Renal Denervation for Treatment of Hypertension: a Second Start and New Challenges

Current Hypertension Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-11

  Persu, Alexandre ^a,b   Kjeldsen, Sverre ^c   Staessen, Jan A ^d,e   Azizi, Michel ^f,g,h  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^c ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^g HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^h INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Ambulatory blood pressure; Mild hypertension; Renal denervation; Renal nerve stimulation; Renal sympathetic denervation; Resistant hypertension; Sympathetic nervous system

Indexed keywords

BLOOD LEVEL; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY DENERVATION; NONHUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTION; REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ANIMAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; DENERVATION; KIDNEY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BLOOD PRESSURE; DENERVATION; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY;

EID: 84953224454     PISSN: 15226417     EISSN: 15343111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11906-015-0610-9     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Bohm M. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1903–9.
2. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, D’Agostino R, Flack JM, Katzen BT. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1393–401. In this large US randomised trial including a sham procedure, the benefit assignable to renal denervation was < 3 mmHg, vs. 25–30 mmHg in Symplicity HTN-2 and other previous studies. The main explanation accounting for this large discrepancy is blinding, which minimized patient- and physician-related biases in Symplicity HTN-3. The failure of Symplicity HTN-3 to meet its primary endpoint showed unequivocally that renal denervation is not ready for wide clinical dissemination.
3. Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Larstorp AC, Fossum E, Brekke M, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Adjusted drug treatment is superior to renal sympathetic denervation in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;63(5):991–9.
4. Azizi M, Sapoval M, Gosse P, Monge M, Bobrie G, Delsart P, et al. Optimum and stepped care standardised antihypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1957–65. This French randomized trial showed a significant −5.9 mmHg additional decrease in daytime ambulatory blood pressure in the renal denervation vs. control arm, leading to a more balanced evaluation of RDN after the “failure” of Symplicity HTN-3. One of the main assets of DENERHTN is that optimum and stepped-care standardized antihypertensive treatment was applied in both arms, both before and after randomisation.
5. Rosa J, Widimský P, Toušek P, Petrák O, Curila K, Waldauf P, et al. Randomized comparison of renal denervation versus intensified pharmacotherapy including spironolactone in true-resistant hypertension: six-month results from the Prague-15 study. Hypertension. 2014;65:407–13.
6. Desch S, Okon T, Heinemann D, Kulle K, Röhnert K, Sonnabend M, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial of renal sympathetic denervation in mild resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65(6):1202–8.
7. Kario K, Ogawa H, Okumura K, Okura T, Saito S, Ueno T. First randomized controlled trial of catheter-based renal denervation in Asian patients. Circ J. 2015;79(6):1222–9.
8. Fadl Elmula FE, Jin Y, Yang WY, Thijs L, Lu YC, Larstorp AC, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension. Blood Press. 2015;24(5):263–74. This meta-analysis including 7 randomised controlled trials testing renal denervation using the Symplicity system against maintained or intensified drug treatment alone failed to show a significant advantage of renal denervation. Nevertheless, it cannot rule out a significant benefit of the procedure in a minority of patients.
9. DiBona GF, Esler M. Translational medicine: the antihypertensive effect of renal denervation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(2):R245–53.
10. Esler M. Renal denervation for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015;14:107–15.
11. Laurent S, Schlaich M, Esler M. New drugs, procedures, and devices for hypertension. Lancet. 2012;380(9841):591–600.
12. Monge M, Lorthioir A, Bobrie G, Azizi M. New drug therapies interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system for resistant hypertension. J Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2013;14(4):285–9.
13. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J, Bartus K, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373(9671):1275–81.
14. Persu A, Renkin J, Asayama K, O’Brien E, Staessen JA. Renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension: the need for restraint and more and better evidence. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;11(6):739–49.
15. Kandzari DE, Bhatt DL, Sobotka PA, O’Neill WW, Esler M, Flack JM, et al. Catheter-based renal denervation for resistant hypertension: rationale and design of the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(9):528–35.
16. Sapoval M, Azizi M. Renal artery denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Update after Medtronic announcement that its Symplicity HTN3 study failed to meet its primary efficacy end point. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(4):353–4.
17. Azizi M, Steichen O, Frank M, Bobrie G, Plouin PF, Sapoval M. Catheter-based radiofrequency renal-nerve ablation in patients with resistant hypertension. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(3):293–9.
18. Persu A, Renkin J, Thijs L, Staessen JA. Renal denervation: ultima ratio or standard in treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60(3):596–606.
