lessons for Deliberative Democracy, 91 B.U. L. REV. 1249, 1257 (2011).
34. Mathilde Cohen, Sincerity and Reason-Giving: When May Legal Decision Makers Lie?, 59 DEPAUL L. REV. 1091, 1112 (2010).
35. Tom R. Tyler & Peter Degoey, Collective Restraint in Social Dilemmas: Procedural Justice and Social Identification Effects on Support for Authorities, 69 J. PERSONALITY & SOC. PSYCHOL. 482, 483 (1995).
36. I. Bennett Capers, Crime, Legitimacy, and Testilying, 83 IND. L.J. 835, 835-42 (2008).
37. Jamie Masten, Note, "Ain't No Snitches Ridin' Wit' Us": How Deception in the Fourth Amendment Triggered the Stop Snitching Movement, 70 OHIO ST. L.J. 705, 708-09 (2009).
38. EMILY M. CALHOUN, LOSING TWICE 48 (2011).
39. Micah Schwartzman, Judicial Sincerity, 94 VA. L. REV. 987, 991 (2008).
40. Paul Butler, When Judges Lie (and When They Should), 91 MINN. L. REV. 1785, 1785-86 (2007).
41. ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES 710-21 (3d ed. 2006).
42. Gregory Klass, Meaning, Purpose, and Cause in the Law of Deception, 100 GEO. L.J. 449, 449 (2012)
43. Eric L. Muller, Constitutional Conscience, 83 B.U. L. REV. 1017, 1071 (2003).
44. Derek E. Bambauer, Orwell's Armchair, 79 U. CHI. L. REV. 863, 897 (2012).
45. John C. Jeffries, Jr., The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts, 99 VA. L. REV. 207 (2013).
46. Eric J. Mitnick, Procedural Due Process and Reputational Harm: Liberty as Self-Invention, 43 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 79, 102, 142 (2009).
47. Randolph J. Haines, Note, Reputation, Stigma and Section 1983: The Lessons of Paul v. Davis, 30 STAN. L. REV. 191, 238-39 (1977).
48. Shaudee Navid, Comment, They're Making a List, but Are They Checking It Twice? How Erroneous Placement on Child Offender Databases Offends Procedural Due Process, 44 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 1641, 1667-74 (2011).
49. Barbara E. Armacost, Race and Reputation: The Real Legacy of Paul v. Davis, 85 VA. L. REV. 569, 621-22 (1999).
50. Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., Fundamental Property Rights, 85 GEO. L.J. 555, 590-607 (1997).
51. Laurie Magid, Deceptive Police Interrogation Practices: How Far is Too Far?, 99 MICH. L. REV. 1168, 1174 (2001).
52. William J. Stuntz, Lawyers, Deception, and Evidence Gathering, 79 VA. L. REV. 1903, 1907 (1993).
53. Irina Khasin, Note, Honesty Is the Best Policy: A Case for the Limitation of Deceptive Police Interrogation Practices in the United States, 42 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1029, 1032 (2009).
54. Andrew B. Coan, Judicial Capacity and the Substance of Constitutional Law, 122 YALE L.J. 422 (2012)
55. David A. Strauss, The Ubiquity of Prophylactic Rules, 55 U. CHI. L. REV. 190 (1988).
56. Christopher Slobogin, Lying and Confessing, 39 TEX. TECH. L. REV. 1275, 1276 (2007).
57. Hayley M. D. Cleary, Police Interviewing and Interrogation of Juvenile Suspects: A Descriptive Examination of Actual Cases, 38 LAW & HUM. BEHAV. 271 (2014).
58. Errol C. Dauis, Note, Police Trickery and Juvenile Suspects: People v. Mays, 15 U.C. DAVIS J. JUV. L. & POL'Y 205 (2011).
59. Patrick M. McMullen, Comment, Questioning the Questions: The Impermissibility of Police Deception in Interrogations of Juveniles, 99 NW. U. L. REV. 971, 975-76 (2005).
60. William E. Underwood, Note, A Little White Lie: The Dangers of Allowing Police Officers to Stretch the Truth As a Means to Gain a Suspect's Consent to Search, 18 WASH. & LEE J. CIVIL RTS. & SOC. JUST. 167 (2011).
61. J. Roland Pennock, Coercion: An Overview, in COERCION 1 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1972).
62. Caroline Mala Corbin, The First Amendment Right Against Compelled Listening, 89 B.U. L. REV. 939, 941 (2009)
63. Nadia N. Sawicki, Compelling Images: The Constitutionality of Emotionally Persuasive Health Campaigns, 73 MD. L. REV. 458, 516-20 (2014).
