The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy

The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-196

  Brandt, Deborah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953306994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (247)

1. Adams, Katherine H. 1993. A History of Professional Writing Instruction in American Colleges: years of acceptance, growth and doubt. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press
2. Alvermann, Donna E. 2004. Adolescents and Literacies in a Digital World. New York: Peter Lang
3. Angel, Dennis and Samuel W. Tannenbaum 1976.Works made for hire under S.22. New York Law School Law Review 22, 2: 209–239
4. Anson, Chris M. and L. Lee Forsberg 1990. Moving beyond the academic community: transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication 7, 2: 200–231
5. Applebee, Arthur 1984. Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research 54, 4: 577–596
6. Applebee, Arthur N. and Judith Langer 2006. The State of Writing Instruction in American’s Schools: what existing data tell us. Albany: Center on English Learning and Achievement at Albany State University of New York
7. Asencion Delaney, Yuly 2008. Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7, 3: 140–150
8. Atwell, Nancie 1998. In the Middle: new understandings about writing, reading and learning 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
9. Auer, John J. 1984. Ghostwriting and the cult of leadership response. Communication Education 33: 306–307
10. Avril, Patricia Sanchez, Avner Levin, and Alissa Del Riego 2012. Blurred boundaries: social media privacy and the twenty-first century employee. American Business Law Journal 49, 1: 63–124
11. Baker, C. Edwin 1989. Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. New York: Oxford University Press
12. Barlow, Aaron J. 2007. The Rise of the Blogosphere. New York: Praeger
13. Bazerman, Charles 2007. Handbook of Research on Writing: history, society, school, individual and text. New York: Routledge
14. Bawarshi, Anis 2003. Genre and the Invention of the Writer: reconsidering the place of invention in composition. Logan: Utah State University Press
15. Beaufort, Anne 1999. Writing in the Real World: making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press
16. Bennett, Stephen R., Staci Rhine, and Richard Flickinger 2000. Reading’s impact on democratic citizenship in America. Political Behavior 22, 3: 167–195
17. Bereiter, Carl and Marlene Scardamalia 1984. Learning about writing from reading. Written Communication 1, 2: 163–188
18. Berninger, Virginia W., Robert D. Abbott, Sylvia P. Abbott, Steve Graham, and Todd Richards 2002. Writing and reading: connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities 35, 1: 39–56
19. Berninger, Virginia W. and William D. Winn 2006. Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development. In Charles A. MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald (eds.). Handbook of Writing Research. New York. Guildford Press, pp. 96–114
20. Bertaux, Daniel 1981. Biography and Society: the life history approach in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
21. Bertaux, Daniel 2003. The usefulness of life stories for a realist and meaningful sociology. In Robin Humphrey, Robert Miller, and Elena Zaravomyslova (eds.). Biographical Research in Eastern Europe: altered lives and broken biographies. Hampshire, England: Ashgate, pp. 39–52
22. Bertaux, Daniel and Catherine Delcroix 2000. Case histories of families and social processes. In Prue Chamberlayne, Joanna Bornat, and Tom Wengraf (eds.). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. New York: Routledge, pp. 71–89
23. Bezanson, Randall P. 2010. The manner of government speech. Denver University Law Review 87, 4: 809–818
24. Bezanson, Randall P. and William G. Buss 2001. The many faces of government speech. Iowa Law Review 86: 1377–1511
25. Bibbs, Maria 2011. “The African American Literacy Myth: literacy’s ethical objective during the Progressive Era, 1890–1919,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, ProQuest 3488549
26. Black, Rebecca 2008. Adolescents and Online Fan Fiction. New York: Peter Lang
27. Boesky, Amy 2013. The ghostwrites back. Kenyon Review Online. Winter: DOI 656342
28. Bolter, Jay 2001. Writing Space: computers, hypertext, and the myth of transparency. New York: Routledge
29. Bormann, Ernest G. 1960. Ghostwriting and the rhetorical critic. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 284–288
