A tailored, interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Weymann, Nina ^a   Härter, Martin ^a   Dirmaier, Jörg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Patient information; Randomized controlled trial; Study protocol; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Web

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876271299     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-24     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, Lin JK, Farzadfar F, Khang YH, Stevens GA, Lancet 2011 378 31 40 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X 21705069
2. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H, Diabetes Care 2004 27 1047 1053 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 15111519
3. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care 2012 35 1 64 71
4. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 2 D003417 15846663
5. Access to diabetes self-management education: results of national surveys of patients, educators, and physicians. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Funnell MM, Siminerio LM, Diabetes Educ 2009 35 246-248, 252-246 258-263 19208816
6. Disparities in Diabetes Self-management Education for Uninsured and Underinsured Adults. Shaw K, Killeen M, Sullivan E, Bowman P, Diabetes Educ 2011 37 813 819 10.1177/0145721711424618 22021026
7. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ, J Med Internet Res 2010 12 23 10.2196/jmir.1286 20581001
8. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, Garg AX, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Implement Sci 2011 6 92 10.1186/1748-5908-6-92 21824386
9. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Prev Med 2010 51 214 221 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 20558196
10. The effects of a web-based intervention on psychosocial well-being among adults aged 60 and older with diabetes: a randomized trial. Bond GE, Burr RL, Wolf FM, Feldt K, Diabetes Educ 2010 36 446 456 10.1177/0145721710366758 20375351
11. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 D004274 10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4
12. Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. Leslie E, Marshall AL, Owen N, Bauman A, Prev Med 2005 40 54 59 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.002 15530581
13. eHealth Evaluation and Dissemination Research. Glasgow RE, Am J Prev Med 2007 32 Suppl 5 119 126
14. Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public. Brouwer W, Oenema A, Raat H, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Health Educ Res 2010 25 585 595 10.1093/her/cyp063 19897515
15. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M, J Med Internet Res 2007 9 1 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e1 17478410
16. Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-management Education Intervention Elements: A Meta-analysis. Fan L, Sidani S, Can J Diabetes 2009 33 18 26
17. The law of attrition. Eysenbach G, J Med Internet Res 2005 7 11 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 15829473
18. Defining participant exposure measures in Web-based health behavior change programs. Danaher BG, Boles SM, Akers L, Gordon JS, Severson HH, J Med Internet Res 2006 8 15 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e15 16954125
19. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L, J Med Internet Res 2009 11 13 10.2196/jmir.1194 19403466
20. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA, Am J Prev Med 2007 33 336 345 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007 17888860
21. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Oenema A, J Med Internet Res 2011 13 2 10.2196/jmir.1639 21212045
22. Effectiveness of a computer-tailored print-based physical activity intervention among French Canadians with type 2 diabetes in a real-life setting. Boudreau F, Godin G, Poirier P, Health Educ Res 2011 26 573 585 10.1093/her/cyr008 21414998
23. Kreuter M, Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 2000
24. Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials. Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Kalaitzaki E, White IR, McCambridge J, Thompson SG, Wallace P, Godfrey C, J Med Internet Res 2011 13 26 10.2196/jmir.1523 21371988
25. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 3 rt. No.: MR000008 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
26. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care 2010 33 Suppl 1 11 61
27. Validity of diabetes self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative: comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements. Margolis KL, Lihong Q, Brzyski R, Bonds DE, Howard BV, Kempainen S, Simin L, Robinson JG, Safford MM, Tinker LT, Phillips LS, Clin Trials 2008 5 240 247 10.1177/1740774508091749 18559413
28. The role of user control in adherence to and knowledge gained from a website: randomized comparison between a tunneled version and a freedom-of-choice version. Crutzen R, Cyr D, de Vries NK, J Med Internet Res 2012 14 45 10.2196/jmir.1922 22532074
29. The information architecture of behavior change websites. Danaher BG, McKay HG, Seeley JR, J Med Internet Res 2005 7 12 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e12 15914459
30. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Diabetes Care 2000 23 943 950 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 10895844
31. Miller WR, Rollnick S, Motivational Interviewing, Second Edition: Preparing People for Change New York: Guilford Press 2002
32. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, van Der Bij AK, Grol R, Feder G, Diabetes Care 2002 25 1933 1939 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1933 12401735
33. Evaluation and comparison of guidelines for the management of people with type 2 diabetes from eight European countries. Stone MA, Wilkinson JC, Charpentier G, Clochard N, Grassi G, Lindblad U, Muller UA, Nolan J, Rutten GE, Khunti K, Group GS, Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010 87 252 260 10.1016/j.diabres. 2009.10.020 19932517
34. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), National Guideline C. Type 2 diabetes. The management of type 2 diabetes. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id= 15202
35. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Nolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH, Patient Educ Couns 2007 65 351 360 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016 17027221
36. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K, Patient Educ Couns 2007 66 192 201 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.002 17320338
37. Assessment of proximal outcomes of selfmanagement programs: translation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). Schuler M, Musekamp G, Faller H, Ehlebracht-Konig I, Gutenbrunner C, Kirchhof R, Bengel J, Nolte S, Osborne RH, Schwarze M, Qual Life Res 2012 10.1007/s11136-012-0268-6
38. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. O'Connor AM, Med Decis Making 1995 15 25 30 10.1177/0272989X9501500105 7898294
39. Graham I, O'Connor A, Preparation for Decision Making Scale-User manual 1996 http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User-Manuals/UM-PrepDM.pdf
40. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2011: Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz - ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht. Van Eimeren B, Frees B, media perspektiven 2011 7 8 334 349
41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Diabetes Report Card 2012. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services 2012 http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/reportcard.htm
42. When to use web-based surveys. Wyatt JC, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000 7 426 429 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070426 10887170
43. An Assessment of the Generalizability of Internet Surveys. Best SJ, Krueger B, Hubbard C, Smith A, Soc Sci Comput Rev 2001 19 131 145 10.1177/089443930101900201
44. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N, Am J Epidemiol 2010 172 1292 1298 10.1093/aje/kwq291 20880962
45. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, van der Ploeg HM, Heine RJ, Brand AN, Qual Life Res 1998 7 33 38 9481149
46. Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Booth-Kewley S, Larson GE, Miyoshi DK, Comput Human Behav 2007 23 463 477 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.020
47. Internet-based questionnaire assessment: appropriate use in clinical contexts. Buchanan T, Cogn Behav Ther 2003 32 100 109 10.1080/16506070310000957 16291542