Analyzing crop change scenario with the SmartScape™ spatial decision support system

Land Use Policy

Volumn 51, Issue , 2016, Pages 41-53

  Tayyebi, Amin ^a   Tayyebi, Amirhossein ^b   Vaz, Eric ^c   Arsanjani, Jamal Jokar ^d   Helbich, Marco ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b The University of Iowa   (United States)

^c RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioenergy crops; Crop change policy; Ecosystem services; Policymakers; SmartScape

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; CROP PLANT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LAND USE CHANGE; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER;

DANE COUNTY; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

AVES; MEDICAGO SATIVA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84955278861     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arnold J.G., Fohrer N. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19(3):563-572.
2. Bennett A.B., Isaacs R. Landscape composition influences pollinators and pollination services in perennial biofuel plantings. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 193:1-8.
3. 2O and NO emissions from fertilized fields. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16(4):1-28.
4. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Díaz S., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A., Pereira H.M., Perrings C., Reid W.V., Sarukhan J., Scholes R.J., Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:1305-1312.
5. Costanza R., dArge R., deGroot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., ONeill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., vanden Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
6. Farrell A.E., Plevin R.J., Turner B.T., Jones A.D., O M., Hare, Kammen D.M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 2006, 311(5760):506-508.
7. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 2005, vol. 78. Springer Science Business & Media.
8. Filipe-Lucia M.R., Comin F.A., Bennett E.M. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19. 20.
9. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe M.T., Daily G.C., Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309:570-574.
10. Frank S., Fürst C., Pietzsch F. Cross-sectoral resource management: how forest management alternatives affect the provision of biomass and other ecosystem services. Forests 2015, 6(3):533-560.
11. Fürst C., Frank S., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin F. Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of ecosystem services at regional scale. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 127:S96-116.
12. Geertman S. Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach. Environ. Plan. B 2006, 33:863-880.
13. Global Bioenergy Partnership, 2011 . http://www.globalbioenergy.org/programmeofwork/sustainability/gbep-24-sustainability-indicators/e.
14. Groot J.C., Rossing W.A., Jellema A., Stobbelaar D.J., Renting H., Van Ittersum M.K. Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality-a methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 120(1):58-69.
15. Hill J., Nelson E., Tilman D., Polasky S., Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103(30):11206-11210.
16. Jenkins W.A., Murray B.C., Kramer R.A., Faulkner S.P. Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(5):1051-1061.
17. Jokar Arsanjani J., Helbich M., Vaz E. Spatiotemporal Simulation of Urban growth patterns using agent-based modeling: The case of Tehran. Cities 2013, 32:33-42.
18. Khanal S., Anex R.P., Anderson C.J., Herzmann D.E., Jha M.K. Implications of biofuel policy-driven land cover change for rainfall erosivity and soil erosion in the United States. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5(6):713-722.
19. McIntosh B.S., Seaton R.A.F., Jeffrey P. Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use of computer-based support tools in policy relevant research. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:640-648.
20. Meehan T.D., Werling B.P., Landis D.A., Gratton C. Pest-suppression potential of midwestern landscapes under contrasting bioenergy scenarios. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(7):e41728.
21. Meehan T.D., Gratton C., Diehl E., Hunt N.D., Mooney D.F., Ventura S.J., Jackson R.D. Ecosystem-service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in Riparian Zones of the US Midwest. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(11):e80093.
22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being. Current State and Trends 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC.
23. Pekin B.K. Effect of widespread agricultural chemical use on butterfly diversity across Turkish provinces. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27(6):1439-1448.
24. Pijanowski B.C., Tayyebi A., Delavar M.R., Yazdanpanah M.J. Urban expansion simulation using geographic information systems and artificial neural networks. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2009, 3(4):493-502.