30. Bormann, Ernest G. 1961. Ethics of ghostwritten speeches. Quarterly Journal of Speech 67: 262–267
31. Bosch, Xavier, Christina Hernandez, Juan M. Pericas, and Pamela Doti 2013. Ghostwriting policies in high-impact biomedical journals: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Internal Medicine 173, 10: 920–921
32. Bowers, Stacey L. Bowers 2006. Privacy and library records. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, 4: 377–383
33. Braaksma, Martine. A.H., Gert Rijlaarsdam, and Huub van den Bergh 2002. Observational learning and the effects of model–observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 2: 405–415
34. Braaksma, Martine A.H., Gert Rijlaarsdam, Huub van den Bergh, and Bernardette H.A.M. Van Hout-Wolters 2004. Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction 22, 1: 1–36
35. Brandt, Deborah 2001. Literacy in American Lives. New York: Cambridge University Press
36. Brandt, Deborah 2004. Drafting US literacy. College English 66, 5: 485–502
37. Brandt, Deborah 2005. Writing for a living: literacy and the knowledge economy. Written Communication 22, 2: 166–197
38. Brandt, Deborah 2009. Literacy and Learning: reflections on writing, reading, and society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
39. Brodhead, Richard 1993. Cultures of Letters: scenes of reading and writing in nineteenth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
40. Brooke, Robert 1988. Modeling a writer’s identity: reading and imitation in the writing classroom. College Composition and Communication 39, 1: 23–41
41. Brown, Richard D. 1997. Strength of a People: the idea of an informed citizenry in America 1650–1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
42. Burguiere, Andre 2009. The Annales School: an intellectual history. Trans. Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
43. Burk, Dan L. 2004. Intellectual property and the firm. University of Chicago Law Review 71, 1: 3–21
44. Burke, Peter 2005. History and Social Theory, 2nd ed. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, p. 2
45. Burton, Vicki Tolar 2008. Spiritual Literacy in John Wesley’s Methodism: reading, writing, and speaking to believe. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press
46. Burton-Jones, Alan 2001. Knowledge Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press
47. Buss, Kristine 2011. Ghosting authenticity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24, 2: 159–183
48. Carr, Nicholas 2011. The Shallows: what the Internet is doing to our brain. New York: Norton
49. Casper, Scott E. 2007. The census, the Post Office, and government publishing. In Scott E. Casper, Jeffrey D. Groves, Stephen W. Nissenbaum, and Michael Winship (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume III: the industrial book, 1840– 1880. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 178–193
50. Chamberlayne, Prue, Joanna Bornat, and Tom Wengraf 2000. The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. New York: Routledge
51. Chandler, Alfred 1977. The Visible Hand. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press
52. Charmaz, Kathy 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
53. Chartier, Roger 1995. Forms and Meanings: text, performances, and audiences from codex to computer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
54. Choi, Stephen J. Choi and G. Mitu Gulati 2000. Empirical measures of judicial performance: which judges write their own opinions and should we care? Florida State University Law Review 32 (Summer): 107–122
55. Christen, Richard S. 1999. Boundaries between liberal and technical learning: images of seventeenth-century English writing masters. History of Education Quarterly 39, 1 (Spring): 31–50
56. Clark, Jon 1997. Copyright law and work for hire: a critical history. Copyright Law Symposium 40: 129–164
57. Cogan, Neil H. 1997. The Complete Bill of Rights: the drafts, debates, sources and origins. New York: Oxford University Press
58. Cohen, Daniel A. 1993. Pillars of Salt/Monuments of Grace: New England crime literature and the origins of American popular culture, 1674–1860. New York: Oxford University Press
59. Cornelius, Janet Duitsman 1992. When I Can Read My Title Clear: literacy, slavery, and religion in the Antebellum South. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press
60. Corbett, Edward P.J. 1971. The theory and practice of imitation in classical rhetoric. College Composition and Communication 22, 3: 243–250
61. Cunningham, Anne E. and Keith E. Stanovich 2001. What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction 1, 2: 137–149
