Speech matters: On lying, morality, and the law

Speech Matters: On Lying, Morality, and the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-234

  Shiffrin, Seana Valentine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924862435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (184)

1. Immanuel Kant, Of Ethical Duties Towards Others, and Especially Truthfulness, in Lectures on Ethics 200, 200-01 (Peter Heath & J.B. Schneewind eds., Peter Heath trans., 2001)
2. Immanuel Kant, On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy, in Practical Philosophy 611
3. Christine M. Korsgaard, The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil, in Creating the Kingdom of Ends 133 (1996);
4. Tamar Schapiro, Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances, 117 Ethics 32, 32-45 (2006);
5. David Sussman, On the Supposed Duty of Truthfulness: Kant on Lying in Self-Defense, in The Philosophy of Deception 225 (Clancy Martin ed., 2009);
6. Allen Wood, Kantian Ethics 240-58 (2008).
7. Derek Parfit, On What Matters 83 (Samuel Scheffler ed., 2011).
8. Charles Fried, Right and Wrong, 64-68 (1978).
9. Tyler Burge, Content Preservation, 102 Phil. Rev. 457, passim and especially 466-68, 485 n. 23 (1993).
10. C.A.J. Coady, Testimony (1992).
11. Stuart Hampshire, Sincerity and Single-Mindedness, in Freedom of Mind and Other Essays 232, 236-38, 253-55 (1972).
12. Charles C. Dike et al., Pathological Lying Revisited, 33 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 342, 343 (2005).
13. Charles C. Dike, Pathological Lying: Symptom or Disease, Psychiatric Times (June 1, 2008), http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/pathological-lying-symptom-or-disease
14. Graham E. Powell, Gisli H. Gudjonsson & Paul Mullen, Application of the Guilty-Knowledge Technique in a Case of Pseudologia Fantastica, 4 Personality & Individual Differences 141, 145-46 (1983).
15. Sean A. Spence et al., Behavioural and Functional Anatomical Correlates of Deception in Humans, 12 NeuroReport 2849, 2849 (2001).
16. Alastair MacIntyre, Truthfulness, Lies, and Moral Philosophers: What Can We Learn from Mill and Kant?, in 16 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 309, 336 (1994)
17. F.A.M. Forbes, St. Athanasius 102 (1919).
18. Bella M. DePaulo et al., Lying in Everyday Life, 70 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 979 (1996).
19. T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other 317-20 (1998).
20. Richard Craswell, Regulating Deceptive Advertising: The Role of Cost-Benefit Analysis, 64 S. Cal. L. Rev. 549, 590 (1991);
21. Richard Craswell, Interpreting Deceptive Advertising, 65 B.U. L. Rev. 657, 697 (1985).
22. Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law 205-07, 219-33 (2005);
23. Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law 1259-69, 1360-414, 1467-501 (2005).
24. J. Ashley Roach, Ruses and Perfidy: Deception During Armed Conflict, 23 Tol. L. Rev. 395, 407, 407 n. 44, 411-12 (1992).
25. Promises Under Fire, 112 Ethics 483, 489-90, 493-95 (2002).
26. Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals 184 (Mary Gregor ed., 2007).
27. Joseph Betz, Moral Considerations Concerning the Police Response to Hostage Takers, in Ethics, Public Policy, and Criminal Justice 110 (Frederick Ellison & Norman Bowie eds., 1982).
28. Thomas Strentz, Psychological Aspects of Crisis Negotiation 69 (2006).
29. Frances Kamm, Intricate Ethics 13 (2006).
30. Immoral, Conflicting, and Redundant Promises, in Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon 155, 159-63 (R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Freeman eds., 2011).