64. Eric L. Muller, Constitutional Conscience, 83 B.U. L. REV. 1017, 1045 (2003).
65. Rosalie Berger Levinson, Time to Bury the Shocks the Conscience Test, 13 CHAP. L. REV. 307, 308 (2010).
66. Daniel Givelber, The Right to Minimum Social Decency and the Limits of Evenhandedness: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress by Outrageous Conduct, 82 COLUM. L. REV. 42, 51 (1982).
67. Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 23 YALE L.J. 16, 55 (1913).
68. Frederick Schauer, Hohfeld's First Amendment, 76 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 914, 914 (2008).
69. Mary Jean Dolan, Government Identity Speech and Religion: Establishment Clause Limits After Summum, 19 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1, 24 (2010).
70. Caroline Mala Corbin, Mixed Speech: When Speech is Both Private and Governmental, 83 N.Y.U. L. REV. 605 (2008)
71. Leslie Gielow Jacobs, Who's Talking? Disentangling Government and Private Speech, 36 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 35 (2002)
72. Gia B. Lee, Persuasion, Transparency, and Government Speech, 56 HASTINGS L.J. 983 (2005)
73. Helen Norton, The Measure of Government Speech: Identifying Expression's Source, 88 B.U. L. REV. 587 (2008)
74. Nelson Tebbe, Government Nonendorsement, 98 MINN. L. REV. 648 (2013).
75. Jeffrey M. Cohen, The Right to Learn: Intellectual Honesty and the First Amendment, 39 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 659, 683 (2012).
76. Jess Alderman, Words to Live By: Public Health, the First Amendment, and Government Speech, 57 BUFF. L. REV. 161, 164 (2009).
77. Josh Chafetz, Congress's Constitution, 160 U. PA. L. REV. 715, 721 (2012).
78. Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Soft Power and American Foreign Policy, 119 POL. SCI. Q. 255, 256 (2004).
79. Jacob E. Gersen & Eric A. Posner, Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice, 61 STAN. L. REV. 573, 577 (2008).
80. Michael W. McConnell, Coercion: The Lost Element of Establishment, 27 WM. & MARY L. REV. 933, 941 (1986).
81. Martin H. Redish & Kevin Finnerty, What Did You Learn in School Today? Free Speech, Values Inculcation, and the Democratic-Educational Paradox, 88 CORNELL L. REV. 62, 99 (2002).
82. Brian C. Castello, Note, The Voice of Government as an Abridgement of First Amendment Rights of Speakers: Rethinking Meese v. Keene, 1989 DUKE L.J. 654, 676-77 (1989).
83. Richard H. Pildes & Richard G. Niemi, Expressive Harms, "Bizarre Districts," and Voting Rights: Evaluating Election-District Appearances After Shaw v. Reno, 92 MICH. L. REV. 483, 506-07 (1993).
84. Helen Norton, The Equal Protection Implications of Government's Hateful Speech, 54 WM. & MARY L. REV. 159, 198-208 (2012).
85. David Spencer, Note, What's the Harm? Nontaxpayer Standing to Challenge Religious Symbols, 34 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 1071, 1075 (2011).
86. Geoffrey R. Stone, The Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Public Debate, 1993 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 127, 132.
87. Jennifer E. Laurin, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, Rodriguez v. City of Houston, and Remedial Rationing, 109 COLUM. L. REV. SIDEBAR 82, 83-84 (2009).
88. Michael T. Morley, Public Law at the Cathedral: Enjoining the Government, 35 CARDOZO L. REV. 2453, 2454-79 (2014).
89. David S. Han, Rethinking Speech-Tort Remedies, 2014 WIS. L. REV. 1135.
90. Christopher Slobogin, Why Liberals Should Chuck the Exclusionary Rule, 1999 U. ILL. L. REV. 363, 368.
91. Heidi Kitrosser, Free Speech Aboard the Leaky Ship of State: Calibrating First Amendment Protections for Leakers of Classified Information, 6 J. NAT'L SECURITY L. & POL'Y 409, 411 (2013).
92. Helen Norton, Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government's Control of Its Workers' Speech to Protect Its Own Expression, 59 DUKE L.J. 1 (2009).
93. Jenny-Brooke Condon, Illegal Secrets, 91 WASH. U. L. REV. 1099 (2014).
94. Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet & Michael Serota, Translating Fiduciary Principles into Public Law, 126 HARV. L. REV. F. 91, 101 (2013).
95. Helen Norton, Campaign Speech Law with a Twist: When the Government Is the Speaker, Not the Regulator, 61 EMORY L.J. 209, 229-32 (2011).
96. Lawrence Gene Sager, Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms, 91 HARV. L. REV. 1212, 1227 (1978).
97. Cass R. Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. PA. L. REV. 2021 (1996).
98. Julian Davis Mortenson, Law Matters, Even to the Executive, 112 MICH. L. REV. 1015, 1015 (2014).
99. Michael Walzer, Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands, 2 PHIL. & PUB. AFF. 160, 180 (1973).