62. Daniell, Beth A. 2003. Communion of Friendship: literacy, spiritual practice, and women in recovery. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
63. Daniels, Harvey A. 1983. Famous Last Words: the American language crisis reconsidered. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
64. Darnton, Robert 1978. History of mentalities. In Richard Harvey Brown and Stanford M. Lyman (eds.). Structure, Consciousness, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp.106–136
65. Dehaene, Stanislas. 2009. Reading in the Brain. New York: Viking
66. Dewey, John 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt
67. Doheny-Farina, Stephen 1986. Writing in an emerging organization. Written Communication 3, 2: 158–185
68. Drucker, Peter F. 2003. The knowledge society. In A Functioning Society: sixty-five years of writing on community, society, and polity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, pp. 147–194
69. Durkheim, Emile 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method (1st Am. Ed.). Trans W.D. Halls. New York: Free Press
70. Dyson, Anne Haas 1997. Writing Superheroes: contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press
71. Dyson, Anne Haas 2003. The Brothers and the Sisters Learn to Write: popular literacies in childhood and school culture. New York: Teachers College Press
72. Ede, Lisa and Andrea Lunsford 1990. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
73. Einhorn, Lois J. 1988. The ghosts talk: personal interviews with three former speechwriters. Communications Quarterly 36, 2: 94–108
74. Eisenstein, Elizabeth 1982. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. New York: Cambridge University Press
75. Elbow, Peter 1998. Writing Without Teachers, Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Edition. New York: Oxford University Press
76. Emerson, Thomas L. 1976. Legal foundations of the right to know. Washington University Law Quarterly 1: 1–24
77. Emig, Janet 1977. Writing as mode of learning. College Composition and Communication 28, 2: 122–128
78. Erdal, Jennie 2004. Ghosting: a double life. New York: Doubleday
79. Eubanks, Phillip 2010. Metaphor and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press
80. Fabian, Sarah L. 2010. Garcetti v. Ceballos: whether an employee speaks as a citizen or a public employee: who decides? UC Davis Law Review 43: 1675–1708
81. Fielkow, Colleen Creamer 1997. Clashing rights under United States copyright law: harmonizing an employer’s economic right with the artist-employee’s moral rights in a work made for hire. DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 7: 218–263
82. Fischer, Frank 2009. Democracy and Expertise: reorienting public policy inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press
83. Fisher, Maisha T. 2007. Writing in Rhythm: spoken word poetry in urban classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press
84. Fisher, Maisha T. 2009. Black Literate Lives: historical and contemporary perspectives. New York: Routledge
85. Fisk, Catherine 2000. Working knowledge: trade secrets, restrictive covenants in employment, and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800–1920. Hastings Law Journal 52, 2: 441–536
86. Fisk, Catherine 2003. Authors at work: the origins of the work-for-hire doctrine. Yale Journal of Law 15, 1: 1–70
87. Fisk, Catherine 2009.Working Knowledge: employee innovation and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800–1939. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
88. Fitzgerald, Jill and Timothy Shanahan 2000. Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist 35, 1: 39–50
89. Flaherty, Alice W. 2004. The Midnight Disease: the drive to write, writer’s block and the creative brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004
90. Fleming, David 2003. The very idea of a progymnasmata. Rhetoric Review 22, 2: 105–120
91. Fletcher, Robert J. 2005. Ghostwriting initiated by commercial companies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 549
92. Flower, Linda, Victoria Stein, John Ackerman, Margaret J. Krantz, Kathleen McCormick, and Wayne C. Peck 1990. Reading-to-Write: exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press
93. Foerstal, Herbert N. 1999. Freedom of Information and the Right to Know: the origins and applications of the Freedom of Information Act. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
94. Fosko, T.J. 2012. Buying a lie: the harms and deceptions of ghostwriting. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 35: 165
