The ATPases of cohesin interface with regulators to modulate cohesin-mediated DNA tethering

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue NOVEMBER2015, 2015, Pages

  Çamdere, Gamze ^a   Guacci, Vincent ^a   Stricklin, Jeremiah ^a   Koshland, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; COHESIN; ACYLTRANSFERASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CHROMATIN; DNA; ECO1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; RAD61 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SMC3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOME PROTEIN 1;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; WESTERN BLOTTING; CHROMATIN; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ACETYLTRANSFERASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84955308895     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.11315     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Antony E, Hingorani MM. 2004. Asymmetric ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of the thermus aquaticus MutS dimer is key to modulation of its interactions with mismatched DNA. Biochemistry 43:13115-13128. doi: 10. 1021/bi049010t
2. Arumugam P, Gruber S, Tanaka K, Haering CH, Mechtler K, Nasmyth K. 2003. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Current Biology 13:1941-1953. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.036
3. Arumugam P, Nishino T, Haering CH, Gruber S, Nasmyth K. 2006. Cohesin's ATPase activity is stimulated by the c-terminal winged-helix domain of its kleisin subunit. Current Biology 16:1998-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006. 09.002
4. Chan K-L, Roig MB, Hu B, Beckouët F, Metson J, Nasmyth K. 2012. Cohesin's DNA exit gate is distinct from its entrance gate and is regulated by acetylation. Cell 150:961-974. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.028
5. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Shevchenko A, Nasmyth K. 2000. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Molecular Cell 5:243-254. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7
6. Eng T, Guacci V, Koshland D. 2014. ROCC, a conserved region in cohesin's Mcd1 subunit, is essential for the proper regulation of the maintenance of cohesion and establishment of condensation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:2351-2364. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0929
7. Eng T, Guacci V, Koshland D. 2015. Interallelic complementation provides functional evidence for cohesin- cohesin interactions on DNA. Molecular Biology of the Cell 26:4224-4235. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0331
8. Furman C, Mehla J, Ananthaswamy N, Arya N, Kulesh B, Kovach I, Ambudkar SV, Golin J. 2013. The deviant ATP-binding site of the multidrug efflux pump Pdr5 plays an active role in the transport cycle. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:30420-30431. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.494682
9. Gligoris TG, Scheinost JC, Burmann F, Petela N, Chan K-L, Uluocak P, Beckouet F, Gruber S, Nasmyth K, Lowe J. 2014. Closing the cohesin ring: structure and function of its Smc3-kleisin interface. Science 346:963-967. doi: 10.1126/science.1256917
10. Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu H-G, Mistrot C, Unal E, Koshland DE, DeRisi JL, Gerton JL, Bruce Stillman. 2004. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biology 2:e259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020259
11. Grossmann N, Vakkasoglu AS, Hulpke S, Abele R, Gaudet R, TampéR. 2014. Mechanistic determinants of the directionality and energetics of active export by a heterodimeric ABC transporter. Nature Communications 5:5419. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6419
12. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A. 1997. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in s. cerevisiae. Cell 91:47-57. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674 (01)80008-8
13. Guacci V, Koshland D. 2012. Cohesin-independent segregation of sister chromatids in budding yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 23:729-739. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-08-0696
14. Guacci V, Stricklin J, Bloom MS, Gu X, Bhatter M, Koshland D. 2015. A novel mechanism for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion by the ECO1 acetyltransferase. Molecular Biology of the Cell 26:117-133. doi: 10. 1091/mbc.E14-08-1268
15. Haering CH, Schoffnegger D, Nishino T, Helmhart W, Nasmyth K, Löwe J. 2004. Structure and stability of cohesin's Smc1-kleisin interaction. Molecular Cell 15:951-964. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.030
16. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Mert O, Davenport C, Guacci V, Koshland D. 2010. Systematic reduction of cohesin differentially affects chromosome segregation, condensation, and DNA repair. Current Biology 20:957-963. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.018
17. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Onn I, Koshland D. 2010. Genetic evidence that the acetylation of the Smc3p subunit of cohesin modulates its ATP-bound state to promote cohesion establishment in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 185:1249-1256. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.116871
18. Hirano T. 2006. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7:311-322. doi: 10.1038/nrm1909
19. Hohl M, Briand C, Grütter MG, Seeger MA. 2012. Crystal structure of a heterodimeric ABC transporter in its inward-facing conformation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 19:395-402. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2267