19. Shun-Shin MJ, Howard JP, Francis DP. Removing the hype from hypertension. BMJ. 2014;348:g1937.
20. Kjeldsen SE, Fadl Elmula FE, Persu A, Jin Y, Staessen JA. Renal sympathetic denervation in the aftermath of Symplicity HTN-3. Blood Press. 2014;23(5):256–61.
21. Schmieder RE. Hypertension: How should data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 be interpreted? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(7):375–6.
22. Esler M. Illusions of truths in the Symplicity HTN-3 trial: generic design strengths but neuroscience failings. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(8):593–8.
23. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001;358(9290):1305–15.
24. Persu A, Jin Y, Azizi M, Baelen M, Volz S, Elvan A, et al. Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28(3):150–6.
25. Persu A, Azizi M, Jin Y, Volz S, Rosa J, Fadl Elmula FE, et al. Hyperresponders vs. nonresponder patients after renal denervation: do they differ? J Hypertens. 2014;32(12):2422–7.
26. Mahfoud F, Böhm M, Azizi M, Pathak A, Durand Zaleski I, Ewen S, et al. Proceedings from the European clinical consensus conference for renal denervation: considerations on future clinical trial design. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(33):2219–27. A European perspective on the best way to move the renal denervation field forward.
27. White WB, Galis ZS, Henegar J, Kandzari DE, Victor R, Sica D, et al. Renal denervation therapy for hypertension: pathways for moving development forward. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015;9(5):341–50. A US perspective on the best way to move the renal denervation field forward.
28. Korb-Savoldelli V, Gillaizeau F, Pouchot J, Lenain E, Postel-Vinay N, Plouin PF, et al. Validation of the French version of the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale in hypertensive adults. J Clin Hypertens. 2012;14(7):429–34.
29. Kjeldsen SE, Persu A, Azizi M. Design of renal denervation studies not confounded by antihypertensive drugs. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015;9(5):337–40.
30. Rippy MK, Zarins D, Barman NC, Wu A, Duncan KL, Zarins CK. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation: chronic preclinical evidence for renal artery safety. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011;100(12):1095–101.
31. Patel HC, Dhillon PS, Mahfoud F, Lindsay AC, Hayward C, Ernst S, et al. The biophysics of renal sympathetic denervation using radiofrequency energy. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(5):337–44.
32. Tzafriri AR, Keating JH, Markham PM, Spognardi AM, Stanley JR, Wong G, et al. Arterial microanatomy determines the success of energy-based renal denervation in controlling hypertension. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(285):285ra65.
33. Tzafriri AR, Mahfoud F, Keating JH, Markham PM, Spognardi A, Wong G, et al. Innervation patterns may limit response to endovascular renal denervation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(11):1079–87.
34. Henegar JR, Zhang Y, Hata C, Narciso I, Hall ME, Hall JE. Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation: location effects on renal norepinephrine. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28(7):909–14.
35. Mahfoud F, Tunev S, Ewen S, Cremers B, Ruwart J, Schulz-Jander D, et al. Impact of lesion placement on efficacy and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(16):1766–75.
36. Machino T, Murakoshi N, Sato A, Xu D, Hoshi T, Kimura T, et al. Anti-hypertensive effect of radiofrequency renal denervation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Life Sci. 2014;110(2):86–92.
37. Lohmeier TE, Iliescu R, Liu B, Henegar JR, Maric-Bilkan C, Irwin ED. Systemic and renal-specific sympathoinhibition in obesity hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;59(2):331–8.
38. Henegar JR, Zhang Y, De Rama R, Hata C, Hall ME, Hall JE. Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation lowers blood pressure in obese hypertensive dogs. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27(10):1285–92.
39. Sakakura K, Tunev S, Yahagi K, O’Brien AJ, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, et al. Comparison of histopathologic analysis following renal sympathetic denervation over multiple time points. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2), e001813.
40. Booth LC, Nishi EE, Yao ST, Ramchandra R, Lambert GW, Schlaich MP, et al. Reinnervation of renal afferent and efferent nerves at 5.5 and 11 months after catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation in sheep. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):393–400.
41. Holmes Jr DR, Monahan KH, Packer D. Pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical spectrum and interventional considerations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):267–76.
42. Templin C, Jaguszewski M, Ghadri JR, Sudano I, Gaehwiler R, Hellermann JP, et al. Vascular lesions induced by renal nerve ablation as assessed by optical coherence tomography: pre-and post-procedural comparison with the Simplicity® catheter system and the EnligHTN™ multi-electrode renal denervation catheter. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2141–8.
