Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 29-43

  Morris, David M ^a   Crago, Jean E ^b   DeLuca, Stephanie C ^a   Pidikiti, Rama D ^c   Taub, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c BIRMINGHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Motor control; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Therapy; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NONHUMAN; REHABILITATION; STROKE; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0031001147     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8135(97)00012-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WD, Nepomuceno CS et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-354.
2. Taub E, Crago JE. Overcoming learned non-use. A new behavioral approach to physical medicine. In: Kikuchi T, Sakuma H, Saito K, Tsuboi K, editors. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1995:2-9.
3. Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain behaviors. In: Toole J, editor. Imaging and neurologic rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Publications, 1996:133-154.
4. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induction techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Rehabil, 1997.
5. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use in hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non-use among chronic stroke and head injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-132.
6. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1979;18:43-48.
7. Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke 1990;21:1081-1085.
8. de Pedro-Cuestra J, Widen-Holmquist L, Back-y-Rita P. Evaluation of stroke rehabilitation by randomized controlled studies: a review. Acta Neurol Scand 1992;86:433-439.
9. Bach-y-Rita P. Recovery from brain damage. J Neurol Rehabil 1993;6:191-199.
10. Bach-y-Rita P, Wicab Bach-y-Rita E. Biological and psychosocial factors in recovery from brain damage in humans. Can J Psychol 1990;44:148-165.
11. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Effect of deafferentation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science 1958;128:842-843.
12. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Movement in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol 1963;7:305-315.
13. Taub E. Motor behavior following deafferentation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In: Herman R, Grillner S, Ralston PS, Stein PSG, Stuart D, editors. Neural control of locomotion. New York, NY: Plenium Press, 1976:605-705.
14. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: Exercise and sports science reviews, vol. 4. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates, 1977:335-374.
15. Taub E, Bacon R, Berman AJ. The acquisition of a trace-conditioned avoidance response after deafferentation of the responding limb. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1965;58:275-279.
16. Taub E, Berman AJ. Avoidance conditioning in the absence of relevant proprioceptive and exteroceptive feedback. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1963;56:1012-1016.
17. Taub E, Ellman SJ, Berman AJ. Deafferentation in monkeys. Effect on conditioned grasp response. Science 1966;151:593-594.
18. Taub E, Goldberg IA, Taub PB. Deafferentation in monkeys: pointing at a target without visual feedback. Exp Neurol 1975;46:178-186.
19. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.
20. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
21. Risely TR, Baer DM. Operant behavior modification; the deliberate development of behavior. In: Caldwell M, Riccuiti HN, editors. Review of child development research, vol. III. Development and social action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1973:283-329.
22. Morgan GW. The shaping game: a technique. Behav Ther 1974;5:481-488.
23. Panyan MV. How to use shaping. Lawrence, KS: H and H Enterprises, 1980.
24. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. New York, NY: Williams and Wilkins, 1980:371-401.
25. Taub E, Perella PN, Miller EA, Barro G. Diminution of early environmental control through perinatal and pre-natal somatosensory deafferentation. Biol Psychiatry 1975;10:609-626.
26. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WD, Nepo Muceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993;74:354.
27. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, Platz T, Ulrike R, Mauritz KH, Gresser K, McCulloch KL, Taub E. The arm motor ability test (AMAT): Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in the activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; in press.
28. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW, DeLuca SC et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned non-use by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994;61:281-293.