Genre and the invention of the writer: Reconsidering the place of invention in composition

Genre and the Invention of The Writer: Reconsidering the Place of Invention in Composition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-207

  Bawarshi, Anis S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056425171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (267)

1. Adams, Hazard, Ed. 1992. Critical Theory Since Plato. Rev. ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
2. Addison, Joseph. 1992. On the Pleasures of the Imagination. Adams: 284-288.
3. Alcorn, Marshall W. 2002. Changing the Subject in English Class: Discourse and the Construction of Desire. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
4. Althusser, Louis. 1984. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Essays on Ideology. London: Verso. 1-60.
5. Arieti, Silvano. 1976. Creativity: The Magic Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
6. Aristotle. 1992. Poetics. Adams: 50-66.
7. Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. George A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Baecker, Diann L. 1998. Uncovering the Rhetoric of the Syllabus: The Case of the Missing I. College Teaching 46.2: 58-62.
10. Bain, Alexander. 1887. English Composition and Rhetoric. Enl. Ed. 2 vols. New York: American Book.
11. Bacon, Nora. 2000. Building a Swan's Nest for Instruction in Rhetoric. College Composition and Communication 51.4: 589-609.
12. Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13. Bakhtin, M.M. 1986. The Problem of Speech Genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Eds. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. 60-102.
14. Bartholomae, David. 1983. Writing Assignments: Where Writing Begins. In Fforum: Essays on Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Writing. Ed. Patricia L. Stock. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook. 300-312.
15. Bartholomae, David. 1985. Inventing the University. In When a Writer Can't Write. Ed. Mike Rose. New York: Guilford. 134-65.
16. Bartholomae, David. 1995. Writing with Teachers: A Conversation with Peter Elbow. College Composition and Communication 46.1: 62-71.
17. Bawarshi, Anis, Amy J. Devitt, and Mary Jo Reiff. Forthcoming. Materiality and Genre in the Study of Discourse Community. College English.
18. Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. Bazerman, Charles. 1994a. Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions. Freedman and Medway (1994a): 79-101.
20. Bazerman, Charles. 1994b. Where is the Classroom? Freedman and Medway (1994b): 25-30.
21. Bazerman, Charles. 1994c. Whose Moment? The Kairotics of Intersubjectivity. In Constructing Experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 171-193.
22. Bazerman, Charles. 1997a. Discursively Structured Activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4.4: 296-308.
23. Bazerman, Charles. 1997b. The Life of Genre, the Life in the Classroom. Bishop and Ostrom: 19-26.
24. Bazerman, Charles. 2000. A Rhetoric for Literate Society: The Tension between Expanding Practices and Restricted Theories. In Inventing a Discipline: Rhetoric Scholarship in Honor of Richard E. Young. Ed. Maureen Daly Goggin. Urbana: NCTE. 5-28.
25. Bazerman, Charles. 2002. Genre and Identity: Citizenship in the Age of the Internet and the Age of Global Capitalism. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 13-37.
26. Bazerman, Charles, and James Paradis, Eds. 1991. Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27. Beaugrande, Robert Alain de. 1979. Toward a General Theory of Creativity. Poetics 8: 269-306.
28. Beebee, Thomas O. 1994. The Ideology of Genre. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
29. Bergmann, Linda S. 1996. Academic Discourse and Academic Service: Composition vs. WAC in the University. CEA Critic 58.3: 50-59.
30. Berkenkotter, Carol. 2001. Genre Systems at Work: DSM IV and Rhetorical Recontextualization in Psychotherapy Paperwork. Written Communication 18.3: 326-349.
31. Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking Genre from a Sociocognitive Perspective. Written Communication 10.4: 475-509.
32. Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Berlin, James. 1987. Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
34. Berlin, James. 1996. Rhetoric, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring College English Studies. Urbana: NCTE.
35. Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
36. Bishop, Wendy. 1999. Places to Stand: The Reflective Writer-Teacher- Writer in Composition. College Composition and Communication 51.1: 9-31.
