Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Fernandes Júnior, Gerardo A ^a   Rosa, Guilherme J M ^b   Valente, Bruno D ^b   Carvalheiro, Roberto ^a   Baldi, Fernando ^a   Garcia, Diogo A ^a   Gordo, Daniel G M ^a   Espigolan, Rafael ^a   Takada, Luciana ^a   Tonussi, Rafael L ^a   De Andrade, Willian B F ^a   Magalhães, Ana F B ^a   Chardulo, Luis A L ^a   Tonhati, Humberto ^a   De Albuquerque, Lucia G ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PASTURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BRAZIL;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOVINAE; HUMAN HERPESVIRUS 4;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINE; BRAZIL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; RED MEAT; SELECTIVE BREEDING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BRAZIL; CATTLE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; RED MEAT; SELECTIVE BREEDING;

EID: 84957434055     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0188-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Carvalheiro R. Genomic selection in Nelore cattle in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 17-22 Aug 2014, Vancouver. 2014. https://asas.org/docs/default-source/wcgalp-proceedings-oral/258-paper-10329-manuscript-1314-0.pdf?sfvrsn=2
2. Hankins O, Howe PE. Estimation of the composition of beef cattle carcasses and cuts. Washington USDA. Tech Bull. 1946;926:1-20.
3. Schefers JM, Weigel KA. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Anim Front. 2012;2:4-9.
4. Van Eenennaam AL, Weigel KA, Young AE, Cleveland MA, Dekkers JCM. Applied animal genomics: results from the field. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2:105-39.
5. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
6. Pryce JE, Arias J, Bowman PJ, Davis SR, Macdonald KA, Waghorn GC, et al. Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:2108-19.
7. Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, et al. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:3088-104.
8. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:433-43.
9. Morota G, Boddhireddy P, Vukasinovic N, Gianola D, Denise S. Kernel-based variance component estimation and whole-genome prediction of pre-corrected phenotypes and progeny tests for dairy cow health traits. Front Genet. 2014;5:56.
10. Neves HR, Carvalheiro R, O'Brien AMP, Utsunomiya YT, do Carmo AS, Schenkel FS, et al. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:17.
11. Rosa GJM, Padovani CR, Gianola D. Robust linear mixed models with normal/independent distributions and Bayesian MCMC implementation. Biometric J. 2003;45:573-90.
12. Gianola D. Priors in whole-genome regression: the Bayesian alphabet returns. Genetics. 2013;194:573-96.
13. Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:55.
14. Guo G, Lund MS, Zhang Y, Su G. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables. J Anim Breed Genet. 2010;127:423-32.
15. Boddhireddy P, Kelly MJ, Northcutt S, Prayaga KC, Rumph J, DeNise S. Genomic predictions in Angus cattle: comparisons of sample size, response variables, and clustering methods for cross-validation. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:485-97.
16. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture. Official United States standards for grades of carcasses beef. Washington: Agricultural Marketing Service; 1997.
17. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
18. De Los Campos G, Hickey JM, Pong-Wong R, Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL. Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics. 2013;193:327-45.
19. Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 19-23 Aug 2002; Montpellier 2002.
20. Pérez P, de los Campos G. Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics. 2014;198:483-95.
21. Rolf MM, Garrick DJ, Fountain T, Ramey HR, Weaber RL, Decker JE, Pollak EJ, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:23-30.
22. Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M. Accelerating Improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2013;1:221-37.
23. González-Recio O, Rosa GJM, Gianola D. Machine learning methods and predictive ability metrics for genome-wide prediction of complex traits. Livest Sci. 2014;166:217-31.
24. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JHJ. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:4.
25. Pérez-Cabal MA, Vazquez AI, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction in a dairy cattle population using different cross-validation layouts. Front Genet. 2012;3:27.
26. Espigolan R, Baldi F, Boligon AA, Souza FRP, Gordo DGM, Tonussi RL, et al. Study of whole genome linkage disequilibrium in Nellore cattle. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:305.
27. Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:56.
28. Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL, Pong-Wong R, de los Campos G, Hickey JM. Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and bench marking. Genetics. 2013;193:347-65.
29. Chen L, Vinsky M, Li C. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Anim Genet. 2015;46:55-9.
30. Garrick D, Dekkers J, Fernando R. The evolution of methodologies for genomic prediction. Livestock Sci. 2014;166:10-8.
31. Weber KL, Thallman RM, Keele JW, Snelling WM, Bennett GL, Smith TPL, et al. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:4177-90.
32. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2011;128:409-21.