A three dimensional micropatterned tumor model for breast cancer cell migration studies

Biomaterials

Volumn 81, Issue , 2016, Pages 72-83

  Peela, Nitish ^a   Sam, Feba S ^a   Christenson, Wayne ^a   Truong, Danh ^a   Watson, Adam W ^b   Mouneimne, Ghassan ^b   Ros, Robert ^a   Nikkhah, Mehdi ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA); MCF10A; MCF7; MDA MB 231; Microengineering; Photolithography; Real time cell tracking; Tumor model

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; DISEASES; FLUORINE; HYDROGELS; PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; STIFFNESS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; TUMORS;

CELL TRACKING; GELATIN METHACRYLATE (GELMA); MCF10A; MCF7; MDA-MB-231; MICRO-ENGINEERING; TUMOR MODELS;

CELLS;

ALPHA TUBULIN; F ACTIN; GELATIN; METHACRYLIC ACID; 4',6 DIAMIDINO 2 PHENYLINDOLE; ACTIN; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; RHODAMINE; RHODAMINE B;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BREAST CANCER CELL LINE; BREAST EPITHELIUM CELL; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRACKING; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; CYTOSKELETON; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; MCF 7 CELL LINE; MICROTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; TUMOR MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST TUMOR; CELL MOTION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; FLUORESCENCE; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ACTINS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL TRACKING; CYTOSKELETON; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; INDOLES; MICROTECHNOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RHODAMINES; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84953319210     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Braun S., Naume B. Circulating and disseminated tumor cells. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23:1623-1626.
2. Foroni C., Broggini M., Generali D., Damia G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer: role, molecular mechanisms and clinical impact. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38:689-697.
3. Friedl P., Wolf K. Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3:362-374.
4. Geiger T.R., Peeper D.S. Metastasis mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1796:293-308.
5. Lu P., Weaver V.M., Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:395-406.
6. Dyke T.V., Jacks T. Cancer modeling in the modern era: progress and challenges. Cell 2002, 108:135-144.
7. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., Agah M. Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed. Microdevices 2009, 11:429-441.
8. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., De Vita R., Agah M. The cytoskeletal organization of breast carcinoma and fibroblast cells inside three dimensional (3-D) isotropic silicon microstructures. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4552-4561.
9. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., Schmelz E.M., Roberts P.C., Zhou H., Agah M. MCF10A and MDA-MB-231 human breast basal epithelial cell co-culture in silicon micro-arrays. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7625-7632.
10. Nikkhah M., Edalat F., Manoucheri S., Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials 2012, 33:5230-5246.
11. Kleinman H.K., Martin G.R. Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2005, 15:378-386.
12. Liu J., Tan Y., Zhang H., Zhang Y., Xu P., Chen J., et al. Soft fibrin gels promote selection and growth of tumorigenic cells. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11:734-741.
13. Grinnell F. Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:264-269.
14. Raeber G.P., Lutolf M.P., Hubbell J.A. Molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels: a novel model system for proteolytically mediated cell migration. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:1374-1388.
15. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
16. Park T.H., Shuler M.L. Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19:243-253.
17. Pedron S., Harley B.A. Impact of the biophysical features of a 3D gelatin microenvironment on glioblastoma malignancy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 101:3404-3415.
18. Dickinson L.E., Lutgebaucks C., Lewis D.M., Gerecht S. Patterning microscale extracellular matrices to study endothelial and cancer cell interactions in vitro. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4244-4248.
19. Banks J.M., Harley B.A.C., Bailey R.C. Tunable, photoreactive hydrogel system to probe synergies between mechanical and biomolecular cues on adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1:718-725.
20. Alsop A.T., Pence J.C., Weisgerber D.W., Harley B.A., Bailey R.C. Photopatterning of vascular endothelial growth factor within collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds can induce a spatially confined response in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10:4715-4722.
21. Nichol J.W., Koshy S.T., Bae H., Hwang C.M., Yamanlar S., Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5536-5544.
22. Aubin H., Nichol J.W., Hutson C.B., Bae H., Sieminski A.L., Cropek D.M., et al. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6941-6951.
23. Nikkhah M., Eshak N., Zorlutuna P., Annabi N., Castello M., Kim K., et al. Directed endothelial cell morphogenesis in micropatterned gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 2012, 33:9009-9018.
24. Schuurman W., Levett P.A., Pot M.W., van Weeren P.R., Dhert W.J., Hutmacher D.W., et al. Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13:551-561.