37. Bishop, Wendy and Hans Ostrom, Eds. 1997. Genre and Writing: Issues, Arguments, Alternatives. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
38. Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 1-14.
39. Bizzell, Patricia. 1992. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. University of Pittsburgh Press.
40. Blair, Hugh. 1873. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Philadelphia: Porter and Coates.
41. Blanchot, Maurice. 1959. Le livre à venir. Paris: Gallimard.
42. Bleich, David. 1988. The Double Perspective: Language, Literacy, and Social Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Booth, Wayne. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
46. Branch, Kirk. 1998. From the Margins at the Center: Literacy, Authority, and the Great Divide. College Composition and Communication 30.2: 206-231.
47. Brereton, John C., Ed. 1995. The Origins of Composition in the American College, 1875-1925: A Documentary History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
48. Britton, James, et al. 1975. The Development of Writing Abilities. London: Macmillan.
49. Brodkey, Linda. 1987. Academic Writing as Social Practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50. Brooke, Robert. 1989. Control in Writing: Flower, Derrida, and Images of the Writer. College English 51.4: 405-417.
51. Brooke, Robert, and Dale Jacobs. 1997. Genre in Writing Workshops: Identity Negotiation and Student-Centered Writing. Bishop and Ostrom: 215-228.
52. Bruffee, Kenneth A. 1986. Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge. College English 48: 773-790.
53. Burke, Kenneth. 1969a. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54. Burke, Kenneth. 1969b. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1982. The Rhetorical Act. Blemont: Wadsworth.
56. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen M. Jamieson. 1978. Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action. Falls Church: Speech Communication Assoc.
57. Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58. Christie, Frances. 1988. Genres as Choice. Reid: 22-34.
59. Christie, Frances. 1993. Curriculum Genres: Planning for Effective Teaching. Cope and Kalantzis: 154-178.
60. Christie, Frances, and J.R. Martin, Eds. 1997. Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.
61. Clifford, John. 1991. The Subject in Discourse. In Contending with Words. Eds. Patricia Harkin and John Schilb. New York: MLA. 38-51.
62. Coe, Richard. 1994a. "An Arousing and Fulfilment of Desire": The Rhetoric of Genre in the Process Era and Beyond. Freedman and Medway (1994a): 181-186.
63. Coe, Richard. 1994b. Teaching Genre as Process. Freedman and Medway (1994b): 157-169.
64. Coe, Richard, Lorelei Lingard, and Tatiana Teslenko, Eds. 2002. The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
65. Cohen, Ralph. 1986. History and Genre. New Literary History 17.1: 203-218.
66. Cohen, Ralph. 1989. Do Postmodern Genres Exist? Perloff: 11-27.
67. Cohen, Ralph. 1991. Genre Theory, Literary History, and Historical Change. In Theoretical Issues in Literary History. Ed. David Perkins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 85-113.
68. Cole, M. and Y. Engeström. 1993. A Cultural-historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. In Distributed Cognitions. Ed. G. Salomon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1-46.
69. Cole, Thomas. 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
70. Connors, Robert J. 1981. The Rise and Fall of the Modes of Discourse. College Composition and Communication 32: 444-63.
71. Connors, Robert J. 1997. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
72. Connors, Robert J., and Cheryl Glenn. 1995. The St. Martin's Guide to Teaching Writing. Third Edition. New York: St. Martin's Press.
73. Conrad, Joseph. 1988. Heart of Darkness. 3rd Ed. Ed. Robert Kimbrough. New York: W.W. Norton.
74. Consigny, Scott. 1994. Rhetoric and Its Situations. Young and Liu: 59-67.
75. Cooper, Marilyn. 1989. The Ecology of Writing. Cooper and Holzman: 1-12.
76. Cooper, Marilyn, and Michael Holzman. 1989. Writing as Social Action. New Hampshire: Boynton/Cook.
77. Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis, eds. 1993. The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
78. Corbett, Edward P. J. 1990. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Reader 3rd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Corder, Jim. 1994. Varieties of Ethical Argument. Young and Liu: 99-133.
