The cytoskeletal organization of breast carcinoma and fibroblast cells inside three dimensional (3-D) isotropic silicon microstructures

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 4552-4561

  Nikkhah, Mehdi ^a   Strobl, Jeannine S ^a,b   De Vita, Raffaella ^a   Agah, Masoud ^a  

^a State University   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AFM; Breast cancer; HS68 fibroblasts; Isotropic; MEMS; Silicon

Indexed keywords

AFM; ANCHOR SITE; BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMAS; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CELL LINES; CELL TYPES; CURVED SURFACES; CYTOSKELETAL; CYTOSKELETAL ORGANIZATION; CYTOSKELETONS; DEFORMABILITY; ETCH PROCESS; FIBROBLAST CELLS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; FORCE BALANCES; HS68 FIBROBLASTS; ISOTROPIC; ISOTROPIC MICROSTRUCTURES; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MICROTUBULES; NOCODAZOLE; PLEURAL EFFUSION; SILICON MICROSTRUCTURES; SINGLE-MASK; TENSEGRITIES; VINCULIN;

ADHESION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; FIBROBLASTS; MEMS; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; MICROSTRUCTURE; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CELL CULTURE;

NOCODAZOLE; SILICON; VINCULIN;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EPITHELIUM; BREAST TUMOR; CELL ADHESION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LINE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEMBRANE DAMAGE; METASTASIS; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROTUBULE; PLEURA EFFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NOCODAZOLE; SILICON; TUBULIN MODULATORS;

