Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 144-147

  Houlard, Sandra ^a   Perrotin, Franck ^a   Fourquet, Florence ^a   Marret, Henri ^a   Lansac, Jacques ^a   Body, Gilles ^a  

^a CHU BRETONNEAU   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervical stenosis; Laser cone biopsy

Indexed keywords

OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISEASE MARKER; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; STENOSIS; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; WART VIRUS;

EID: 0037057212     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00062-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sigurdsson K. Trends in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in Iceland through 1995: evaluation of targeted age groups and screening intervals. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 78:1999;492.
2. Tabor A., Berget A. Cold knife and laser conization for cervical intaepithelial neoplasia. Obstet. Gynecol. 76:1990;633-635.
3. 2 des conisations laser et des conisations au bistouri froid. A propos de 141 cas. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 17:1988;661-674.
4. Baggish M.S. Laser management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 26:1983;980-995.
5. Larsson G., Gullberg B., Grundsell H. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization. Obstet. Gynecol. 62:1983;213-217.
6. Baldauf J.J., Dreyfus M., Ritter J., Meyer P., Philippe E. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet. Gynecol. 88:1996;933-938.
7. 2 laser excisional conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under local anesthesia. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 72:1993;302-306.
8. Urbaniak K.J., Widjaja A. Endocervical cell retrieval following excisional treatment of CIN: a comparison study between large loop excision of the transformation zone and laser cone excision. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 75:1996;63-67.
9. Wagner A.L. Laser excisional conization in an office environment. J. Gynecol. Surg. 6:1990;47-51.
10. Bostofte E., Berget A., Larsen J.F., Pedersen P.H., Rank F. Conization by carbon dioxide laser or cold knife in the treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 65:1986;199-202.
11. Delmore J., Horbelt D.V., Kallail K.J. Cervical conization: cold knife and laser excision in residency training. Obstet. Gynecol. 79:1992;1016-1019.
12. Mathevet P., Dargent D., Roy M., Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol. Oncol. 54:1994;175-179.
13. Santos C., Galdos R., Alvarez M.et al. One session management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a solution for developing countries. Gynecol. Oncol. 61:1996;11-15.
14. Baggish M.S., Dorsey J.H. Carbon dioxide laser for combination excisional-vaporisation conization. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 151:1985;23-27.
15. Macindoe G.A.J., Robson M.S., Tidy J.A., Mason W.P., Anderson M.C. Laser excision rather than vaporisation: the treatment of choice for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet. Gynecol. 74:1989;165-168.
16. Tchabo J.G., Thomure M.F., Tomai T.P. A comparison of laser and cold knife conization. Int. Surg. 78:1993;131-133.
17. Suh-Burgmann E.J., Whall-Strojwas D., Chang Y., Hundley D., Goodman A. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure. Obstet. Gynecol. 96:2000;657-660.
18. Duggan B.D., Felix J.C., Muderspach L.I.et al. Cold knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 180:1999;276-282.
19. Kristensen G.B., Jensen L.K., Holund B. A randomised trial comparing two methods of cold knife conization with laser conization. Obstet. Gynecol. 76:1990;1009-1013.