Mismatch repair and homeologous recombination

DNA Repair

Volumn 38, Issue , 2016, Pages 75-83

  Tham, Khek Chian ^a   Kanaar, Roland ^a   Lebbink, Joyce H G ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Antirecombination; Heteroduplex rejection; Homeologous recombination; Homologous recombination; Mismatch repair

Indexed keywords

HETERODUPLEX;

DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA SEQUENCE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MISMATCH REPAIR; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA REPLICATION; HUMAN;

ANIMALS; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEIC ACID HETERODUPLEXES;

EID: 84956693666     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.010     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Iyer R.R., et al. DNA mismatch repair: functions and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106(2):302-323.
2. Jiricny J. Postreplicative mismatch repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5(4):a012633.
3. Kunkel T.A., Erie D.A. Eukaryotic mismatch repair in relation to DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2015, 49:291-313.
4. Manhart C.M., Alani E. Roles for mismatch repair proteins in promoting meiotic crossing over. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
5. Groothuizen F.S., Sixma T.K. The conserved molecular machinery in DNA mismatch repair enzyme structures. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
6. Hingorani M.M. Mismatch binding, ADP-ATP exchange and intramolecular signaling during mismatch repair. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
7. Friedhoff P., Li P., Gotthardt J. Protein-protein interactions in DNA mismatch repair. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
8. Putnam C.D. Evolution of the methyl directed mismatch repair system in E. coli. DNA Repair (Amst) 2016, (in this issue).
9. Kadyrova L.Y., Kadyrov F.A. Endonuclease activities of MutLα and its homologs in DNA mismatch repair. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
10. Lin Z., et al. Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103(27):10328-10333.
11. Ogawa T., et al. RecA-like recombination proteins in eukaryotes: functions and structures of RAD51 genes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1993, 58:567-576.
12. Yang S., et al. Archaeal RadA protein binds DNA as both helical filaments and octameric rings. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 314(5):1077-1085.
13. Lopes A., et al. Detection of novel recombinases in bacteriophage genomes unveils Rad52: Rad51 and Gp2. 5 remote homologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38(12):3952-3962.
14. Takata M., et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 1998, 17(18):5497-5508.
15. Spies M. K.S Homologous Recombination by the RecBCD and RecF Pathways, in The Bacterial Chromosome 2005, ASM Press, Washington DC.
16. Heyer W.D. Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7(8).
17. Kanaar R., Wyman C., Rothstein R. Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing. EMBO J. 2008, 27(4):581-588.
18. George C.M., Alani E. Multiple cellular mechanisms prevent chromosomal rearrangements involving repetitive DNA. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012, 47(3):297-313.
19. Surtees J.A., Argueso J.L., Alani E. Mismatch repair proteins: key regulators of genetic recombination. Cytogenet. Genome. Res. 2004, 107(3-4):146-159.
20. Kolodner R.D. A personal historical view of DNA mismatch repair with an emphasis on eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2016.
21. Sugawara N., et al. Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not pms1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(25):9315-9320.
22. Rayssiguier C., Dohet C., Radman M. Interspecific recombination between E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium occurs by the RecABCD pathway. Biochimie 1991, 73(4):371-374.
23. Zahrt T.C., Mora G.C., Maloy S. Inactivation of mismatch repair overcomes the barrier to transduction between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176(5):1527-1529.
24. Zahrt T.C., Maloy S. Barriers to recombination between closely related bacteria: MutS and RecBCD inhibit recombination between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94(18):9786-9791.
25. Majewski J., et al. Barriers to genetic exchange between bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae transformation. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182(4):1016-1023.
26. Calmann M.A., Marinus M.G. MutS inhibits RecA-mediated strand exchange with platinated DNA substrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(39):14174-14179.
27. Calmann M.A., Evans J.E., Marinus M.G. MutS inhibits RecA-mediated strand transfer with methylated DNA substrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33(11):3591-3597.
28. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D.S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 1989, 342(6248):396-401.
