Response of the rumen microbiota of sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed different concentrations of tannin rich plants

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Li, Zhipeng ^a   Wright, André Denis G ^c   Liu, Hanlu ^a   Fan, Zhongyuan ^a   Yang, Fuhe ^a   Zhang, Zhigang ^b   Li, Guangyu ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b KUNMING INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; PROPIONIC ACID; TANNIN; TANNIN DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DIETARY INTAKE; ENTODINIUM LONGINUCLEATUM; EPIDINIUM CAUDATUM; EUDIPLODINIUM MAGGII; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL COMMUNITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; LONGINUCLEATUM; MALE; METHANOBREVIBACTER; METHANOBREVIBACTER MILLERAE; METHANOBREVIBACTER RUMINANTIUM; METHANOBREVIBACTER THAUERI; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; METHANOPLASMATALES; METHANOSPHAERA STADTMANAE; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PIROMYCES; PLANT LEAF; PREVOTELLA; PROTOZOON; PSEUDOBUTYRIVIBRIO; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SIKA DEER; SPECIES DOMINANCE; TREPONEMA; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CILIATE; DEER; FUNGUS; INTESTINE FLORA; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; RUMEN;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CILIOPHORA; DEER; FUNGI; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; MALE; RUMEN; TANNINS;

EID: 84957584214     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123481     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. McSweeney CS, Palmer B, McNeill DM, Krause DO. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2001; 91(1-2): 83-93.
2. Cieslak A, Szumacher-Strabel M, Stochmal A, Oleszek W. Plant components with specific activities against rumen methanogens. animal. 2013; 7(Supplements2): 253-65.
3. Jayanegara A, Leiber F, Kreuzer M. Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012; 96(3): 365-75.
4. Min BR, Barry TN, Attwood GT, McNabb WC. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2003; 106(1-4): 3-19.
5. Russell JB, Rychlik JL. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science. 2001; 292(5519): 1119-22. PMID: 11352069.
6. Tan HY, Sieo CC, Abdullah N, Liang JB, Huang XD, Ho YW. Effects of condensed tannins from Leucaena on methane production, rumen fermentation and populations of methanogens and protozoa in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011; 169(3-4): 185-93.
7. Ross EM, Moate PJ, Marett L, Cocks BG, Hayes BJ. Investigating the effect of two methane-mitigating diets on the rumen microbiome using massively parallel sequencing. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96(9): 6030-46. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6766 PMID: 23871375.
8. Carberry CA, Kenny DA, Han S, McCabe MS, Waters SM. Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78(14): 4949-58. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07759-11 PMID: 22562991.
9. Kittelmann S, Seedorf H, Walters WA, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gordon JI, et al. Simultaneous amplicon sequencing to explore co-occurrence patterns of bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic microorganisms in rumen microbial communities. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(2): e47879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047879 PMID: 23408926.
10. Li ZP, Wright ADG, Liu HL, Bao K, Zhang TT, Wang KY, et al. Bacterial community composition and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed three different diets. Microb Ecol. 2015; 69(2): 307-318. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0497-z PMID: 25252928.
11. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E GM, editor. Nucleic acid techniques in bacteria systematics. New York: Wiley Press; 1991. p. 115-75.
12. Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VPW, Palmer JD. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999; 46(4): 327-38. PMID: 10461381.
13. Wright ADG, Pimm C. Improved strategy for presumptive identification of methanogens using 16S riboprinting. J Microbiol Methods. 2003; 55(2): 337-49. PMID: 14529955.
14. Ishaq SL, Wright ADG. Design and validation of four new primers for next-generation sequencing to target the 18S rRNA genes of gastrointestinal ciliate protozoa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80(17): 5515-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01644-14 PMID: 24973070.
15. Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: An in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10(1): 189.
16. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Meth. 2010; 7(5): 335-6.
17. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(19): 2460-1. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 PMID: 20709691.
18. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimerachecked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(7): 5069-72. PMID: 16820507.
19. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Database issue): D590-6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 PMID: 23193283.
20. Abarenkov K, Henrik Nilsson R, Larsson K-H, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi-recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol. 2010; 186(2): 281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x PMID: 20409185.
21. Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011; 21(3): 494-504. doi: 10.1101/gr.112730.110 PMID: 21212162.
22. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(17): 3389-402. PMID: 9254694.
23. Zhang ZG, Geng JW, Tang Xd, Fan H, Xu JC, Wen XJ, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and co-occurrence patterns of human mucosal-associated intestinal microbiota. ISME J. 2014; 8(4): 881-93. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.185 PMID: 24132077.
24. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(3): 431-2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675 PMID: 21149340.
25. GOOD IJ. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika. 1953; 40(3-4): 237-64.
26. Ishaq SL, Wright ADG. High-throughput DNA sequencing of the ruminal bacteria from Moose (Alces alces) in Vermont, Alaska, and Norway. Microb Ecol. 2014; 68(2): 185-95. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014- 0399-0 PMID: 24595908.
27. Gruninger RJ, Sensen CW, McAllister TA, Forster RJ. Diversity of rumen bacteria in Canadian cervids. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(2): e89682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089682 PMID: 24586961.
28. Li ZP, Liu HL, Li GY, Bao K, Wang KY, Xu C, et al. Molecular diversity of rumen bacterial communities from tannin-rich and fiber-rich forage fed domestic Sika deer (Cervus nippon) in China. BMC Microbiol. 2013; 13(1): 151.
