The use of constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) to promote motor recovery following stroke

Cognitive Neurorehabilitation

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 401-416

  Morris, David M ^a   Taub, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Neurology and clinical neuroscience; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954240235     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316529898.029     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. American Heart Association (2005). Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. http://www.Americanheart.org/statistics/stroke.htm.
2. Azrin, N. H.,&Holz, W. C. (1996). Punishment. In W. K.Honig (Ed.), Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application (pp. 380-447). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Bach-y-Rita, P. (1993). Recovery from brain damage. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 6, 191-199.
4. Bach-y-Rita, P., & Bach-y-Rita, E. W. (1990). Biological and psychosocial factors in recovery from brain damage in humans. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 148-165.
5. Bauder, H., Sommer, M., Taub, E., & Miltner, W. H. R. (1999). Effect of CI therapy on movement-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 36, S31.
6. Butefisch, C., Hummelsheim, H., Densler, P., & Mauritz, K.-H. (1995). Mauritz, K-H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome ofmotor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. Journal of Neurological Science, 130, 59-68.
7. Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Health, United States. http.//www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm.
9. Dettmers, C., Teske, U., Hamzei, F. et al. (2005). Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 204-209.
10. Dobkin, B. H. (1989). Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcome. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 46, 701-703.
11. Duncan, P. W. (1997). Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 3, 1-20.
12. Duncan, P. W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B. et al. (2005). Management of adult rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke, 36, e100-e143.
13. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased use of the left hand in string players associated with increased cortical representation of the fingers. Science, 220, 21-23.
14. Estes, W. K. (1944). An experimental study of punishment. Psychological Monographs, 57, (Serial № 263).
15. Flor, H., Elbert, T., Knecht, S. et al. (1995). Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive reorganization in upper limb amputees. Nature, 375, 482-484.
16. Franz, S. I., Scheetz, M. E., & Wilson, A. A. (1915). The possibility of recovery of motor functioning in long-standing hemiplegia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 65, 2150-2154.
17. Halberstam, J. L., Zaretsky, H. H., Brucker, B. S., & Guttman, A. (1971). Avoidance conditioning of motor responses in elderly brain-damaged patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 52, 318-328.
18. Hesse, S., Bertelt, C., Schaffrin, A., Malezic, M. S., & Mauritz, K.-H. (1994). Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1087-1093.
19. Ince, L. P. (1969). Escape and avoidance conditioning of response in the plegic arm of stroke patients: a preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 16, 49-50.
20. Jenkins, W. M., Merzenich, M. M., Ochs, M. T., T., A., & Guic-Robles, E. (1990). Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 63, 82-104.
21. Knapp, H. D., Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. (1958). Effect of deafferentiation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science, 128, 842-843.
22. Kolb, B. (2003). Overview of cortical plasticity and recovery from brain injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 14, Suppl. 1, S7-S25.
23. Kopp, B., Kunkel, A., Flor, H. et al. (1997). The Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT): Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 615-620.
24. Kopp, B., Kunkel, A., Mühlnickel, W. et al. (1999). Plasticity in the motor system correlated with therapy-induced improvement of movement in human stroke patients. NeuroReport, 10, 807-810.
25. Kunkel, A., Kopp, B., Muller, G. et al. (1999). Constraintinduced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 624-628.
26. Lashley, K. S. (1924). Studies of cerebral function in learning: V. The retention of motor areas in primates. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 12, 249-276.
27. Levy, C. E., Nichols, D. S., Schmalbrock, P. M., Keller, P., & Chakers, D. W. (2001). Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 4-12.
28. Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Sommer, M. et al. (1998). Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neuroscience Letters, 250, 5-8.
29. Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Miltner, W. H. R., Taub, E., & Weiller, C. (2000). Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke, 31, 1210-1216.
30. Lum, P. S., Taub, E., Schwandt, D. et al. (2004). Automated constraint-induced therapy extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41, 249-257.
31. Lum, P. S., Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Hardin, P., & Mark, V.W. (2006). A tele-rehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43, 391-399.
32. Mark, V. W., & Taub, E. (2004). Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 22, 317-336.