80. Croce, Benedetto. 1968. Aesthetic. Trans. Douglas Ainslie. New York: Noonday.
81. Crowley, Sharon. 1990. The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current Traditional Rhetoric. Southern Illinois University Press.
82. Crowley, Sharon. 1995. Composition's Ethic of Service, the Universal Requirement, and the Discourse of Student Need. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 15.2: 227-239.
83. Crowley, Sharon. 1998. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
84. Crowley, Sharon. 2000. Request for Opinions. WPA-L Discussion Group. WPA-L@ASU.EDU. August 28.
85. Culler, Jonathan. 1975. Structuralist Poetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
86. D'Angelo, Frank. 1980. Process and Thought in Composition. 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Winthrope.
87. Dasenbrock, Reed Way. 1993. The Myths of the Subjective and of the Subject in Composition Studies. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 13.1: 21-32.
88. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Freud and the Scene of Writing. In Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 196-231.
89. Derrida, Jacques. 1980. The Law of Genre. Glyph 7. Rpt. Critical Inquiry 7 (Autumn 1980): 55-81.
90. Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. Adams: 1117-1126.
91. Devitt, Amy J. 1991. Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional. Charles Bazerman and James Paradis: 335-357.
92. Devitt, Amy J. 1993. Generalizing about Genre: New Conceptions of an Old Concept. College Composition and Communication 44: 573-586.
93. Devitt, Amy J. 1997. Genre as Language Standard. Bishop and Ostrom: 45-55.
94. Dias, Patrick. 1994. Initiating Students into the Genres of Discipline- Based Reading and Writing. Freedman and Medway (1994b): 193-206.
95. Dubrow, Heather. 1982. Genre. London: Methune.
96. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. 1984. Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 35: 155-173.
97. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. 1990. Singular Texts/ Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondal: Southern Illinois University Press.
98. Elbow, Peter. 1995. Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic: A Conflict in Goals. College Composition and Communication 46: 72-83.
99. Emig, Janet. 1964. The Uses of the Unconscious in Composing. College Composition and Communication 15: 6-11.
100. Emig, Janet. 1971. The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. Urbana: NCTE.
101. Enos, Theresa, Ed. 1996. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication From Ancient Times to the Present. New York: Garland.
102. Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1993. Genre and Rhetorical Craft. Research in the Teaching of English 27.3: 265-271.
103. Faigley, Lester. 1992. Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
104. Farrell, Thomas B. 1996. Commonplaces. Enos: 116-117.
105. Feldman, David Henry, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, and Howard Gardner. 1994. Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity. Westport: Praeger.
106. Fishelov, David. 1993. Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. Pennsylvania: Penn. State University Press.
107. Flannery, Katherine T. 1991. Composing and the Question of Agency. College English 53: 701-713.
108. Fleming, David. 1998. Rhetoric as a Course of Study. College English 61.2: 169-191.
109. Flower, Linda S. 1994. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
110. Flower, Linda S., and John R. Hays. 1980. The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. College Composition and Communication 31: 21-32.
111. Flower, Linda S., and John R. Hays. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32: 365-387.
112. Ford, Marjorie, and Jon Ford. 1998. Dreams and Inward Journeys: A Rhetoric and Reader for Writers. New York: Longman.
113. Foucault, Michel. 1994. What Is an Author? In Contemporary Literary Criticism. Third ed. Eds. Robert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer. New York: Longman. 342-353.
114. Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Freadman, Anne. 1988. Anyone for Tennis? Reid: 91-124.
116. Freadman, Anne. 2002. Uptake. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 39-53.
117. Freedman, Aviva. 1993a. Show and Tell? The Role of Explicit Teaching in the Learning of New Genres. Research in the Teaching of English 27: 222-251.
