Working with the tree of life in comparative studies: How to build and tailor phylogenies to interspecific datasets

Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and their Application in Evolutionary Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-18

  Garamszegi, László Zsolt ^a   Gonzalez Voyer, Alejandro ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956976063     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Abdo Z, Minin VN, Joyce P, Sullivan J (2005) Accounting for uncertainty in the tree topology has little effect on the decision-theoretic approach to model selection in phylogeny estimation. Mol Biol Evol 22 (3):691-703. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi050
2. Alfaro ME, Huelsenbeck JP (2006) Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty. Syst Biol 55(1):89-96. doi:10.1080/10635150500433565
3. Amcoff M, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Kolm N (2013) Evolution of egg dummies in tanganyikan cichid fishes: the roles of parental care and sexual selection. J Evol Biol 26:2369-2382. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12231
4. Arima S, Tardella L (2012) Improved harmonic mean estimator for phylogenetic model evidence. J Comput Biol 19(4):418-438. doi:10.1089/cmb.2010.0139
5. Arnold C, Matthews LJ, Nunn CL (2010) The 10k Trees website: a new online resource for primate phylogeny. Evol Anthropol 19:114-118
6. Benson DA, al. e (2011) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D32-D37
7. Bininda-Emonds O, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (1999) Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol Rev 74:143-175
8. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, R DEM, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2007) The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446:507-512
9. Blomberg SP, Lefevre JG, Wells JA, Waterhouse M (2012) Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent. Syst Biol 61(3):382-391. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr118
10. Bromham L (2011) The genome as a life-history character: why rate of molecular evolution varies between mammal species. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:2503-2513. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0014
11. Burleigh JG, Bansal MS, Eulenstein O, Hartmann S, Wehe A, Vision TJ (2011) Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 gene trees. Syst Biol 60(2):117-125. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq072
12. Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540-552
13. de Villemereuil P, Wells JA, Edwards RD, Blomberg SP (2012) Bayesian models for comparative analysis integrating phylogenetic uncertainty. BMC Evol Biol 12. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-102
14. Desluc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Rev Genet 6(5):361-375
15. Donoghue MJ, Ackerly DD (1996) Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Phil Trans R Soc B 351:1241-2149
16. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G (1998) Biological sequence analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Ewens WJ, Grant GR (2010) Statistical methods in bioinformatics: an introduction. Springer Science and Business Media, New York
18. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125(1):1-15
19. Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates
20. FitzJohn RG, Maddison WP, Otto SP (2009a) Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst Biol 58(6):595-611. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp067
21. FitzJohn RG, Maddison WP, Otto SP (2009b) Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst Biol 58:595-611
22. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160(6):712-726. doi:10.1086/343873
23. Galtier N, Jobson RW, Nabholz B, Glemin S, Blier PU (2009) Mitochondrial whims: metabolic rate, longevity and the rate of molecular evolution. Biol Lett 5 (3):413-416. doi:rsbl.2008.0662 [pii] 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0662
24. Gonzalez-Voyer A, Fitzpatrick JL, Kolm N (2008) Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62 (8):2015-2026. doi:EVO426 [pii] 10.1111/j. 1558-5646.2008.00426.x
25. Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Phil Trans R Soc B 326(1223):119-157
26. Hall BG (2004) Phylogenetic trees made easy: a how-to manual. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland
27. Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51(5):1341-1351
28. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Hastings WK (1970) Monte carlo sampling methods using markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1):97-109. doi:10.2307/2334940
30. Higgins D, Lemey P (2009) Multiple sequence alignment. In: Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M (eds) The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 68-96
31. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314
32. Ives AR, Midford PE, Garland T (2007) Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst Biol 56(2):252-270. doi:10.1080/10635150701313830
33. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012a) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491(7424):444-448. doi:10.1038/nature11631
34. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012b) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444-448. doi:10.1038/nature11631
35. Kälersjö M, Albert VA, Farris JS (1999) Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15(1):91-93. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00400.x
36. Kalinowski ST (2009) How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships among populations? Heredity 102:506-513. doi:10.1038/hdy.2008.136
37. Leclerc MC, Hugot JP, Durand P, Renaud F (2004) Evolutionary relationships between 15 Plasmodium species from new and old World primates (including humans): an 18S rDNA cladistic analysis. Parasitology 129:677-684
38. Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M (eds) (2009) The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
39. Linder CR, Warnow T (2006) An overview of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Aluru S (ed) Handbook of computational molecular biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC Computer & Information Science, Boca Raton, FL
40. Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae. 10th edn., Stockholm
41. Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149(4):646-667
42. Martins EP, Housworth EA (2002) Phylogeny shape and the phylogenetic comparative method. Syst Biol 51(6):873-880. doi:10.1080/10635150290155863
43. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087-1092
44. Minin V, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Sullivan J (2003) Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst Biol 52 (5):674-683. doi:10.1080/10635150390235494
45. Moriyama EN, Powell JR (1997) Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 45:378-391
46. Morlon H, Parsons TL, Plotkin JB (2011) Reconciling molecular phylogenies with the fossil record. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(39):16327-16332. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102543108
47. Nakhleh L (2013) Computational approaches to species phylogeny inference and gene tree reconciliation. Trends Ecol Evol 28(12):719-728. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.004
48. Nei M, Kumar N (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
49. Page RDM, Holmes EC (1998) Molecular evolution: a phylogenetic approach. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
50. Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884
51. Pagel M, Meade A (2006) Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am Nat 167(6):808-825
52. Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D (2004a) Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst Biol 53(3):673-684. doi:10.1080/10635150490522232
53. Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D (2004b) Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst Biol 53(5):673-684
54. Paradis E (2011) Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
55. Posada D, Buckley TR (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53(5):793-808. doi:10.1080/10635150490522304
56. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. doi:http://www.R-project.orgS
57. Revell LJ, Reynolds RG (2012) A new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation. Evolution 66(9):2697-2707. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01645.x
58. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574
59. Roquet C, Thuiller W, Lavergne S (2013) Building megaphylogenies for macroecology: taking up the challenge. Ecography 36:13-26. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07773.x
60. Rzhetsky A, Nei M (1992) A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 9:945-967
61. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406-425
62. Sanderson MJ (1997) A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol Biol Evol 14(12):1218-1231
63. Santos JC (2012) Fast molecular evolution associated with high active metabolic rates in poison frogs. Mol Biol Evol 29(8):2001-2018
64. Santos-Gally R, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Arroyo J (2013) Deconstructing heterostyly: the evolutionary role of incompatibility system, pollinators, and floral architecture. Evolution 67(7):2072-2082
65. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven
66. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22 (21):2688-2690. btl446 [pii] doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
67. Stone GN, Nee S, Felsenstein J (2011) Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species. Phil Trans R Soc B 366(1569):1410-1424. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0311
68. Symonds MRE (2002) The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts. Syst Biol 51:541-553
69. Thomas GH, Hartmann K, Jetz W, Joy JB, Mimoto A, Mooers AO (2013) PASTIS: an R package to facilitate phylogenetic assembly with soft taxonomic inferences. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1011-1017. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12117
70. Wolfe KH, Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) Rates of synonymous substitution in plant nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 29:208-211
71. Wu D, Jospin G, Eisen J (2013) Systematic identification of gene families for use as “markers” for phylogenetic and phylogeny-driven ecological studies of bacteria and archaea and their major subgroups. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077033
72. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. University of Texas at Austin, Austin