Segmentation of image data from complex organotypic 3D models of cancer tissues with markov random fields

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Robinson, Sean ^a,b,c,d,e   Guyon, Laurent ^c,d,e   Nevalainen, Jaakko ^a,f   Toriseva, Mervi ^a,b   Åkerfelt, Malin ^a,b   Nees, Matthias ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^d CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

^e INSERM   (France)

^f TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER ASSOCIATED FIBROBLAST; CANCER MODEL; CANCER TISSUE; CELL CONTACT; COCULTURE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FIBROBLAST; IMAGE PROCESSING; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE CANCER CELL LINE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MARKOV CHAIN; MULTIPHOTON MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR CELL LINE; VALIDATION STUDY;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE, MULTIPHOTON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84955441907     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143798     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Weigelt B, Ghajar C, Bissell M. The need for complex 3D culture models to unravel novel pathways and identify accurate biomarkers in breast cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014; 69-70:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.001 PMID: 24412474
2. Härmä V, Virtanen J, Mäkelä R, Happonen A, Mpindi JP, Knuuttila M, et al. A comprehensive panel of three-dimensional models for studies of prostate cancer growth, invasion and drug responses. PLOS One. 2010; 5(5):e10431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010431 PMID: 20454659
3. Subramanian B, Rudym D, Cannizzaro C, Perrone R, Zhou J, Kaplan D. Tissue-engineered three-dimensional in vitro models for normal and diseased kidney. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010; 16:2821-2831. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0595 PMID: 20486787
4. Gaggioli C, Hooper S, Hidalgo-Carcedo C, Grosse R, Marshall J, Harrington K, et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9:1392-1400. doi: 10.1038/ncb1658 PMID: 18037882
5. Pietras K, Östman A. Hallmarks of cancer: Interactions with the tumor stroma. Exp Cell Res. 2010; 316 (8):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.045 PMID: 20211171
6. Karagiannis GS, Poutahidis T, Erdman SE, Kirsch R, Riddell RH, Diamandis EP. Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive the progression of metastasis through both paracrine and mechanical pressure on cancer tissue. Mol Cancer Res. 2012; 10(11):1403-1418. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0307 PMID: 23024188
7. Kenny PA, Lee GY, Myers CA, Neve RM, Semeiks JR, Spellman PT, et al. The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three-dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expression. Mol Oncol. 2007; 1(1):84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.02.004 PMID: 18516279
8. Danuser G. Computer Vision in Cell Biology. Cell. 2011; 147:973-978. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.001 PMID: 22118455
9. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL. Digital image processing using MATLAB. New Jersey, Prentice Hall; 2003.
10. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, Friman O, et al. CellProfiler: Image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 2006; 7(10). doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 PMID: 17076895
11. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676-682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 PMID: 22743772
12. Wang C, Komodakis N, Paragios N. Markov random field modeling, inference & learning in computer vision & image understanding: A survey. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2013; 117(11):1610-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2013.07.004
13. Amat F, Myers EW, Keller PJ. Fast and robust optical flow for time-lapse microscopy using super-voxels. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29(3):373-380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts706 PMID: 23242263
14. Tokunaga T, Hirose O, Kawaguchi S, Toyoshima Y, Teramoto T, Ikebata H, et al. Automated detection and tracking of many cells by using 4D live-cell imaging data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(12):i43-i51. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu271 PMID: 24932004
15. Rajapakse JC, Liu S. Staging tissues with conditional random fields. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2011. p. 5128-5131.
16. Roberts TJ, McKenna SJ, Du CJ, Wuyts N, Valentine TA, Bengough AG. Estimating the motion of plant root cells from in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy images. Mach Vis Appl. 2010; 21(6):921-939. doi: 10.1007/s00138-009-0207-x
17. Mondal PP, Vicidomini G, Diaspro A. Markov random field aided Bayesian approach for image reconstruction in confocal microscopy. J Appl Phys. 2007; 102(4):044701. doi: 10.1063/1.2770961
18. Vicidomini G, Boccacci P, Diaspro A, Bertero M. Application of the split-gradient method to 3D image deconvolution in fluorescence microscopy. J Microsc. 2009; 234(1):47-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03150.x PMID: 19335456
19. Liang L, Zhou X, Li F, Wong ST, Huckins J, King RW. Mitosis cell identification with conditional random fields. In: Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop, 2007. LISA 2007. IEEE/NIH; 2007. p. 9-12.
20. Liu AA, Li K, Kanade T. A semi-Markov model for mitosis segmentation in time-lapse phase contrast microscopy image sequences of stem cell populations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012; 31(2):359-369. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2169495 PMID: 21954199