118. Freedman, Aviva. 1993b. Situating Genre: A Rejoinder. Research in the Teaching of English 27: 272-281.
119. Freedman, Aviva, and Peter Medway, Eds. 1994a. Genre and the New Rhetoric. Bristol: Taylor and Francis.
120. Freedman, Aviva, and Peter Medway, Eds. 1994b. Learning and Teaching Genre. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
121. Freedman, Aviva, and Graham Smart. 1997. Navigating the Current of Economic Policy: Written Genres and the Distribution of Cognitive Work at a Financial Institution. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4.4: 238-255.
122. Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
123. Fuller, Gillian, and Alison Lee. 2002. Assembling a Generic Subject. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 207-224.
124. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
125. Genette, Gérard. 1992. The Architext: An Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
126. Genung, John. 1887. The Study of Rhetoric in the College Course. Brereton: 133-157.
127. Genung, John. 1892. The Practical Elements of Rhetoric. Boston: Ginn.
128. Ghiselin, Brewster, ed. 1952. The Creative Process. Berkeley: University of California Press.
129. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
130. Giffen, Allison. 1997. Resisting Consolation: Early American Women Poets and the Elegiac Tradition. Bishop and Ostrom: 115-124.
131. Giltrow, Janet. 2002. Meta-Genre. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 187-205.
132. Giltrow, Janet, and Michele Valiquette. 1994. Genres and Knowledge: Students Writing in the Disciplines. Freedman and Medway (1994b): 47-62.
133. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.
134. Graden, Sherrie L. 1995. Romancing Rhetorics: Social Expressivist Perspectives on the Teaching of Writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
135. Green, Bill, and Alison Lee. 1994. Writing Geography: Literacy, Identity, and Schooling. Freedman and Medway (1994b): 207-224.
136. Greenblatt, Stephen. 1982. Introduction to Special Issue on the Forms of Power and the Power of Forms in the Renaissance. Genre 15.1,2: 3-6.
137. Hart, John S. 1877. A Manual of Composition and Rhetoric: A Textbook for Schools and Colleges. Philadelphia: Eldredge.
138. Halasek, Kay. 1999. A Pedagogy of Possibility: Bakhtinian Perspectives on Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
139. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
140. Harris, Joseph. 1997. A Teaching Subject: Composition Since 1966. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
141. Hatch, Gary Layne. 1999. Arguing in Communities. 2nd Edition. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
142. Hausman, Carl R. 1984. A Discourse on Novelty and Creation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
143. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. Building, Dwelling, Thinking. In The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Trans. Michael Heim. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
144. Heilker, Paul. 1997. Rhetoric Made Real: Civil Discourse and Writing Beyond the Curriculum. In Writing the Community. Ed. Linda Adler-Kassner, Robert Crooks, and Ann Watters. Washington D.C.: American Association for Higher Education. 71-76.
145. Helscher, Thomas P. 1997. The Subject of Genre. Bishop and Ostrom: 27-36.
146. Hill, Adams Sherman. 1878. The Principles of Rhetoric and Their Amplification. Rev. enl. ed. New York: American Book.
147. Hill, Charles A., and Lauren Resnick. 1995. Creating Opportunities for Apprenticeship in Writing. In Reconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction. Ed. Joseph Petraglia. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
148. Hirsch, E.D. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
149. Howard, Rebecca Moore. 1999. Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, and Collaborators. Stamford: Ablex.
150. Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
151. Jamieson, Kathleen M. 1973. Generic Constraints and the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 6: 163.
152. Jamieson, Kathleen M. 1975. Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech 61: 406-15.
153. Jarratt, Susan C. 1991. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
154. Kant, Immanuel. 1992. From Critique of Judgement. Adams: 376-393.
155. Kent, Thomas. 1991. On the Very Idea of a Discourse Community. College Composition and Communication 42: 425-445.
156. Kent, Thomas, Ed. 1999. Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
157. Knoblauch, C.H., and Lil Brannon. 1984. Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing. New Hampshire: Boynton/Cook.
158. Kress, Gunther. 1988. Genre in a Social Theory of Language: A Reply to John Dixon. Reid: 35-45.
159. Kress, Gunther. 1993. Genre as Social Process. Cope and Kalantzis: 22-37.
160. Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
161. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
162. Lawrence, D.H. 1977. Sons and Lovers: Text, Background, and Criticism. Ed. Julian Moynahan. New York: Penguin.
163. Lauer, Janice M. 1967. Invention in Contemporary Rhetoric: Heuristic Procedures. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.
