Adult survival selection in relation to multilocus heterozygosity and body size in a tropical bird species, the Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita

Oecologia

Volumn 180, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 127-136

  Cézilly, Frank ^a   Quinard, Aurélie ^a   Motreuil, Sébastien ^a   Pradel, Roger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Capture mark recapture modelling; Demography; Evolutionary ecology; Heterozygosity fitness correlations; Phenotype

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIRD; BODY SIZE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; HETEROZYGOSITY; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION ESTIMATION; SURVIVAL; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

AVES; ZENAIDA; ZENAIDA AURITA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PIGEONS AND DOVES;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BODY SIZE; COLUMBIDAE; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84952862162     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3466-4     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Acquarone C, Cucco M, Malacarne G, Silvano F (2004) Temporary shift of body size in hooded crows Corvus corone cornix of NW Italy. Folia Zool 53:379–384
2. Agudo R, Carrete M, Alcaide M, Rico C, Hiraldo F, Donazar JA (2012) Genetic diversity at neutral and adaptive loci determines individual fitness in a long-lived territorial bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3241–3249
3. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petran N, Csaki F (eds) International Symposium on Information Theory. Akadémiai Kiadi, Budapest, pp 267–281
4. Armstrong DP, Cassey P (2007) Estimating the effect of inbreeding on survival. Anim Cons 10:487–492
5. Banks SC, Dubach J, Viggers KL, Lindenmayer DB (2010) Adult survival and microsatellite diversity in possums: effects of major histocompatibility complex-linked microsatellite diversity but not multilocus inbreeding estimators. Oecologia 162:359–370
6. Barbraud C (2000) Natural selection on body size traits in a long-lived bird, the snow petrel, Pagodroma nivea. J Evol Biol 13:81–88
7. Bertrand JAM, Bourgeois XYC, Delahaie B, Duval T, García-Jiménez R, Cornuault J, Heeb P, Milá B, Pujol B, Thébaud C (2014) Extremely reduced dispersal and gene flow in an island bird. Heredity 112:190–196
8. Björklund M, Sennar JC (2001) Sex differences in survival selection in the serin, Serinus serinus. J Evol Biol 14:841–849
9. Boag PT, Grant PR (1981) Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin’s finches (Geospizinae) in the Galápagos. Science 214:82–85
10. Bodie JR, Semlitsch RD (2000) Size-specific mortality and natural selection in freshwater turtles. Copeia 3:732–739
11. Bond J (1993) A field guide to the birds of the West Indies, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Harcourt
12. Brown CR, Brown MB (1998) Intense natural selection on body size and wing and tail asymmetry in cliff swallows during severe weather. Evolution 52:1461–1475
13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
14. Cain BA, Wandera B, Shawcross SG, Harris WE, Stevens-Wood B, Kemp SJ, Okita-Ouma B, Watts PC (2014) Sex-biased inbreeding effects on reproductive success and home range size of the critically endangered black rhinoceros. Cons Biol 28:594–603
15. Carlson SM, Olsen EM, Vøllestad LA (2008) Seasonal mortality and the effect of body size: a review and an empirical test using the brown trout. Funct Ecol 22:663–673
16. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol Ecol 18:2746–2765
17. Choquet R, Rouan L, Pradel R (2009) Program E-SURGE: a software application for fitting multievent models. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds) Modeling demographic processes in marked populations, book 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 847–868
18. Clark JA (2009) Selective mortality of waders during severe weather. Bird Study 56:96–102
19. Clobert J (1995) Capture–recapture and evolutionary ecology: a difficult wedding? J Appl Stat 22:989–1008
20. Cooch EG, Cam E, Link W (2002) Occam’s shadow: levels of analysis in evolutionary ecology—where to next? J Appl Stat 29:19–48
21. Davies JC, Rockwell RF, Cooke F (1988) Body-size variation and fitness components in lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens). Auk 105:639–648
22. De Léon LF, Bermingham E, Podos J, Hendry AP (2010) Divergence with gene flow as facilitated by ecological differences: within-island variation in Darwin’s finches. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:1041–1052
23. Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Monceau K, Cézilly F (2011) Sexing birds using discriminant function analysis: a critical appraisal. Auk 128:78–86
24. Endler J (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton
25. Evans ML, Neff BD, Heath DD (2010) MHC-mediated local adaptation in reciprocally translocated Chinook salmon. Cons Genet 11:2333–2342
26. Forcada J, Hoffman JI (2014) Climate change selects for heterozygosity in a declining fur seal population. Nature 511:462–465
27. Fortsmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B (2012) Heterozygosity–fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Mol Ecol 21:3237–3249