31. Bruce A. Arrigo & Jennifer Leslie Bullock, The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prisoners in Supermax Units: Reviewing What We Know and Recommending What Should Change, 52 Int'l J. Offender Therapy & Comp. Criminology 622, 627-30 (2008);
32. Craig Haney, Mental Health Issues in Long-Term Solitary and "Supermax" Confinement, 49 Crime & Delinquency 124, 130-32 (2003);
33. Atul Gawande, Hellhole, New Yorker, Mar. 30, 2009, at 36.
34. Adrienne Rich, Women and Honor: Some Notes on Lying, in Lies, Secrets, and Silence 191 (1979).
35. David Owens, Shaping the Normative Landscape 231-49 (2012)
36. Eric Chwang, Coerced Promises, in Promises and Agreements 156, 157, 161 (Hanoch Sheinman ed., 2011);
37. Judith Jarvis Thomson, The Realm of Rights 310-13 (1990).
38. Robert Nozick, Coercion, in Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel 440, 441-45 (Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes & Morton White eds., 1969).
39. Scott Anderson, The Enforcement Approach to Coercion, 5 J. Ethics & Soc. Phil. 1, 1-26 (2010).
40. Margaret Gilbert, A Theory of Political Obligation 79 (2006)
41. Barbara Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment (1996)
42. Immanuel Kant, Of Ethical Duties Toward Others, and Especially Truthfulness, in Lectures on Ethics 200, 203 (Peter Heath & J. B. Schneewind eds., Peter Heath trans., 2001).
43. Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments 327-42 (D.D. Raphael & A.L. Macfie eds., 1982).
44. Kent Greenawalt, Speech, Crime and the Uses of Language 90-92 (1989).
45. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Immoral, Conflicting, and Redundant Promises, in Reasons and Recognition: Themes from T.M. Scanlon 155, 159-63 (Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Freeman eds., 2011).
46. Jane O'Grady, Elizabeth Anscombe: Obituary, The Guardian (January 10, 2001) (http://www.theguardian.com/news/2001/jan/11/guardianobituaries.highereducation).
47. Howard Kurtz, Unabomber Manuscript Is Published, Wash. Post, Sept. 19, 1995, at A01.
48. C. Edwin Baker, Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech 47-69 (1989);
49. C. Edwin Baker, Autonomy and Free Speech, 27 Const. Comment. 251 (2011).
50. Robert Post, Participatory Democracy and Free Speech, 97 Va. L. Rev. 477 (2011);
51. James Weinstein, Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine, 97 Va. L. Rev. 491 (2011).
52. Steven H. Shiffrin, The First Amendment, Democracy and Romance 132-39 (1990).
53. Charles Fried, Modern Liberty 95-123 (2007);
54. Charles Fried, The New First Amendment Jurisprudence: A Threat to Liberty, 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 225 (1992);
55. Dana Remus Irwin, Freedom of Thought: The First Amendment and the Scientific Method, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1479;
56. Christina E. Wells, Reinvigorating Autonomy: Freedom and Responsibility in the Supreme Court's First Amendment Jurisprudence, 32 Harv. C.R.-C. L. L. Rev. 159 (1997);
57. Neil M. Richards, Informational Privacy, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 387 (2008);
58. Timothy Macklem, Independence of Mind 1-32 (2006);
59. Susan Williams, Truth, Autonomy, and Speech 130-229 (2004).
60. Martin H. Redish & Abby Marie Mollen, Understanding Post's and Meiklejohn's Mistakes: The Central Role of Adversary Democracy in the Theory of Free Expression, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1303, 1363-64 (2009);
61. Martin H. Redish, The Value of Free Speech, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 591 (1982).
62. Jed Rubenfeld, The Freedom of the Imagination, 112 Yale L. J. 1, 38-39 (2002).
63. Immanuel Kant, Of Ethical Duties Towards Others, and Especially Truthfulness, in Lectures on Ethics (Peter Heath & J.B. Schneewind eds., Peter Heath trans., 1997).
