Molecular basis for SMC rod formation and its dissolution upon DNA binding

Molecular Cell

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 290-303

  Soh, Young Min ^a   Bürmann, Frank ^b   Shin, Ho Chul ^a   Oda, Takashi ^c   Jin, Kyeong Sik ^d   Toseland, Christopher P ^b   Kim, Cheolhee ^d   Lee, Hansol ^a   Kim, Soo Jin ^a   Kong, Min Seok ^a   Durand Diebold, Marie Laure ^b   Kim, Yeon Gil ^d   Kim, Ho Min ^a   Lee, Nam Ki ^d   Sato, Mamoru ^c   Oh, Byung Ha ^a   Gruber, Stephan ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^c YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; COHESIN; CONDENSIN; BACTERIAL DNA; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SMC PROTEIN, BACTERIA;

ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; DNA BINDING; FUNGAL STRAIN; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DNA, BACTERIAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS;

EID: 84921445757     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.023     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alipour E., Marko J.F. Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:11202-11212.
2. Anderson D.E., Losada A., Erickson H.P., Hirano T. Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J.Cell Biol. 2002, 156:419-424.
3. Arumugam P., Gruber S., Tanaka K., Haering C.H., Mechtler K., Nasmyth K. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Current biology: CB 2003, 13:1941-1953.
4. Bürmann F., Shin H.C., Basquin J., Soh Y.M., Giménez-Oya V., Kim Y.G., Oh B.H., Gruber S. An asymmetric SMC-kleisin bridge in prokaryotic condensin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:371-379.
5. Chiu A., Revenkova E., Jessberger R. DNA interaction and dimerization of eukaryotic SMC hinge domains. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:26233-26242.
6. Cuylen S., Metz J., Haering C.H. Condensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:894-901.
7. Fuentes-Perez M.E., Gwynn E.J., Dillingham M.S., Moreno-Herrero F. Using DNA as a fiducial marker to study SMC complex interactions with the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:839-848.
8. Griese J.J., Hopfner K.P. Structure and DNA-binding activity of the Pyrococcus furiosus SMC protein hinge domain. Proteins 2011, 79:558-568.
9. Griese J.J., Witte G., Hopfner K.P. Structure and DNA binding activity of the mouse condensin hinge domain highlight common and diverse features of SMC proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:3454-3465.
10. Gruber S., Arumugam P., Katou Y., Kuglitsch D., Helmhart W., Shirahige K., Nasmyth K. Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 2006, 127:523-537.
11. Gruber S., Veening J.W., Bach J., Blettinger M., Bramkamp M., Errington J. Interlinked sister chromosomes arise in the absence of condensin during fast replication in B. subtilis. Current biology: CB 2014, 24:293-298.
12. Haering C.H., Löwe J., Hochwagen A., Nasmyth K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:773-788.
13. Haering C.H., Schoffnegger D., Nishino T., Helmhart W., Nasmyth K., Löwe J. Structure and stability of cohesin's Smc1-kleisin interaction. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:951-964.
14. Hirano T. Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1659-1678.
15. Hirano M., Hirano T. Opening closed arms: long-distance activation of SMC ATPase by hinge-DNA interactions. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:175-186.
16. Huis in 't Veld P.J., Herzog F., Ladurner R., Davidson I.F., Piric S., Kreidl E., Bhaskara V., Aebersold R., Peters J.M. Characterization of a DNA exit gate in the human cohesin ring. Science 2014, 346:968-972.
17. Hura G.L., Menon A.L., Hammel M., Rambo R.P., Poole F.L., Tsutakawa S.E., Jenney F.E., Classen S., Frankel K.A., Hopkins R.C., et al. Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Nat. Methods 2009, 6:606-612.
18. Kimura K., Hirano T. ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin: a biochemical implication for chromosome condensation. Cell 1997, 90:625-634.
19. Ku B., Lim J.H., Shin H.C., Shin S.Y., Oh B.H. Crystal structure of the MukB hinge domain with coiled-coil stretches and its functional implications. Proteins 2010, 78:1483-1490.