28. Garroway CJ, Radersma R, Sepil I, Santure AW, De Cauwer I, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2013) Fine-scale genetic structure in a wild bird population: the role of limited dispersal and environmentally based selection as causal factors. Evolution 67:3488–3500
29. Geraci J, Béchet A, Cézilly F, Ficheux S, Baccetti N, Samraoui B, Wattier R (2012) Greater flamingo colonies around the Mediterranean form a single interbreeding population and share a common history. J Avian Biol 43:341–354
30. Gillingham MAF, Cézilly F, Wattier R, Béchet A (2013) Evidence for an association between post-fledging dispersal and microsatellite multilocus heterozygosity in a large population of greater flamingos. PLoS One 8(11):e81118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081118
31. Gimenez O, Choquet R (2010) Individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture–recapture mixed models. Ecology 91:951–957
32. Gimenez O, Viallefont A, Charmantier A, Pradel R, Cam E, Brown CR, Covas R, Gaillard JM (2008) The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one. Am Nat 172:441–448
33. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186
34. Hall KSS, Ryttman H, Fransson T, Stolt B-O (2004) Stabilising selection on wing length in reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. J Avian Biol 35:7–12
35. Hansson B, Westerberg L (2002) On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol Ecol 11:2467–2474
36. Harrison XA, Bearhop S, Inger R, Colhoun K, Gudmundsson GA, Hodgson D, McElwaine G, Tregenza T (2011) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in a migratory bird: an analysis of inbreeding and single-locus effects. Mol Ecol 20:4786–4795
37. Herdegen M, Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Konowalik A, Babik W, Radwan J (2013) Heterozygosity, sexual ornament and body size in the crested newt. J Zool 291:146–153
38. Herdegen M, Dudka K, Radwan J (2014) Heterozygosity and orange coloration are associated in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). J Evol Biol 27:220–225
39. Hoffman JI, Hanson N, Forcada J, Trathan PN, Amos W (2010) Getting long in the tooth: a strong positive correlation between canine size and heterozygosity in Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella. J Hered 101:527–538
40. Hoffman JL, Simpson F, David P, Rijks JM, Kuiken T, Thorne MAS, Lacyg RC, Dasmahapatrah KK (2014) High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3775–3780
41. Johnson DW, Hixon MA (2010) Ontogenetic and spatial variation in size-selective mortality of a marine fish. J Evol Biol 23:724–737
42. Jones G (1987) Selection against large size in the sand martin Riparia riparia during a dramatic population crash. Ibis 129:274–280
43. Kardos M, Allendorf FW, Lukart G (2013) Evaluating the role of inbreeding depression in heterozygosity-fitness correlations: how useful are tests for identity disequilibrium? Mol Ecol Res 14:519–530
44. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2007) Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57:561–571
45. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CH, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245–261
46. Kloch A, Baran K, Buczek M, Konarzewski M, Radwan J (2013) MHC influences infection with parasites and winter survival in the root vole Microtus oeconomus. Evol Ecol 27:635–653
47. Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118
48. Lebreton JD, Pradel R, Clobert J (1993) The statistical-analysis of survival in animal populations. Trends Ecol Evol 8:91–95
49. Markert JA, Grant PR, Grant BR, Keller LF, Coombs JL, Petren K (2004) Neutral locus heterozygosity, inbreeding, and survival in Darwin’s ground finches (Geospiza fortis and G. scandens). Heredity 92:306–315
50. Milá B, Warren BH, Heeb P, Thébaud C (2010) The geographic scale of diversification on islands: genetic and morphological divergence at a very small spatial scale in the Mascarene grey white-eye (Aves: Zosterops borbonicus). BMC Evol Biol 10:158
51. Miller JM, Coltman DW (2014) Assessment of identity disequilibrium and its relation to empirical heterozygosity fitness correlations: a meta-analysis. Mol Ecol 23:1899–1909
52. Miller JM, Malenfant RM, David P, Davis CS, Poissant J, Hogg JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW (2014) Estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: effects of demographic history and marker type. Heredity 112:240–247
53. Milner JM, Albon SD, Illius AW, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (1999) Repeated selection of morphometric traits in the Soay sheep on St Kilda. J Anim Ecol 68:472–488
54. Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (1986) On being the right size: natural selection and body size in the herring gull. Evolution 40:1096–1099
55. Monceau K, Gaillard M, Harrang E, Santiago-Alarcon D, Parker P, Cézilly F, Wattier R (2009) Twenty-three polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Caribbean endemic Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita, and its conservation in related Zenaida species. Cons Genet 10:1577–1581