95. Foucault, Michel 1988. Technologies of the Self. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press
96. Frankel, Oz 2006. States of Inquiry: social investigations and print culture in nineteenthcentury Britain and the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
97. Fugh-Berman, Adriane 2005. The corporate co-author. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 546–548
98. Furet, Francois and Jaques Ozouf 1982. Reading and Writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
99. Gallegos, Bernardo 1992. Literacy, Education and Society in New Mexico 1693–1821. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press
100. Gelfand, Donald E. 2006. The Aging Network: programs and services. New York: Springer
101. Gillespie, Thomas C. 2002. Let’s stop ghostwriting reviewing officer remarks. Marine Corps Gazette October: 29–30
102. Gilmore, William J. 1992. Reading Becomes a Necessity of Life: material cultural life in rural New England, 1780–1835. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press
103. Ginsberg, Jane 1990. Creation and commercial value: copyright protection of works of information. Columbia Law Review 90, 7: 1865–1938
104. Goldberg, Jonathan 1990. Writing Matter: from the hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
105. Goldschmidt, Jona 2002. In defense of ghostwriting. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29: 1145–1187
106. Gorski, Andrzej and Slawomir Letkiewicz 2010. “Medical writing” and ghostwriting as ethical challenges in medical communication. Transplantation Proceedings 42, 8: 3335–3337
107. Graff, Harvey J. 1979. The Literacy Myth: cultural integration and social structure in the nineteenth century. New York: Academic Press
108. Graff, Harvey J. 1987. The Legacies of Literacy: continuities and contradictions in Western culture and society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
109. Graff, Harvey J. 2010. The literacy myth at 30. Journal of Social History 43, 3: 635–661
110. Graham, Steve and Michael Hebert 2010. Writing to Read: evidence for how writing can improve reading. New York: Carnegie Corporation
111. Graves, Donald 2003. Writing: teachers and children at work, 20th anniversary edition. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2003
112. Gray, James 2000. Teachers at the Center: a memoir of the early years of the National Writing Project. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project
113. Gross, Robert A. 2007. Reading for an extensive republic. In Robert A. Gross and Mary Kelley (eds.). A History of the Book in America Volume II: print, culture, and society in the new nation, 1790–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 516–544
114. Grow, Brian 2010. As jurors go online US trials go off track. Reuters Legal (December 8). Web
115. Hall, David D. 2007. The Chesapeake in the seventeenth century. In Hugh Amory and David D. Hall, (eds.). History of the Book in America Volume I. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 55–82
116. Hall, David D. 2007–2010. A History of the Book in America, Volumes 1–V. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
117. Hardy, I.T. 1987. An economic understanding of copyright law’s work-made-for-hire doctrine. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 12, 2: 181–228
118. Haswell, Janis and Richard Haswell 2010. Authoring: an essay for the English profession on potentiality and singularity. Logan: Utah State University Press
119. Henry, Jim 2000. Writing Workplace Culture: an archaeology of professional writing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
120. Herrington, Anne and Charles Moran 2005. Genre Across the Curriculum. Logan: Utah State University Press
121. Hitt, Jack 1997. The writer is dead. New York Times Magazine, 25 May: 38–41
122. Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium 2012. Varieties of Narrative Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage
123. Howard, Ursula 2012. Literacy and the Practice of Writing in the 19thCentury: a strange blossoming of spirit. Leicester, England: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education
124. Hutton, Patrick H. 1981. The history of mentalities: the new map of cultural history. History and Theory 20, 3: 237–259
125. Jaszi, Peter 1991. Toward a theory of copyright: the metamorphoses of “authorship.” Duke Law Journal 2: 455–502
