Motor imagery-based skill acquisition disrupted following rTMS of the inferior parietal lobule

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 234, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 397-407

  Kraeutner, Sarah N ^a   Keeler, Laura T ^a   Boe, Shaun G ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Implicit sequence learning; Motor imagery; Motor learning; Skill acquisition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; RESPONSE TIME; THETA RHYTHM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION SYSTEM; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; IMAGINATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; PARIETAL LOBE; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955710329     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4472-9     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Annett J (1995) Motor imagery: perception or action? Neuropsychologia 33:1395–1417
2. Behrmann M (2004) Parietal cortex and attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:212–217. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.012
3. Bolognini N, Ro T (2010) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: disrupting neural activity to alter and assess brain function. J Neurosci 30:9647–9650. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1990-10.2010
4. Braun S, Kleynen M, Schols J et al (2008) Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clin Rehabil 22:579–591. doi:10.1177/0269215508090066
5. Buch ER, Modir Shanechi A, Fourkas AD et al (2012) Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. Brain 135:596–614. doi:10.1093/brain/awr331
6. Burianová H, Marstaller L, Sowman P et al (2013) Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm. NeuroImage 71:50–58. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.001
7. Chambers C, Payne J, Mattingley J (2007) Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities. Neuropsychologia 45:1715–1724. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.001
8. Chen W-HH, Mima T, Siebner HR et al (2003) Low-frequency rTMS over lateral premotor cortex induces lasting changes in regional activation and functional coupling of cortical motor areas. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1628–1637
9. Cooke DF, Taylor CS, Moore T, Graziano MS (2003) Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of the ventral intraparietal area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6163–6168. doi:10.1073/pnas.1031751100
10. Corbetta M, Shulman G (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:201–215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
11. Culham J, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A (2006) The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 44:2668–2684. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.003
12. de Vries P, de Jong B, Bohning D et al (2009) Changes in cerebral activations during movement execution and imagery after parietal cortex TMS interleaved with 3T MRI. Brain Res 1285:58–68. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.006
13. Destrebecqz A, Peigneux P, Laureys S et al (2005) The neural correlates of implicit and explicit sequence learning: interacting networks revealed by the process dissociation procedure. Learn Mem 12:480–490. doi:10.1101/lm.95605
14. Doyon J, Benali H (2005) Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:161–167. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004
15. Gallivan JP, Culham JC (2015) Neural coding within human brain areas involved in actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 33:141–149. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.012
16. Goschke T, Bolte A (2012) On the modularity of implicit sequence learning: independent acquisition of spatial, symbolic, and manual sequences. Cogn Psychol 65:284–320. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.002
17. Hétu S, Grégoire M, Saimpont A et al (2013) The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:930–949. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017
18. Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H (2002) Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:217–222
19. Hilgetag C, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2001) Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced “virtual lesions” of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4:953–957. doi:10.1038/nn0901-953
20. Huang Y-ZZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E et al (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45:201–206. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033
21. Jeannerod M (1995) Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia 33:1419–1432
22. Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14:S103–S109. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
23. Johansson B (2011) Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity: stroke rehabilitation. Acta Neurol Scand 123:147–159. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x
24. Kawamichi H, Kikuchi Y, Endo H et al (1998) Temporal structure of implicit motor imagery in visual hand-shape discrimination as revealed by MEG. NeuroReport 9:1127–1132
25. Kelley K, Preacher K (2012) On effect size. Psychol Methods 17:137–152. doi:10.1037/a0028086
26. Kitadono K, Humphreys G (2011) Neuropsychological evidence for an interaction between endogenous visual and motor-based attention. Neurocase 17:323–331. doi:10.1080/13554794.2010.509322
27. Kleim J, Kleim E, Cramer S (2007) Systematic assessment of training-induced changes in corticospinal output to hand using frameless stereotaxic transcranial magnetic stimulation. Nat Protoc 2:1675–1684. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.206
28. Kraeutner S, Gionfriddo A, Bardouille T, Boe S (2014) Motor imagery-based brain activity parallels that of motor execution: evidence from magnetic source imaging of cortical oscillations. Brain Res 1588:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.001