43. Steigerwald K, Titova A, Malle C, Kennerknecht E, Jilek C, Hausleiter J, et al. Morphological assessment of renal arteries after radiofrequency catheter-based sympathetic denervation in a porcine model. J Hypertens. 2012;30(11):2230–9.
44. Persu A, Sapoval M, Azizi M, Monge M, Danse E, Hammer F, et al. Renal artery stenosis following renal denervation: a matter of concern. J Hypertens. 2014;32(10):2101–5.
45. Koppelstaetter C, Kerschbaum J, Lenzhofer M, Glodny B, Esterhammer R, Frick M, et al. Distal renal artery stenosis after percutaneous renal denervation leading to renal impairment but normotension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17(2):162–4.
46. Mabin T, Sapoval M, Cabane V, Stemmett J, Iyer M. First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension. EuroIntervention. 2012;8(1):57–61.
47. Worthley SG, Tsioufis CP, Worthley MI, Sinhal A, Chew DP, Meredith IT, et al. Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2132–40.
48. Versaci F, Trivisonno A, Olivieri C, Caranci F, Brunese L, Prati F. Late renal artery stenosis after renal denervation: is it the tip of the iceberg? Int J Cardiol. 2014;172(3):e507–8.
49. Lambert T, Nahler A, Reiter C, Schwarz S, Gammer V, Blessberger H, et al. Frequency of renal artery stenosis after renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(11):1545–8.
50. Karanasos A, Van Mieghem N, Bergmann MW, Hartman E, Ligthart J, van der Heide E, et al. Multimodality intra-arterial imaging assessment of the vascular trauma induced by balloon-based and nonballoon-based renal denervation systems. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(7), e002474.
51. Pathak A, Coleman L, Roth A, Stanley J, Bailey L, Markham P, et al. Renal sympathetic nerve denervation using intraluminal ultrasound within a cooling balloon preserves the arterial wall and reduces sympathetic nerve activity. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(4):477–84.
52. Kandzari DE, Bhatt DL, Brar S, Devireddy CM, Esler M, Fahy M, et al. Predictors of blood pressure response in the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(4):219–27.
53. Bakris GL, Townsend RR, Liu M, Cohen SA, D’Agostino R, Flack JM, et al. Impact of renal denervation on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure: results from SYMPLICITY HTN-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(11):1071–8.
54. Ewen S, Ukena C, Linz D, Kindermann I, Cremers B, Laufs U, et al. Reduced effect of percutaneous renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65(1):193–9.
55. Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011;57(5):911–7.
56. Dörr O, Liebetrau C, Möllmann H, Gaede L, Troidl C, Rixe J, et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and endothelial adhesion molecules (intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) as predictive markers for blood pressure reduction after renal sympathetic denervation. Hypertension. 2014;63(5):984–90.
57. Pöss J, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Esler MD, Schlaich M, Hering D, et al. Association of vitamin D status and blood pressure response after renal denervation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(1):41–7.
58. Dörr O, Liebetrau C, Möllmann H, Gaede L, Troidl C, Haidner V, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a marker for immediate assessment of the success of renal sympathetic denervation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1151–3.
59. Liang FQ, Walline R, Earnest DJ. Circadian rhythm of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neurosci Lett. 1998;242(2):89–92.
60. Begliuomini S, Lenzi E, Ninni F, Casarosa E, Merlini S, Pluchino N, et al. Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor daily variations in men: correlation with cortisol circadian rhythm. J Endocrinol. 2008;197(2):429–35.
61. Chinushi M, Izumi D, Iijima K, Suzuki K, Furushima H, Saitoh O, et al. Blood pressure and autonomic responses to electrical stimulation of the renal arterial nerves before and after ablation of the renal artery. Hypertension. 2013;61(2):450–6.
62. Gal P, de Jong MR, Smit JJ, Adiyaman A, Staessen JA, Elvan A. Blood pressure response to renal nerve stimulation in patients undergoing renal denervation: a feasibility study. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;29(5):292–5. First human study showing the feasibility and safety of renal nerve stimulation as a method to assess the completeness of renal nerve ablation.
63. Dudenbostel T, Acelajado MC, Pisoni R, Li P, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Refractory hypertension: evidence of heightened sympathetic activity as a cause of antihypertensive treatment failure. Hypertension. 2015;66(1):126–33.
64. Václavík J, Sedlák R, Plachy M, Navrátil K, Plásek J, Jarkovsky J, et al. Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hypertension. 2011;57(6):1069–75.
65. Oxlund CS, Henriksen JE, Tarnow L, Schousboe K, Gram J, Jacobsen IA. Low dose spironolactone reduces blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double blind randomized clinical trial. J Hypertens. 2013;31(10):2094–102.