126. Jaszi, Peter 1994. On the author effect: contemporary copyright and collective creativity. In Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi (eds.). The Construction of Authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp. 29–56
127. Jenkins, Joseph R., Evelyn Johnson, and Jennifer Hileman 2004. When is reading also writing? Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading 8, 2: 125–151
128. Johns, Adrian 2010. The Nature of the Book: print and knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
129. Kaestle, Carl 1983. Pillars of the Republic: the common school and American society 1780–1860. New York: Hill and Wang
130. Kaestle, Carl, Helen Damon-Moore, Lawrence C. Stedman, and Katherine Tinsley 1991. Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading Since 1880. New Haven: Yale University Press
131. Kalman, Judy 1999. Writing on the Plaza: mediated literacy practices among scribes and clients in Mexico City. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
132. Karlsson, Anna-Malin 2009. Positioned by reading and writing: literacy practices, roles, and genres in common occupations. Written Communication 26, 1: 53–76
133. Katz, Susan M. 1998. The Dynamics of Writing Review: opportunities for growth and change in the workplace. Stamford, CT: Ablex
134. Keen, Andrew 2007. The Cult of the Amateur: how today’s Internet is killing our culture. New York: Crown Business
135. Keys, Ralph 2003. The Courage to Write: how writers transcend fear. New York: Holt
136. Kirkland, Aaron 2006.You got fired on your day off: challenging termination of employees for personal blogging practices. University of Missouri – Kansas City Law Review 75, 2: 545–568
137. Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal 2001. Author-stories: narrative’s implications for moral rights and copyright’s joint authorship doctrine. Southern California Law Journal 75, 1: 1–64
138. Lacasse, Jeffrey R., Jonathan Leo, Andrea N. Cimino, Kristen F. Bean, and Melissa Del Colle 2012. Knowledge of undisclosed corporate authorship (“ghostwriting”) reduces the perceived credibility of antidepressant research: a randomized vignette study with experienced nurses. Bio Med Center Research Notes 5. doi: 10.1186/1756–0500–5–490,5 012,5:490
139. Langer, Judith A. and Arthur Applebee 1987. How Writing Shapes Thinking. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
140. Langer, Judith A. and Sheila Flihan 2002. Writing and reading relationships: constructive tasks. In Roselmina Indrisano and James R. Squires (eds.). Perspectives on Writing: research, theory and practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 120–146
141. Laquintano, Tim 2010. Sustained Authorship: digital writing, self-publishing, and the e-book. Written Communication 27, 4: 469–493
142. Lenart, Amanda and Susanna Fox 2006. Bloggers: a portrait of the Internet’s new storytellers. Washington D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project
143. Lerman, Lisa G. 2001. Misattribution in legal scholarship: plagiarism, ghostwriting, and authorship. South Texas Law Review 42 (Spring): 467–492
144. Lessig, Lawrence 2005. Free Culture: the nature and future of creativity. New York: Penguin
145. Lidsky, Lyrissa 2010. Nobody’s fool: the rational audience as the First Amendment ideal. University of Illinois Law Review 2010: 799–850
146. Lidsky, Lyrissa and Robert G. Wright 2004. Freedom of the Press: a reference guide to the United States Constitution. New York: Praeger
147. Lippmann, Walter 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan
148. Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede 2011. Writing Together: collaboration in theory and practice. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s
149. Lyons, Martyn 2010. A History of Reading and Writing in the Western World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan
150. Lyons, Martyn 2012. Writing Culture of Ordinary People in Europe c. 1860–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press
151. Machlup, Fritz 1972. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press
152. McCarthy, Lucille 1991. A psychiatrist using DSM-III: the influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In Charles Bazerman and James Paradis (eds.). Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 358–378
153. McDermott, Patrice 2007. Who Needs to Know? The state of public access to federal government information. Lanham, MD: Bernan Press
154. McGill, Meredith L. 1997. The matter of the text: commerce, print culture, and the authority of the State in American copyright law. American Literary History 9, 1: 21–59
