Retraction to: Heterozygosity, sexual ornament and body size in the crested newt (Journal of Zoology, 291, (146-153), 10.1111/jzo.12056);Heterozygosity, sexual ornament and body size in the crested newt

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 291, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 146-153

  Herdegen, M ^a   Nadachowska Brzyska, K ^a,e   Konowalik, A ^b   Babik, W ^c   Radwan, J ^d  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WROC AW   (Poland)

^c INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION OF ANIMALS   (Poland)

^d ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^e UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Amphibians; Heterozygosity fitness correlation; Sexual selection; Triturus cristatus

Indexed keywords

AGE; AMPHIBIAN; BODY SIZE; FITNESS; GENE; HETEROZYGOSITY; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PATH ANALYSIS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL;

AMPHIBIA; SALAMANDRIDAE; TRITURUS CRISTATUS;

EID: 84884721413     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12427     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Andersson, M. (1986). Evolution of condition dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804-816.
2. Andersson, M. & Simmons, L.W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296-302.
3. Andersson, M.B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Aparicio, J.M. (2011). The paradox of the resolution of the lek paradox based on mate choice for heterozygosity. Anim. Behav. 81, 1271-1279.
5. Babik, W., Pabijan, M., Arntzen, J.W., Cogalniceanu, D., Durka, W. & Radwan, J. (2009). Long-term survival of a urodele amphibian despite depleted major histocompatibility complex variation. Mol. Ecol. 18, 769-781.
6. Balloux, F., Amos, W. & Coulson, T. (2004). Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol. Ecol. 13, 3021-3031.
7. Bonneaud, C., Chastel, O., Federici, P., Westerdahl, H. & Sorci, G. (2006). Complex Mhc-based mate choice in a wild passerine. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.-Biol. Sci. 273, 1111-1116.
8. Brown, J.L. (1997). A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8, 60-65.
9. Castanet, J. & Smirina, E. (1990). Introduction to the skeletochronological method in amphibians and reptiles. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. (Paris) 11, 191-196.
10. Chapman, J.R., Nakagawa, S., Coltman, D.W., Slate, J. & Sheldon, B.C. (2009). A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2746-2765.
11. Chapuis, M.P. & Estoup, A. (2007). Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 621-631.
12. Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. (2009). Fundamental concepts in genetics the genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 783-796.
13. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
14. Eizaguirre, C., Yeates, S.E., Lenz, T.L., Kalbe, M., Milinski, M. (2009). MHC-based mate choice combines good genes and maintenance of MHC polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 18, 3316-3329.
15. Ekblom, R., Saether, S.A., Grahn, M., Fiske, P., Kalas, J.A. & Hoglund, J. (2004). Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Mol. Ecol. 13, 3821-3828.
16. Fisher, R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Forstmeier, W., Schielzeth, H., Mueller, J.C., Ellegren, H. & Kempenaers, B. (2012). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3237-3249.
18. Francillon, H. (1979). Etude experimentale des marques de croissance sur les humerus et les femurs de Tritons cretes (Triturus cristatus cristatus Laurenti) en relation avec la determination de l′age individuel. Acta Zool.-Stockholm 60, 223-232.
19. Fromhage, L., Kokko, H. & Reid, J. (2009). Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 63, 684-694.
20. Garant, D., Dodson, J.D. & Bernatchez, L. (2005). Offspring genetic diversity increases fitness of female Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 240-244.
21. Gittins, S.P., Steed, J.E. & Williams, R. (1982). Population age structure of the common toad (Bufo bufo) at a lake in mid-Wales determined from annual growth rings in the phalanges. Br. J. Herpetol. 6, 249-252.
22. Green, A.J. (1991). Large male crests, an honest indicator of condition, are preferred by female smooth newts, Triturus vulgaris (salamandridae) at the spermatophore transfer stage. Anim. Behav. 41, 367-369.
23. Hedlund, L. (1990). Factors affecting differential mating success in male crested newts, Triturus cristatus. J. Zool. 220, 33-40.
24. Hoffman, J.I., Forcada, J., Trathan, P.N. & Amos, W. (2007). Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature 445, 912-914.
25. Hoglund, J., Piertney, S.B., Alatalo, R.V., Lindell, J., Lundberg, A. & Rintamaki, P.T. (2002). Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.-Biol. Sci. 269, 711-715.
26. Hunt, J., Bussiere, L.F., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. (2004). What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 329-333.
