Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 27-48

  Shariff, Azim F ^a   Willard, Aiyana K ^b   Andersen, Teresa ^a   Norenzayan, Ara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

helping prosocial behavior; morality; priming; religion; research methods

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; RELIGION; COOPERATION; MORALITY; REPETITION PRIMING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

HELPING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MORALS; RELIGION; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY; REPETITION PRIMING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84954200449     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: 15327957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868314568811     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. A.M.AhmedM.Hammarstedt (2011). The effect of subtle religious representations on cooperation. International Journal of Social Economics, 38, 900-910.
2. A.M.*AhmedO.Salas (2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 242-246.
3. A.M.*AhmedO.Salas (2013). Religious context and prosociality: An experimental study from Valparaíso, Chile. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 627-637.
4. G.W.Allport (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
5. J.B.AsendorpfM.ConnerF.De FruytJ.De HouwerJ.J.DenissenK.FiedlerJ.M.. Wicherts (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108-119.
6. M.E.*Aveyard (2014). A call to honesty: Extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PLoS ONE, 9(7), Article e99447.
7. M.W.*BaldwinS.E.CarrellD.F.Lopez (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
8. J.A.BarghM.ChenL.Burrows (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
9. D.J.*BenjaminJ.J.ChoiG.W.Fisher (2010). Religious identity and economic behavior (No. w15925). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. J.Bering (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
11. J.Bulbulia (2007). The evolution of religion. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. T.P.*CarpenterM.A.Marshall (2009). An examination of religious priming and intrinsic religious motivation in the moral hypocrisy paradigm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 386-393.
13. E.*Carter (2014). [Religious priming and delay discounting]. Unpublished raw data.
14. S.E.*CavrakH.M.Kleider-Offutt (in press). Pictures are worth a thousand words and a moral decision or two: Religious symbols prime moral judgments. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.
15. K.Q.*ChanE.M.W.TongY.L.Tan (2014). Taking a leap of faith reminders of God lead to greater risk taking. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 901-909.
16. E.*CohenR.MundryS.Kirschner (2014). Religion, synchrony, and cooperation. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4, 20-30.
17. J.Cohen (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
18. G.Cumming (2014). The new statistics why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
19. G.CummingF.FidlerP.KalinowskiJ.Lai (2012). The statistical recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64, 138-146.
20. A.DijksterhuisJ.A.Bargh (2001). The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1-40.
21. A.*DijksterhuisJ.PrestonD.M.WegnerH.Aarts (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 2-9.
22. A.DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergR.W.Holland (2014). Evaluating behavior priming research: Three observations and a recommendation. Social Cognition, 32, 196-208.
23. S.DoyenO.KleinC.L.PichonA.Cleeremans (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind?PLoS ONE, 7(1), Article e29081.
24. E.*Duhaime (2014). Did religion facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperative societies? (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
25. E.Durkheim (2001). The elementary forms of religious life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1912)
26. S.DuvalR.Tweedie (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
27. R.A.EmmonsR.F.Paloutzian (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377-402.
28. T.A.*FergusW.C.Rowatt (2015). Uncertainty, God, and scrupulosity: Uncertainty salience and priming God concepts interact to cause greater fears of sin. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 93-98.
29. S.Freud (1961). The future of an illusion. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. (Original work published 1927)
30. L.W.Galen (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876-906.
31. W.M.*GervaisA.Norenzayan (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 298-302.
32. W.M.GervaisA.Norenzayan (2013). Religion and the origins of anti-atheist prejudice. In (Eds.), Intolerance and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 126-145). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. W.M.*GervaisA.Norenzayan (2014). [Religion, self-awareness, and generosity]. Unpublished raw data.
34. W.M.GervaisA.F.ShariffA.Norenzayan (2011). Do You Believe in Atheists? Trust and anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189-1206.
35. J.*GingesI.HansenA.Norenzayan (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224-230.
36. P.*GranqvistM.MikulincerV.GewirtzP.R.Shaver (2012). Experimental findings on God as an attachment figure: Normative processes and moderating effects of internal working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 804-818.