33. McCulloch, K., Cook, E. W. I., Fleming, W. C. et al. (1988). A reliable test of upper extremity ADL function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 755.
34. Miltner, W. H. R., Bauder, H., Sommer, M., Dettmers, C., & Taub, E. (1999). Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke, 30, 586-592.
35. Miltner, W. H. R., Balzer, C., & Taub, E. (submitted). CI therapy treatment outcome tracked by substantial changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging.
36. Morgan, W. G. (1974). The shaping game: a teaching technique. Behavior Therapy, 5, 271-272.
37. Morris, D., & Taub, E. (2001). The constraint-induced therapy approach to restoring function after neurological injury. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8, 16-30.
38. Morris, D. M., Crago, J. E., DeLuca, S. C., Pidikiti, R. D., & Taub, E. (1997). Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabitation, 9, 29-43.
39. Morris, D. M., Uswatte, G., Crago, J. E., Cook, E. W. III., & Taub, E. (2001). The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 750-755.
40. Mott, F. W., & Sherrington, C. S. (1895). Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limbs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 57, 481-488.
41. Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996). Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery following ischemic infarct. Science, 272, 1791-1794.
42. Ostendorf, C. G., & Wolf, S. L. (1981). Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. Physical Therapy, 61, 1022-1028.
43. Panyan, M. V. (1980). How to use Shaping. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
44. Pons, T. P., Garraghty, A. K., Ommaya, A. K. et al. (1991). Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentiation in adult macaques. Science, 252, 1857-1860.
45. Recanzone, G. H., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1992a). Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1015-1030.
46. Recanzone, G. H., Merzenich, M. M., & Jenkins, W. M. (1992b). Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1057-1070.
47. Recanzone, G. H., Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Grajski, A., & Dinse, H. R. (1992c). Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1031-1056.
48. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
49. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
50. Sterr, A., Müller, M. M., Elbert, T. et al. (1998). Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature, 391, 134-135.
51. Sterr, A., Elbert, T., Berthold, I. et al. (2002). CI therapy in chronic hemiparesis: the more the better? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1374-1377.
52. Taub, E. (1980). Somatosensory deafferentation researchwith monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In L. P. Ince (Eds.), Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications (pp. 371-401). New York, NY: Williams & Wilkins.
53. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A. et al. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347-354.
54. Taub, E., Crago, J. E., Burgio, L. D. et al. (1994). An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 281-293.
55. Taub, E., Crago, J. E., & Uswatte, G. (1998). Constraintinduced movement therapy: a newapproach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 43, 152-170.
56. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Pidikiti, R. (1999). Constraintinduced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 237-251.
57. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Elbert, T. (2002). New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Neuroscience, 3, 226-236.
58. Taub, E., Lum, P. S., Hardin, P., Mark, V. W., & Uswatte, G. (2005). AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke, 36, 1301-1304.
59. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., King, D. K. et al. (2006). A placebo controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke, 37, 1045-1049.
60. Twitchell, T. E. (1954). Sensory factors in purposive movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 17, 239-254.
61. Uswatte, G., & Taub, E. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In D. T. Stuss, G. Winocur, & I. H. Robertson (Eds.), Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (pp. 214-229). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Uswatte, G., & Taub, E. (2005). Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraint-induced movement therapy. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 34-42.
63. Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D. M., Vignolo, M., & McCulloch, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke, 36, 2493-2496.
64. Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D. M., Barman, J., & Crago, J. (2006). Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. Neurorehabilitation, 21, 147-156.
65. Wittenberg, G. F., Chen, R., Ishii, K. et al. (2003). Constraintinducedmovement therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 17, 48-57.
66. Wolf, S. L., Lecraw, D. E., Barton, L. A., & Jann, B. B. (1989). Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and headinjured patients. Experimental Neurology, 104, 104-132.
67. Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M. et al. (2001). Assessing the Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for research with patients post-stroke. Stroke, 32, 1635-1639.
68. Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C., Miller, J. P. et al. (2006). The Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial for patients with sub-acute stroke. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2095-2104.