Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 152-170

  Taub, Edward ^a   Crago, Jean E ^a   Uswatte, Gitendra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; DRUG ABUSE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REVIEW; STROKE; THEORY;

EID: 0031828860     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.43.2.152     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Andrews, K., & Stewart, J. (1979). Stroke recovery: He can but does he? Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 18, 43-48.
2. Baxter-Petralia, P., Bruening, L. A., Blackmore, S. M., & McEntee, P. M. (1990). Physical capacity evaluation. In J. M. Hunter (Ed.), Rehabilitation of the hand (pp. 93-108). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
3. Birbaumer, N. P., & Taub, E. (1994). Constraint-induced facilitation to overcome impaired movement: Application in treatment of a spinal cord-injured patient. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Butefisch, C., Hummelsheim, H., Denzler, P., & Mauritz, K-H. (1995). Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 130, 59-68.
5. Chambers, W. W., Konorski, J., Liu, C. N., Yu, J., & Anderson, R. (1972). The effects of cerebellar lesions upon skilled movements and instrumental conditioned reflexes. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 32, 721-732.
6. Chatterjee, A., Edwards, D., Uswatte, G., & Taub, E. (1997). [Lesion location as a predictor of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy outcome with chronic stroke patients]. Unpublished data.
7. Computer Science Applications. (1996). Activity monitor Model 7164 [Manual]. Shalimar, FL: Author.
8. Cress, M. E., Buchner, D. M., Questad, K. A., Esselman, P. C., deLateur, B. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (1996). Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults: A validation study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 1243-1250.
9. Crocker, M. D., MacKay-Lyons, M., & McDonnell, E. (1997). Forced use of the upper extremity in cerebral palsy: A single case design. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 824-833.
10. DeLuca, S. C., Crago, J. E., & Taub, E. (1997). [Use of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for a case of hemiparesis of early origin]. Unpublished data.
11. Desai, V. (1991, March). Report on functional utility score change in nine chronic stroke or closed head injury patients receiving a training program for overcoming learned nonuse as part of a multi modality treatment program. In N. E. Miller (Chair), Overcoming learned nonuse and the release of covert behavior as a new approach to physical medicine. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association of Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Dallas, TX.
12. Dobkin, B. H. (1989). Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcome. Archives of Neurology, 46, 701-703.
13. Duncan, P. W. (1997). Synthesis of intervention trails to improve motor recovery following stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 3, 1-20.
14. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased use of the left hand in string players associated with increased cortical representation of the fingers. Science, 270, 305-307.
15. Ernst, E. (1990). A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke, 21, 1081-1085.
16. Flor, H., Elbert, S., Knecht, C., Wienbruch, C., Pantev, C., Birmbaumer, N., Larbig, W., & Taub, E. (1995). Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive cortical reorganization in upper limb amputees. Nature, 375, 482-484.
17. Fordyce, W. E. (1991). Behavioral factors in pain. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2, 749-759.
18. Halberstam, J. L., Zaretsky, H. H., Brucker, B. S., & Gutman, A. (1971). Avoidance conditioning of motor responses in elderly brain-damaged patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 52, 318-328.
19. Hesse, S., Bertelt, C., Schaffrin, A., Malezic, M., & Mauritz, K-H. (1994). Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1087-1093.
20. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166-170.
21. Horak, F. (1992). Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In Contemporary management of motor control problems. Proceedings of the II Step Conference, American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, 11-28.
22. Ince, L. P. (1969). Escape and avoidance conditioning of response in the plegic arm of stroke patients: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 16, 49-50.
23. Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970). Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist, 1, 20-30.
24. Keith, R. A. (1995). Conceptual basis of outcome measures. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 73-80.
25. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. In M. G. Eisenberg & R. C. Grzesiak (Eds.), Advances in clinical rehabilitation, Vol. 1 (pp. 6-18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Kimble, G. S. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis'conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Knapp, H. D., Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. (1958). Effect of deafferentation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science, 128, 842-843.
28. Knapp, H. D., Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. (1963). Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Experimental Neurology, 7, 305-315.
