A process mining approach to linking the study of aptitude and event facets of self-regulated learning

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 16-20-March-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 265-269

  Beheshitha, Sanam Shirazi ^a   Gašević, Dragan ^b   Hatala, Marek ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clustering; Learning Patterns; Process Mining; Self Regulated Learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

APPROACHES TO LEARNING; CLUSTERING; GOAL ORIENTATIONS; LEARNING PATTERNS; PILOT STUDIES; PROCESS MINING; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; TWO PATHS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84955576198     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2723576.2723628     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. P. H. Winne, "Improving measurements of self-regulated learning, " Educ. Psychol., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 267-276, 2010.
2. R. E. Snow, "Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy., " J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., vol. 59, no. 2, p. 205, 1991.
3. P. H. Winne, "Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events, " Metacognition Learn., pp. 1-9, 2014.
4. F. De Jong, "Task and student dependency in using selfregulation activities: Consequences for process-oriented instruction, " Process-Oriented Instr. Verbal Pict. Aid Comprehension Strateg., pp. 87-99, 1994.
5. A. F. Hadwin, J. C. Nesbit, D. Jamieson-Noel, J. Code, and P. H. Winne, "Examining trace data to explore selfregulated learning, " Metacognition Learn., vol. 2, no. 2-3, pp. 107-124, 2007.
6. M. Kapur, J. Voiklis, and C. K. Kinzer, "Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups, " Comput. Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 54-66, 2008.
7. M. Bannert, P. Reimann, and C. Sonnenberg, "Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning, " Metacognition Learn., pp. 1-25, 2014.
8. A. J. Elliot, A. J. Elliot, and C. S. Dweck, "A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct, " Handb. Competence Motiv., vol. 16, pp. 52-72, 2005.
9. C. Ames, "Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation., " J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 84, no. 3, p. 261, 1992.
10. A. J. Elliot, K. Murayama, and R. Pekrun, "A 3× 2 achievement goal model., " J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 103, no. 3, p. 632, 2011.
11. J. B. Biggs, Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Research Monograph. ERIC, 1987.
12. K.-L. Lau and J. Lee, "Examining Hong Kong students' achievement goals and their relations with students' perceived classroom environment and strategy use, " Educ. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 357-372, 2008.
13. L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, D. F. Tyson, and E. A. Patall, "When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors, " Rev. Int. Psychol. Soc., no. 1, pp. 19-70, 2008.
14. J. Biggs, D. Kember, and D. Y. Leung, "The revised twofactor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, " Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 133-149, 2001.
15. M. Baeten, E. Kyndt, K. Struyven, and F. Dochy, "Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness, " Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243-260, 2010.
16. Z. Akyol and D. R. Garrison, "Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning, " Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 233-250, 2011.
17. P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, "nStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet, " in International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, Springer, 2013, pp. 293-308.
18. C. E. Weinstein, T. W. Acee, and J. Jung, "Self-regulation and learning strategies, " New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2011, no. 126, pp. 45-53, 2011.
19. A.-M. Bliuc, R. Ellis, P. Goodyear, and L. Piggott, "Learning through face-to-face and online discussions: Associations between students' conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science, " Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 512-524, May 2010.
20. J. Malmberg, S. Järvelä, and P. A. Kirschner, "Elementary school students' strategic learning: does task-type matter?, " Metacognition Learn., pp. 1-24, 2014.
21. P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, "Studying as self-regulated learning, " Metacognition Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 93, pp. 27-30, 1998.
22. G. Lust, J. Elen, and G. Clarebout, "Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: Student differences and performance effects, " Comput. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 385-395, 2013.
23. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, " Manag. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.
24. R. A. Bjork, J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell, "Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions, " Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 64, pp. 417-444, 2013.
25. P. H. Winne and J. C. Nesbit, "Graph theoretic techniques for examining patterns and strategies in students' studying: An application of LogMill, " in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1995.
26. M. Zhou and P. H. Winne, "Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation, " Learn. Instr., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 413-419, 2012.