Spontaneous regression of CIN2 in women aged 18-24 years: A retrospective study of a state-wide population in Western Australia

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 291-298

  Munro, Aime ^a,b,c   Powell, Rhys G ^a,c   Cohen, Paul A ^a,b,d   Bowen, Shirley ^a   Spilsbury, Katrina ^c   O'leary, Peter ^c   Semmens, James B ^c   Codde, Jim ^a   Williams, Vincent ^e   Steel, Nerida ^f   Leung, Yee ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (Australia)

^b St John of God Hospital Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre   (Australia)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cervical abnormality; cervical dysplasia; CIN; pre invasive; squamous; young women

Indexed keywords

ABLATION THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; COUNSELING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL STATUS; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; WART VIRUS; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; BIOPSY; CANCER GRADING; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; DISEASE COURSE; PATHOLOGY; TUMOR REGRESSION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVIX; WATCHFUL WAITING; WESTERN AUSTRALIA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM REGRESSION, SPONTANEOUS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WATCHFUL WAITING; WESTERN AUSTRALIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84957436326     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12835     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Montz FJ,. Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43: 394-409
2. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Lorey T, et al., Five-year risk of CIN 3+ to guide the management of women aged 21 to 24 years. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013; 17: S64-8
3. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Lorey T, et al., Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women with HPV-positive and HPV-negative high-grade Pap results. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013; 17: S50-5
4. National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC]. Screening to prevent cervical cancer: guidelines for the management of women with screen detected abnormalities. Canberra: NHRMC, 2005
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. Cervical screening in Australia 2011-2012. Canberra: AIHW, 2014
6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. Gynaecological cancers in Australia: an overview. Canberra: AIHW, 2012
7. McAllum B, Sykes PH, Sadler L, Macnab H, Simcock BJ, Mekhail AK,. Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: e1-7
8. Moore K, Cofer A, Elliot L, Lanneau G, Walker J, Gold MA,. Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: e1-6
9. Moscicki A, Ma Y, Wibbelsman C, Darragh TM, Powers A, Farhat S, et al., Risk of and risks for regression of cervical intrapethelial neoplasia in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1373-80
10. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM, Solomon D,. Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 18-25
11. Massad SL, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al., 2012 Updated consensus guidelines for the managment of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013; 17: S1-27
12. Moscicki A,. Conservative management of adolescents with abnormal cytology and histology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008; 6: 101-6
13. Baileff A,. Cervical screening: patients' negative attitudes and experiences. Nurs Stand. 2000; 14: 35-7
14. McDonald TW, Neutens JJ, Fischer LM, Jessee D,. Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and treatment on self-esteem and body image. Gynecol Oncol. 1989; 34: 345-9
15. Palmer AG, Tucker S, Warren R, Adams M,. Understanding women's responses to treatment for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993; 32: 101-12
16. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M,. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG. 2007; 114: 70-80
17. Houlard S, Perrotin F, Fourquet F, Marret H, Lansac J, Body G,. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 104: 144-7
18. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E,. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-Analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367: 489-98
19. Inna N, Phianmongkhol Y, Charoenkwan K,. Sexual function after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia. J Sex Med. 2010; 7: 1291-7
20. Serati M, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, Zanirato M, Mauri S, Siesto G, et al., The impact of the loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial lesions on female sexual function. J Sex Med. 2010; 7: 2267-72
21. Brameld KJ, Thomas MA, Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rouse IL,. Validation of linked administrative data on end-stage renal failure: application of record linkage to a clinical base population. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999; 23: 464-7
22. Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rosman DL, Smith MB, Semmens JB, Glasson EJ, et al., A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. Aust Health Rev. 2008; 32: 766-77
23. Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rouse IL, Hobbs MS,. Population-based linkage of health records in Western Australia: development of a health services research linked database. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999; 23: 453-9
24. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia-Data only; 2006 (ABS Cat. No. 2033.0.55.001). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2039.0/ (accessed May 2014)
25. University of Adelaide. ARIA and Accessibility, 2014. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/apmrc/research/projects/category/aria.html [accessed May 2014)
26. Castanon A, Leung VM, Landy R, Lim AW, Sasieni P,. Characteristics and screening history of women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 20-29 years. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109: 35-41
27. Landy R, Birke H, Castanon A, Sasieni P,. Benefits and harms of cervical screening from age 20 years compared with screening from age 25 years. Br J Cancer [Epidemiol]. 2014; 110: 1841-6
28. Sasieni P, Castanon A, Cuzick J,. Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. BMJ. 2009; 339: b2968
29. Shield PW, Finnimore J, Cummings M, Wright GR,. Performance measures for Australian laboratories reporting cervical cytology: a decade of data 1998-2008. Pathology. 2010; 42: 623-8
30. Robertson AJ, Anderson JM, Beck JS, Burnett RA, Howatson SR, Lee FD, et al., Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1989; 42: 231-8
31. Stoler MH, Schiffman H,. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1500-5
32. Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, Dippery S, Gardner S, Kubota J, et al., Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 264-72
33. Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, et al., Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 430-4
34. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al., Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-Analysis. BMJ. 2008; 18: a1284
35. Long S, Leeman L,. Treatment options for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013; 40: 291-316
36. Frederiksen ME, Njor S, Lynge E, Rebolj M,. Psychological effects of diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect. 2015; 91: 248-56
37. Berretta R, Salvatore G, Dall'Asta A,. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone. Dis Markers. 2013; 35: 721-6