25. Van Den Bulcke A.I., Bogdanov B., Rooze N.D., Schact E.H., Cornelissen M., Berghmans H. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1:31-38.
26. Bertassoni L.E., Cecconi M., Manoharan V., Nikkhah M., Hjortnaes J., Cristino A.L., et al. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip 2014, 14:2202-2211.
27. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., Nikkhah M., Gaharwar A.K., Hashmi B., Guermani E., Aliabadi H., et al. A combinatorial cell-laden gel microarray for inducing osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:3896.
28. Kaemmerer E., Melchels F.P., Holzapfel B.M., Meckel T., Hutmacher D.W., Loessner D. Gelatine methacrylamide-based hydrogels: an alternative three-dimensional cancer cell culture system. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10:2551-2562.
29. Schulz O., Koberling F., Walters D., Koenig M., Viani J., Ros R. Simultaneous single molecule atomic force and fluorescence lifetime imaging. SPIE 2010, 7571:757109-757110.
30. Fuhrmann A., Staunton J.R., Nandakumar V., Banyai N., Davies P., Ros R. AFM stiffness nanotomography of normal, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8:10.
31. Agus D.B., Alexander J.F., Arap W., Ashili S., Aslan J.E., Austin R.H., et al. A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:1449.
32. Butt H., Jaschke M. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 1995, 6:1-7.
33. Guo S., Akhremitcev B.B. Packing density and structural heterogeneity of insulin amyloid fibrils measured by AFM nanoindentation. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1630-1636.
34. Kiss A., Horvath P., Rothballer A., Kutay U., Csucs G. Nuclear motility in glioma cells reveals a cell-line dependent role of various cytoskeletal components. PLoS One 2014, 9:e93431.
35. Saini H., Navaei A., Putten A.V., Nikkhah M. 3D cardiac microtissues encapsulated with the co-culture of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4:1961-1971.
36. Tanner K., Mori H., Mroue R., Bruni-Cardoso A., Bissell M.J. Coherent angular motion in the establishment of multicellular architecture of glandular tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:1973-1978.
37. Kimlin L.C., Casagrande G., Virador V.M. In vitro three-dimensional (3D) models in cancer research: an update. Mol. Carcinog. 2013, 52:167-182.
38. Son T.I., Sakuragi M., Takahashi S., Obuse S., Kang J., Fujishiro M., et al. Visible light-induced crosslinkable gelatin. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:4005-4010.
39. Fenn S.L., Oldinski R.A. Visible light crosslinking of methacrylated hyaluronan hydrogels for injectable tissue repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2015, [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1002/jbm.b.3347.
40. Zaman M.H., Trapani L.M., Sieminski A.L., Mackellar D., Gong H., Kamm R.D., et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:10889-10894.
41. Kraning-Rush C.M., Reinhart-King C.A. Controlling matrix stiffness and topography for the study of tumor cell migration. Cell Adh. Migr. 2012, 6:274-279.
42. Friedl P., Gilmour D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:445-457.
43. Ehrbar M., Sala A., Lienemann P., Ranga A., Mosiewicz K., Bittermann A., et al. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:284-293.
44. Stowers R.S., Allen S.C., Suggs L.J. Dynamic phototuning of 3D hydrogel stiffness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015, 17:1953-1958.
45. Mayor R., Carmona-Fontaine C. Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:319-328.
46. Desai R.A., Gopal S.B., Chen S., Chen C.S. Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10:20130717.
47. Petrie R.J., Yamada K.M. At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:5917-5926.
48. Poincloux R., Collin O., Lizarraga F., Romao M., Debray M., Piel M., et al. Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D matrigel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:1943-1948.
49. Lance A., Yang C., Swamyda M., Dean D., Deitch S., Burg K.J., et al. Increased extracellular matrix density decreases MCF10A breast cell acinus formation in 3D culture conditions. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1002/term.1675.
50. Nedvetsky P.I., Kwon S.H., Debnath J., Mostov K.E. Cyclic AMP regulates formation of mammary epithelial acini in vitro. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:2973-2981.
51. Krause S., Maffini M.V., Soto A.M., Sonnenschein C. The microenvironment determines the breast cancer cells' phenotype: organization of MCF7 cells in 3D cultures. BMC Cancer 2010, 10:263.
52. Rhee S., Jiang H., Ho C., Grinnell F. Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:5425-5430.
53. Peyton S.R., Ghajar C.M., Khatiwala C.B., Putnam A.J. The emergence of ECM mechanics and cytoskeletal tension as important regulators of cell function. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 47:300-320.
54. Rovini A., Savry A., Braguer D., Carre M. Microtubule-targeted agents: when mitochondria become essential to chemotherapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1807:679-688.
55. Jordan M.A., Wilson N. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4:253-265.
56. Jordan M.A., Dumontet C. Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9:790-803.
57. Escuin D., Kline E.R., Giannakakou P. Both microtubule-stabilizing and microtubule-destabilizing drugs inhibit hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha accumulation and activity by disrupting microtubule function. Cancer Res. 2005, 65:9021-9028.