164. Lauer, Janice M. 1970. Heuristics and Composition. In Contemporary Rhetoric: A Conceptual Background with Readings. Ed. Ross Winterowd. NY: Harcourt: 79-90.
165. Lauer, Janice M. 1984. Issues in Rhetorical Invention. In Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Eds. Robert Connors, Lisa Ede, and Andrea Lunsford. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 127-139.
166. Lauer, Janice M. 1996. Topics. Enos: 724-725.
167. LeFevre, Karen Burke. 1987. Invention as a Social Act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
168. Lindemann, Erika. 1995. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. 3rd. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
169. Locke, John. 1992. From Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Adams: 254-268.
170. Lovitt, Carl R., and Art Young. 1997. Rethinking Genre in the First-Year Composition Course: Helping Student Writers Get Things Done. Profession 1997: 113-125.
171. Lu, Min-zhan. 1991. Redefining the Legacy of Mina Shaughnessy: A Critique of the Politics of Linguistic Innocence. Journal of Basic Writing 10.1: 26-40.
172. Lunsford, Andrea A., and Lisa Ede. 1994. Collaborative Authorship and the Teaching of Writing. Woodmansee and Jaszi: 418-438.
173. Maimon, Elaine. 1983. Maps and Genres: Exploring Connections in the Arts and Sciences. In Composition and Literature: Bridging the Gap. Ed. Winifred Bryan Horner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 110-125.
174. Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
175. Martin, J.R. 1997. Analyzing Genre: Functional Parameters. Christie and Martin: 33-69.
176. Medway, Peter. 1998. Understanding Architects' Notebooks: Does Genre Theory Help? Symposium on Genre: Literacy and Literature. Simon Fraser University, January.
177. Medway, Peter. 2002. Fuzzy Genres and Community Identity: The Case of Architecture Students' Sketchbooks. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 123-153.
178. Miller, Carolyn R. 1979. A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing. College English 40.6: 610-617.
179. Miller, Carolyn R. 1980. Vocationalism and Vision in Writing Courses. JGE: The Journal of General Education 32.3: 239-246.
180. Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151-167.
181. Miller, Carolyn R. 1992. Kairos in the Rhetoric of Science. In A Rhetoric of Doing. Eds. S.P. Witte, N. Nakadato, and R.D. Cherry. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 310-327.
182. Miller, Carolyn R. 1994. Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre. Freedman and Medway (1994a): 67-77.
183. Miller, Carolyn R. 1999. On the Borders between Disciplines: An Interview with Carolyn Miller. By Mary Jo Reiff and Anis Bawarshi. Issues in Writing 9.2: 110-138.
184. Miller, Susan. 1989. Rescuing the Subject: A Critical Introduction to Rhetoric and the Writer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
185. Miller, Susan. 1991. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
186. Miller, Susan. 1997. Technologies of Self?-Formation. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 17.3: 497-500.
187. Miller, Thomas P. 1997. The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
188. Mühlhäusler, P., and R. Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil and Blackwell.
189. Munby, J. 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
190. Murphy, James J, Ed. 1990. A Short History of Writing Instruction From Ancient Greece to Twentieth-Century America. Davis: Hermagoras Press.
191. Murray, Donald. 1989. Expecting the Unexpected: Teaching Myself and Others to Read and Write. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
192. Newman, Samuel. 1838. A Practical System of Rhetoric or The Principles and Rules of Style Inferred from Examples of Writing, to Which is Added a Historical Dissertation on English Style. 7th. Ed. Boston: Newman.
193. Ohmann, Richard. 1976. English in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
194. Paré, Anthony. 1998. Professional Persona: Erasing the Self from Official Stories. Conference on College Composition and Communication. Chicago. April 2.