27. Jourdan-Pineau, H., Folly, J., Crochet, P.A. & David, P. (2012). Testing the influence of family structure and outbreeding depression on heterozygosity-fitness correlations in small populations. Evolution 66, 3624-3631.
28. Kempenaers, B. (2007). Mate choice nad genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv. Stud. Behav. 37, 189-287.
29. Krupa, A.P., Jehle, R., Dawson, D.A., Gentle, L.K., Gibbs, M., Arntzen, J.W. & Burke, T. (2002). Microsatellite loci in the crested newt (Triturus cristatus) and their utility in other newt taxa. Conserv. Genet. 3, 87-89.
30. Lampert, K.P., Bernal, X.E., Rand, A.S., Mueller, U.G. & Ryan, M.J. (2006). No evidence for female mate choice based on genetic similarity in the tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 796-804.
31. Landry, C., Garant, D., Duchesne, P. & Bernatchez, L. (2001). 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B.-Biol. Sci. 268, 1279-1285.
32. Lerner, L.M. (1954). Genetic homeostasis. London: Oliver & Boyd.
33. Malmgren, J.C. & Enghag, M. (2008). Female preference for male dorsal crests in great crested newts (Triturus cristatus). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 20, 71-80.
34. Marsh, D.M. & Trenham, P.C. (2001). Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv. Biol. 15, 40-49.
35. Mitton, J.B., Schuster, W.S.F., Cothran, E.G. & Defries, J.C. (1993). Correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity 71, 59-63.
36. Paterson, S. & Pemberton, J.M. (1997). No evidence for major histocompatibility complex-dependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B.-Biol. Sci. 264, 1813-1819.
37. Pemberton, J. (2004). Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 613-615.
38. Penn, D.J., Damjanovich, K. & Potts, W.K. (2002). MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11260-11264.
39. Piertney, S.B. & Oliver, M.K. (2006). The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96, 7-21.
40. Prokop, Z.M., Les, J.E., Banas, P.K., Koteja, P. & Radwan, J. (2010). Low inbreeding depression in a sexual trait in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Evol. Ecol. 24, 827-837.
41. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
42. Radwan, J. (2008). Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms. Genetica 134, 113-127.
43. Reid, J.M., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A., Marr, A.B., Smith, J.N.M. & Keller, L.F. (2005). Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. Roy. Soc. B.-Biol. Sci. 272, 481-487.
44. Reid, J.M., Arcese, P. & Keller, L.F. (2006). Intrinsic parent-offspring correlation in inbreeding level in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population open to immigration. Am. Nat. 168, 1-13.
45. Reid, J.M. & Keller, L.F. (2010). Correlated inbreeding among relatives: occurrence, magnitude, and implications. Evolution 64, 973-985.
46. Richardson, D.S., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. & von Schantz, T. (2005). MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.-Biol. Sci. 272, 759-767.
47. Rousset, F. (2008). GENEPOP' 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 103-106.
48. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B.-Biol. Sci. 263, 1415-1421.
49. Rozenblut, B. & Ogielska, M. (2005). Development and growth of long bones in european water frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae), with remarks on age determination. J. Morphol. 265, 304-317.
50. Ryder, T.B., Tori, W.P., Blake, J.G., Loiselle, B.A. & Parker, P.G. (2010). Mate choice for genetic quality: a test of the heterozygosity and compatibility hypotheses in a lek-breeding bird. Behav. Ecol. 21, 203-210.
51. Sauermann, U., Nurnberg, P., Bercovitch, F.B., Berard, J.D., Trefilov, A., Widdig, A., Kessler, M., Schmidtke, J. & Krawczak, M. (2001). Increased reproductive success of MHC class II heterozygous males among free-ranging rhesus macaques. Hum. Genet. 108, 249-254.
52. Slate, J., David, P., Dodds, K.G., Veenvliet, B.A., Glass, B.C., Broad, T.E. & McEwan, J.C. (2004). Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93, 255-265.
53. Smirina, E.M., Klevezal, G.A. & Berger, L. (1986). Experimental investigation of the annual layer formation in bones of amphibians. Zool. Zh. 65, 1526-1534.
54. Sommer, S. (2005). Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in a monogamous rodent. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 181-189.
55. Spurgin, L.G. & Richardson, D.S. (2010). How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.-Biol. Sci. 277, 979-988.
56. Szulkin, M., Bierne, N. & David, P. (2010). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64, 1202-1217.
57. Tomkins, J.L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J.S. & Tregenza, T. (2004). Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 323-328.
58. Westerdahl, H. (2004). No evidence of an MHC-based female mating preference in great reed warblers. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2465-2470.
59. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection - a selection for a hand0oicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205-214.