37. M.HadnesH.Schumacher (2012). The Gods are watching: An experimental study of religion and traditional belief in Burkina Faso. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 689-704.
38. G.S.Hall (1917). Jesus, the Christ, in the light of psychology (Vol 2). New York, NY: Appleton.
39. J.M.D.HarrisonR.T.McKay (2013). Do religious and moral concepts influence the ability to delay gratification? A priming study. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 10, 25-40.
40. D.O.Hebb (1949). The organization of behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.
41. L.V.Hedges (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
42. J.HenrichS.J.HeineA.Norenzayan (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-135.
43. P.HerbisonJ.Hay-SmithW.J.Gillespie (2006). Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1249-1256.
44. J.P.Higgins (Ed.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 5). Chichester, UK: Wiley–Blackwell.
45. L.*Hone (2014). [Religious priming and hand-grip endurance]. Unpublished raw data.
46. J.J.*HortonD.G.RandR.J.Zeckhauser (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425.
47. C.R.HullettT.R.Levine (2003). The overestimation of effect sizes from F values in meta-analysis: The cause and a solution. Communication Monographs, 70, 52-67.
48. S.G.Hurst (2014). Religion’s moral delusion (Unpublished master’s thesis). London School of Economics, London, UK.
49. M.*InzlichtA.M.Tullett (2010). Reflecting on God: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psychological Science, 21, 1184-1190.
50. W.James (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
51. M.K.*JohnsonW.C.RowattJ.LaBouff (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119-126.
52. M.K.*JohnsonW.C.RowattJ.P.LaBouff (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 154-168.
53. P.JuniA.WitschiR.BlochM.T.Egger (1999). The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1054-1060.
54. D.M.KuporK.LaurinJ.Levav (in press). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of God can increase non-moral risk-taking. Psychological Science.
55. J.P.*LaBouffW.C.RowattM.K.JohnsonC.Finkle (2012). Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 1-9.
56. K.*LaurinA.C.KayG.M.Fitzsimons (2011). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4-21.
57. E.L.Lehmann (1986). Testing statistical hypotheses (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
58. T.R.LevineK.J.AsadaC.Carpenter (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286-302.
59. B.LittenbergL.E.Moses (1993). Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: A new meta-analytic method. Medical Decision Making, 13, 313-321.
60. M.E.*McCulloughE.C.CarterC.N.DeWallC.M.Corrales (2012). Religious cognition down-regulates sexually selected, characteristically male behaviors in men, but not in women. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 562-568.
61. R.*McKayC.EffersonH.WhitehouseE.Fehr (2011). Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1858-1863.
62. D.C.Molden (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: An overview and integration. Social Cognition, 32, 243-249.
63. B.R.NewellD.R.Shanks (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 1-19.
64. A.Norenzayan (2013). Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. A.NorenzayanJ.HenrichE.Slingerland (2013). Religious prosociality: A synthesis. In (Eds.), Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion (pp. 365-378). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. A.NorenzayanA.F.Shariff (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58-62.
67. A.NorenzayanA.F.ShariffW.M.GervaisA.K.WillardR.McNamaraE.SlingerlandJ.Henrich (in press). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
68. H.PashlerN.CoburnC.R.Harris (2012). Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments. PLoS ONE, 7(8), Article e42510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042510
69. I.*PichonG.BoccatoV.Saroglou (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032-1045.
70. I.PichonV.Saroglou (2009). Religion and helping: Impact of target thinking styles and just-world beliefs. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspychologie, 31, 215-236.
71. M.S.PratteJ.N.Rouder (2009). A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1276-1283.
72. J.L.PrestonR.S.Ritter (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1471-1483.
73. T.ProulxM.InzlichtE.Harmon-Jones (2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285-291.
74. B.G.*PurzyckiA.BaimelR.McNamaraA.K.Willard (2014). [Religious priming adapted for use in small-scale societies-pilot]. Unpublished raw data.