29. Matic I., Radman M., Rayssiguier C. Structure of recombinants from conjugational crosses between E. coli donor and mismatch-repair deficient Salmonella typhimurium recipients. Genetics 1994, 136(1):17-26.
30. Stambuk S., Radman M. Mechanism and control of interspecies recombination in E. coli I. Mismatch repair, methylation, recombination and replication functions. Genetics 1998, 150(2):533-542.
31. Junop M.S., et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of MutS, MutL and MutH mutants: correlation of mismatch repair and DNA recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003, 2(4):387-405.
32. Calmann M.A., Nowosielska A., Marinus M.G. The MutS C terminus is essential for mismatch repair activity in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187(18):6577-6579.
33. Calmann M.A., Nowosielska A., Marinus M.G. Separation of mutation avoidance and antirecombination functions in an E. coli mutS mutant. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33(4):1193-1200.
34. Elez M., Radman M., Matic I. The frequency and structure of recombinant products is determined by the cellular level of MutL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(21):8935-8940.
35. Bailis A.M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics 1990, 126(3):535-547.
36. Selva E.M., et al. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1995, 139(3):1175-1188.
37. Selva E.M., Maderazo A.B., Lahue R.S. Differential effects of the mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MSH3 on homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997, 257(1):71-82.
38. Datta A., et al. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16(3):1085-1093.
39. Nicholson A., et al. Regulation of mitotic homeologous recombination in yeast: functions of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair genes. Genetics 2000, 154(1):133-146.
40. Myung K., et al. SGS1: the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27(1):113-116.
41. Datta A., et al. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94(18):9757-9762.
42. Chen W. Mismatch repair proteins regulate heteroduplex formation during mitotic recombination in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998, 18(11):6525-6537.
43. Chen W., Jinks-Robertson S. The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics 1999, 151(4):1299-1313.
44. Welz-Voegele C., Jinks-Robertson S. Sequence divergence impedes crossover more than noncrossover events during mitotic gap repair in yeast. Genetics 2008, 179(3):1251-1262.
45. Mitchel K., et al. Molecular structures of crossover and noncrossover intermediates during gap repair in yeast: implications for recombination. Mol. Cell 2010, 38(2):211-222.
46. Welz-Voegele C., et al. Alleles of the yeast Pms1 mismatch-repair gene that differentially affect recombination- and replication-related processes. Genetics 2002, 162(3):1131-1145.
47. Umar A., et al. Requirement for PCNA in DNA mismatch repair at a step preceding DNA resynthesis. Cell 1996, 87(1):65-73.
48. 6 interact to form an active mispair recognition complex. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26(3):375-378.
49. Hombauer H., et al. Visualization of eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair reveals distinct recognition and repair intermediates. Cell 2011, 147(5):1040-1053.
50. Stone J.E., et al. Role of proliferating cell nuclear antigen interactions in the mismatch repair-dependent processing of mitotic and meiotic recombination intermediates in yeast. Genetics 2008, 178(3):1221-1236.
51. Hombauer H., et al. Mismatch repair, but not heteroduplex rejection, is temporally coupled to DNA replication. Science 2011, 334(6063):1713-1716.
52. Schmidt T.T., Hombauer H. Visualization of mismatch repair complexes using fluorescence microscopy. DNA Repair 2016, (in this issue).
53. 2 single and compound mutations. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 20(1):149-157.
54. Erdeniz N., et al. Mutations affecting a putative MutLalpha endonuclease motif impact multiple mismatch repair functions. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007, 6(10):1463-1470.
55. Spell R.M., Jinks-Robertson S. Examination of the roles of Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases in the enforcement of recombination fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004, 168(4):1855-1865.
56. Mitchel K., Lehner K., Jinks-Robertson S. Heteroduplex DNA position defines the roles of the Sgs1, Srs2, and Mph1 helicases in promoting distinct recombination outcomes. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9(3):e1003340.
57. Chiolo I., et al. Srs2 and Sgs1 DNA helicases associate with Mre11 in different subcomplexes following checkpoint activation and CDK1-mediated Srs2 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25(13):5738-5751.
58. Veaute X., et al. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 2003, 423(6937):309-312.
59. Veaute X., et al. UvrD helicase, unlike Rep helicase, dismantles RecA nucleoprotein filaments in E. coli. EMBO J. 2005, 24(1):180-189.