155. McHenry, Elizabeth 2002. Forgotten Readers: recovering the lost history of African American literary societies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
156. McHenry, Leemon 2010. Of sophists and spin-doctors: industry-sponsored ghostwriting and the crisis of academic medicine. Mens Sana Monographs 8, 1: 129–145
157. Meadows, Susannah 2004. Between the lines. Newsweek 12 January: 12
158. Medhurst, Martin J. 1987. Ghostwritten speeches: ethics isn’t the only lesson. Communications Education 36, 3: 241–249
159. Meiklejohn, Alexander 1948. Free Speech and Its Relationship to Self Government. New York: Harper
160. Migdal, Joel 2001. State in Society: studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. New York: Cambridge University Press
161. Miller, Carolyn R. and Davida Charney 2007. Persuasion, audience, and argument. In Charles Bazerman (ed.). Handbook of Research on Writing: history, society, school, individual and text. New York: Routledge pp. 583–598
162. Miller, Susan 1998. Assuming the Positions: cultural pedagogy and the politics of commonplace writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
163. Milner, Henry 2002. Civic Literacy: how informed citizens make democracy work. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press
164. Monaghan, E. Jennifer 2005. Learning to Read and Write in Colonial America. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press
165. Murray, Donald and Thomas Newkirk 2009. The Essential Don Murray: lessons from America’s greatest writing teacher. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
166. Myers, D.G. 2006. The Elephants Teach: creative writing since 1880. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
167. Nash, Ray 1959. American Writing Masters and Copybooks. Boston: Colonial Society of Massachusetts
168. National Writing Project and Carl Nagin 2006. Why Writing Matters. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project
169. Nell, Victor 1988. Lost in a Book: the psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press
170. Nelson, Nancy and Robert C. Calfee 1998. The reading–writing connection viewed historically. In Nancy Nelson and Robert C. Calfee (eds.). The Reading–Writing Connection: ninety-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–52
171. Neuborne, Burt 1989. First Amendment and government regulation of capital markets. Brooklyn Law Review 55, 1: 5–64
172. Nichols, Marie Hocmuth 1963. Ghostwriting: implications for public address. In Rhetoric and Criticism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, pp. 35–48
173. Niles-Yokum, Kelly and Donna L. Wagner 2011. The Aging Networks: a guide to programs and services. New York: Springer
174. Nimmer, Melville B. 1970. Does copyright abridge the First Amendment guarantees of free speech and press? UCLA Law Journal 17, 6: 1180–1204
175. Nord, David Paul and John V. Richardson Jr. 2009. US government publishing in the postwar era. In David Paul Nord, Joan Shelley Rubin, and Michael Schudson (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume V: the enduring book: print culture in postwar America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 167–180
176. Norton, Helen 2003–2004. Not for attribution: government’s interest in protecting the integrity of its own expression. University of California – Davis Law Review 37: 1317–1350
177. Norton, Helen 2008. Government workers and government speech. First Amendment Law Review 7, 1: 75–91
178. Norton, Helen 2009. Constraining public employee speech: government’s control of its workers’ speech to protect its own expression. Duke Law Journal 59, 1: 1–68
179. Oatley, Keith 2011. Such Stuff as Dreams: the psychology of fiction. New York: Wiley
180. Orbach, Barak Y. 2009. “The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace.” Discussion Paper 356. Center for Law, Economics, and Business. Harvard Law School. Web
181. Orren, Karen 1991. Belated Feudalism: labor, the law, and liberal development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press
182. Pare, Anthony 1993. Discourse regulations and the production of knowledge. In Rachel Spilka (ed.). Writing in the Workplace: new research perspectives. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 111–123
183. Pare, Anthony 2002. Genre and identity: individuals, institutions, and ideology. In Richard M. Coe, Lorelei Lingard, and Tatiana Teslenko (eds.). The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 57–72
184. Pennebaker, James W. 1997. Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8, 3: 162–166