64. Tyler Burge, Computer Proof, Apriori Knowledge, and Other Minds: The Sixth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture, 32 Nous Suppl. 1, 10-13, 19-22, 27-28 (1998);
65. Tyler Burge, Memory and Persons, 112 Phil. Rev. 289, 300-03, 314-21 (2003).
66. Bruce A. Arrigo & Jennifer Leslie Bullock, The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prisoners in Supermax Units: Reviewing What We Know and Recommending What Should Change, 52 Int'l. J. Offender Therapy & Comp. Criminology 622, 627 (2008);
67. Craig Haney, Mental Health Issues in Long-Term Solitary and "Supermax" Confinement, 49 Crime & Delinq. 124, 130-32 (2003).
68. John Stuart Mill, Considerations on Representative Government 24-25 (Currin Shields ed., 1958) (1861);
69. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice 395-587 (1971).
70. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Speech, Death and Double Effect, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1135, 1164-71 (2003).
71. Frank Jackson, Epiphenomenal Qualia, 32 Phil. Q. 127, 128-30, 133-36 (1982);
72. Frank Jackson, What Mary Didn't Know, 83 J. Phil. 291 (1986).
73. Alan K. Chen, Free Speech and Instrumental Music, 66 Hastings L. J. (forthcoming 2015).
74. Robert W. Levenson et al., Voluntary Facial Action Generates Emotion-Specific Autonomic Nervous System Activity, 27 Psychophysiology 363, 364, 368, 376, 382 (1990)
75. Paul Ekman & Richard J. Davidson, Voluntary Smiling Changes Regional Brain Activity, 4 Psychol. Sci. 342, 345 (1993)
76. Robin Damrad-Frye & James D. Laird, The Experience of Boredom: The Role of the Self-Perception of Attention, 57 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 315, 315 (1989)
77. Steven H. Shiffrin, The First Amendment and Economic Regulation: Away from a General Theory of the First Amendment, 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1212, 1246 (1983)
78. C. Edwin Baker, The First Amendment and Commercial Speech, 84 Ind. L. J. 981, 987-89 (2009)
79. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Compelled Association, Morality, and Market Dynamics, 41 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 317, 320-21 (2007).
80. Susan Williams, Free Speech and Autonomy: Thinkers, Storytellers, and a Systemic Approach to Speech, 27 Const. Comment. 399, 407-08 (2011).
81. Vincent Blasi, Seana Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Freedom of Speech: A Response, 27 Const. Comment. 309, 310-12 (2011).
82. Jennifer Colangelo, The Right to Refuse Treatment for Mental Illness, 5 Rutgers J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 492, 506-10 (2008);
83. Bruce J. Winick, The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment: A First Amendment Perspective, 44 U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (1989);
84. Lawrence O. Gostin, Freedom of Expression and the Mentally Disordered: Philosophical and Constitutional Perspectives, 50 Notre Dame Law. 419 (1975).
85. Colin M. Macleod, A Liberal Theory of Freedom of Expression for Children, 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 55 (2004).
86. Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults?, 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 3 (2004).
87. Thomas Scanlon, Comment on Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech, 27 Const. Comment. 327, 332 (2011).
88. James Weinstein, Seana Shiffrin's Thinker-Based Theory of Free Speech: Elegant and Insightful, but Will It Work in Practice? 27 Const. Comment. 385, 388-89 (2011).
89. Frederick Schauer, Must Speech Be Special? 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1284, 1289-92 (1984).
90. Stephen Gardbaum, The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice 47-76 (2013);
91. Jeremy Waldron, The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review, 115 Yale L. J. 1346, 1369-95 (2006).
92. John R. Searle, A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts, in 7 Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 344 (Keith Gunderson ed., 1975), reprinted in John R. Searle, Expression and Meaning 1, 15 (1979);
93. John R. Searle, What is Language? Some Preliminary Remarks, 11 Ethics & Pol. 173, 181 (2009).
94. Kent Greenawalt, Speech, Crime, and the Uses of Language 57-63 (1989)
95. J.L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words 32-33, 151-57 (1965).
96. Jed Rubenfeld, The First Amendment's Purpose, 53 Stan. L. Rev. 767, 775-78, 793-94 (2001).
97. Thomas I. Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression 9 (1970).
98. Leslie Kendrick, Content Discrimination Revisited, 98 Va. L. Rev. 231 (2012).
99. David Strauss, Persuasion, Autonomy and Freedom of Expression, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 334, 335, 365-68 (1991)
100. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Speech, Death, and Double Effect, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1135, 1165-71 (2003).