29. Kraeutner S, MacKenzie L, Westwood D, Boe S (2015) Characterising skill acquisition through motor imagery with no prior physical practice. J Exp Psychol. doi:10.1037/xhp0000148
30. Lebon F, Lotze M, Stinear C, Byblow W (2012) Task-dependent interaction between parietal and contralateral primary motor cortex during explicit versus implicit motor imagery. PLoS ONE 7:e37850. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037850
31. López-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernández-Del-Olmo M (2014) Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul 7:372–380 doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004
32. Malouin F, Richards C, Jackson P et al (2007) The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther 31:20–29. doi:10.1097/01.NPT.0000260567.24122.64
33. Marvel C, Turner B, O’Leary D et al (2007) The neural correlates of implicit sequence learning in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 21:761. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.6.761-777
34. McInnes K, Friesen C, Boe S (2015) Specific brain lesions impair explicit motor imagery ability: a systematic review of the evidence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 15:620–626. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.012
35. Miyawaki Y, Shinozaki T, Okada M (2012) Spike suppression in a local cortical circuit induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Comput Neurosci 33:405–419. doi:10.1007/s10827-012-0392-x
36. Moran A, Guillot A, MacIntyre T, Collet C (2012) Re-imagining motor imagery: building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology: re-imagining motor imagery. Br J Psychol 103:224–247. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02068.x
37. Nyffeler T, Cazzoli D, Wurtz P et al (2008) Neglect-like visual exploration behaviour after theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right posterior parietal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 27:1809–1813. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06154.x
38. Nyffeler T, Cazzoli D, Hess CW, Müri RMM (2009) One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect. Stroke 40:2791–2796. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552323
39. Oberman L, Edwards D, Eldaief M, Pascual-Leone A (2011) Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol 28:67–74. doi:10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f
40. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
41. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M (2003) Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 153:146–157. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1588-0
42. Rorden C, Karnath H-O (2004) Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci 5:813–819. doi:10.1038/nrn1521
43. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini P, Pascual-Leone A (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120:2008–2039. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
44. Ruff CC, Driver J, Bestmann S (2009) Combining TMS and fMRI: from “virtual lesions” to functional-network accounts of cognition. Cortex 45:1043–1049. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.012
45. Rushworth M, Krams M, Passingham R (2001) The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 13:698–710. doi:10.1162/089892901750363244
46. Rushworth MF, Johansen-Berg H, Göbel S, Devlin J (2003) The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. NeuroImage 20:S89–S100. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.011
47. Rüsseler J, Hennighausen E, Rösler F (2001) Response anticipation processes in the learning of a sensorimotor sequence. J Psychophysiol 15:95–105. doi:10.1027//0269-8803.15.2.95
48. Sack AT (2006) Transcranial magnetic stimulation, causal structure-function mapping and networks of functional relevance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:593–599. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.016
49. Sharma N, Pomeroy V, Baron J-C (2006) Motor imagery a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke 37:1941–1952. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc
50. Sharma N, Baron J-C, Rowe J (2009) Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol 66:604–616. doi:10.1002/ana.21810
51. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L et al (1996) The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273:1564–1568
52. Stinear C, Byblow W, Steyvers M et al (2006) Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 168:157–164. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0078-y
53. Tzvi E, Münte T, Krämer U (2014) Delineating the cortico-striatal-cerebellar network in implicit motor sequence learning. Neuroimage 94:222–230. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.004
54. Ungerleider LG, Doyon J, Karni A (2002) Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78:553–564
55. Vandenberghe R, Molenberghs P, Gillebert C (2012) Spatial attention deficits in humans: the critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 50:1092–1103. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.016
56. Wagner TA, Zahn M, Grodzinsky AJ, Pascual-Leone A (2004) Three-dimensional head model simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1586–1598. doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.827925
57. Wohldmann EL, Healy AF, Lyle BEJ (2007) Pushing the limits of imagination: mental practice for learning sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33:254–261. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.254
58. Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R (2010) Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors: motor skill learning and performance. Med Educ 44:75–84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
59. Zhang H, Xu L, Zhang R et al (2012) Parallel alterations of functional connectivity during execution and imagination after motor imagery learning. PLoS ONE 7:e36052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036052