195. Paré, Anthony. 2002. Genre and Identity: Individuals, Institutions, and Ideology. Coe, Lingrad, and Teslenko: 57-71.
196. Paré, Anthony, and Graham Smart. 1994. Observing Genres in Action: Towards a Research Methodology. Freedman and Medway (1994a): 146-154.
197. Pelkowski, Stephanie. 1998. The Teacher's Audience is Always a Fiction. Unpublished Manuscript.
198. Perelman, C.H. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
199. Perelman, C.H., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
200. Perkins, David. 1981. The Mind's Best Work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
201. Perl, Sondra. 1979. The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers. Research in the Teaching of English 13: 317-336.
202. Perl, Sondra. 1988. Understanding Composing. In The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook. Eds. Gary Tate and Edward P.J. Corbett. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 113-118.
203. Perloff, Marjorie, ed. 1989. Postmodern Genres. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
204. Peters, Brad. 1997. Genre, Antigenre, and Reinventing the Forms of Conceptualization. Bishop and Ostrom: 199-214.
205. Petruzzi, Anthony. 1998. Between Conventions and Critical Thinking: The Concept of "Limit-Situations" in Critical Literacy and Pedagogy. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 18.2: 310-332.
206. Pfau, Thomas. 1994. The Pragmatics of Genre: Moral Theory and Lyric Authorship in Hegel and Wordsworth. Woodmansee and Jaszi: 138-158.
207. Popken, Randall. 1999. The Pedagogical Dissemination of a Genre: The Resume in American Business Discourse Textbooks, 1914-1939. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 19.1: 91-116.
208. Reid, Ian, Ed. 1988. The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates. Geelong: Deakin University.
209. Reiff, John D., and James E. Middleton. 1983. A Model for Designing and Revising Assignments. Stock: 263-268.
210. Reynolds, Nedra. 1998. Composition's Imagined Geographies: The Politics of Space in the Frontier, City, and Cyberspace. College Composition and Communication 50.1: 12-35.
211. Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
212. Rohman, D. Gordon. 1994. Pre-Writing: The Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process. Young and Liu: 41-49.
213. Rose, Mark. 1993. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
214. Rose, Nikolas. 1996. Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
215. Rosmarin, Adena. 1985. The Power of Genre. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
216. Rothenberg, Albert. 1979. The Emerging Goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
217. Russell, David. 1991. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
218. Russell, David R. 1997. Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis. Written Communication 14.4: 504-554.
219. Russell, David R. 2002. The Kind-ness of Genre: An Activity Theory Analysis of High School Teachers' Perceptions of Genre in Portfolio Assessment Across the Curriculum. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 225-242.
220. Sacks, Peter M. 1985. The English Elegy: Studies in the Genre from Spenser to Yates. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
221. Said, Edward. 1975. Beginnings: Intention and Method. New York: Columbia University Press.
222. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1966. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
223. Schell, Eileen. 1997. Response to Wendy Hesford. Bishop and Ostrom: 172-175.
224. Scholes, Robert E. 1975. Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale University Press.
225. Schreiner, Steven. 1997. A Portrait of the Student as a Young Writer: Re-evaluating Emig and the Process Movement. College Composition and Communication 48.1: 86-104.
226. Schryer, Catherine F. 1994. The Lab vs. the Clinic: Sites of Competing Genres. Freedman and Medway (1994a): 105-124.
227. Schryer, Catherine F. 1999. Genre Time/Space: Chronotopic Strategies in the Experimental Article. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 19.1: 81-89.
228. Schryer, Catherine F. 2002. Genre and Power: A Chronotopic Analysis. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 73-102.
229. Scott, Fred Newton, and Joseph Villiers Denney. 1902. Composition- Literature. Boston: Allyn.
230. Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
231. Slevin, James F. 1988. Genre Theory, Academic Discourse, and Writing in the Disciplines. In Audits of Meaning: A Festschrift in Honor of Anne E. Berthoff. Ed. Louise Z. Smith. Portsmouth: Boynton Cook. 3-16.