101. David Brooks, The Mother of All No-Brainers, N.Y. Times, Jul. 5, 2011 at A21.
102. Micah Schwartzman, The Sincerity of Public Reason, 19 J. Pol. Phil. 375, 378, 392 (2011).
103. Elizabeth Markovits, The Trouble with Being Earnest: Deliberative Democracy and the Sincerity Norm, 14 J. Pol. Phil. 249, 250, 260-66 (2006)
104. Mark Richard, Contextualism and Relativism, 119 Phil. Stud. 215 (2004).
105. Perez Zagorin, Ways of Lying 153-221 (1990);
106. Sissela Bok, Lying 35-37 (1978).
107. Julie C. Suk, Are Gender Stereotypes Bad for Women? Rethinking Antidiscrimination Law and Work-Family Conflict, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1, 8-9 (2010)
108. Robin R. Runge, Redefining Leave from Work, 19 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 445 (2012)
109. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Egalitarianism, Choice-Sensitivity, and Accommodation, in Reason and Value: Themes from the Work of Joseph Raz 270 (Philip Pettit et al. eds. 2004).
110. C. Edwin Baker, Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech 32-34 (1992);
111. David Strauss, Persuasion, Autonomy and Freedom of Expression, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 334, 335, 365-68 (1991)
112. Jonathan D. Varat, Deception and the First Amendment: A Central, Complex, and Somewhat Curious Relationship, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 1107, 1115 (2007).
113. David A. Hyman & Charles Silver, Medical Malpractice Litigation and Tort Reform: It's the Incentives, Stupid, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1085, 1089, 1091-92 (2006)
114. John C. P. Goldberg, What Are We Reforming? Tort Theory's Place in Debates Over Malpractice Reform, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1075, 1078 (2006)
115. Tom Baker, Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action, 35 L. & Soc'y Rev. 275, 275-89, 295-301 (2001).
116. Kathryn Zeiler, Charles Silver, Bernard Black, David A. Hyman & William Sage, Physicians' Insurance Limits and Malpractice Payments: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990-2003, 36 J. Legal Stud. S9, S39 (2007).
117. Stephen G. Gilles, The Judgment-Proof Society, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 603, 666-67 (2006).
118. Josh Bowers, Legal Guilt, Normative Innocence, and the Equitable Decision Not to Prosecute, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1655, 1659 (2010)
119. Judith S. Brook, Martin Whiteman & Elinor B. Balka, Parent Drug Use, Parent Personality, and Parenting, 156 J. Genetic Psychol. 137, 146-49 (1995)
120. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971);
121. Amartya Sen, Equality of What?, in 1 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 195 (Sterling M. McMurrin ed., 1980);
122. Ronald Dworkin, What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare, 10 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 185 (1981);
123. Ronald Dworkin, What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources, 10 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 283 (1981);
124. G.A. Cohen, On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, 99 Ethics 906 (1989).
125. Elizabeth Anderson, What is the Point of Equality? 109 Ethics 287 (1999);
126. Jonathan Wolff, Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos, 27 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 97 (1998);
127. Samuel Scheffler, What is Egalitarianism? 31 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 5 (2003).
128. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Autonomy, Beneficence, and the Permanently Demented, in Dworkin and His Critics 195, 202-03 (Justine Burley ed., 2004);
129. Agnieszka Jaworska, Respecting the Margins of Agency: Alzheimer's Patients and the Capacity to Value, 28 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 105, 135-37 (1999).