21. Peng B, Zhang L, Zhang D. A survey of graph theoretical approaches to image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 2013; 46(3):1020-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.09.015
22. Meas-Yedid V, Tilie S, Olivo-Marin JC. Color image segmentation based on Markov random field clustering for histological image analysis. In: Pattern Recognition, 2002. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on. vol. 1; 2002. p. 796-799.
23. Luck BL, Carlson KD, Bovik AC, Richards-Kortum RR. An image model and segmentation algorithm for reflectance confocal images of in vivo cervical tissue. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2005; 14(9):1265-1276. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2005.852460 PMID: 16190463
24. Zhu Y, Li F, Cridebring D, Ma J, Wong ST, Vadakkan TJ, et al. Coupling oriented hidden Markov random field model with local clustering for segmenting blood vessels and measuring spatial structures in images of tumor microenvironment. In: Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2011 IEEE International Conference on; 2011. p. 352-357.
25. Daněk O, Matula P, Ortiz-de Solórzano C, Muñoz-Barrutia A, Maška M, Kozubek M. Segmentation of touching cell nuclei using a two-stage graph cut model. In: Proceedings of Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis (SCIA). vol. 5575; 2009. p. 410-419. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02230-2-42
26. Lou X, Koethe U, Wittbrodt J, Hamprecht FA. Learning to segment dense cell nuclei with shape prior. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on; 2012. p. 1012-1018.
27. Dimopoulos S, Mayer CE, Rudolf F, Stelling J. Accurate cell segmentation in microscopy images using membrane patterns. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(18):2644-2651. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu302 PMID: 24849580
28. Keuper M, Schmidt T, Rodriguez-Franco M, Schamel W, Brox T, Burkhardt H, et al. Hierarchical Markov random fields for mast cell segmentation in electron microscopic recordings. In: Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on; 2011. p. 973-978.
29. Åkerfelt M, Byramoglu N, Robinson S, Toriseva M, Schukov HP, Härmä V, et al. Automated tracking of tumor-stroma morphology in microtissues identifies functional targets within the tumor microenvironment for therapeutic intervention. Oncotarget. 2015; 6(30):30035-30056. PMID: 26375443
30. Horoszewicz J, Leong S, Kawinski E, Karr J, Rosenthal H, Chu T, et al. LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1983; 43(4):1809-1818. PMID: 6831420
31. Madar S, Brosh R, Buganim Y, Ezra O, Goldstein I, Solomon H, et al. Modulated expression of WFDC1 during carcinogenesis and cellular senescence. Carcinogenesis. 2009; 30(1):20-27. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn232 PMID: 18842679
32. Ljosa V, Sokolnicki KL, Carpenter AE. Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):637. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2083 PMID: 22743765
33. Rother C, Kolmogorov V, Boykov Y, Blake A. Interactive foreground extraction: Using graph cut. In: Blake A, Kohli P, Rother C, editors. Markov random fields for vision and image processing. The MIT Press; 2011. p. 111-126.
34. Boykov Y, Veksler O, Zabih R. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2001; 23(11):1222-1239. doi: 10.1109/34.969114
35. Szummer M, Kohli P, Hoiem D. Learning large-margin random fields using graph cuts. In: Blake A, Kohli P, Rother C, editors. Markov random fields for vision and image processing. The MIT Press; 2011. p. 233-248.
36. Boykov Y, Kolmogorov V. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004; 26(9):1124-1137. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.60 PMID: 15742889
37. Kolmogorov V, Zabih R. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004; 26(2):147-159. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262177 PMID: 15376891
38. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyber. 1975; 1 (1):62-66.
39. Greggio N, Bernardino A, Laschi C, Dario P, Santos-Victor J. Fast estimation of Gaussian mixture models for image segmentation. Mach Vis Appl. 2012; 23(4):773-789. doi: 10.1007/s00138-011-0320-5
40. Sokolova M, Lapalme G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf Process Manag. 2009; 45(4):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002
41. Hoque MT, Windus LC, Lovitt CJ, Avery VM. PCaAnalyser: A 2D-image analysis based module for effective determination of prostate cancer progression in 3D culture. PLOS One. 2013; 8(11):e79865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079865 PMID: 24278197
42. Härmä V, Schukov HP, Happonen A, Ahonen I, Virtanen J, Siitari H, et al. Quantification of dynamic morphological drug responses in 3D organotypic cell cultures by automated image analysis. PLOS One. 2014; 9(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096426 PMID: 24810913
43. Warger WC, Newmark JA, Warner CM, DiMarzio CA. Phase-subtraction cell-counting method for live mouse embryos beyond the eight-cell stage. J Biomed Opt. 2008; 13(3):034005-034005. doi: 10.1117/1.2937468 PMID: 18601550
44. Zaritsky A, Manor N, Wolf L, Ben-Jacob E, Tsarfaty I. Benchmark for multi-cellular segmentation of bright field microscopy images. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14(1):319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-319 PMID: 24195722
45. Gelasca ED, Obara B, Fedorov D, Kvilekval K, Manjunath B. A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10(1):368. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-368