232. Smith, Frank. 1994. Understanding Reading. 5th Ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
233. Sommers, Nancy. 1982. Responding to Student Writing. College Composition and Communication 33.2: 148-156.
234. Spellmeyer, Kurt. 1989. Foucault and the Freshman Writer: Considering the Self in Discourse. College English 51: 715-729.
235. Spivak, Gayatri. 1976. Translator's Preface. In Of Grammatology, Jacques Derrida. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ix-lxxxvii.
236. Stock, Patricia L., Ed. 1983. Fforum: Essays on Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
237. Stygall, Gail. 1994. Resisting Privilege: Basic Writing and Foucault's Author Function. College Composition and Communication 45: 320-341.
238. Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
239. Swales, John M. 1996. Occluded Genres in the Academy: The Case of the Submission Letter. In Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 44-58.
240. Swales, John M. 1998. Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
241. Threadgold, Terry. 1989. Talking about Genre: Ideologies and Incompatible Discourses. Cultural Studies 3.1: 101-27.
242. Trimbur, John. 2002. Call to Write. 2nd Edition. New York: Longman.
243. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1970. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Trans. Richard Howard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
244. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1976. The Origin of Genres. New Literary History 8.1: 159-170.
245. Tran, Teresa. 1997. A Patient as an Object. Unpublished Manuscript.
246. Villanueva, Victor. 1993. Bootstraps: From an American Academic of Color. Urbana: NCTE.
247. Vitanza, Victor J. 1999. "The Wasteland Grows" Or, What is "Cultural Studies for Composition" and Why Must We Always Speak Good of It?: ParaResponse to Julie Drew. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 19.4: 699-703.
248. Vygotsky, Lev. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
249. Watt, Ian. 1983. The Rise of the Novel. Berkeley: University of California Press.
250. Weisberg, Robert. 1993. Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York: W.H. Freeman.
251. Wellek, René, and Austin Warren. 1942. Theory of Literature. New York: Harvest.
252. Williams, James D. 1989. Preparing to Teach Writing. Belmont: Wadsworth.
253. Williams, Joseph M., and Gregory G. Colomb. 1993. The Case for Explicit Teaching: Why What You Don't Know Won't Help You. Research in the Teaching of English 27.3: 252-264.
254. Williams, Patricia J. 1992. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
255. Williams, Raymond. 1981. Problems in Materialism and Culture. New York: Schocken.
256. Woodman, Leonora, and Thomas P. Adler. 1988. The Writer's Choices with Handbook. 2nd. Ed. Glenview, IL: Scott.
257. Woodmansee, Martha, and Peter Jaszi, eds. 1994. The Construction of the Author: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham: Duke University Press.
258. Worsham, Lynn. 1991. Writing Against Writing: The Predicament of Écriture Féminine. In Contending with Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age. Eds. Patricia Harkin and John Schilb. NY: MLA.
259. Yates, JoAnne. 1989. Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
260. Yates, JoAnne, and Wanda Orlikowski. 1992. Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structural Approach. Academy of Management Review 17: 299-326.
261. Yates, JoAnne, and Wanda Orlikowski. 2002. Genres Systems: Chronos and Kairos in Communicative Interaction. Coe, Lingard, and Teslenko: 103-121.
262. Young, Edward. 1992. From Conjectures on Original Composition. Adams: 329-337.
263. Young, Richard. 1978. Paradigms and Problems: Needed Research in Rhetorical Invention. In Research on Composing: Points of Departure. Eds. Charles R. Cooper and Lee Odell. Urbana: NCTE. 29-47.
264. Young, Richard. 1986. Invention: A Topographical Survey. In Teaching Composition: Twelve Bibliographic Essays. Ed. Gary Tate. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press. 1-43.
265. Young, Richard. 1994. Concepts of Art and the Teaching of Writing. Young and Liu: 193-202.
266. Young, Richard, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike. 1970. Rhetoric: Discovery and Change. NY: Harcourt.
267. Young, Richard, and Yameng Liu, Eds. 1994. Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention. Davis: Hermagoras Press.