29. Koelbel, S., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Sterr, A., Jahn, T., & Taub, E. (1997, May). Constraint-induced movement therapy under German conditions. Paper read at the meeting of the European Congress of Psychophysiology, Konstanz, Germany.
30. Kopp, B., Kunkel, A., Flor, H., Platz, T., Rose, U., Mauritz, K. H., Gresser, K., McCulloch, K. L., & Taub, E. (1997). The Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT): Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing ADL disability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 615-620.
31. Kunkel, A., Kopp, B., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (1997, November). Constraint-induced facilitation of movement in patients after central nervous system lesions. Paper presented at the Second Berlin Conference on Cortical Plasticity, Berlin, Germany.
32. Lashley, K. S. (1924). Studies of cerebral function in learning: V. The retention of motor areas in primates. Archives of Neurology and Psychology, 12, 249-276.
33. Lassek, A. M. (1953). Inactivation of voluntary motor function following rhizotomy. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 2, 83-87.
34. Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Sommer, M., Miltner, W. H. R., Dettmers, C., Weiller, C., & Taub, E. (in press). Motor cortex plasticity during Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neuroscience Letters.
35. Mahoney, R. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Mid-state Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
36. McCulloch, K., Cook, E. W., III, Fleming, W. C., Novack, T. A., Nepomuceno, C. S., & Taub, E. (1988). A reliable test of upper extremity ADL function [Abstract]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 755.
37. Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M. P., Cynader, M. S., Shoppmann, A., and Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224, 591-605.
38. Morgan, W. G. (1974). The shaping game: A teaching technique. Behavior Therapy, 5, 271-272.
39. Morris, D. M., Crago, J. E., DeLuca, S. C., Pidikiti, R. D., & Taub, E. (1997). Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 9, 29-43.
40. Mott, P. W., & Sherrington, C. S. (1895). Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon the movement and nutrition of limbs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 57, 481-488.
41. Muehlnickel, W., Elbert, T., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (in press). Deviations from the tonotopic map are correlated with tinnitus strength. In C. Aine, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S. Swithenby, & C. Wood (Eds.), Advances in biomagnetism research: Biomag96 (Vol. II). New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Novack, T. A., Dillon, M. C., & Jackson, W. T. (1996). Neurochemical mechanisms in brain injury and treatment: A review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 685-706.
43. Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996). Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery following ischemic infarct. Science, 272, 1791-1794.
44. Ogden, R., & Franz, S. I. (1917). On cerebral motor control: The recovery from experimentally produced hemiplegia. Psychology, 1, 33-50.
45. Ostendorf, C. G., & Wolf, S. L. (1981). Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. Physical Therapy, 61, 1022-1028.
46. Panyan, M. V. (1980). How to use shaping. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
47. de Pedro-Cuesta, J., Widen-Holmqvist, L., & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1992). Evaluation of stroke rehabilitation by randomized controlled studies: A review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, 86, 433-439.
48. Pons, T. P., Garraghty, P. E., Ommaya, A. K., Kaas, J. H., Taub, E., & Mishkin, M. (1991). Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science, 252, 1857-1860.
49. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
50. Schwab, M. E., & Bartholdi, D. (1996). Degeneration and regeneration of axons in the lesioned spinal cord. Psychological Reviews, 76, 319-370.
51. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (1995). Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
52. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
53. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
54. Smith, D. S., & Clark, M. S. (1995). Competence and performance in activities of daily living in patients following rehabilitation from stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 15-23.
55. Sommer, M., Bauder, H., Miltner, W., & Taub, E. (1997, March). Ein neues psychologisch - rehabilitatives Behandling fuer Schlanganfallpatienten [New psychological rehabilitation technique for stroke patients]. Paper presented at the meeting of the German Society of Behavioral Medicine, Jena, Germany.
56. Spear, M., Yakley, S., & Taub, E. (1998). [Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Use for the lower extremity in chronic stroke patients]. Unpublished data.
57. Sterr, A., Mueller, M. M., Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Pantev, C., & Taub, E. (1998). Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature, 391, 134-135.
