Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: Population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 339, Issue 7716, 2009, Pages 328-

  Sasieni, Peter ^a   Castanon, Alejandra ^a   Cuzick, Jack ^a   Snow, John ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENTIAL AREA; SCREENING; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69449097272     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2968     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fiander AN. Cervical screening in young women aged 20-24 years. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008;34:19.
2. Nair MS, Bhandari HM, Nordin AJ. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: east Kent experience. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;27:706-708
3. Rieck GC, Tristram A, Hauke A, Fielder H, Fiander AN. Cervical screening in 20-24-year olds. J Med Screen 2006;13:64-71.
4. Crocetti E, Battisti L, Betta A, Palma PD, Paci E, Piffer S, et al. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007;16:564-567 (Pubitemid 350307508)
5. Herbert A, Holdsworth G, Kubba AA. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:21-25
6. Bano F, Kolhe S, Zamblera D, Jolaoso A, Folayan O, Page L, et al. Cervical screening in under 25s: a high-risk young population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;1389:86-89 (Pubitemid 351893140)
7. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003;89:88-93. (Pubitemid 36897941)
8. IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening. Screening for squamous cervical cancer - the duration of low risk following negative results in cervical cytology test: introduction. IARC Sci Publ 1986;76:15-24.
9. Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S, Iossa A, Paci E, Sasieni P. Lower protection of cytological screening for adenocarcinomas and shorter protection for younger women: the results of a case-control study in Florence. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1784-1786 (Pubitemid 38725653)
10. Yang B, Morrell S, Zuo Y, Roder D, Tracey E, Jelfs P. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:569-576
11. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, et al. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:622-629
12. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-1005
13. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, Moscicki AB, Smith RA, Eyre HJ, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-362 (Pubitemid 35446606)
14. Anttila A, Pukkala E, Soderman B, Kallio M, Nieminen P, Hakama M. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 1999;83:59-65.
15. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, et al. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:677-686 (Pubitemid 40489214)
16. Pettersson F, Bjorkhom E, Naslund I. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. Int J Epidemiol 1985;14:521-527
17. Sigurdsson K, Sigvaldason H. Is it rational to start population-based cervical cancer screening at or soon after age 20? Analysis of time trends in preinvasive and invasive diseases. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:769-774 (Pubitemid 46502905)
18. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay JMH, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents Vol IX. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications, 2007.
19. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical screening programme, England: 2005-2006. Leeds: Information Centre, 2006.
20. Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1095-1101 (Pubitemid 44116919)
21. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch PL, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric Outcome after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489-498 (Pubitemid 43208905)
22. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:309-313 (Pubitemid 46197421)