Information and decision support needs in patients with type 2 diabetes

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 46-59

  Weymann, Nina ^a   Härter, Martin ^a   Dirmaier, Jörg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

decision support; diabetes mellitus; Internet; needs assessment; patient information

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF CARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84955296541     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458214534090     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet 2011; 378: 31-40.
2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047-1053.
3. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2012; 35 (Suppl. 1): 64-71.
4. Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Arnold MS, et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ 1991; 17: 37-41.
5. Funnell MM, Anderson RM,. Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2004; 22: 123-127.
6. Meetoo D, Gopaul H,. Empowerment: giving power to people with diabetes. J Diabetes Nurs 2005; 9: 28-32.
7. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 (Suppl. 1): S11-S61.
8. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Funnell MM, et al. Access to diabetes self-management education: results of national surveys of patients, educators, and physicians. Diabetes Educ 2009; 35: 246-248, 252-256, 258-263.
9. Shaw K, Killeen M, Sullivan E, et al. Disparities in diabetes self-management education for uninsured and underinsured adults. Diabetes Educ 2011; 37: 813-819.
10. Wagner TH, Baker LC, Bundorf MK, et al. Use of the Internet for health information by the chronically ill. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 1: A13.
11. Fox S, Purcell K,. Chronic disease and the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project. An initiative of the Pew Research Center, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Chronic-Disease.aspx (2010,. accessed 11 November 2012).
12. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to Internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e2.
13. Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, et al. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12 (2): e23.
14. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 92.
15. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS,. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-221.
16. Bond GE, Burr RL, Wolf FM, et al. The effects of a web-based intervention on psychosocial well-being among adults aged 60 and older with diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ 2010; 36: 446-456.
17. Thakurdesai PA, Kole PL, Pareek RP,. Evaluation of the quality and contents of diabetes mellitus patient education on Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 53: 309-313.
18. Bull SS, Gaglio B, McKay HG, et al. Harnessing the potential of the Internet to promote chronic illness self-management: diabetes as an example of how well we are doing. Chronic Illn 2005; 1: 143-155.
19. Van Esch SC, Cornel MC, Snoek FJ,. Type 2 diabetes and inheritance: what information do diabetes organizations provide on the Internet? Diabet Med 2006; 23: 1233-1238.
20. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, et al. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol 2004; 9: 85-98.
21. Weymann N, Harter M, Dirmaier J,. A tailored, interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 24.
22. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, et al. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4: CD004274.
23. O'Connor A, Jacobsen MJ,. Workbook on developing and evaluating patient decision aids. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/develop-da.pdf (2003,. accessed 11 November 2012).
24. Petersen DJ, Alexander GR,. Needs Assessment in Public Health: A Practical Guide for Students and Professionals. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001.
25. Fox S, Duggan M,. The diagnosis difference. Pew Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2013/PewResearch-DiagnosisDifference.pdf (2013,. accessed 4 January 2014).
26. Fox S,. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Pew Internet & American Life Project. An initiative of the Pew Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2007/EPatients-Chronic-Conditions-2007.pdf.pdf (2007,. accessed 4 January 2014).
27. Stake RE,. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press, 2010.
28. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE,. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
29. Mayring P,. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (7. Auflage, erste Auflage 1983). 7th ed. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag, 2000.
30. Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM, et al. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999; 282: 737-743.
31. Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E,. Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 874-879.
32. Nutbeam D,. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000; 15: 259-267.
33. Unipark Survey Software. Online Befragungssoftware für Studenten und Hochschulen., http://www.unipark.info/1-0-online-befragungssoftware-fuer-studenten-und-universitaeten-unipark-home.htm (. accessed 11 November 2012).
34. Grant RW, Cagliero E, Chueh HC, et al. Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: the generation and education gap. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 470-473.
35. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, et al. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 53.
36. Van Eimeren B, Frees B,. Rasanter Anstieg des Internetkonsums-Onliner fast drei Stunden täglich im Netz. Media Perspektiven 2013; 7-8: 358-372.
37. Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, et al. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1165-1170.
38. Fagnano M, Halterman JS, Conn KM, et al. Health literacy and sources of health information for caregivers of urban children with asthma. Clin Pediatr 2012; 51: 267-273.
39. Sun GH,. The digital divide in Internet-based patient education materials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 47: 855-857.
40. Charbonneau DH,. Readability of menopause web sites: a cross-sectional study. J Women Aging 2012; 24: 280-291.
41. Lam CG, Roter DL, Cohen KJ,. Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90: 82-87.
42. Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K,. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of "dangerous" literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: 223-228.
43. Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea ZC, et al. Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 362-375.
44. Paterson B,. Myth of empowerment in chronic illness. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34: 574-581.
45. Zoffmann V, Kirkevold M,. Life versus disease in difficult diabetes care: conflicting perspectives disempower patients and professionals in problem solving. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 750-765.
46. Zoffmann V, Harder I, Kirkevold M,. A person-centered communication and reflection model: sharing decision-making in chronic care. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 670-685.
47. Peek ME, Wilson SC, Gorawara-Bhat R, et al. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making among African-Americans with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 1135-1139.
48. Zoffmann V, Kirkevold M,. Relationships and their potential for change developed in difficult type 1 diabetes. Qual Health Res 2007; 17: 625-638.
49. Jones S, Benroubi M, Castell C, et al. Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating insulin therapy: baseline data from the INSTIGATE study. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 691-700.
50. Schipf S, Werner A, Tamayo T, et al. Regional differences in the prevalence of known Type 2 diabetes mellitus in 45-74 years old individuals: results from six population-based studies in Germany (DIAB-CORE Consortium). Diabet Med 2012; 29: e88-e95.
51. Rathmann W, Giani G,. Qualität der Arzneimittelversorgung bei Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 in Deutschland. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2003; 128: 1183-1186.
52. Ybarra ML, Suman M,. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 29-41.