130. Rachel Barkow, The Ascent of the Administrative State and the Demise of Mercy, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1332 (2008)
131. Gillian Lester, Can Joe the Plumber Support Redistribution? Law, Social Preferences, and Sustainable Policy Design, 64 Tax L. Rev. 313, 315-19 (2011).
132. David Pittinger, Deception in Research: Distinctions and Solutions from the Perspective of Utilitarianism, 12 Ethics & Behavior 117, 134 (2002)
133. Hilke Plassmann et al., Marketing Actions Can Modulate Neural Representations of Experienced Pleasantness, 105 Proc. of the Nat'l Acad. of Sciences 1050 (2008).
134. Collin C. O'Neil and Franklin G. Miller, When Scientists Deceive: Applying the Federal Regulations, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 344 (2009).
135. Meir Dan-Cohen, Harmful Thoughts 247-49 (2002).
136. Daniel Markovits & Alan Schwartz, The Myth of Efficient Breach: New Defenses of the Expectation Interest, 97 Va. L. Rev. 1939, 1954 (2011)
137. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Are Contracts Promises?, in Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law 242, at 247, 251 (Andrei Marmor ed., 2012)
138. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, The Divergence of Contract and Promise, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 708, 747-48 (2007).
139. David A. Hoffman, The Best Puffery Article Ever, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 1395, 1404-06 (2006)
140. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, "Hot News": The Enduring Myth of Property in News, 111 Colum. L. Rev. 419, 444 (2011);
141. Isaac Clarke Pray, Memoirs of James Gordon Bennett and His Times 135 (1855);
142. Henry Alford, Not a Word, New Yorker, Aug. 29, 2005, at 31
143. Mrinal Pande, Check Please, Indian Express (Apr. 9, 2010), http://www.indianexpress.com/news /check-please/602256/
144. John D'Agata & Jim Fingal, The Lifespan of a Fact (2012).
145. Fred Inbau et al., Criminal Interrogation and Confessions 241-68, 293-98, 427-29 (4th ed. 2004)
146. Richard A. Leo, Police Interrogation and Social Control, 3 Soc. & Legal Stud. 93, 106-08 (1994);
147. Richard A. Leo, From Coercion to Deception: The Changing Nature of Police Interrogation in America, 18 Crime L. & Soc. Change 35, 43-47 (1992);
148. Anne M. Coughlin, Interrogation Stories, 95 Va. L. Rev. 1599, 1605-06, 1642-51 (2009).
149. Deborah Young, Unnecessary Evil: Police Lying in Interrogations, 28 Conn. L. Rev. 425, 427-28 (1996)
150. Brandon L. Garrett, The Substance of False Confessions, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1051, 1097-99 (2010)
151. Laurie Magid, Deceptive Police Interrogation Practices: How Far Is Too Far, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 1168, 1190-97 (2001)
152. James Risen, Ex-Spy Alleges Effort to Discredit Bush Critic, N.Y. Times, June 16, 2011, at A1
153. Kent S. Miller & Ray Bellamy, Fine Print, Restrictive Grants, and Academic Freedom, Academe, May-June 2012, at 17
154. Risa L. Lieberwitz, Confronting the Privatization and Commercialization of Academic Research: An Analysis of Social Implications at the Local, National, and Global Levels, 12 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 109 (2005)
155. Judith Jarvis Thomson et al., Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board, Academe, Sept-Oct. 2006, at 95, 95-96, available at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/humansubs.htm;
156. Judith Jarvis Thomson et al., Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors, Regulation of Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board 1-3 (2013), available at http://www.aaup.org/file/IRB-Final-Report.pdf
157. Philip Hamburger, Getting Permission, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 405 (2007);
158. Philip Hamburger, The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards, 2004 Sup. Ct. Rev. 271.
159. Carl H. Coleman et al., The Ethics and Regulation of Research with Human Subjects 3-51 (2005).
160. Judith Areen, Government as Educator: A New Understanding of First Amendment Protection of Academic Freedom and Governance, 97 Geo. L.J. 945, 974-76 (2009);
161. Robert M. O'Neil et al., Protecting an Independent Faculty Voice: Academic Freedom After Garcetti v. Ceballos, Academe, Nov.-Dec. 2009, at 67, 75-78 (2009), available at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/postgarcettireport.htm.