EID: 77950060016     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.034     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Mofrad M.R.K., Kamm R.D. Cytoskeletal mechanics: models and measurements 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. Alexopoulos L.G., Setton L.A., Guilak F. The biomechanical role of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. Acta Biomater 2005, 1:317-325.
3. Rao K.M.K., Cohen H.J. Actin cytoskeletal network in aging and cancer. Mutat Res 1991, 256:139-148.
4. Thoumine O., Ott A. Comparison of the mechanical properties of normal and transformed fibroblasts. Biorheology 1997, 34:309-326.
5. Bao G., Suresh S. Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat Mater 2003, 2:715-725.
6. Wakatsuki T., Kolodney M.S., Zahalak G.I., Elson E.L. Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. Biophys J 2000, 79:2353-2368.
7. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater 2007, 3:413-438.
8. Stevens M.M., George J.H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005, 310:1135-1138.
9. Timpl R. Macromolecular organization of basement membranes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996, 8:618-624.
10. Mata A., Boehm C., Fleischman A.J., Muschler G., Roy S. Analysis of connective tissue progenitor cell behavior on polydimethylsiloxane smooth and channel micro-textures. Biomed Microdevices 2002, 4:267-275.
11. Yim E.K.F., Reano R.M., Pang S.W., Yee A.F., Chen C.S., Leong K.W. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2005, 26:5405-5413.
12. Mai J.Y., Sun C., Li S., Zhang X. A microfabricated platform probing cytoskeleton dynamics using multidirectional topographical cues. Biomed Microdevices 2007, 9:523-531.
13. Tan J.L., Tien J., Pirone D.M., Gray D.S., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:1484-1489.
14. Walboomers X.F., Croes H.J.E., Ginsel L.A., Jansen J.A. Contact guidance of rat fibroblasts on various implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1999, 47:204-212.
15. Walboomers X.F., Monaghan W., Curtis A.S.G., Jansen J.A. Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res 1999, 46:212-220.
16. Clark P., Connolly P., Curtis A.S.G., Dow J.A.T., Wilkinson C.D.W. Cell guidance by ultrafine topography invitro. J Cell Sci 1991, 99:73-77.
17. Charest J.L., Garcia A.J., King W.P. Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2202-2210.
18. Charest J.L., Eliason M.T., Garcia A.J., King W.P. Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2487-2494.
19. Tsai W.B., Ting Y.C., Yang J.Y., Lai J.Y., Liu H.L. Fibronectin modulates the morphology of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on nano-grooved substrates. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009, 20:1367-1378.
20. Tsai W.B., Lin J.H. Modulation of morphology and functions of human hepatoblastoma cells by nano-grooved substrata. Acta Biomater 2009, 5:1442-1454.
21. Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Yarwood S.J., Wilkinson C.D.W., Curtis A.S.G. Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. Exp Cell Res 2003, 284:274-282.
22. Hwang C.M., Park Y., Park J.Y., Lee K., Sun K., Khademhosseini A., et al. Controlled cellular orientation on PLGA microfibers with defined diameters. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:739-746.
23. Abbott A. Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature 2003, 424:870-872.
24. Albrecht D.R., Underhill G.H., Wassermann T.B., Sah R.L., Bhatia S.N. Probing the role of multicellular organization in three-dimensional microenvironments. Nat Methods 2006, 3:369-375.
25. Nikkhah M., Strobl J.S., Peddi B., Agah M. Cytoskeletal role in differential adhesion patterns of normal fibroblasts and breast cancer cells inside silicon microenvironments. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:585-595.
26. Nikkhah M., Strobl J., Agah M. Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:429-441.
27. Rosen P.P., Hoda S.A., Dershaw D.D., Liberman L. Breast pathology: diagnosis by needle core biopsy 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2nd ed.
28. Kalluri R., Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006, 6:392-401.
29. Jedeszko C., Victor B.C., Podgorski I., Sloane B.F. Fibroblast hepatocyte growth factor promotes invasion of human mammary ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res 2009, 69:9148-9155.
30. Rhee S., Jiang H., Ho C.H., Grinnell F. Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:5425-5430.
31. Brew C.T., Aronchik I., Kosco K., McCammon J., Bjeldanes L.F., Firestone G.L. Indole-3-carbinol inhibits MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell motility and induces stress fibers and focal adhesion formation by activation of Rho kinase activity. Int J Cancer 2009, 124:2294-2302.
32. Swierczewska M., Hajicharalambous C.S., Janorkar A.V., Megeed Z., Yarmush M.L., Rajagopalan P. Cellular response to nanoscale elastin-like polypeptide polyelectrolyte multilayers. Acta Biomater 2008, 4:827-837.
33. Hertz H. On the elastic contact of elastic solids. J Reine Angew Math 1881, 92:156-171.
34. Timoshenko S.P., Goodier J.N. Theory of elasticity 1970, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York. 3rd ed.
35. Guo S.L., Akhremitchev B.B. Packing density and structural heterogeneity of insulin amyloid fibrils measured by AFM nanoindentation. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1630-1636.
36. Costa K.D. Single-cell elastography: probing for disease with the atomic force microscope. Dis Markers 2004, 19:139-154.
37. Ananthakrishnan R., Guck J., Wottawah F., Schinkinger S., Lincoln B., Romeyke M., et al. Quantifying the contribution of actin networks to the elastic strength of fibroblasts. J Theor Biol 2006, 242:502-516.
38. Stossel T.P. Contribution of actin to the structure of the cytoplasmic matrix. J Cell Biol 1984, 99:S15-S21.
39. King M.R. Principles of cellular engineering: understanding the biomolecular interface 2006, Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington.
40. Wang N., Tolic-Norrelykke I.M., Chen J.X., Mijailovich S.M., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J., et al. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 282:C606-C616.
41. Li Q.S., Lee G.Y.H., Ong C.N., Lim C.T. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008, 374:609-613.
42. Kim Y.C., Park S.J., Park J.K. Biomechanical analysis of cancerous and normal cells based on bulge generation in a microfluidic device. Analyst 2008, 133:1432-1439.
43. Hou H.W., Li Q.S., Lee G.Y.H., Kumar A.P., Ong C.N., Lim C.T. Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices 2009, 11:557-564.
44. Cross S.E., Jin Y.S., Tondre J., Wong R., Rao J., Gimzewski J.K. AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells. Nanotechnology 2008, 19.
45. Cross S.E., Jin Y.S., Rao J., Gimzewski J.K. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 2007, 2:780-783.
46. Guck J., Schinkinger S., Lincoln B., Wottawah F., Ebert S., Romeyke M., et al. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 2005, 88:3689-3698.
47. Ren X.D., Kiosses W.B., Schwartz M.A. Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J 1999, 18:578-585.
48. ChrzanowskaWodnicka M., Burridge K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 1996, 133:1403-1415.
49. Rhee S., Grinnell F. Fibroblast mechanics in 3D collagen matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007, 59:1299-1305.
50. Tomasek J.J., Hay E.D. Analysis of the role of microfilaments and microtubules in acquisition of bipolarity and elongation of fibroblasts in hydrated collagen gels. J Cell Biol 1984, 99:536-549.