58. Taub, E. (1976). Motor behavior following deafferentation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In R. Herman, S. Grillner, H. J. Ralston, P. S. G. Stein, & D. Stuart (Eds.), Neural control of locomotion. New York: Plenum Press.
59. Taub, E. (1977). Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In Exercise and sports science reviews (Vol. 4, pp. 335-374). Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates.
60. Taub, E. (1980). Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In L. P. Ince (Ed.), Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: Clinical applications (pp. 371-401). New York: Williams & Wilkins.
61. Taub, E. (1994). Overcoming learned nonuse: A new approach to treatment in physical medicine. In J. G. Carlson, A. R. Seifert, & N. Birbaumer (Eds.), Clinical applied psychophysiology (pp. 185-220). New York: Plenum Press.
62. Taub, E., Bacon, R., & Berman, A. J. (1965). The acquisition of a trace-conditioned response after deafferentation of the responding limb. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 58, 275-279.
63. Taub, E., DeLuca, S., & Crago, J. E. (1996). Actual Amount of Use Test (AAUT) [Manual]. (Available from Edward Taub, Psychology Department, UAB, CH415, 1300 8th Ave. S., Birmingham, AL 35294).
64. Taub, E., Ellman, S. J., & Berman, A. J. (1966). Deafferentation in monkeys: Effect on conditioned grasp response. Science, 151, 593-594.
65. Taub, E., Flor, H., Knecht, S., & Elbert, E. (1995). Correlation between phantom limb pain and cortical reorganization. The Journal of NIH Research, 7, 49-50.
66. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., III, Fleming, W. D., Nepomuceno, C. S., Connell, J. S., & Crago, J. E. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347-354.
67. Taub, E., Perrella, P. N., Miller, N. E., & Barro, G. (1973). Behavioral development following forelimb deafferentation on day of birth in monkeys with and without blinding. Science, 181, 959-960.
68. Taub, E., Perrella, P. N., Miller, E., & Barro, G. (1975). Diminution of early environmental control through perinatal and prenatal somatosensory deafferentation. Biological Psychiatry, 10, 609-626.
69. Taub, E., Pidikiti, R. D., DeLuca, S. C., & Crago, J. E. (1996). Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In J. Toole (Ed.), Imaging and neurologic rehabilitation (pp. 133-154). New York: Demos.
70. Taub, E., Williams, M., Barro, G., & Steiner, S. S. (1978). Comparison of the performance of deafferented and intact monkeys on continuous and fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement. Experimental Neurology, 58, 1-13.
71. Taub, E., & Wolf, S. (1997). Constraint induction techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 3, 38-61.
72. Tower, S. S. (1940). Pyramidal lesion in the monkey. Brain, 63, 36-90.
73. Tries, J. M. (1991, March). Learned nonuse: A factor in incontinence. In N. E. Miller (Chair), Overcoming learned nonuse and the release of covert behavior as a new approach to physical medicine. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Dallas, TX.
74. Tryon, W., & Williams, R. (1996). Fully proportional actigraphy: A new instrument. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 392-403.
75. Uswatte, G., Miltner, W., Walker, H., Spraggins, S., Moran, S., Calhoun, J., Beatty, C., & Taub, E. (1997). Accelerometers in rehabilitation: Objective measurement of extremity use at home [Abstract]. Rehabilitation Psychology, 42, 139.
76. Uswatte, G., & Taub, E. (in press). Constraint-induced movement therapy: New approaches to measurement in physical rehabilitation. In D. T. Stuss, G. Winocur, & I. H. Robertson (Eds.), Cognitive neurorehabilitation: A comprehensive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
78. Wolf, S. L. (1983). Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients: A critical review. Physical Therapy, 63, 1148-1455.
79. Wolf, S. L., & Binder-Macleod, S. A. (1983). Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Physical Therapy, 63, 1393-1403.
80. Wolf, S. L., Lecraw, D. E., Barton, L. A., & Jann, B. B. (1989). Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Experimental Neurology, 104, 125-132.