29. Sundset MA, Praesteng KE, Cann IK, Mathiesen SD, Mackie RI. Novel rumen bacterial diversity in two geographically separated sub-species of reindeer. Microb Ecol. 2007; 54(3): 424-38. PMID: 17473904.
30. Bekele AZ, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Genetic diversity and diet specificity of ruminal Prevotella revealed by 16S rRNA gene-based analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010; 305(1): 49-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1574- 6968.2010.01911.x PMID: 20158525.
31. Schnorr SL, Candela M, Rampelli S, Centanni M, Consolandi C, Basaglia G, et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat Commun. 2014; 5. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4654.
32. Min BR, Attwood GT, McNabb WC, Molan AL, Barry TN. The effect of condensed tannins from Lotus corniculatus on the proteolytic activities and growth of rumen bacteria. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2005; 121(1-2): 45-58.
33. Reichardt N, Duncan SH, Young P, Belenguer A, McWilliam Leitch C, Scott KP, et al. Phylogenetic distribution of three pathways for propionate production within the human gut microbiota. ISME J. 2014; 8(6): 1323-35. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.14 PMID: 24553467.
34. Min BR, Solaiman S, Shange R, Eun JS. Gastrointestinal bacterial and methanogenic archaea diversity dynamics associated with condensed tannin-containing pine bark diet in goats using 16S rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing. International Journal of Microbiology. 2014; 2014: 11. doi: 10.1155/2014/141909.
35. Tymensen LD, Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA. Structures of free-living and protozoa-associated methanogen communities in the bovine rumen differ according to comparative analysis of 16S rRNA and mcrA genes. Microbiology. 2012; 158(Pt 7): 1808-17. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.057984-0 PMID: 22539164.
36. Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K. In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. J Sci Food Agric. 1995; 69(4): 481-93.
37. Eadie JM. Inter-relationships between certain rumen ciliate protozoa. J Gen Microbiol. 1962; 29(4): 579-88.
38. Dehority BA, Demarais S, Osborn DA. Rumen ciliates of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), axis deer (Axis axis), sika deer (Cervus nippon) and fallow deer (Dama dama) from Texas. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999; 46(2): 125-31. PMID: 10361734.
39. Kang DW, Park JG, Ilhan ZE, Wallstrom G, Labaer J, Adams JB, et al. Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(7): e68322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068322 PMID: 23844187.
40. Mao SY, Zhang RY, Wang DS, Zhu WY. The diversity of the fecal bacterial community and its relationship with the concentration of volatile fatty acids in the feces during subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows. BMC Vet Res. 2012; 8(237). doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-237 PMID: 23217205.
41. de Oliveira MNV, Jewell KA, Freitas FS, Benjamin LA, Tótola MR, Borges AC, et al. Characterizing the microbiota across the gastrointestinal tract of a Brazilian Nelore steer. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 164(3-4): 307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.008 PMID: 23570865.
42. Williams AG, Coleman GS. The Rumen Protozoa. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
43. Michalowski T, Belzecki G, Kwiatkowska E, Pajak JJ. The effect of selected rumen fauna on fibrolytic enzyme activities, bacterial mass, fibre disappearance and fermentation pattern in sheep. J Anim Feed Sci. 2003; 12(1): 45-64.
44. Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev. 1990; 70(2): 567-90. PMID: 2181501.
45. Poulsen M, Schwab C, Jensen BB, Engberg RM, Spang A, Canibe N, et al. Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nat Commun. 2013; 4: 1428. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2432 PMID: 23385573.
46. Leadbetter JR, Schmidt TM, Graber JR, Breznak JA. Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 by spirochetes from termite guts. Science. 1999; 283(5402): 686-9. PMID: 9924028.
47. King EE, Smith RP, St-Pierre B, Wright ADG. Differences in the rumen methanogen populations of lactating Jersey and Holstein dairy cows under the same diet regimen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(16): 5682-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05130-11 PMID: 21705541.
48. Danielsson R, Schnurer A, Arthurson V, Bertilsson J. Methanogenic population and CH4 production in swedish dairy cows fed different levels of forage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78(17): 6172-9. doi: 10. 1128/AEM.00675-12 PMID: 22752163.
49. Miller TL, Lin C. Description of Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52(3): 819-22. PMID: 12054244.
50. Rea S, Bowman JP, Popovski S, Pimm C, Wright ADG. Methanobrevibacter millerae sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter olleyae sp. nov., methanogens from the ovine and bovine rumen that can utilize formate for growth. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57(3): 450-6. PMID: 17329767.
51. Samuel BS, Hansen EE, Manchester JK, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Fulton R, et al. Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104(25): 10643-8. PMID: 17563350.
52. Leahy SC, Kelly WJ, Altermann E, Ronimus RS, Yeoman CJ, Pacheco DM, et al. The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLOS ONE. 2010; 5(1): e8926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0008926 PMID: 20126622.
53. Paul SS, Deb SM, Punia BS, Singh D, Kumar R. Fibrolytic potential of anaerobic fungi (Piromyces sp.) isolated from wild cattle and blue bulls in pure culture and effect of their addition on in vitro fermentation of wheat straw and methane emission by rumen fluid of buffaloes. J Sci Food Agric. 2010; 90(7): 1218-26. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3952 PMID: 20394004.