56. Monceau K, Wattier R, Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Motreuil S, Cézilly F (2011) Territoriality vs. flocking in the Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita: resource polymorphism revisited using morphological and genetic analyses. Auk 128:15–25
57. Monceau K, Wattier R, Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Dubreuil C, Cézilly F (2013a) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in adult and juvenile Zenaida doves, Zenaida aurita. J Heredity 104:47–56
58. Monceau K, Cézilly F, Moreau J, Motreuil S, Wattier R (2013b) Genetic and morphological evidence suggests rapid differentiation between island populations of a Caribbean endemic bird species, the Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita. PLoS One 8:e82189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082189
59. Munch SB, Mangel M, Conover DO (2003) Quantifying natural selection on body size from field data with an application to winter mortality in Menidia menidia. Ecology 84:2168–2177
60. Nolan PM, Hill GE, Stoehr AM (1998) Sex, size, and plumage redness predict house finch survival in an epidemic. Proc R Soc B 265:961–965
61. Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for the analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003), Vienna. ISSN 1609-395X
62. Potti J, Canal D, Serrano D (2013) Lifetime fitness and age-related female ornament signalling: evidence for survival and fecundity selection in the pied flycatcher. J Evol Biol 26:1445–1457
63. Quinard A, Cézilly F (2012) Sex roles during conspecific territorial defence in the Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita. Anim Behav 83:47–54
64. Quinard A, Dechaume-Moncharmont FX, Cézilly F (2014) Pairing patterns in relation to body size, genetic similarity and multilocus heterozygosity in a tropical monogamous bird species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1723–1731
65. Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2005) Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 142:1377–1402
66. Redfield JA (1974) Genetics and selection at the Ng locus in blue grouse (Dendragapus obscurus). Heredity 33:69–78
67. Reznick DN, Butler MJ IV, Rodd FH, Ross P (1996) Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50:1651–1660
68. Rhodes OE, Smith LM, Smith MH (1996) Relationships between genetic variation and body size in wintering mallards. Auk 113:339–345
69. Rivera-Milan FF (1996) Nest density and success of columbids in Puerto Rico. Condor 98:100–113
70. Rivera-Milan FF (2001) Transect surveys of columbid nests on Puerto Rico, Vieques, and Culebra Islands. Condor 103:332–342
71. Rivera-Milan FF, Schafner FC (2002) Demography of Zenaida doves on Cayo del Agua, Culebra, Puerto Rico. Condor 104:587–597
72. Rotella JJ, Clark RG, Afton AD (2003) Survival of female lesser scaup: effect of body size, age, and reproductive effort. Condor 105:336–345
73. Rousset F (2011) Genepop 4.1 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X. http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/~rousset/Genepop.htm
74. Sandercock BK (2006) Estimation of demographic parameters from live encounter data: a summary review. J Wild Manage 70:1504–1520
75. Schaschl H, Suchentrunk F, Morris DL, Ben Slimen H, Smith S, Arnold W (2012) Sex-specific selection for MHC variability in Alpine chamois. BMC Evol Biol 12:20
76. Schmeller DS, Schregel J, Veith M (2007) The importance of heterozygosity in a frog’s life. Naturwissenschaften 94:360–366
77. Schulte-Hostedde A, Millar J, Gibbs L (2002) Female-biased sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): sex-specific patterns of annual reproductive success and survival. Evolution 56:2519–2529
78. Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Griffin, London
79. Sepil I, Lachish S, Sheldon BC (2013) Mhc-linked survival and lifetime reproductive success in a wild population of great tits. Mol Ecol 22:384–396
80. Sol D, Elie M, Marcoux M, Chrostovsky E, Porcher C, Lefebvre L (2005) Ecological mechanisms of a resource polymorphism in Zenaida doves of Barbados. Ecology 86:2397–2407
81. Su YS, Yajima M (2012) R2jags: a package for running jags from R. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags
82. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64:1202–1217
83. Vangestel C, Mergeay C, Dawson DA, Vandomme V, Lens L (2011) Spatial heterogeneity in genetic relatedness among house sparrows along an urban–rural gradient as revealed by individual-based analysis. Mol Ecol 20:4643–4653
84. Weisberg S (1980) Applied linear regression. Wiley, New York
85. Wetzel DP, Stewart IRK, Westneat DF (2012) Heterozygosity predicts clutch and egg size but not plasticity in a house sparrow population with no evidence of inbreeding. Mol Ecol 21:406–420
86. Wiggins DA (1991) Natural selection on body size and laying date in the tree swallow. Evolution 45:1169–1174
87. Wiley JW (1991) Ecology and behavior of the Zenaida dove. Ornithol Neotrop 2:49–75
88. Winne CT, Willson JD, Gibbons JW (2010) Drought survival and reproduction impose contrasting selection pressures on maximum body size and sexual size dimorphism in a snake, Seminatrixpygaea. Oecologia 162:913–922
89. Worley K, Collet J, Spurgin LG, Cornwallis C, Pizzari T, Richardson DS (2010) MHC heterozygosity and survival in red junglefowl. Mol Ecol 19:3064–3075