60. Krejci L., et al. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 2003, 423(6937):305-309.
61. Putnam C.D.H.T., Kolodner R.D. Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. Nature 2009, 460(7258):984-989.
62. Waldman A.S., Liskay R.M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987, 84(15):5340-5344.
63. Waldman A.S., Liskay R.M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol. Cell Biol. 1988, 8(12):5350-5357.
64. te Riele H., Maandag E.R., Berns A. Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89(11):5128-5132.
65. Deng C., Capecchi M.R. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol. Cell Biol. 1992, 12(8):3365-3371.
66. Nassif N., Engels W. DNA homology requirements for mitotic gap repair in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993, 90(4):1262-1266.
67. Belmaaza A., et al. Interference of DNA sequence divergence with precise recombinational DNA repair in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 1994, 13(22):5355-5360.
68. de Wind N., et al. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell 1995, 82(2):321-330.
69. de Wind N., et al. HNPCC-like cancer predisposition in mice through simultaneous loss of Msh3 and Msh6 mismatch-repair protein functions. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23(3):359-362.
70. Pedrazzi G., et al. The Bloom's syndrome helicase interacts directly with the human DNA mismatch repair protein hMSH6. Biol. Chem. 2003, 384(8):1155-1164.
71. Yang Q., et al. The mismatch DNA repair heterodimer, hMSH2/6, regulates BLM helicase. Oncogene 2004, 23(21):3749-3756.
72. Larocque J.R., Jasin M. Mechanisms of recombination between diverged sequences in wild-type and BLM-deficient mouse and human cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 30(8):1887-1897.
73. Traver S., et al. MCM9 is required for mammalian DNA mismatch repair. Mol. Cell 2015, 59(5):831-839.
74. Stasiak A., Egelman E.H. Structure and function of RecA-DNA complexes. Experientia 1994, 50(3):192-203.
75. Chen Z., Yang H., Pavletich N.P. Mechanism of homologous recombination from the RecA-ssDNA/dsDNA structures. Nature 2008, 453(7194):4-489.
76. Flory J., Tsang S.S., Muniyappa K. Isolation and visualization of active presynaptic filaments of recA protein and single-stranded DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1984, 81(22):7026-7030.
77. Egelman E.H., Stasiak A. Structure of helical RecA-DNA complexes. Complexes formed in the presence of ATP-gamma-S or ATP. J. Mol. Biol. 1986, 191(4):677-697.
78. Heuser J., Griffith J. Visualization of RecA protein and its complexes with DNA by quick-freeze/deep-etch electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 210(3):473-484.
79. Yu X., Egelman E.H. Structural data suggest that the active and inactive forms of the RecA filament are not simply interconvertible. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 227(1):334-346.
80. van Loenhout M.T., et al. Dynamics of RecA filaments on single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37(12):4089-4099.
81. Menetski J.P., Kowalczykowski S.C. Interaction of recA protein with single-stranded DNA. Quantitative aspects of binding affinity modulation by nucleotide cofactors. J. Mol. Biol. 1985, 181(2):281-295.
82. Mazin A.V., Kowalczykowski S.C. The specificity of the secondary DNA binding site of RecA protein defines its role in DNA strand exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93(20):10673-10678.
83. Bazemore L.R., et al. RecA tests homology at both pairing and strand exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94(22):11863-11868.
84. Folta-Stogniew E., et al. Exchange of DNA base pairs that coincides with recognition of homology promoted by E. Coli RecA protein. Mol. Cell 2004, 15(6):965-975.
85. Christiansen G., Griffith J. Visualization of the paranemic joining of homologous DNA molecules catalyzed by the RecA protein of E. coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986, 83(7):2066-2070.
86. Ragunathan K., Joo C., Ha T. Real-time observation of strand exchange reaction with high spatiotemporal resolution. Structure 2011, 19(8):1064-1073.
87. Howard-Flanders P., West S.C., Stasiak A. Role of RecA protein spiral filaments in genetic recombination. Nature 1984, 309(5965):215-220.
88. Register J.C., Christiansen G., Griffith J. Electron microscopic visualization of the RecA protein-mediated pairing and branch migration phases of DNA strand exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262(26):12812-12820.
89. Honigberg S.M., Radding C.M. The mechanics of winding and unwinding helices in recombination: torsional stress associated with strand transfer promoted by RecA protein. Cell 1988, 54(4):525-532.
90. West S.C. Enzymes and molecular mechanisms of genetic recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1992, 61:603-640.
91. Bianchi M., DasGupta C., Radding C.M. Synapsis and the formation of paranemic joints by E. coli RecA protein. Cell 1983, 34(3):931-939.
92. Menetski J.P., Bear D.G., Kowalczykowski S.C. Stable DNA heteroduplex formation catalyzed by the E. coli RecA protein in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990, 87(1):21-25.