185. Pennebaker, James W. and Cindy K. Chung 2006. Expressive writing, emotional upheaval and health. In Howard S. Friedman and Roxanne Cohen Silver (eds.). Foundations of Health Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–284
186. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press
187. Porat, Marc Uri 1977. The Information Economy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce
188. Prose, Francine 2007. Reading Like a Writer: a guide for people who love books and for those who want to write them. New York: Harper Perennial
189. Riessman, Catherine Kohler 2007. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
190. Rijlaarsdam, Gert, Martine Braaksma, Michel Couzijn, Tanja Janssen, Marleen Kieft, Mariet Raedts, Elke van Steendam, Anne Toorenaar, and Huub van den Berg 2009. The role of readers in writing development: writing students bringing their texts to the test. In Roger Beard, Debra Myhill, Jeni Riley, and Martin Nystrand (eds.). Sage Handbook of Writing Development. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 436–452
191. Riley, Linda and Stuart C. Brown 1996. Crafting a public image: an empirical study of the ethics of ghostwriting. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 7: 711–721
192. Robbins, Ira P. 2010. Ghostwriting: filling in the gaps of pro se prisoners’ access to the courts. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 23, 2: 271–321
193. Rose, Mark 1995. Authors and Owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
194. Rosenberg, Scott 2010. Say Everything: how blogging began, what it is becoming, and why it matters. New York: Crown Publishing
195. Rothermich, John C. 1999. Ethical and procedural implications of ghostwriting for pro se litigants: toward increased access to civil justice. Fordham Law Review 67: 2687–2729
196. Rubin, Joan Shelley 2007. Songs Of Ourselves: the uses of poetry in America. Harvard University Press
197. Saunders, David and Ian Hunter 1991. Lessons from the literatory: how to historicize authorship. Critical Inquiry 17, 2: 479–509
198. Schauer, Frederick. 2004. The boundaries of the First Amendment: a preliminary exploration of constitutional salience. Harvard Law Review 117, 6: 1765–1809
199. Schemo, Diana Jean 2006. Schoolbooks are given Fs in originality. New York Times 13 July: A1, A21
200. Schryer, Catherine F. 1994. The lab vs. the clinic: sites of competing genres. In Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway (eds.). Genre in the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 105–124
201. Schultz, Vicki 2000. Life’s work. Columbia Law Review 100, 7: 1881–1964
202. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press
203. Seavey, Charles A. and Caroline F. Sloat 2009. The government as publisher. In Carl Kaestle and Janice A. Radway (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume IV: print in motion: the expansion of publishing and reading in the United States, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 260–275
204. Selfe, Cynthia L. and Gail Hawisher 2004. Literate Lives in the Information Age: narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
205. Shirky, Clay 2009. Here Comes Everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin
206. Shooman, Jeffrey 2005–2006. The speech of public employees outside the workplace: towards a new framework. Seton Hall Law Review 16: 1341–1371
207. Sicherman, Barbara 2010. Well Read Lives: how books inspired a generation of American Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
208. Slack, Jennifer D., David J.Miller, and Jeffrey Doak 2006. The technical communicator as author: meaning, power, authority. In J. Blake Scott, Bernadette Longo, and Katherine V. Willis (eds.). Critical Power Tools. Albany, NY: State University of Albany Press, pp. 25–46
209. Smith, Donald K. 1961. Ghostwritten speeches. Quarterly Journal of Speech 67: 417–420
210. Soltow, Lee and Edward Stevens 1981. The Rise of Literacy and the Common School in the United States: a socioeconomic analysis to 1876. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
211. Somers-Willett, Susan 2009. The Cultural Politics of Slam Poetry: race,identity, and the performance of popular verse in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
212. Spinuzzi, Clay 2003. Tracing Genres Through Organizations: a sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
213. Starr, Paul 2004. The Creation of the Media. New York: Basic Books
