Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: a student and staff partnership model

International Journal for Academic Development

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 41-53

  Jensen, Kathrine ^a   Bennett, Liz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic development; liminality; partnership; quality enhancement; student engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955408567     PISSN: 1360144X     EISSN: 14701324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113537     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. P.Baron,, & L.Corbin, (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
2. C.Bovill,, A.Cook-Sather,, & P.Felten, (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
3. C.Bryson, (2011). Clarifying the concept of student engagement: A fruitful approach to underpin policy and practice. Paper presented at the HEA conference, Nottingham University, July 5–6th, 2011.
4. A.Cook-Sather, (2008). ‘What you get is looking in a mirror, only better’: Inviting students to reflect (on) college teaching. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 9(4), 473–483. doi:10.1080/14623940802431465
5. A.Cook-Sather, (2011). Layered learning: Student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 41–57.10.1080/09650792.2011.547680
6. A.Cook-Sather, (2013). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
7. A.Cook-Sather,, & Z.Alter, (2011). What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
8. K.Crawford, (2009). Understanding the students’ perspective on how pedagogical approaches influence their experience. Proceedings of the 4th International iPED Conference, iPED 2009. Edited by the iPED Research Network, September 14–15 2009 Coventry: Coventry University. ISBN 978-1-84600-0287.
9. K.Crawford, (2012). Rethinking the student/teacher nexus: Students as consultants on teaching in higher education. In H.Stephenson, L.Bell, & M.Neary (Eds.), Towards teaching in public: Reshaping the modern university (pp 52–67). Continuum. London: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9781441124791.
10. Dunne, & Zandstra. (2011). Students as change agents – New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/8064
11. HEA. (2013). Student engagement survey UK pilot – Year 2. Higher Education Academy webpage published. Retrieved October 24, 2013, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/engagement_survey/pilot_call_2014
12. M.Healey, (2012). Students as change agents: A selected bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.mickhealey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Students-as-change-agents-bibliography1.doc
13. M.Healey,, K.M.O’Connor,, & P.Broadfoot, (2010). Reflections on engaging students in the process and product of strategy development for learning, teaching, and assessment: An institutional case study. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/13601440903529877
14. Higher Education Academy. (2014). Framework for student and staff partnerships in learning and teaching in higher education. Draft for Consultation. Retrieved May 2014, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/students_as_partners/Framework-for-student-and-staff-partnerships.pdf
15. E.R.Kahu, (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
16. J.Kay,, E.Dunne,, J.Hutchinson, (2010). Rethinking the values of higher education – students as change agents? Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/StudentsChangeAgents.pdf
17. B.Little,, W.Locke,, A.Scesa,, & R.Williams, (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. Centre for Higher Education Research and Information. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/cheri/documents/student-engagement-report.pdf
18. M.Molesworth,, E.Nixon,, & R.Scullion, (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. doi:10.1080/13562510902898841
19. M.Neary, (2010). Student as producer: A Pedagogy for the Avant-Garde; or, how do revolutionary teachers teach? Learning Exchange, 1(1), 1–12.
20. M.Neary,., & S.Amsley,. (2012). Occupy: A new pedagogy of space and time? Journal of Critical Education Policy, 10(2), 106–138. ISSN. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/PDFs/10-2-03.pdf
21. C.Robinson, (2012). Student engagement: What does this mean in practice in the context of higher education institutions? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 94–108. doi:10.1108/17581181211273039
22. A.Szakolcza, (2009). Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 141–172. Retrieved from http://www.politicalanthropology.org/ipa-journal.html
23. B.Thomassen, (2009). The Uses and Meanings of Liminality. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 5–27. Retrieved from http://www.politicalanthropology.org/ipa-journal.html
24. V.Trowler, (2010). Student engagement literature review. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University. Review commissioned by the Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/studentengagement/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf
25. V.Turner, (6th ed.). (1967–1982). Betwixt and between: The liminal period. In Rites de passage. The forest of symbols – aspects of ndembu ritual, Chapter IV, (pp. 93–111). Cornell University Press.