Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle

Animal Genetics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 55-59

  Chen, L ^a   Vinsky, M ^b   Li, C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b LACOMBE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bos Taurus; BovineSNP50; carcass traits; genomic prediction

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOS TAURUS;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; BOVINAE; BREEDING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MEAT; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MEAT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84921648816     PISSN: 02689146     EISSN: 13652052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/age.12238     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Browning S.R., &, Browning B.L., (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 1084-97.
2. Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) (1993) Farm animals. In: Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Vol. 1. (Ed. by, E.D. Olfert, B.M. Cross, &, A.A. McWilliams,), pp. 65-78. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.
3. Chen L., Schenkel F., Vinsky M., Crews D.H., &, Li C., (2013) Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4669-78.
4. Clark S.A., Hickey J.M., &, van der Werf J.H.J., (2011) Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 18.
5. Daetwyler H.D., Villanueva B., &, Woolliams J.A., (2008) Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 3, e3395.
6. Daetwyler H.D., Pong-Wong R., Villanueva B., &, Woolliams J.A., (2010) The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185, 1021-31.
7. Daetwyler H., Kemper K., Van der Werf J., &, Hayes B., (2012) Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3375-84.
8. Fernando R.L., &, Garrick D.J., (2008) gensel-User Manual for a Portfolio of Genomic Selection Related Analyses. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. http://bigs.ansci.iastate.edu/bigsgui/login.html.
9. Gilmour A.R., Gogel B.J., Cullis B.R., &, Thompson R., (2009) asreml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK. www.vsni.co.uk.
10. Goddard M., (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245-57.
11. Hayes B., Bowman P., Chamberlain A., Verbyla K., &, Goddard M., (2009a) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 51.
12. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., &, Goddard M.E., (2009b) Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433-43.
13. Hayes B.J., Pryce J., Chamberlain A.J., Bowman P.J., &, Goddard M.E., (2010) Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genetics 6, e1001139.
14. Kachman S.D., Spangler M.L., Bennett G.L., Hanford K.J., Kuehn L.A., Snelling W.M., Thallman R.M., Saatchi M., Garrick D.J., &, Schnabel R.D., (2013) Comparison of molecular breeding values based on within and across-breed training in beef cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 45, 1-9.
15. Kizilkaya K., Fernando R.L., &, Garrick D.J., (2010) Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 88, 544-51.
16. Mao F., Chen L., Vinsky M., Okine E., Wang Z., Basarab J., Crews D.H., &, Li C., (2013) Phenotypic and genetic relationships of feed efficiency with growth performance, ultrasound, and carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais steers. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2067-76.
17. Meuwissen T.H., Hayes B.J., &, Goddard M.E., (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-29.
18. Pryce J.E., Gredler B., Bolormaa S., Bowman P.J., Egger-Danner C., Fuerst C., Emmerling R., Solkner J., Goddard M.E., &, Hayes B.J., (2011) Short communication: genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2625-30.
19. Pszczola M., Strabel T., Mulder H., &, Calus M., (2012) Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 389-400.
20. de Roos A.P.W., Hayes B.J., &, Goddard M.E., (2009) Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 183, 1545-53.
21. Toosi A., Fernando R.L., &, Dekkers J.C.M., (2010) Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. Journal of Animal Science 88, 32-46.
22. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., &, Schenkel F.S., (2009) Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16-24.
23. Weber K.L., Thallman R.M., Keele J.W., Snelling W.M., Bennett G.L., Smith T.P.L., McDaneld T.G., Allan M.F., Van Eenennaam A.L., &, Kuehn L.A., (2012) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4177-90.