Evaluating the role of inbreeding depression in heterozygosity-fitness correlations: How useful are tests for identity disequilibrium?

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 519-530

  Kardos, Marty ^a   Allendorf, Fred W ^a   Luikart, Gordon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulations; Genome wide heterozygosity; Inbreeding depression; Individual fitness; Microsatellite loci; Nucleotide polymorphisms

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; INBREEDING; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; INBREEDING; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84898542656     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12193     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Spraker TR, Lyons E et al. (2006) Contrasting effects of heterozygosity on survival and hookworm resistance in California sea lion pups. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1973-1982.
2. Alho J, Lillandt B-G, Jaari S, Merilä J (2009) Multilocus heterozygosity and inbreeding in the Siberian jay. Conservation Genetics, 10, 605-609.
3. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Molecular Ecology, 13, 3021-3031.
4. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley AC (1996) The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 351, 1271-1280.
5. Chapman N, Thompson E (2003) A model for the length of tracts of identity by descent in finite random mating populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 64, 141-150.
6. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2746-2765.
7. Coltman DW, Pilkington JG, Smith JA, Pemberton JM (1999) Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a free-living island population. Evolution, 53, 1259-1267.
8. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ.
9. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML (2011) Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 499-510.
10. David P (1997) Modeling the genetic basis of heterosis: tests of alternative hypotheses. Evolution, 51, 1049-1057.
11. David P (1998) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity, 80, 531-537.
12. David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J (2007) Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2474-2487.
13. Fisher RA (1965) The Theory of Inbreeding. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
14. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B (2012) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3237-3249.
15. Franklin I (1977) The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Theoretical Population Biology, 11, 60-80.
16. Gage MJ, Surridge AK, Tomkins JL et al. (2006) Reduced heterozygosity depresses sperm quality in wild rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Current Biology, 16, 612-617.
17. Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K (2001) A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution. Genetica, 112-113, 359-382.
18. Grueber CE, Waters JM, Jamieson IG (2011) The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species. Molecular Ecology, 20, 67-79.
19. 2, a microsatelline measure of inbreeding and outbreeding. Evolution, 55, 1256-1260.
20. Hill WG, Robertson A (1968) The effects of inbreeding at loci with heterozygote advantage. Genetics, 60, 615-628.
21. Hill WG, Weir BS (2011) Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genetics Research, 93, 47-64.
22. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230-241.
23. Luikart G, Cornuet J-M, Allendorf FW, Sherwin WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal ofHeredity, 89, 238-247.
24. Luikart G, Ryman N, Tallmon DA, Schwartz MK, Allendorf FW (2010) Estimation of census and effective population sizes: the increasing usefulness of DNA-based approaches. Conservation Genetics, 11, 355-373.
25. Luquet E, Léna L-P, David P et al. (2012) Within- and among-population impact of genetic erosion on adult fitness-related traits in the European tree frog Hyla arborea. Heredity, 110, 347-354.
26. Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
27. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ (1956) An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 42, 855-863.
28. Ohta T (1971) Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genetical Research, 18, 277-286.
29. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
30. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org/.
31. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 9197-9201.
32. Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Elliott KH, Sampson L, Hasselquist D (2007) Inbreeding effects on immune response in free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 274, 697-706.
33. Robinson SP, Simmons LW, Kennington WJ (2013) Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history. Molecular Ecology. doi: 10.1111/mec.12529.
34. Ruiz-Ĺpez MJ, Gañan N, Godoy JA et al. (2012) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and inbreeding depression in two critically endangered mammals. Conservation Biology, 26, 1121-1129.
35. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG et al. (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity, 93, 255-265.
36. Stam P (1980) The distribution of the fraction of the genome identical by descent in finite random mating populations. Genetics Research, 35, 131-155.
37. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution, 64, 1202-1217.
38. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1973) Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genetical Research, 21, 247-262.
39. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97-159.
40. Zheng B (2000) Summarizing the goodness of fit of generalized linear models for longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1265-1275.