The evolution of methodologies for genomic prediction

Livestock Science

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-18

  Garrick, Dorian ^a   Dekkers, Jack ^a   Fernando, Rohan ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian regression; Genomic prediction; Linear models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905588839     PISSN: 18711413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:743-752.
2. Brondum R.F., Su G., Lund M.S., Bowman P.J., Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. Genome position specific priors for genomic prediction. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:543.
3. Erbe M., Hayes B.J., Matukumalli L.K., Goswami S., Bowman P.J., Reich C.M., Mason B.A., Goddard M.E. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:4114-4129.
4. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Pearson Education Ltd., Prentice Hall. 4th edition.
5. Fernando R.L., Garrick D.J. Bayesian methods applied to GWAS. Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction 2013, Springer, Berlin, (Chapter in). C. Gondro, J.H.J. van der Werf, B. Hayes (Eds.).
6. Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M., Garrick D.J. A Bayesian method to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole genome analyses. Genet. Sel. Evol. 46 2014, accepted for publication.
7. Garrick D.J., Fernando R.L. Implementing a QTL detection study (GWAS) using genomic prediction methodology. Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction 2013, Springer, Berlin, (Chapter in). C. Gondro, J.H.J. van der Werf, B. Hayes (Eds.).
8. Garrick, D.J., and M. Saatchi. 2013. Experience in developing breed-specific predictions for GE-EPD. In: Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation 10th Genetic Prediction Workshop, BIF, vol. 10, pp. 24-34.
9. Garrick D.J., Taylor J.F., Fernando R.L. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:55.
10. Gauss, Carl Friedrich (1903), Werke (in German) 9, Göttingen: Köninglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften.
11. Geman S., Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984, 6:721-741.
12. Gianola D., de los Campos G., Hill W.G., Manfredi E., Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 2009, 183(1):347-363.
13. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Kizilkaya K., Garrick D.J. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:186.
14. Hazel L.N. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 1943, 28:476-490.
15. Henderson C.R. A simple way for calculating the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 1976, 32:69-83.
16. Henderson, CR (1984). Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. Guelph, Ont: University of Guelph. ISBN 0-88955-030-1.
17. Henderson C.R., Kempthorne O., Searle S.R., Von Krosigk C.N. Estimation of environmental and genetic trends from records subject to culling. Biometrics 1959, 13:192-218.
18. Hyde, L., W. Shafer, S. McGuire, M. Saatchi, and D. Garrick. 2013. ASA experience with incorporating genomics into genetic evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation 10th Genetic Prediction Workshop, BIF, vol. 10, pp. 10-14.
19. Kizilkaya K., Fernando R.L., Garrick D.J. Genomic prediction of simulated multi-breed and purebred performance using observed 50k SNP genotypes. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:544-551.
20. Legarra A., Aguilar I., Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:4656-4663.
21. MacNeil M.D., Nkrumah J.D., Woodward B.W., Northcutt S.L. Genetic evaluation of Angus cattle for carcass marbling using ultrasound and genomic indicators. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:517-522.
22. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
23. Misztal I., Legarra A., Aguilar I. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:4648-4655.
24. Patterson H.D., Thompson R. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 1971, 62:545-554.
25. Quaas R.L. Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 1976, 32:949-953.
26. Quaas, R.L., and Z.W. Zhang. 2006. Multiple breed genetic evaluation in the US beef cattle context: methodology. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
27. Saatchi M., Schnabel R.D., Rolf M.M., Taylor J.F., Garrick D.J. Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2012, 44:38.
28. Saatchi M., Ward J., Garrick D.J. Impact of genetic relationships on the accuracy of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91:1538-1551.
29. Searle S.R. Linear Models 1976, Wiley, New York.
30. Strandén I., Garrick D.J. Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:2971-2975.
31. Tanner M.A. Tools for Statistical Inference - Methods for the Exploration of Posterior Distributions and Likelihood Functions 1996, Springer, New York.
32. Ugarte E, Alenda R., Carabano M.J. Fixed or random contemporary groups in genetic evaluations. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:269-278.
33. Van Raden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
34. Wiggans G.R., VanRaden P.M., Cooper T.A. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:3202-3211.
35. Wolc A., Stricker C., Arango J., Settar P., Fulton J.E., O'Sullivan N.P., Preisinger R., Habier D., Fernando R., Garrick D.J., Lamont S.J., Dekkers J.C.M. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:5.
36. Wolc A., Arango J., Settar P., Fulton J.E., O'Sullivan N.P., Preisinger R., Habier D., Fernando R., Garrick D.J., Hill W.G., Dekkers J.C.M. Genome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens. Anim. Genet. 2012, 43(1):87-96.
37. Wright S. The methods of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 1934, 5:161-215.
38. Yang W., Tempelman R.J. A Bayesian antedependence model for whole genome prediction. Genetics 2012, 190:1491-1501.