20. Hohl M, Hurlimann LM, Bohm S, Schoppe J, Grutter MG, Bordignon E, Seeger MA. 2014. Structural basis for allosteric cross-talk between the asymmetric nucleotide binding sites of a heterodimeric ABC exporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:11025-11030. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1400485111
21. Holland IB, A. Blight M. 1999. ABC-ATPases, adaptable energy generators fuelling transmembrane movement of a variety of molecules in organisms from bacteria to humans. Journal of Molecular Biology 293:381-399. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2993
22. Hopfner K-P, Karcher A, Shin DS, Craig L, Arthur LM, Carney JP, Tainer JA. 2000. Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase. Cell 101:789-800. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80890-9
23. Kueng S, Hegemann B, Peters BH, Lipp JJ, Schleiffer A, Mechtler K, Peters J-M. 2006. Wapl controls the dynamic association of cohesin with chromatin. Cell 127:955-967. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.040
24. Ladurner R, Bhaskara V, Huis in 't Veld PJ, Davidson IF, Kreidl E, Petzold G, Peters J-M. 2014. Cohesin's ATPase activity couples cohesin loading onto DNA with Smc3 acetylation. Current Biology 24:2228-2237. doi: 10.1016/ j.cub.2014.08.011
25. Laloraya S, Guacci V, Koshland D. 2000. Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mcd1p. The Journal of Cell Biology 151:1047-1056. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.5.1047
26. Lengronne A, Katou Y, Mori S, Yokobayashi S, Kelly GP, Itoh T, Watanabe Y, Shirahige K, Uhlmann F. 2004. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430:573-578. doi: 10.1038/nature02742
27. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. 1997. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91:35-45. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6
28. Murayama Y, Uhlmann F. 2014. Biochemical reconstitution of topological DNA binding by the cohesin ring. Nature 505:367-371. doi: 10.1038/nature12867
29. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2009. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annual Review of Genetics 43:525-558. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233
30. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Ünal E, Koshland DE. 2008. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 24:105-129. doi: 10.1146/annurev. cellbio.24.110707.175350
31. Onn I, Koshland D. 2011. In vitro assembly of physiological cohesin/DNA complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:12198-12205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107504108
32. QIN W, CAO X-J. 2008. Synthesis of a novel pH-sensitive methacrylate amphiphilic polymer and its primary application in aqueous two-phase systems. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 150:171-183. doi: 10. 1007/s12010-008-8139-x
33. Ben-Shahar TR, Heeger S, Lehane C, East P, Flynn H, Skehel M, Uhlmann F. 2008. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321:563-566. doi: 10.1126/science. 1157774
34. De la Rosa MB, Nelson SW. 2011. An interaction between the walker a and d-loop motifs is critical to ATP hydrolysis and cooperativity in bacteriophage T4 Rad50. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:26258-26266. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.256305
35. Rowland BD, Roig MB, Nishino T, Kurze A, Uluocak P, Mishra A, Beckouët F, Underwood P, Metson J, Imre R, Mechtler K, Katis VL, Nasmyth K. 2009. Building sister chromatid cohesion: Smc3 acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Molecular Cell 33:763-774. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.028
36. Soh Y-M, Bürmann F, Shin H-C, Oda T, Jin KS, Toseland CP, Kim C, Lee H, Kim SJ, Kong M-S, Durand-Diebold M-L, Kim Y-G, Kim HM, Lee NK, Sato M, Oh B-H, Gruber S. 2015. Molecular basis for SMC rod formation and its dissolution upon DNA binding. Molecular Cell 57:290-303. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.023
37. Straight AF, Belmont AS, Robinett CC, Murray AW. 1996. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Current Biology 6:1599-1608. doi: 10. 1016/S0960-9822(02)70783-5
38. Sutani T, Kawaguchi T, Kanno R, Itoh T, Shirahige K. 2009. Budding yeast Wpl1(Rad61)-Pds5 complex counteracts sister chromatid cohesion-establishing reaction. Current Biology 19:492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.cub. 2009.01.062
39. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Kim W, Guacci V, Onn I, Gygi SP, Koshland DE. 2008. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321:566-569. doi: 10.1126/science.1157880
40. Wahba L, Gore SK, Koshland D. 2013. The homologous recombination machinery modulates the formation of RNA-DNA hybrids and associated chromosome instability. eLife 2:e00505. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00505
41. Yang R, Cui L, Hou Y.-x., Riordan JR, Chang X.-b. 2003. ATP binding to the first nucleotide binding domain of multidrug resistance-associated protein plays a regulatory role at low nucleotide concentration, whereas ATP hydrolysis at the second plays a dominant role in ATP-dependent leukotriene C4 transport. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:30764-30771. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304118200
42. Zhang J, Shi X, Li Y, Kim B-J, Jia J, Huang Z, Yang T, Fu X, Jung SY, Wang Y, Zhang P, Kim S-T, Pan X, Qin J. 2008. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for s phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Molecular Cell 31:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.006