66. Weber MA, Black H, Bakris G, Krum H, Linas S, Weiss R, et al. A selective endothelin-receptor antagonist to reduce blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9699):1423–31.
67. Bakris GL, Lindholm LH, Black HR, Krum H, Linas S, Linseman JV, et al. Divergent results using clinic and ambulatory blood pressures: report of a darusentan-resistant hypertension trial. Hypertension. 2010;56(5):824–30.
68. Bobrie G, Frank M, Azizi M, Peyrard S, Boutouyrie P, Chatellier G, et al. Sequential nephron blockade versus sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade in resistant hypertension: a prospective, randomized, open blinded endpoint study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(8):1656–64.
69. Beaussier H, Boutouyrie P, Bobrie G, Frank M, Laurent S, Coudoré F, et al. True antihypertensive efficacy of sequential nephron blockade in patients with resistant hypertension and confirmed medication adherence. J Hypertens. 2015.
70. Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, Webb DJ, Sever P, McInnes G, et al. Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet. 2015.
71. Esler M, Jennings G, Biviano B, Lambert G, Hasking G. Mechanism of elevated plasma noradrenaline in the course of essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 5:S39–43.
72. Julius S, Majahalme S. The changing face of sympathetic overactivity in hypertension. Ann Med. 2000;32(5):365–70.
73. Jung O, Gechter JL, Wunder C, Paulke A, Bartel C, Geiger H, et al. Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31(4):766–74.
74. Tomaszewski M, White C, Patel P, Masca N, Damani R, Hepworth J, et al. High rates of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HP LC-MS/MS) urine analysis. Heart. 2014;100(11):855–61.
75. Florczak E, Tokarczyk B, Warchoł-Celińska E, Szwench-Pietrasz E, Prejbisz A, Gosk M, et al. Assessment of adherence to treatment in patients with resistant hypertension using toxicological serum analysis. A subgroup evaluation of the RESIST-POL study. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(1–2):65–72.
76. Jin Y, Jacobs L, Baelen M, Thijs L, Renkin J, Hammer F, et al. Rationale and design of the Investigator-Steered Project on Intravascular Renal Denervation for Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension (INSPiRED) trial. Blood Press. 2014;23(3):138–46.
77. Calhoun DA. Hyperaldosteronism as a common cause of resistant hypertension. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:233–47.
78. Kikuya M, Hansen TW, Thijs L, Björklund-Bodegård K, Kuznetsova T, Ohkubo T, et al. Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on 10-year cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2007;115(16):2145–52.
79. Hansen TW, Kikuya M, Thijs L, Björklund-Bodegård K, Kuznetsova T, Ohkubo T, et al. Prognostic superiority of daytime ambulatory over conventional blood pressure in four populations: a meta-analysis of 7030 individuals. J Hypertens. 2007;25(8):1554–64.
80. O’Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al. European society of hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1731–68.
81. Persu A, O’Brien E, Verdecchia P. Use of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the definition of resistant hypertension: a review of the evidence. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(11):967–72.
82. de la Sierra A, Segura J, Banegas JR, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, Armario P, et al. Clinical features of 8295 patients with resistant hypertension classified on the basis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2011;57(5):898–902.
83. Pierdomenico SD, Lapenna D, Bucci A, Di Tommaso R, Di Mascio R, Manente BM, et al. Cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(11):1422–8.
84. Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Schmieder RE, Cremers B, Rump LC, Vonend O, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure changes after renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Circulation. 2013;128(2):132–40.
85. Lüscher TF, Mahfoud F. Renal nerve ablation after SYMPLICITY HTN-3: confused at the higher level? Eur Heart J. 2014;35(26):1706–11.
86. Sakakura K, Ladich E, Cheng Q, Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Fowler DR, et al. Anatomic assessment of sympathetic peri-arterial renal nerves in man. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(7):635–43.
87. Okada T, Pellerin O, Savard S, Curis E, Monge M, Frank M, et al. Eligibility for renal denervation: anatomical classification and results in essential resistant hypertension. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(1):79–87.
88. Hering D, Marusic P, Walton AS, Duval J, Lee R, Sata Y, et al. Renal artery anatomy affects the blood pressure response to renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2015;202:388–93.
89. Id D, Kaltenbach B, Bertog SC, Hornung M, Hofmann I, Vaskelyte L, et al. Does the presence of accessory renal arteries affect the efficacy of renal denervation? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(10):1085–91.
90. Schlaich MP, Esler MD, Fink GD, Osborn JW, Euler DE. Targeting the sympathetic nervous system: critical issues in patient selection, efficacy, and safety of renal denervation. Hypertension. 2014;63(3):426–32.