Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 205, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 478.e1-478.e7

  McAllum, Bree ^a   Sykes, Peter H H ^a,c   Sadler, Lynn ^d,e   MacNab, Helene ^a,c   Simcock, Bryony J ^a,c   Mekhail, Adel K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c CHRISTCHURCH WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^d AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

CIN2; management; young women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMISSION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

EID: 80255139288     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.069     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. National Cervical Screening Programme Who should have cervical smear tests? National screening unit, 2009 http://www.nsu.govt.nz/current-nsu- programmes/1155.asp Accessed Nov. 1, 2009
2. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging National Cervical Screening Program, 2009 http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/ publishing.nsf/Content/cervical-about#overview Accessed Nov. 1, 2009
3. National Cancer Institute Task force announces new cervical cancer screening guidelines: US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), 2003 http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/cervicalscreen Accessed Nov. 1, 2009
4. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes NHS Cervical Screening Programme, 2009 http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/index.html Accessed Nov. 1, 2009
5. K. Syrjanen, V. Kataja, M. Yliskoski, F. Chang, S. Syrjanen, and S. Saarikoski Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda system Obstet Gynecol 79 1992 675 682
6. M.F. Mitchell, G. Tortolero-Luna, and T. Wright Cervical human papillomavirus infection and intraepithelial neoplasia: a review J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 21 1996 17 25
7. K. Moore, A. Cofer, L. Elliott, G. Lanneau, J. Walker, and M.A. Gold Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment and outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 2007 141.e1 141.e6
8. k. Fuchs, S. Weitzen, L. Wu, M.G. Phipps, and L.A. Boardman Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescent and young women J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 20 2007 269 274 (Pubitemid 47375138)
9. M.G. Discacciati, C.A. de Souza, and M.G. d'Otavianno Outcome of expectant Souza CA, management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 155 2011 204 208
10. T.C. Wright, J.T. Cox, L.S. Massad, J. Carlson, L.B. Twiggs, and E.J. Wilkonson 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 2003 295 304 (Pubitemid 36886564)
11. A.B. Moscicki Conservative management of adolescents with abnormal cytology and histology J Natl Compr Canc Netw 6 2008 101 106
12. M. Kyrgiou, G. Koliopoulos, P. Martin-Hirsch, M. Arbyn, W. Prendiville, and E. Paraskevaidis Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 367 2006 489 498 (Pubitemid 43208905)
13. L. Sadler, A. Saftlas, W. Wang, M. Exeter, J. Whittaker, and L. McCowan Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery JAMA 291 2004 2100 2106 (Pubitemid 38580153)
14. S.A. Samson, J.R. Bentley, T.J. Fahey, D.J. McKay, and G.H. Gill The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 325 332 (Pubitemid 40229450)
15. P. Sasieni, A. Castanon, and J. Cuzick Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data BMJ 339 2009 b2968
16. M.R. McCredie, K.J. Sharples, and C. Paul Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 9 2008 425 434
17. A.J. Robertson, J.M. Anderson, and J.S. Beck Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens J Clin Pathol 42 1989 231 238 (Pubitemid 19077263)
18. M.H. Stoler, and H. Schiffman Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study JAMA 285 2001 1500 1505 (Pubitemid 32221899)
19. E.J. Mayeaux, M.B. Harper, F. Abreo, J.B. Pope, and G.S. Phillips A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology J Fam Pract 40 1995 57 62
20. B. Carns, and O. Fadare Papanicolaou test in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a re-evaluation based on cytohistologic non-correlation rates in 356 concurrently obtained samples Int J Clin Exp Pathol 1 2008 285 290
21. O. Kierkegaard, C. Byrjalsen, K.H. Frandsen, K.C. Hansen, and M. Frydenberg Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and colposcopy in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73 1994 648 651 (Pubitemid 24299123)
22. J.C. Gage, V.W. Hanson, and K. Abbey Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy Obstet Gynecol 108 2006 264 272 (Pubitemid 44305665)
23. R.G. Pretorius, W.H. Zhang, and J.L. Belinson Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 2004 430 434 (Pubitemid 39178694)