Sexing birds using discriminant function analysis: A critical appraisal

Auk

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 78-86

  Dechaume Moncharmont, François Xavier ^a   Monceau, Karine ^a   Cezilly, Frank ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

Cross validation; DFA; Measurement errors; Morphological measurements; Sample size effect; Sexual dimorphism; Zenaida aurita

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BIRD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; DATA QUALITY; DATA SET; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; SEX DETERMINATION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

AVES; ZENAIDA; ZENAIDA AURITA;

EID: 79954504288     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2011.10129     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Arnqvist, G., and T. Mårtensson. 1998. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: Empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44:73-96. (Pubitemid 128180688)
3. Babyak, M. A. 2004. What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine 66:411-421. (Pubitemid 38668414)
4. Bailey, R. C., and J. Byrnes. 1990. A new, old method for assessing measurement error in both univariate and multivariate morphometric studies. Systematic Zoology 39:124-130.
5. Bellman, R. 1957. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
6. Blakesley, J. A., A. B. Franklin, and R. J. Gutiérrez. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in Northern Spotted Owls from northwest California. Journal of Field Ornithology 61:320-327.
7. Bourgeois, K., C. Curé, J. Legrand, E. Gómez-Díaz, E. Vidal, T. Aubin, and N. Mathevon. 2007. Morphological versus acoustic analysis: What is the most efficient method for sexing Yelkouan Shearwaters Puffinus yelkouan? Journal of Ornithology 148:261-269.
8. Brennan, L. A., J. B. Buchanan, C. T. Schick, and S. G. Herman. 1991. Estimating sex-ratios with discriminant function analysis: The influence of probability cutpoints and sample size. Journal of Field Ornithology 62:357-366.
9. Brennan, L. A., J. B. Buchanan, C. T. Schick, S. G. Herman, and T. M. Johnson. 1984. Sex determination of Dunlins in winter plumage. Journal of Field Ornithology 55:343-348.
10. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. Cardoni, D. A., J. E. Maldonado, J. P. Isacch, and R. Greenberg. 2009. Subtle sexual dimorphism in the Bay-capped Wren-Spinetail (Spartonoica maluroides; Furnariidae) uncovered through molecular sex determination. Onitología Neotropical 20:347-355.
12. Castoro, P. L., and A. M. Guhl. 1958. Pairing behavior of pigeons related to aggressiveness and territory. Wilson Bulletin 70:57-69.
13. Clark, R. G., P. C. James, and J. B. Morari. 1991. Sexing adult and yearling American Crows by external measurements and discriminant analysis. Journal of Field Ornithology 62:132-138.
14. Cuthill, I. C., A. T. D. Bennett, J. C. Partridge, and E. J. Maier. 1999. Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. American Naturalist 153:183-200. (Pubitemid 29139435)
15. Daniel, C., C. D. Millar, S. M. H. Ismar, B. M. Stephenson, and M. E. Hauber. 2007. Evaluating molecular and behavioural sexing methods for the Australasian Gannet (Morus serrator). Australian Journal of Zoology 55:377-382. (Pubitemid 351838113)
16. Darwin, C. R. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
17. Delestrade, A. 2001. Sexual size dimorphism and positive assortative mating in Alpine Choughs (Pyrrhocorax graculus). Auk 118:553-556.
18. Derksen, S., and H. J. Keselman. 1992. Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: Frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 45:265-282.
19. Devlin, C. M., A. W. Diamond, and G. W. Saunders. 2004. Sexing Arctic Terns in the field and laboratory. Waterbirds 27:314-320. (Pubitemid 39520482)
20. Dubiec, A., and M. Zagalska-Neubauer. 2006. Molecular techniques for sex identification in birds. Biological Letters 43:3-12.
21. Eisenbeis, R. A. 1977. Pitfalls in the application of discriminant analysis in business, finance, and economics. Journal of Finance 32:875-900.
22. Fernandez-Juricic, E., A. J. del Nevo, and R. Poston. 2009. Identification of individual and population-level variation in vocalizations of the endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). Auk 126:89-99.
23. Fletcher, K. L., and K. C. Hamer. 2003. Sexing terns using biometrics: The advantage of within-pair comparisons. Bird Study 50:78-83. (Pubitemid 36374564)
24. Flux, I., and J. Innes. 2001. A field technique for determining the sex of North Island Kokako (Callaeas cinerea wilsoni). Notornis 48:217-223. (Pubitemid 34119857)
25. Francis, R. I. C. C., and R. H. Mattlin. 1986. A possible pitfall in the morphometric application of discriminant analysis: Measurement bias. Marine Biology 93:311-313.
26. Fridolfsson, A. K., and H. Ellegren. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology 30:116-121. (Pubitemid 29174845)