75. J.E.RamsayJ.S.PangM.J.ShenW.C.Rowatt (2014). Rethinking value violation: Priming religion increases prejudice in Singaporean Christians and Buddhists. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24, 1-15.
76. D.G.*RandA.DreberO.S.HaqueR.J.KaneM.A.NowakS.Coakley (2013). Religious motivations for cooperation: An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4, 31-48.
77. B.*Randolph-SengM.E.Nielsen (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303-315.
78. F.D.RichardC.F.BondJr.J.J.Stokes-Zoota (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
79. L.M.RodriguezC.NeighborsD.W.Foster (2013). Priming effects of self-reported drinking and religiosity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1-9.
80. R.Rosenthal (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183-192.
81. K.RoundingA.LeeJ.A.JacobsonL.J.Ji (2012). Religion replenishes self-control. Psychological Science, 23, 635-642.
82. A.M.*Rutchick (2010). Deus ex machina: The influence of polling place on voting behavior. Political Psychology, 31, 209-225.
83. M.S.RyeK.I.PargamentM.A.AliG.L.BeckE.N.DorffC.HalliseyJ.G.…Williams (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17-40). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
84. C.*SagioglouM.Forstmann (2013). Activating Christian religious concepts increases intolerance of ambiguity and judgment certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 933-939.
85. V.*SaroglouO.CorneilleP.Van Cappellen (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143-154.
86. J.Y.*SasakiH.S.KimT.MojaverianL.D.KelleyI.Y.ParkS.Janušonis (2013). Religion priming differentially increases prosocial behavior among variants of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 209-215.
87. K.*SchumannI.McGregorK.A.NashM.Ross (2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 432-453.
88. C.SedikidesJ.E.Gebauer (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17-36.
89. D.R.ShanksB.R.NewellE.H.LeeD.BalakrishnanL.EkelundZ.CenacC.Moore (2013). Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS ONE, 8(4), Article e56515.
90. A.F.Shariff (2011). Big Gods were made for big groups: Commentary on Schloss & Murray. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 89-93.
91. A.F.*ShariffA.Norenzayan (2007). God is watching you: Supernatural agent concepts increase prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803-809.
92. J.P.SimmonsL.D.NelsonU.Simonsohn (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366.
93. U.SimonsohnL.NelsonJ.Simmons (2014). P-curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534-547.
94. R.SosisB.J.Ruffle (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular Kibbutzim1. Current Anthropology, 44, 713-722.
95. T.K.SrullR.S.Wyer (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
96. T.*ToburenB.P.Meier (2010). Priming God-related concepts increases anxiety and task persistence. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 29, 127-143.
97. J.A.*TsangA.SchulwitzR.D.Carlisle (2012). An experimental test of the relationship between religion and gratitude. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 40-55.
98. P.*Van CappellenO.CorneilleS.ColsV.Saroglou (2011). Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 97-105.
99. M.van ElkB.T.RutjensJ.van der PligtF.van Harreveld (in press). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior.
100. W.Viechtbauer (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
101. F.M.A.Voltaire (1825). Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire (Vol. 65). Paris, France: Antoine-Augustin Renouard.
102. W.A.Wallis (1942). Compounding probabilities from independent significance tests. Econometrica, 10, 229-248.
103. J.L.Wenger (2004). The automatic activation of religious concepts: Implications for religious orientations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 109-123.
104. S.C.WheelerK.G.DeMarreeR.E.Petty (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime to behavior effects: The Active-Self Account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.
105. L.Wilkinson (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
106. J.*Willis (2014). [A neurophysiological investigation of religion’s effect on group endorsement]. Unpublished raw data.
107. D.*Xygalatas (2012). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 3, 91-102.
108. D.XygalatasP.MitkidisR.FischerP.ReddishJ.SkewesA.W.GeertzJ.. Bulbulia (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24, 1602-1605.
109. O.*YilmazH.G.Bahçekapili (2014). Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs. Unpublished manuscript.