Methanogenic population and CH4 production in swedish dairy cows fed different levels of forage

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 6172-6179

  Danielsson, R ^a   Schnurer A ^a   Arthurson, V ^a   Bertilsson, J ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

16S RRNA GENE LIBRARIES; ACID CONTENT; DAIRY COW; DRY MATTERS; METHANE PRODUCTION; METHANOGENIC COMMUNITY; MOLAR PROPORTIONS; PROPIONIC ACIDS; Q-RT-PCR; QUANTITATIVE REAL TIME PCR; TERMINAL RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS;

ACETIC ACID; METHANE; METHANOGENS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

NUTRITION;

METHANE; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 16S;

ACETIC ACID; CATTLE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DAIRY FARMING; FATTY ACID; FORAGE; METHANE; METHANOGENESIS; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM; REAL TIME;

ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; BIOTA; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DIET; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RUMINANT STOMACH; SWEDEN;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BIOTA; CATTLE; DIET; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; METHANE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOBREVIBACTER; METHANOBREVIBACTER RUMINANTIUM; METHANOBREVIBACTER SMITHII; METHANOBREVIBACTER THAUERI;

EID: 84866174359     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00675-12     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson R, Bång M, Frid G, Paulsson R. 2010. Minskade växtnäringsförluster och växthusgasutsläpp till 2016 -förslag till handlingsprogram för jordbruket. Rapport 2010:10. Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, Sweden.
2. Andersson R, Hedlund B. 1983. HPLC analysis of organic acids in lactic acid fermented vegetables. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 176:440-443.
3. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O'Mara F, McAllister TA. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48:21-27.
4. Beever DE, et al. 1989. The effect of concentrate type on energy utilization in lactating cows. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Energy Metabolism. EAAP publication no. 43:33. European Federation of Animal Science, Rome, Italy.
5. Chamberlain D, Thomas P, Anderson FJ. 1983. Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen in sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. J. Agric. Sci. 101:47-58.
6. Emanuelson M, Cederberg C, Bertilsson J, Rietz H. 2006. Närodlat foder till mjölkkor-en kunskapsuppdatering. Rapport 7059-P. Swedish Dairy Association, Stockholm, Sweden.
7. European Commission Regulation. 2008. No 889/2008 of the 5 September 2008. Laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Official Journal of the European Union 18.9.2008. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
8. Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Strid I. 2008. LCA-databas för konventionella fodermedel-miljöpåverkan i samband med produktion. Rapport 772. SIK, the Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
9. Good IJ. 1953. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika. 40:237-264.
10. Hegarty R. 1999. Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50:1321-1328.
11. Hook SE, Northwood KS, Wright ADG, McBride BW. 2009. Long-term monensin supplementation does not significantly affect the quantity or diversity of methanogens in the rumen of the lactating dairy cow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:374-380.
12. Hook SE, Steele MA, Northwood KS, Wright ADG, McBride BW. 2011. Impact of high-concentrate feeding and low ruminal pH on methanogens and protozoa in the rumen of dairy cows. Microb. Ecol. 62:94-105.
13. Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW. 2010. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea. 2010:1-11.
14. Huber T, Faulkner G, Hugenholtz P. 2004. Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 20:2317-2319.
15. Huhtanen P. 1998. Supply of nutrients and productive responses in dairy cows given diets based on restrictively fermented silage. Agric. Food Sci. Finland. 7:213-250.
16. Jaakkola S, Huhtanen P. 1993. The effects of forage preservation method and proportion of concentrate on nitrogen digestion and rumen fermentation in cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 48:146-154.
17. Janssen PH, Kirs M. 2008. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3619-3625.
18. Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.
19. Johnson K, Johnson D. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483-2492.
20. Jouany JP, Demeyer DL, Grain J. 1988. Effect of defaunting the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 21:229-265.
21. Kaiser HF. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 23:187-200.
22. King EE, Smith RP, St-Pierre B, Wright ADG. 2011. Differences in the rumen methanogen populations of lactating Jersey and Holstein dairy cows under the same diet regimen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5682-5687.
23. Kumar S, et al. 2009. Factors affecting rumen methanogens and methane mitigation strategies. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25:1557-1566.
24. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
25. Martinez E, et al. 2010. Between animal variance in ruminal bacteria and protozoal communities from DGGE profiles of steers on low quality forage diets, 28, p 63. In Proceedings of the 28th Biennial Conference. Australian Society of Animal Production, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
26. McAllister TA, Newbold CJ. 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48:7-13.
27. McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999 PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.
28. Miller DM, McCarthy PT. 2002. Geologic map of the Terrace Mountain West quadrangle, Box Elder County, Utah. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT.
29. Miller TL, Wolin M. 1986. Methanogens in human and animal intestinal tracts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 7:223-229.
30. Moe P, Tyrrell H. 1979. Methane production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 62:1583-1586.
31. Murphy M, Khalili H, Huhtanen P. 1993. The substitution of barley by other carbohydrates in grass silage based diets to dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 41:279-296.
32. Patel M, et al. 2011. Enteric methane emissions from dairy cows fed different proportions of highly digestible grass silage. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 61:128-136.
33. Rea S, Bowman JP, Popovski S, Pimm C, Wright ADG. 2007. Methanobrevibacter millerae sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter olleyae sp. nov., methanogens from the ovine and bovine rumen that can utilize formate for growth. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:450-456.
34. Saengkerdsub S, et al. 2007. Identification and quantification of methanogenic archaea in adult chicken ceca. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:353-356.
35. Spörndly R. 2003. Fodertabeller för idisslare. Rapport 257. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
36. Stewart CS, Flynt HJ, Bryant MP. 1997. The rumen bacteria, p. 10-72. In Hobson PN, Stewart CS (ed), The rumen microbial ecosystem. Blackie Academic and Professional, New York, NY.
37. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1596-1599.
38. Watanabe T, Asakawa S, Nakamura A, Nagaoka K, Kimura M. 2004. DGGE method for analyzing 16S rDNA of methanogenic archaeal community in paddy field soil. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 232:153-163.
39. Weimer P, Waghorn G, Odt C, Mertens D. 1999. Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:122-134.
40. Westerholm M, Müller B, Arthurson V, Schnürer A. 2011. Changes in the acetogenic population in a mesophilic anaerobic digester in response to increasing ammonia concentration. Microbes Environ. 26:347-353.
41. Whitford M, Teather R, Forster R. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen. BMC Microbiol. 1:5. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-1-5.
42. Wright ADG, Auckland CH, Lynn DH. 2007. Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4206-4210.
43. Wright ADG, Klieve AV. 2011. Does the complexity of the rumen microbial ecology preclude methane mitigation? Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166167:248-253.
44. Wright ADG, Ma X, Obispo NE. 2008. Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela. Microb. Ecol. 56:390-394.
45. Wright ADG, Pimm C. 2003. Improved strategy for presumptive identification of methanogens using 16S riboprinting. J. Microbiol. Methods. 55:337-349.
46. Wright ADG, et al. 2004. Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1263-1270.
47. Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S. 2005. Group specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89:670-679.
48. Zhou M, et al. 2011. Relationship between rumen methanogens and methane production in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with a feed enzyme additive. J. Appl. Microbiol. 111:1148-1158.
49. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan. LL. 2009. Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6524-6533.