27. Garamszegi, L. Z., S. Calhim, N. Dochtermann, G. Hegyi, P. L. Hurd, C. Jørgensen, N. Kutsukake, M. J. Lajeunesse, K. A. Pollard, H. Schielzeth, and others. 2009. Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology. Behavioral Ecology 20:1363-1375.
28. Gill, S. A., and M. J. Vonhof. 2006. Sexing monochromatic birds in the field: Cryptic sexual size dimorphism in Buff-breasted Wrens (Thryotorus leucotis). Ornitología Neotropical 17:409-418. (Pubitemid 44482863)
29. Hallgrimsson, G. T., S. Palsson, and R. W. Summers. 2008. Bill length: A reliable method for sexing Purple Sandpipers. Journal of Field Ornithology 79:87-92. (Pubitemid 351334630)
30. Hanners, L. A., and S. R. Patton. 1985. Sexing Laughing Gulls using external measurements and discriminant analysis. Journal of Field Ornithology 56:158-164.
31. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
32. Helfenstein, F., E. Danchin, and R. H. Wagner. 2004. Assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism in Black-legged Kittiwakes. Waterbirds 27:350-354. (Pubitemid 39520486)
33. Huberty, C. J. 1994. Applied Discriminant Analysis. Wiley, New York.
34. Iko, N. M., S. J. Dinsmore, and F. L. Knopf. 2004. Evaluating the use of morphometric measurements from museum specimens for sex determination in Mountain Plovers (Charadrius montanus). Western North American Naturalist 64:492-496. (Pubitemid 39459699)
35. Isaksson, A., M. Wallman, H. Göransson, and M. G. Gustafsson. 2008. Cross-validation and bootstrapping are unreliable in small sample classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 19:1960-1965.
36. James, F. C., and C. E. McCulloch. 1990. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's box? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 21:129-166.
37. Jarrell, M. G. 1994. A comparison of two procedures, the Mahalanobis distance and the Andrews-Pregibon statistic, for identifying multivariate outliers. Research in the Schools 1:49-58.
38. Jeffrey, J. J., S. G. Fancy, G. D. Lindsey, P. C. Banko, T. K. Pratt, and J. D. Jacobi. 1993. Sex and age identification of Palila. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:490-499.
39. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Wichern. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 3rd. ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
40. Kenward, B., C. Rutz, A. A. S. Weir, J. Chapell and A. Kacelnik. 2004. Morphology and sexual dimorphism of the New Caledonian Crow Corvus moneduloides, with notes on its behaviour and ecology. Ibis 146:652-660. (Pubitemid 39348601)
41. Lance, R. F., M. L. Kennedy, and P. L. Leberg. 2000. Classification bias in discriminant function analyses used to evaluate putatively different taxa. Journal of Mammalogy 81:245-249. (Pubitemid 32122040)
42. Lougheed, S. C., T. W. Arnold, and R. C. Bailey. 1991. Measurement error of external and skeletal variables in birds and its effect on principal components. Auk 108:432-436.
43. Mallory, M. L., and M. R. Forbes. 2005. Sex discrimination and measurement bias in Northern Fulmars Fulmarus glacialis from the Canadian Arctic. Ardea 93:25-36. (Pubitemid 41751794)
44. Manly, B. F. J. 1994. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London.
45. Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent, and J. M. Bibby. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, New York.
46. Marks, S., and O. J. Dunn. 1974. Discriminant functions when covariance matrices are unequal. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69:555-559.
47. McCarthy, M. A. 2007. Bayesian Methods for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
48. McCracken, K. G., D. C. Paton, and A. D. Afton. 2000. Sexual size dimorphism of the Musk Duck. Wilson Bulletin 112:457-466. (Pubitemid 32100357)
49. McGarigal, K., S. Cushman, and S. Stafford. 2000. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer-Verlag, New York.
50. Miller, W. J., and F. H. Wagner. 1955. Sexing mature columbiformes by cloacal characters. Auk 72:279-285.
51. Møller, A. P., and M. D. Jennions. 2001. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:580-586. (Pubitemid 32831580)
52. Monceau, K. 2009. Biologie des populations de tourterelles à queue carrée sur l'île de la Barbade: Apport de l'outil moléculaire. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
53. Monceau, K., R. Wattier, F.-X. Dechaume-Moncharmont, S. Motreuil, and F. Cézilly. 2011. Territoriality versus flocking in the Zenaida Dove (Zenaida aurita): Resource polymorphism revisited using morphological and genetic analyses. Auk 128:000-000.
54. Morrison, M. L. 1984. Influence of sample size on discriminant function analysis of habitat use by birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 55:330-335.
55. Murphy, M. T. 2007. A cautionary tale: Cryptic sexual size dimorphism in a socially monogamous passerine. Auk 124:515-525. (Pubitemid 46799130)
56. Nakagawa, S., and I. C. Cuthill. 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 82:591-605. (Pubitemid 47609922)