162. Jonathan Moss, If Institutional Review Boards Were Declared Unconstitutional, They Would Have To Be Reinvented, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 801, 804 (2007).
163. Steven H. Shiffrin, The First Amendment, Democracy, And Romance 74-80 (1990).
164. Robert Post, Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management 260 (1995);
165. Robert Post, Recuperating First Amendment Doctrine, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 1249, 1273 (1995)
166. Robert Post, Democracy, Expertise, and Academic Freedom 70, 83-84 (2012).
167. Stanley Milgram, Behavioral Study of Obedience, 67 J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psychol. 371 (1963);
168. Stanley Milgram, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 44-54 (1974).
169. American Psychological Association, 2010 Amendments to the 2002 Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, 65 Am. Psychologist 493 (2010).
170. Franklin G. Miller, John P. Gluck, Jr., & David Wendler, Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research, 18 Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 235, 236-37 (2008).
171. Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann, Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense, 18 Ethics & Behav. 59, 64-67 (2008).
172. Clemens Kirschbaum, Karl-Martin Pirke, & Dirk Hellhammer, The 'Trier Social Stress Test'-A Tool for Investigating Psychobiological Stress Responses in a Laboratory Setting, 28 Neuropsychobiology 76 (1993);
173. Brigitte Kudielka, Dirk Hellhammer, & Clemens Kirschbaum, Ten Years of Research with the Trier Social Stress Test-Revisited, in Social Neuroscience: Integrating Biological and Psychological Explanations of Social Behavior 56, 57 (Eddie Harmon-Jones & Piotr Winkielman eds., 2007).
174. Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann, Deception in Psychological Experiments: Two Misconceptions and a Research Agenda, 71 Soc. Psych. Q. 222, 224 (2008)
175. Elizabeth F. Loftus, Lost in the Mall: Misrepresentations and Misunderstandings, 9 Ethics & Behav. 51, 54-55 (1999);
176. Elizabeth F. Loftus & Jacqueline E. Pickrell, The Formation of False Memories, 25 Psych. Annals 720 (1995).
177. Daniel M. Bernstein, Cara Laney, Erin K. Morris & Elizabeth F. Loftus, False Memories About Food Can Lead to Food Avoidance, 23 Soc. Cognition 11, 26-27 (2005).
178. Bryan Benham, The Ubiquity of Deception and the Ethics of Deceptive Research, 22 Bioethics 147, 153 (2008).
179. Dan Ariely & Michael I. Norton, Psychology and Experimental Economics: A Gap in Abstraction, 16 Current Directions Psych. Sci. 336, 337 (2007).
180. Elizabeth J. Marsh, Michelle L. Meade & Henry L. Roediger III, Learning Facts from Fiction, 49 J. Memory & Language 519, 534-35 (2003)
181. Elizabeth J. Marsh & Lisa K. Fazio, Learning Errors from Fiction: Difficulties in Reducing Reliance on Fictional Stories, 34 Memory & Cognition 1140, 1147-48 (2006)
182. Markus Appel & Tobias Richter, Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time, 10 Media Psych. 113, 127-29 (2007)
183. Leslie K. John et al., Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling, 23 Psych. Sci. 524, 526-27 (2012)
184. Paul Condon, Gaelle Desbordes, Willa Miller & David DeSteno, Meditation Increases Compassionate Responses to Suffering, 24 Psych. Sci. 2125, 2125-26 (2013)