20. Kurze A., Michie K.A., Dixon S.E., Mishra A., Itoh T., Khalid S., Strmecki L., Shirahige K., Haering C.H., Löwe J., Nasmyth K. A positively charged channel within the Smc1/Smc3 hinge required for sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 2011, 30:364-378.
21. Li Y., Schoeffler A.J., Berger J.M., Oakley M.G. The crystal structure of the hinge domain of the Escherichia coli structural maintenance of chromosomes protein MukB. J.Mol. Biol. 2010, 395:11-19.
22. Mascarenhas J., Soppa J., Strunnikov A.V., Graumann P.L. Cell cycle-dependent localization of two novel prokaryotic chromosome segregation and condensation proteins in Bacillus subtilis that interact with SMC protein. EMBO J. 2002, 21:3108-3118.
23. Matoba K., Yamazoe M., Mayanagi K., Morikawa K., Hiraga S. Comparison of MukB homodimer versus MukBEF complex molecular architectures by electron microscopy reveals a higher-order multimerization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333:694-702.
24. Melby T.E., Ciampaglio C.N., Briscoe G., Erickson H.P. The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge. J.Cell Biol. 1998, 142:1595-1604.
25. Moreno-Herrero F., de Jager M., Dekker N.H., Kanaar R., Wyman C., Dekker C. Mesoscale conformational changes in the DNA-repair complex Rad50/Mre11/Nbs1 upon binding DNA. Nature 2005, 437:440-443.
26. Nasmyth K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2001, 35:673-745.
27. Nasmyth K. Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates?. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1170-1177.
28. Nolivos S., Sherratt D. The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38:380-392.
29. Oldham M.L., Davidson A.L., Chen J. Structural insights into ABC transporter mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:726-733.
30. Onn I., Aono N., Hirano M., Hirano T. Reconstitution and subunit geometry of human condensin complexes. EMBO J. 2007, 26:1024-1034.
31. Rambo R.P., Tainer J.A. Bridging the solution divide: comprehensive structural analyses of dynamic RNA, DNA, and protein assemblies by small-angle X-ray scattering. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20:128-137.
32. Rambo R.P., Tainer J.A. Super-resolution in solution X-ray scattering and its applications to structural systems biology. Annual review of biophysics 2013, 42:415-441.
33. Revenkova E., Focarelli M.L., Susani L., Paulis M., Bassi M.T., Mannini L., Frattini A., Delia D., Krantz I., Vezzoni P., et al. Cornelia de Lange syndrome mutations in SMC1A or SMC3 affect binding to DNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18:418-427.
34. Schleiffer A., Kaitna S., Maurer-Stroh S., Glotzer M., Nasmyth K., Eisenhaber F. Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:571-575.
35. Soppa J., Kobayashi K., Noirot-Gros M.F., Oesterhelt D., Ehrlich S.D., Dervyn E., Ogasawara N., Moriya S. Discovery of two novel families of proteins that are proposed to interact with prokaryotic SMC proteins, and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis family members ScpA and ScpB. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45:59-71.
36. Thadani R., Uhlmann F., Heeger S. Condensin, chromatin crossbarring and chromosome condensation. Current biology: CB 2012, 22:R1012-R1021.
37. Vos S.M., Stewart N.K., Oakley M.G., Berger J.M. Structural basis for the MukB-topoisomerase IV interaction and its functional implications invivo. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2950-2962.
38. Weitzer S., Lehane C., Uhlmann F. A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1930-1940.
39. Williams R.S., Williams J.S., Tainer J.A. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. Biochemistry and cell biology 2007, 85:509-520.
40. Woo J.S., Lim J.H., Shin H.C., Suh M.K., Ku B., Lee K.H., Joo K., Robinson H., Lee J., Park S.Y., et al. Structural studies of a bacterial condensin complex reveal ATP-dependent disruption of intersubunit interactions. Cell 2009, 136:85-96.
41. Yamazoe M., Onogi T., Sunako Y., Niki H., Yamanaka K., Ichimura T., Hiraga S. Complex formation of MukB, MukE and MukF proteins involved in chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1999, 18:5873-5884.