93. Rosselli W., Stasiak A. Energetics of RecA-mediated recombination reactions. Without ATP hydrolysis RecA can mediate polar strand exchange but is unable to recycle. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 216(2):335-352.
94. Kowalczykowski S.C., Krupp R.A. DNA-strand exchange promoted by RecA protein in the absence of ATP: implications for the mechanism of energy transduction in protein-promoted nucleic acid transactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92(8):3478-3482.
95. Rehrauer W.M., Kowalczykowski S.C. Alteration of the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) catalytic domain within E. coli recA protein attenuates NTP hydrolysis but not joint molecule formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268(2):1292-1297.
96. Cox J.M., et al. Defective dissociation of a slow RecA mutant protein imparts an E. coli growth defect. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283(36):24909-24921.
97. Jain S.K., Cox M.M., Inman R.B. On the role of ATP hydrolysis in RecA protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. III. Unidirectional branch migration and extensive hybrid DNA formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269(32):20653-20661.
98. Rosselli W., Stasiak A. The ATPase activity of RecA is needed to push the DNA strand exchange through heterologous regions. EMBO J. 1991, 10(13):4391-4396.
99. Stasiak A., Stasiak A.Z., Koller T. Visualization of RecA-DNA complexes involved in consecutive stages of an in vitro strand exchange reaction. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1984, 49:561-570.
100. Cox M.M., Lehman I.R. recA protein of E. coli promotes branch migration, a kinetically distinct phase of DNA strand exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981, 78(6):3433-3437.
101. Stasiak A.Z., Rosselli W., Stasiak A. RecA-DNA helical filaments in genetic recombination. Biochimie 1991, 73(2-3):199-208.
102. van der Heijden T., et al. Homologous recombination in real time: DNA strand exchange by RecA. Mol. Cell 2008, 30(4):530-538.
103. Rice K.P., et al. DNA pairing and strand exchange by the E. coli RecA and yeast Rad51 proteins without ATP hydrolysis: on the importance of not getting stuck. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276(42):38570-38581.
104. DasGupta C., Radding C.M. Polar branch migration promoted by recA protein: effect of mismatched base pairs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1982, 79(3):762-766.
105. Bianchi M.E., Radding C.M. Insertions, deletions and mismatches in heteroduplex DNA made by recA protein. Cell 1983, 35:511-520. (2 Pt 1).
106. Holmes V.F., et al. Bypass of heterology during strand transfer by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29(24):5052-5057.
107. Tsai Y.C., et al. Heterology tolerance and recognition of mismatched base pairs by human Rad51 protein. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10(4):363-372.
108. Ristic D., Kanaar R., Wyman C. Visualizing RAD51-mediated joint molecules: implications for recombination mechanism and the effect of sequence heterology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(1):155-167.
109. Biswas I., Yamamoto A., Hsieh P. Branch migration through DNA sequence heterology. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 279(4):795-806.
110. Worth L., et al. Role of MutS ATPase activity in MutS,L-dependent block of in vitro strand transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273(36):23176-23182.
111. Tham K.C., et al. Mismatch repair inhibits homeologous recombination via coordinated directional unwinding of trapped DNA structures. Mol. Cell 2013, 51(3):326-337.
112. Honda M., et al. Mismatch repair protein hMSH2-hMSH6 recognizes mismatches and forms sliding clamps within a d-loop recombination intermediate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111(3):E316-E325.
113. Worth L., et al. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91(8):3238-3241.
114. Fabisiewicz A., Worth L. E. coli MutS,L modulate RuvAB-dependent branch migration between diverged DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276(12):9413-9420.
115. Morel P., et al. Antipairing and strand transferase activities of E. coli helicase II (UvrD). Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21(14):3205-3209.
116. Dao V. MP mismatch-, MutS-, MutL-, and helicase II-dependent unwinding from the single-strand break of an incised heteroduplex. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:9202-9207.
117. Grilley M., Modrich P.G.J. Bidirectional excision in methyl-directed mismatch repair. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:11830-11837.
118. Harfe B.D., Jinks-Robertson S. Mismatch repair proteins and mitotic genome stability. Mutat Res. 2000, 451(1-2):151-167.
119. Liu J., Sneeden J., Heyer W.D. In vitro assays for DNA pairing and recombination-associated DNA synthesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 745:363-383.