57. Nordhausen, K., H. Oja, and D. E. Tyler. 2008. Tools for exploring multivariate data: The package ICS. Journal of Statistical Software 28:1-31.
58. Osborne, J. W., and A. Overbay. 2004. The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 9(6).
59. Palmer, A. R. 2000. Quasi-replication and the contract of error: Lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:441-480. (Pubitemid 32122410)
60. Petrides, G. A. 1950. Notes on determination of sex and age in the Woodcock and Mourning Dove. Auk 67:357-360.
61. Picard, R. R., and K. N. Berk. 1990. Data splitting. American Statistician 44:140-147.
62. Piraux, F., and R. Palm. 2001. Etude empirique des estimateurs des taux d'erreur en analyse discriminante. Revue de statistique appliquée 49:71-85.
63. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. [Online.] Available at cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/refman.pdf.
64. Rasmussen, J. L. 1988. Evaluating outlier identification tests: Mahalanobis D squared and Comrey D. Multivariate Behavioral Research 23:189-202.
65. Remisiewicz, M., and L. Wennerberg. 2006. Differential migration strategies of the Wood Sandpiper (Tringa glareola)-Genetic analyses reveal sex differences in morphology and spring migration phenology. Ornis Fennica 83:1-10.
66. Robertson, B. C., and N. J. Gemmell. 2006. PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: Wrong answers from an accurate methodology? Conservation Genetics 7:267-271.
67. Rubega, M. A. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism in Red-necked Phalaropes and functional signifiance of nonsexual bill structure variation for feeding performance. Journal of Morphology 228:45-60.
68. Ryder, J. P. 1978. Sexing Ring-billed Gulls externally. Bird-Banding 49:218-222.
69. Santiago-Alarcon, D., and P. G. Parker. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism and morphological evidence supporting the recognition of two subspecies in the Galápagos Dove. Condor 109:132-141.
70. Scargle, J. D. 2000. Publication bias: The "file-drawer" problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration 14:91-106.
71. Schroeder, J., P. M. Lourenço, M. van der Velde, J. C. E. W. Hooijmeijer, C. Both, and T. Piersma. 2008. Sexual dimorphism in plumage and size in Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa limosa. Ardea 96:25-37. (Pubitemid 351642674)
72. Shealer, D. A., and C. M. Cleary. 2007. Sex determination of adult Black Terns by DNA and morphometrics: Tests of sample size, temporal stability and geographic specificity in the classification accuracy of discriminant functions models. Waterbirds 30:180-188. (Pubitemid 47162694)
73. Smith, R. J. 1999. Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution 36:423-459. (Pubitemid 29298516)
74. Snyder, P., B. Thompson, and P. Snyder. 1991. Three reasons why stepwise regression methods should not be used by researchers. Pages 99-105 in Advances in Educational Research: Substantive Findings, Methodological Developments (B. Thompson, Ed.). JAI, Greenwich, Connecticut.
75. Stevens, J. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
76. Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2000. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. HarperCollins, New York.
77. Thompson, B. 1995. Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55:525-534. (Pubitemid 126006425)
78. Thompson, B. 2001. Significance, effect sizes, stepwise methods, and other issues: Strong arguments move the field. Journal of Experimental Education 70:80-93.
79. Ura, T., N. Azuma, S. Hayama, and S. Higashi. 2005. Sexual dimorphism of Latham's Snipe (Gallinago hardwickii). Emu 105: 259-262. (Pubitemid 43225273)
80. Urfi, A. J., and A. Kalam. 2006. Sexual size dimorphism and mating pattern in the Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala). Waterbirds 29:489-496. (Pubitemid 46344451)
81. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics With S, 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
82. Wehberg, S., and M. Schumacher. 2004. A comparison of nonparametric error rate estimation methods in classification problems. Biometrical Journal 46:35-47. (Pubitemid 41448942)
83. Weihs, C., U. Ligges, K. Luebke, and N. Raabe. 2005. klaR analyzing German business cycles. Pages 335-343 in Data Analysis and Decision Support (D. Baier, R. Decker, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
84. Williams, B. K., and K. Titus. 1988. Assessment of sampling stability in ecological applications of discriminant analysis. Ecology 69:1275-1285. (Pubitemid 20418156)
85. Yezerinac, S. M., S. C. Lougheed, and P. Handford. 1992. Measurement error and morphometric studies: Statistical power and observer experience. Systematic Biology 41:471-482.
86. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
87. Zavalaga, C. B., and R. Paredes. 1997. Sex determination of adult Humboldt Penguins using morphometric characters. Journal of Field Ornithology 68:102-112.