214. St Clair, William 2004. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. New York: Cambridge University Press
215. Stevens, Edward W. 1988. Literacy, Law and Social Order. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press
216. Stewart, Thomas A. 1998. Intellectual Capital: the new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday
217. Stotsky, Sandra 1983. Research on reading/writing relationships: a synthesis and suggested directions. Language Arts 60, 5: 627–642
218. Surrency, Edwin C. 1981. Law reports in the United States. American Journal of Legal History 25, 1: 48–66
219. Swank, Drew A. 2005. In defense of rules and roles: the need to curb extreme forms of pro se assistance and accommodation in litigation. American Law Review 54, 5: 1537–1591
220. Tendler, Joseph 2013. Opponents of the Annales School. London: Palgrave McMillan
221. Thompson, Clive 2013a. How successful networks nurture good ideas. Wired Magazine 21, 10. Web
222. Thompson, Clive 2013b. Smarter Than You Think: how technology is changing our minds for the better. New York: Penguin
223. Tierney, Robert and Timothy Shanahan 1991. Research on the reading–writing relationship: interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In Rebecca Barr, Michael L. Kamil, Peter Mosenthal, and P. David Pearson (eds.). Handbook of Reading Research Volume II. New York: Routledge, pp. 246–280
224. Tierney, William M. and Martha S. Gerrity 2005. Scientific discourse, corporate ghostwriting: journal policy and public trust. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 550–51
225. Tomlins, Christopher L. 1993. Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press
226. Tomlinson, Barbara 2005. Authors on Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
227. Torrance, Nancy and David Olson 2009. Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press
228. Tussey, Deborah 2007. Employers as authors: copyrights inworks made for hire. In Peter K. Yu (ed.). Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: issues and practices in the digital age, Volume I. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 71–92
229. Tussman, Joseph 1977. Government and the Mind. New York: Oxford
230. Veit, Helen E., Kenneth R. Bowling, and Charlene Bangs Bickford 1991. Creating the Bill of Rights: the documentary record from the First Federal Congress. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press
231. VerSteeg, Russ 1996. Defining “Author” for purposes of copyright. American University Law Review 45: 1323–1366
232. Waples, Douglas, Bernard Berelson, and Franklyn R. Bradshaw 1940. What Reading Does to People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
233. Walter, David L. 2003. Ghostwriters In the Sky. American Journal of Family Law 17, 2: 61–63
234. Warner, Michael 1992. The Letters of the Republic: publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
235. Weber, Ronald 1997. Hired Pens: professional writers in America’s golden age of print. Athens: Ohio University Press
236. Weeman, Lauren A. 2006. Bending the (ethical) rules in Arizona: ethics opinion 05–06’s approval of undisclosed ghostwriting may be a sign of things to come. Georgia Journal of Legal Ethics 19: 1041–65
237. Wenger, Etienne 1998. Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press
238. Wilson, Douglas L. 1999. Jefferson and literacy. In James Gilreath (ed.). Thomas Jefferson and the Education of a Citizen. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, pp. 79–90
239. Winsor, Dorothy 1993. Owning corporate texts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7, 2: 179–195
240. Witham, Larry 2000. Ghostwriting haunts Christian publishing. Insight on the News 16, 30: 26–27
241. Wolf, Maryanne 2007. Proust and the Squid: the story and science of the reading brain. New York: Harper
242. Woodmansee, Martha and Peter Jaszi 1994. The Construction of Authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
243. Wu, Tim 2008. On copyright’s authorship policy. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2008: 335–354
244. Wyatt, Ian D. and Daniel E. Hecker 2006. Occupational changes during the twentieth century. Monthly Labor Review (March): 35–57
245. Yates, Joanne 1993. Control Through Communication: the rise of system in American management. Johns Hopkins University Press
246. Yen, Alfred C. 1990. Restoring the natural law: copyright as labor and possession. Ohio State Law Journal 51: 517–559
247. Yudof, Mark G. 2009. When Government Speaks: politics, law and government expression in America. University of California Press