Estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: Effects of demographic history and marker type

Heredity

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 240-247

  Miller, J M ^a   Malenfant, R M ^a   David, P ^b   Davis, C S ^a   Poissant, J ^c   Hogg, J T ^d   Festa Bianchet, M ^e   Coltman, D W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d Montana Conservation Science Institute   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

bighorn sheep; identity disequilibrium; microsatellite; Ovis canadensis; SNP; standardized multilocus heterozygosity

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIGHORN SHEEP; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; GENETICS; GENOME; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; UNITED STATES;

ALBERTA; ANIMALS; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTANA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SHEEP, BIGHORN;

EID: 84894051211     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.99     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, et al. (2008). Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3: e3376.
2. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T (2004). Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol Ecol 13: 3021-3031.
3. Bierne N, Tsitrone A, David P (2000). An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck. Genetics 155: 1981-1990.
4. Bohonak AJ, van der Linde K (2004). RMA: Software for Reduced Major Axis regression, Java version. Website, http://www.kimvdlinde.com/professional/rma. html.
5. Borrell YJ, Carleos CE, Sa'nchez JA, Va'zquez E, Gallego V, Asturiano JF, et al. (2011). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in the gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata using microsatellite loci from unknown and gene-rich genomic locations. J Fish Biol 79: 1111-1129.
6. Brandstrom M, Ellegren H (2008). Genome-wide analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in chicken circumventing the ascertainment bias. Genome Res 18: 881-887.
7. Chakraborty R (1981). The distribution of the number of heterozygous loci in an individual in natural-populations. Genetics 98: 461-466.
8. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009). A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol Ecol 18: 2746-2765.
9. Coltman D, Pilkington J, Smith J, Pemberton J (1999). Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 53: 1259-1267.
10. Coltman D, Slate J (2003). Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: a meta-analysis. Evolution 57: 971-983.
11. Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002). Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc Biol Sci 269: 165-172.
12. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML (2011). Genomewide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 12: 499-510.
13. David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J (2007). Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol 16: 2474-2487.
14. DeWoody Y, DeWoody J (2005). On the estimation of genome-wide heterozygosity using molecular markers. J Heredity 96: 85-88.
15. Festa-Bianchet M, Coulson T, Gaillard JM, Hogg JT, Pelletier F (2006). Stochastic predation events and population persistence in bighorn sheep. Proc Biol Sci 273: 1537-1543.
16. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B (2012). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Mol Ecol 21: 3237-3249.
17. Grueber C, Waters J, Jamieson I (2011). The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species. Mol Ecol 20: 67-79.
18. Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2008). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and their relevance to studies on inbreeding depression in threatened species. Mol Ecol 17: 3978-3984.
19. Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, Le'ger P, Lepais O, et al. (2011). Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol Ecol Res 11: 591-611.
20. Hansson B, Westerberg L (2002). On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol Ecol 11: 2467-2474.
21. Hogg JT, Forbes SH (1997). Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high-risk ''unconventional'' tactic. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41: 33-48.
22. Hogg JT, Forbes SH, Steele BM, Luikart G (2006). Genetic rescue of an insular population of large mammals. Proc Biol Sci 273: 1491-1499.
23. Jorgenson JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Wishart WD (1997). Effects of age, sex, disease, and density on survival of bighorn sheep. Ecology 78: 1019-1032.
24. Jourdan-Pineau H, David P, Crochet P-A (2012). Phenotypic plasticity allows the Mediterranean parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus to exploit two temporal niches under continuous gene flow. Mol Ecol 21: 876-886.
25. Kupper C, Kosztola'nyi A, Augustin J, Dawson DA, Burke T, Sze'kely T, et al. (2010). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations of conserved microsatellite markers in Kentish plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Mol Ecol 19: 5172-5185.
26. Ljungqvist M, Kesson M, Hansson B (2010). Do microsatellites reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? A comment on Väli, et al. (2008). Mol Ecol 19: 851-855.
27. Miller JM, Poissant J, Hogg JT, Coltman DW (2012). Genomic consequences of genetic rescue in an insular population of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Mol Ecol 21: 1583-1596.
28. Miller JM, Poissant J, Kijas J, Coltman DW, Consortium TISG (2011). A genome-wide set of SNPs detects population substructure and long range linkage disequilibrium in wild sheep. Mol Ecol Res 11: 314-322.
29. Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RKGrp SNPW (2004). SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 208-216.
30. Olano-Marin J, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B (2011). Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): an analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution 65: 3175-3194.
31. Pilot M, Jedrzejewski W, Branicki W, Sidorovich VE, Jedrzejewska B, Stachura K, et al. (2006). Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol Ecol 15: 4533-4553.
32. Poissant J, Hogg JT, Davis CS, Miller JM, Maddox JF, Coltman DW, et al. (2010). Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep. BMC Genomics 11: 524.
33. Poissant J, Shafer ABA, Davis CS, Mainguy J, Hogg JT, Côté SD, et al. (2009). Genomewide cross-amplification of domestic sheep microsatellites in bighorn sheep and mountain goats. Mol Ecol Res 9: 1121-1126.
34. R Development Core Team (2005). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Reference Index Version 2.13.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.
35. Rioux-Paquette E, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman D (2010). No inbreeding avoidance in an isolated population of bighorn sheep. Animal Behav 80: 865-871.
36. Shen R, Fan J-B, Campbell D, Chang W, Chen J, Doucet D, et al. (2005). High-throughput SNP genotyping on universal bead arrays. Mutat Res 573: 70-82.
37. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE, et al. (2004). Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93: 255-265.
38. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: Aatime for reapprasial. Evolution 64: 1202-1217.
39. Tsitrone A, Rousset F, David P (2001). Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history. Genetics 159: 1845-1859.
40. Väli U, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H (2008). To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? Mol Ecol 17: 3808-3817.
41. Wetzel DP, Stewart IRK, Westneat DF (2012). Heterozygosity predicts clutch and egg size but not plasticity in a house sparrow population with no. Mol Ecol 21: 406-420.