25. Pijanowski B.C., Tayyebi A., Doucette J., Pekin B.K., Braun D., Plourde J. A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: configuring the GIS and neural network based land transformation model to run in a high performance computing environment. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2014, 51:250-268.
26. Plourde J.D., Pijanowski B.C., Pekin B.K. Evidence for increased monoculture cropping in the Central United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 165:50-59.
27. Risse L.M., Nearing M.A., Laflen J.M., Nicks A.D. Error assessment in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57(3):825-833.
28. Rowe R.L., Street N.R., Taylor G. Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2009, 13(1):271-290.
29. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Yu T.H. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319(5867):1238-1240.
30. Skevas T., Swinton S.M., Meehan T.D., Kim T.N., Gratton C., Egbendewe-Mondzozo A. Integrating agricultural pest biocontrol into forecasts of energy biomass production. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 106:195-203.
31. Song W., Pijanowski B.C. The effects of China's cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 46:158-170.
32. Song W., Deng X., Yuan Y., Wang Z., Li Z. Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain. Ecol. Model 2015.
33. Song W., Pijanowski B.C., Tayyebi A. Urban expansion and its consumption of high-quality farmland in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 54:60-70.
34. Soranno P.A., Hubler S.L., Carpenter S.R., Lathrop R.C. Phosphorus loads to surface waters: a simple model to account for spatial pattern of land use. Ecol. Appl. 1996, 6(3):865-878.
35. Tayyebi A.H., Delavar M.R., Tayyebi A., Golobi M. Combining multi criteri decision making and Dempster Shafer theory for landfill site selection. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2010, 38(8):1073-1078.
36. Tayyebi A., Pijanowski B.C., Pekin B. Two rule-based urban growth boundary models applied to the Tehran metropolitan area, Iran. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31:908-918.
37. Tayyebi A., Pijanowski B.C. Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: Comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2014, 28:102-116.
38. Tayyebi A., Perry P.C., Tayyebi A.H. Predicting the expansion of an urban boundary using spatial logistic regression and hybrid raster-vector routines with remote sensing and GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2014, 28(4):639-659.
39. Tayyebi A., Pijanowski B.C., Linderman M., Gratton C. Comparing three global parametric and local non-parametric models to simulate land use change in diverse areas of the world. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2014, 59:202-221.
40. Tayyebi A.H., Tayyebi A., Khanna N. Assessing uncertainty dimensions in land use change models: using swap and multiplicative error models for injecting attribute and positional errors in spatial data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 35(1):149-170.
41. Tayyebi A., Pijanowski B.C., Pekin B.K. Land use legacies of the Ohio River Basin: using a spatially explicit land use change model to assess past and future impacts on aquatic resources. Appl. Geogr. 2015, 57:100-111.
42. Tyner W.E. The US ethanol and biofuels boom: its origins, current status, and future prospects. Bioscience 2008, 58(7):646-653.
43. Van Delden H., Seppelt R., White R., Jakeman A.J. A methodology for the design and development of integrated models for policy support. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26:266-279.
44. Wallander S., Claassen R., Nickerson C. The ethanol decade: an expansion of US corn production 2000-09. USDA-ERS Econ. Inf. Bull. 2011, 79.
45. Uran O., Janssen R. Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands. Comput. Environ. Urban 2003, 2711526(5).
46. Vaz E. The future of landscapes and habitats: the regional science contribution to the understanding of geographical space. Habitat International 2016, 51:70-78.
47. von Haaren C., Kempa D., Vogel K., Rüter S. Assessing biodiversity on the farm scale as basis for ecosystem service payments. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 113:40-50.
48. Wenkel K.O., Berg M., Mirschel W., Wieland R., Nendel C., Köstner B. LandCaRe DSS-an interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 127:S168-S183.
49. West T.O., Brandt C.C., Wilson B.S., Hellwinckel C.M., Tyler D.D., Marland G., Nelson R.G. Estimating regional changes in soil carbon with high spatial resolution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008, 72(2):285-294.
50. Wright C.K., Wimberly M.C. Recent land use change in the western corn belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110:4134-4139.
51. Zhang X., Izaurralde R.C., Manowitz D., West T.O., Post W.M., Thomson A.M., Williams An integrative modeling framework to evaluate the productivity and sustainability of biofuel crop production systems. GCB Bioenergy 2010, 2(5):258-277.