Infostorms: How to take information punches and save democracy

Infostorms: How to Take Information Punches and Save Democracy

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-148

  Hendricks, Vincent F ^a   Hansen, Pelle G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954584633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03832-2     Document Type: Book

References (80)

1. Abbott, A. (2013). Brain-simulation and graphene projects win billion-euro competition. Nature Online. http://www.nature.com. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
2. Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: HarperCollins.
3. Austin, J. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Becker, R. B. (2004). Are markets inefficient? Lecture notes for financial economics (p. E425) Indiana: Indiana University.
5. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 151-170.
6. Black, F. (1985). Noise. Journal of Finance, 41(3), 529-543.
7. Boensvang, H., Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2014). Beware Bystanders. forthcoming
8. Budtz Pedersen, D., Hansen, P. G., & Hendricks, V. F. (2012, Oct 20). Sandheden til salg for junk-evidens. Politiken, 8.
9. Budtz Pedersen, D., & Hendricks, V. F. (2013). Science bubbles. Philosophy and Technology, 27(3), 359-372.
10. Budtz Pedersen, D. (2013). Research Evaluation. Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering. Macmillan Reference (in press).
11. Buchanan, M. (2008, July 19). Why economic rheory is out of whack. New Scientist.
12. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2013, April 10). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
13. Cialdini, R. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Collins Publishers.
14. Centola, D., Willer, R., & Macy, M. (2005). The Emperor’s dilemma: A computational model of self-enforcing norms. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1009-1040.
15. Chwe, M. S.-Y. (2001). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton University Press.
16. Cooper, J., Kelly, K. A., & Weaver, K. (2004). Attitudes, norms and social groups. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Social cognition (pp. 244-267). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
17. Cubitt, R., & Sugden, R. (2003, Oct). Common knowledge, salience, and convention: A reconstruction of David Lewis’ game theory. Economics and Philosophy, 19(2), 175-210.
18. Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1969). Bystander ‘apathy’. American Scientist, 57, 244-268.
19. Druckman, J. (2001a). Evaluating framing effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 96-101.
20. Druckman, J. (2001b). Using credible advice to overcome framing effects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17, 62-82.
21. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
22. Frank, R. (2000). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. Fukuyama, F. (2012). The origins of political order. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
24. Gerrans, P. (2009, July 9). Bubble trouble. Times Higher Education.
25. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332-346.
26. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
27. Gläser, J., & Whitley, R. (2007). The changing governance of the sciences. In R. Whitley (Ed.), The advent of research evaluation systems (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht: Springer.
28. Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Pluralistic ignorance: Historical development and organizational applications. Journal of Management History, 42(1), 126-138.
29. Hansen, P. G., & Hendricks, V. F. (2007). Anerkendelsens 0konomi og oplysningens vmrdi i det offentlige rum. KRITIK, #190, december, 41-51.
30. Hansen, P. G., & Hendricks, V. F. (2011). Oplysningens blinde vinkler: En andselit&r kritik af informationssamfundet. Copenhagen: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
31. Hansen, P. G., Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2013, April). Infostorms. Metaphilosophy, 44(3), 301-326.
32. Hendricks, V. F. (2010, April). Knowledge transmissibility and pluralistic ignorance. Metaphilosophy, 41(3), 279-291.
33. Hendricks, V. F., & Rasmussen, J. L. (2012). Nedtur! Finanskrisen forstaetfilosofisk. Copenhagen: Gyldendal Business.
34. Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2014a). Modules and signals for BBC: Bystanders, Bandwagons and Cascades, in preparation.
35. Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (Eds.). (2014b). Socio-epistemicphenomena: 5 questions. New York: Automatic Press/VIP.
36. Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Student attitudes. Syracuse: Craftsman.
37. Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theories and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Kroman, M. K. (2013). Investeringer og holdninger, report. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
39. Kroman, M. K., & Hendricks, V. F. (2014). Opinion bubbles. forthcoming.
40. Laudel, G. (2006). The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 489-504.
41. Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., Green, J. C., & Herrera, R. (2005). Party Polarization and “conflict extension” in the United States: he case of party activists. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the South Political Science Association. New Orleans.
42. Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83-110.
43. Lee, I. H. (1998). Market crashes and informational avalanches. Review of Economic Studies,65, 741-759.
44. List, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2001). Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9, 277-306.
45. Lynch, M. P. (2010). Democracy as a Space of Reasons. In J. Elkins & A. Norris (Eds.), Truth in Politics (pp. 249-270). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46. Mackie, D. M., & Cooper, J. (1984). Group polarization: The effects of group membership. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 46, 575-585.
47. Mallaby, S. (2010). More money than god: Hedge funds and the making of a new elite. Penguin Press.
48. Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555-562.
49. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Political bubbles: Financial crises and the failure ofAmerican democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50. Mellström, C., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right?. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 845-863. MIT Press.
51. Mirowski, P. (2013). The modern commercialization of science is a passel of Ponzi schemes. Social Epistemology, 26(4), 285-310.
52. Muchnik, L., Aral, S., & Taylor, J. (2013). Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341(6146), 647-651.
53. Myers, D. G. (1982). Polarizing effect of social interaction. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauger (Eds.), Group decision making. Academic Press.
54. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Policy Press.
55. Olsson, E. J. (2011, June). A simulation approach to veritistic social epistemology. Episteme, 8(2), 127-143.
56. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
57. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Books.
58. Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11-46.
59. Rendsvig, R. K., & Hendricks, V. F. (2014). Social proof in extensive games. The Review of Symbolic Logic. forthcoming.
60. Rip, A. (1988). Contextual changes in contemporary science. The Netherlands: University of Twente.
61. Rip, A. (2009, July). Futures of ELSA: Science and society series on convergence research. EMBO Reports, 10(7), 666-670.
62. Robinson, M. (2010). The privatization of neuroscience: the university, the state and the moral aims of science. Somatosphere.net. Accessed 11 Jan 2011.
63. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
64. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton Smith.
65. Schelling, T. C. (1981). Economic reasoning and the ethics of policy. Public Interest, 63, 37-61.
66. Soros, G. (2007). The age of fallibility. New York: Public Affairs.
67. Spalding, J. (2012). Conart—Why you ought to sell your Damien Hirst’s while you can. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
68. Sunstein, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175-195.
69. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Cass Sunstein: 5 Answers. In V. F. Hendricks & R. K. Rendsvig.
72. Stasavage, D. (2007). Polarization and publicity: Rethinking the benefits of deliberative democracy. Journal ofPolitics, 69(1), 59-72.
73. Titmuss, R. M. (1971). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. New Press; Exp Sub edition.
74. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
75. Vogel, H. L. (2010). Financial market bubbles and crashes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Weber, A. A. 2009. Weber says ECB has used room to cut interest rates. http://www.bloomberg.com. Accessed May 2013.
77. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.
78. Wadman, M. (2013). Behind the scenes of a brain-mapping moon shot. Nature Online. http://www.nature.com. Accessed 6 March 2013.
79. Ziman, J. M. (2001). Getting scientists to think about what they are doing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(2), 235-256.
80. Zuh, H. (2009). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums, executive compensation, and diversification. PhD- Dissertation, The University of Michigan.